Paris Jackson begins acting career - Lundon's Bridge - Summary of the book @pg42

Re: Paris Jackson to appear on Ellen - December 8th (Begins acting career)

Let me state the elephant in the room

- This movie was being planned since 2007.
- Auditions had been done in 2009.
- It was supposed to be shown at elementary schools

Now
- It's a major motion picture to be shown in cinemas and begin to make media rounds.

It still has the same companies and same people involved since 2009.

This is all due to Paris and her name and her father.

Sure there had been child stars, sure there had been today's top actresses that started in small low budgetmovies and so on - that's not the issue here - but I'm quite sure they weren't being taken advantage of. Paris's feelings towards this movie are most probably genuine but that doesn't make it okay for her to be taken advantage of.
 
The key here is to learn by our mistakes and not to repeat them. I don't think KJ does anything with hate in her heart (sometimes maybe spite toward Branca) but I equally don't think that she is thinking of Michael when she has allowed the children to be put out there. How would I feel? Well I would address the issue, I wouldn't ignore people and carry on.
How about people's criticisms are unjustified? How about if all these strangers do not get to see the whole picture? It's easy to sit in front of a computer, voice our concerns and pretend to know everything. Have you ever considered that if you get to chance to spend time with Katherine and the children and get to know them, you'll see and feel things differently.
 
Re: Paris Jackson to appear on Ellen - December 8th (Begins acting career)

Katherine Jackson has a long, long, long history of advocating child labor
and exploitation for the benefit of her many offspring.

My prayer is that she will, at least maintain a "safe harbor" home for Michael's children.
From this time forward, it is more important than ever for us fans to
LOVE, SUPPORT and PRAY for Michael Jackson's children:
Prince, Paris, and Blanket.
:angel:
 
Re: Paris Jackson to appear on Ellen - December 8th (Begins acting career)

How about people's criticisms are unjustified? How about if all these strangers do not get to see the whole picture? It's easy to sit in front of a computer, voice our concerns and pretend to know everything. Have you ever considered that if you get to chance to spend time with Katherine and the children and get to know them, you'll see and feel things differently.

Well that would be the point of communication, to defned ones actions and to educate with the whole picture.

It is possible that each of us if we were to spend the time with KJ we could see things differently, including you. However it doesn't take away how much everything has changed since their father passed, I don't expect you to agree with me but from that moment that paris first spoke IMO it has been relentless. If I felt that Michael would be ok with all that has changed I could accept it easier.
 
Re: Paris Jackson to appear on Ellen - December 8th (Begins acting career)

Have you ever considered that if you get to chance to spend time with Katherine and the children and get to know them, you'll see and feel things differently.

I know you are not addressing me, but I would like to add my 2-cent anyway. I hope you don't mind.

Off the top of my head, there is NO way on God's Green Earth, Katherine Jackson would be able to SUCCESSFULLY explain why she would sign a LIFETIME contract for Michael's 3-children with an obvious snake like Howard Mann.

It's almost like whomever shines any type of TRINKET in front of her, she just jumps on it, takes the money, and when things go south (which they often do), it's like: "oh well, not my problem."
 
Re: Paris Jackson to appear on Ellen - December 8th (Begins acting career)

Let me state the elephant in the room

- This movie was being planned since 2007.
- Auditions had been done in 2009.
- It was supposed to be shown at elementary schools

Now
- It's a major motion picture to be shown in cinemas and begin to make media rounds.

It still has the same companies and same people involved since 2009.

This is all due to Paris and her name and her father.

Sure there had been child stars, sure there had been today's top actresses that started in small low budgetmovies and so on - that's not the issue here - but I'm quite sure they weren't being taken advantage of. Paris's feelings towards this movie are most probably genuine but that doesn't make it okay for her to be taken advantage of.

I'm aware of the above fact.

Like you said, Paris's feelings towards the movie seem genuine. Then, what is she or her guardian supposed to do? Turn away to avoid people from taking advantage of her name; even though Pais likes the book and wants to be an actress? Wait until somebody with a bigger name than Michael Jackson to knock on the door to start out? Change her name from Jackson to something else to prevent people from taking advantage of her name?

Paris is Michael Jackson's only daugther. Fortunately and unfortunately, her name will always generate interest. Did Michael turn away from project he was interested in to avoid being taken advantage of?

I'm not a movie guru but I'm quite sure that there are movies that got into bigger scale once the producers got a big name attached to it. Yes, we can call it taking advantage of a big name, but isn't it just how the entertainment industry works?
 
