what do u mean "played one of the jurors"? i thought the actual jurors were in this..........??
Yes five jurors are in it but the show is a mix of their interviews and dramatization of the trial and the deliberation.
Stevens is not one of the five who were interviewed, by the way.
You mean like the reactnament thing e! news did for the 2005 trial?
massively prejudiced against MJ (like Hultman is). .
Yes.
Here's a new preview that ****ing Hultman still says we were under duress.
What duress? The whole world was against Michael it would have been easy to convict him.
https://www.facebook.com/oxygennetwork/videos/1748678255161890/
This idiot will vote guilty based on his sick sex fixated prejudices.
I hope I'm wrong.
And why they believe the Arvizos were abducted, kidnapped, falsely imprisoned because
that's what people always forget that the DA argued MJ could commit the molestation
because he could keep the Arvizos in Neverland against their will. They always forget that count 1 was not molestation
but conspiracy. So do they believe all the other guys the Arvizos accused were guilty too?
That goes to show that this is to take down Michael. nothing else.When will the un-named co-conspirators that gave Gavin alcohol and introduced him to porn to prepare him for MJs alleged molestation be charged? The same guys that helped hold the family imprisoned while shopping and attending spas in different towns for Michaels money,....... How could they even try the case without charging them as well?
I am MAD AS HELL still how they could go after MJ alone and let the other guys walk. If the co-conspirators were charged along with Michael they would destroy Sneddons case immediately.
Its absurd and its the biggest reason the case never should been tried in court. Its a travesty brought on by Sneddon to go forward with such a laughable weak and insane case - he is responsible for all this madness thats still going on.
I just cant get over what Michael had to go through because of this nonsense, it will haunt me until I die :-(
If so, that's good news. Paulina has given reasonable statements based on facts why she acquitted Michael. I don't use reddit, so I hope people ask intelligent questions.
Or maybe just another fame hungry guy. Can you imagine if he had actually taken Michael down? His fame and opportunities in the criminal justice system would have been endless. Now, he's just a little famous footnote to Michael's bio.That goes to show that this is to take down Michael. nothing else.
I looked at reddit and it looks confusing. You probably have to be on it in real time and I have to watch the encores since I'm working during the live show.Couldn't you just create a reddit account? Would be great to have as many fans there as possible
cause haters will sure attack Pauline with full force.
I looked at reddit and it looks confusing. .
Will you calm down? nobody HAS TO join Reddit
You are using caps and tell me to calm down? Nobody said anyone has to join
I said it would be great if more fans were there than haters, not that anyone must be there.
I didn't understand what barbee0715 thought was confusing
and explained how the whole thing will work if she wants to participate
and wants to know. So take your own advice and calm down.
You are using caps and tell me to calm down? Nobody said anyone has to join
I said it would be great if more fans were there than haters, not that anyone must be there.
I didn't understand what barbee0715 thought was confusing
and explained how the whole thing will work if she wants to participate
and wants to know. So take your own advice and calm down.
When will the un-named co-conspirators that gave Gavin alcohol and introduced him to porn to prepare him for MJs alleged molestation be charged? The same guys that helped hold the family imprisoned while shopping and attending spas in different towns for Michaels money,....... How could they even try the case without charging them as well?
I am MAD AS HELL still how they could go after MJ alone and let the other guys walk. If the co-conspirators were charged along with Michael they would destroy Sneddons case immediately.
Its absurd and its the biggest reason the case never should been tried in court. Its a travesty brought on by Sneddon to go forward with such a laughable weak and insane case - he is responsible for all this madness thats still going on.
I just cant get over what Michael had to go through because of this nonsense, it will haunt me until I die :-(
Clearly, the use of caps was not to show anger but to emphasize there's no real obligation. I would use caps in a different part of my post if it was anger. :dancin:
It just proves all along sneddon WAS OUT TO GET MJ NO MATTER WHAT and that to me screams insainty coz america was always thought to be the "righteous " country ...well that what i always felt
I'll admit that I did feel pressured by your "snap back" answer to me about Reddit, but reading the posts forward, I realize that wasn't the intent. I'd do it, but I can't watch the actual show. I'm going to have to watch the Encore later on tonight-and I'm sure all tweeting will be over by then.Clearly nothing in my posts said that anyone has to join so you emphasized your baseless assumption which made it look like
you were irritated by me trying to pressure her.
I didn't feel like it was slanted-they had reps from both the defense and the prosecutor talking about what they were doing or planning or thinking at the time.Just curious about how you feel they handled the OJ episode. Did they slant it in any way and also curious how the jurors were presented.