Re: Paris Jackson to appear on Ellen - December 8th (Begins acting career)

Like you said, Paris's feelings towards the movie seem genuine. Then, what is she or her guardian supposed to do?

What ever happened to saying NO! LOL!

I'm sure there are millions and millions of 13 year-old children who hear that word 10-20 times a day.

Katherine Jackson: NO, Paris, I understand your feelings, but I don't believe this is the correct project for you. End Of Story!

Seriously, who's in charge, Mrs. Jackson or the 13 year-old?
 
Re: Paris Jackson to appear on Ellen - December 8th (Begins acting career)

Well that would be the point of communication, to defned ones actions and to educate with the whole picture.

It is possible that each of us if we were to spend the time with KJ we could see things differently, including you. However it doesn't take away how much everything has changed since their father passed, I don't expect you to agree with me but from that moment that paris first spoke IMO it has been relentless. If I felt that Michael would be ok with all that has changed I could accept it easier.

To communicate, to defend, to educate... I'm sorry if I sound mean, but do you communicate, defend your acations and educate total strangers about your own parenting skills? Why would fans expect Katherine explain the way she take care of the children to us? It's actually none of our business how the children are being raised. The only people she needs to address to is herself, Michael and the children. Not us.

Of course, I agree with you that things changed tremendously since Michael's passing. Believe me, I'm not happy with some of the changes. I don't think Michael would have been okay with all the changes. But, you know what, even if he's still here, he might not approve all of the things his children choose to do. Just like how my mom would not approve some of the things I did when I was a teen.
 
Let me state the elephant in the room- This movie was being planned since 2007. - Auditions had been done in 2009.- It was supposed to be shown at elementary schoolsNow- It's a major motion picture to be shown in cinemas and begin to make media rounds. It still has the same companies and same people involved since 2009. This is all due to Paris and her name and her father. Sure there had been child stars, sure there had been today's top actresses that started in small low budgetmovies and so on - that's not the issue here - but I'm quite sure they weren't being taken advantage of. Paris's feelings towards this movie are most probably genuine but that doesn't make it okay for her to be taken advantage of.
agree. imo shes been used to find funding for this film. shes the only human character in it. why not a voice for an animated character. cause then the promo and attention wont be as big as theres no photo shoots etc. and the other problem is theres no one around to care if she is being taken advantage of as her guardians are the worst when it comes to taking advantage. im sure we can agree that paris has nothing but good intentions and pure motives. but shes just a kid and will jump at an oppotunity to start her career. i dont blame her for that. u expect it.but shes not an adult and doesnt prob have the ability to smell a rat after all she thinks latoya is wonderful aswell. so its upto the adults to make sure things are legit but we know how that rolls
 
Re: Paris Jackson to appear on Ellen - December 8th (Begins acting career)

To communicate, to defend, to educate... I'm sorry if I sound mean, but do you communicate, defend your acations and educate total strangers about your own parenting skills? Why would fans expect Katherine explain the way she take care of the children to us? It's actually none of our business how the children are being raised. The only people she needs to address to is herself, Michael and the children. Not us.

The only problem with that theory is that when Katherine Jackson uses Michael's 3-children as a promotional tool, she is aming them in OUR direction.

She uses those children in order to get our attention, thereby HOPING that we will endorse and/or purchase whatever it is they happen to be pushing that day. Case in point, the brother's signed those jackets, Prince's only purpose for being there was to get OUR attention, because she knows (and they know) that nobody would have been interested unless one of Michael's children was attached.
 
I know you are not addressing me, but I would like to add my 2-cent anyway. I hope you don't mind.Off the top of my head, there is NO way on God's Green Earth, Katherine Jackson would be able to SUCCESSFULLY explain why she would sign a LIFETIME contract for Michael's 3-children with an obvious snake like Howard Mann.It's almost like whomever shines any type of TRINKET in front of her, she just jumps on it, takes the money, and when things go south (which they often do), it's like: "oh well, not my problem."
very true. theres no way to defend oprah the belts howard mann etc katherine has along history of this. and while some may not denie the fact that k loves the kids and they love her she has insulted her son and his wishes because she obviously believes that making money is more important than honouring her sons wishes. and there is no excuse for that
 
Re: Paris Jackson to appear on Ellen - December 8th (Begins acting career)

. But, you know what, even if he's still here, he might not approve all of the things his children choose to do. ----------------------------------the kids wouldnt chose to do anything without mjs aporoval if he were here. she wouldnt be able to do such a film if he said no. She wouldnt be going on ellen or be talking to oprah etc. he would say yes or no cause hes the parent and shes a child. this isnt like smoking behind the bike sheds so true big apple about those jackets the kids are used to get our attention and to get media attention as they will turn up to take pics of the kids
 
Re: Paris Jackson to appear on Ellen - December 8th (Begins acting career)

The only problem is this is not a "low-budget" film, it's a NO BUDGET wanna be film. Big difference in my opinion.

There is also nothing wrong with a low-budget, INDEPENDENT film, which this is not. When they have secured financing, that can be determined, but right now there is no money in the till.

Your example of The Professional is a great one, only problem is that the writer/director was French director Luc Besson, who has a bunch of films (low budget and big budget) under his belt, spanning 25+ years. That film also included Gary Oldman, Jean Reno, and Danny Aiello. NOT Issac from the Love Boat. LOL! A lot of excellent actors like the independent route, because it allows them to fully exercise their acting chops.

Juno (love that film) was low-budget, but look who directed it and who starred in it. Totally different than Larry King's unknown wife.

In my opinion, just like Michael did in his own career, he would have wanted the BEST-OF-THE-BEST for his daughter. He would have ensured that she was placed in the most professional of hands, whether that be low-budget or high-budget. I just don't see Michael Jackson calling up Larry King to ask him if he can help his daughter's acting career. I just can't see that. Michael Jackson would have went to the top, not necessarily because he may have wanted his daughter to be a huge star, but just to ensure that she would have the BEST professional tools available in order to proceed with any possible acting career.

And the best the Jackson's can come up with is Larry King. Sorry, I don't buy that.

P.S. Wasn't Drew Barry's first acting gag in E.T.?
Thank you, Thank You, Thank you.

Very well said post.
 
Re: Paris Jackson to appear on Ellen - December 8th (Begins acting career)

What ever happened to saying NO! LOL!

I'm sure there are millions and millions of 13 year-old children who hear that word 10-20 times a day.

Katherine Jackson: NO, Paris, I understand your feelings, but I don't believe this is the correct project for you. End Of Story!

Seriously, who's in charge, Mrs. Jackson or the 13 year-old?
Amen, people are going out on a limb AGAIN, to defend the indefensible. Who the F_ is in charge? Since when do 13 year old raise themselves? What is there no to get, that at 13 you don't say what you want to do, you are TOLD what to do. Especially when it comes big decisions, such as this one. PERIOD.

I know you are not addressing me, but I would like to add my 2-cent anyway. I hope you don't mind.

Off the top of my head, there is NO way on God's Green Earth, Katherine Jackson would be able to SUCCESSFULLY explain why she would sign a LIFETIME contract for Michael's 3-children with an obvious snake like Howard Mann.

It's almost like whomever shines any type of TRINKET in front of her, she just jumps on it, takes the money, and when things go south (which they often do), it's like: "oh well, not my problem."
Wait someone is going to come in and state Howard held a gun onto her forehead and forced her to do, actions like these aren't ''just a mistake''. NO.
 
Re: Paris Jackson to appear on Ellen - December 8th (Begins acting career)

How would you feel if every single one of your mistakes are being magnified to a degree out of proportion? How would you feel if your parenting skill is being judged by total strangers who have never met or talked to you? And all these strangers justified their harsh criticisms by saying they have concerns over your children, whom they have never met or talked to either.

...

See, I wasn't sure if you were talking about Michael- or his mother... Because people did that to Michael and his parenting choices day in and day out! Strangers having an opinion. That's the great thing about double standards.

...

How would I feel? Well I would address the issue, I wouldn't ignore people and carry on.

Apparently Michael also doesn't feel like bowing down to a bunch of strangers who thought it to be the most ridiculous thing to veil his very young kids in public- why?? Because he was the parent, he was the caretaker.

Life as a parent to me is very much NOT dependent on what other people tell me. If I listened to other people, I would have hurt my child. "Oh, put him down, you're spoiling him yaddayaddayadda" (the whole mainstream litany people unleash on insecure firsttimers...) - turns out that baby that was asking to be held so desperately had an illness- I would have never known if I followed that "advice"- until it would have been very late.

"He needs to learn to sleep in his own bed".
^^^Yeah, I'm sure 20 years down the road his boss is gonna ask him "So, listen, as 3 year old, did you mainly sleep in your bed- or in the place that can't be beat- with a parent?" :D People give advice all day long.

"Why are you nursing this child????" "He needs a stroller, not this primitive carry-him-around- stuff". "Aren't those socks to cold/hot? He needs a hat/he doesn't need a hat. He needs suncreen/sunscreen is disgusting dangerous stuff."

"He needs to be spanked."
No thanks, we don't hit anyone in this house, that extends to children.


The list goes on an on. I also often go against my own parents advice- not because I do not love them- but because raising your children is not a people pleasing contest, just as many people spend their trying to please the unpleasable. I'm constantly amazed how many people feel obligated to do things on this "because this is how it's done" type deal.

I completely learned to ignore people where I can feel and see that they are just repeating commonplace hot air the way people say not to wear white after Labor Day.
People LOVELOVELOVE to give 'advice' on how other people should raise their kids.
But I love to listen to those who share, when something genuinely worked for them.

Guess what- sometimes as parent you even have to disagree with your own child's doctor...because YOU are the caretaker and not anybody else.

I don't elevate Michael into infallible saint status- but one thing I learned from him: You're the one taking care of those kids- you know them and their hearts- everyone else can go pound sand. He didn't let public opinion sway him- he had the full picture and thus knew why he veiled his children when he did. A lot of us can learn a lot from someone who did what he considered right- he even got called names etc.
I also think that we might be a tad unfair to Michael who passed away when his children were quite at a juncture- as a parent you have to deal with things as they happen. I'm sure he wouldn't have insisted on treating his teenagers the way he parented them as an 8 year old.

Being a parent means that the only obligation I have is to do right by that child- nobody else. I'm not talking about neglect issues here such as malnutrition etc- just difference in opinion.
Life is not about doing what everyone else wants you to do- we do that at work because we need to earn a living. People are way too stuck in this mentality of living their life for someone else. To realize that on my deathbed- would be a tad too late.

And Michael Jackson was very central for me to start approaching life from that standpoint. That doesn't mean I agree with every Katherine Jackson does- far, far from. But if someone would seriously live their life by the opinions of a bunch of talking heads on the internet- THAT would worry me more than a potential flop of some movie.

People seem to use absolutely everything to blow it out of proportion. We're talking about a movie here- but just to make sure nobody 'forgets', we're gonna dig out the signed belt story, too. It's like an argument where she always has to bring up some past stuff. Which really makes him listen in return. ;D

Paris Jackson will experience many instances in her life where countless people will pull her into different directions- something her father knew more than well. There is no pleasing everyone. Just living your life.

By the way, this is hypothetical... what if she has a deal with Grandma? Maintain a certain grade point average- and you get to do certain things that you want to do? Let your grades slip- and you won't get to do that? Are you in that house, do you even know if maybe all these things are in place? Just saying.
 
Last edited:
Re: Paris Jackson to appear on Ellen - December 8th (Begins acting career)

Based on what I've seen, the kids seem happy, brave and confident to me too. Isn't being happy the thing Michael wanted the most for his kids. Then, why are so many here act like the kids are suffering? Yes, they are followed by paparazzi (which isn't exactly new to them, they were followed by paps when Michael was alive), they receive inappropriate tweets (which isn't that unusual this day and age, many other regular teenagers get bullied on-line too), they appeared on severeal public events (depends on the event, some fans cheer about their apperance in some events.) So, in many ways, these teenagers are just living life like many other teenagers do, chasing their dreams like many other teenagers do and they are doing the best that they could. Why are we acting like their guardian is doing a horrible job when Prince and Paris are thriving? Look at some contestants of x-factor, would we call parents of Rachel Crow (13 year-old), Astro (13 year-old) and Drew (14 year-old) selling their kids?


1)Again, no one said the kids are suffering, or I missed a lot of posts. A lot of us think they are used and manipulated by their family for money.


Yes, we all have an image of our mothers. To me, my mother is my everything. If some total strangers criticize her or call her names, I would be beyond upset. But, would I think my mother is my everything if she neglected me, abused me or allowed others to abuse me? Guess not. To Michael, his mother is a saint. Does it make sense that Michael still thought his mother is a saint and trusted his children to her if Katherine was less than loving and caring? We are talking about his children, Michael's world and everything, would he trust his children to Katherine for the sake of "preserving a public image of his family"?

2) No one said KJ was not loving, again. What I meant by preserving the family image was that he never publicly said what he thought about their actions towards him (i.e Latoya, Jermaine, ...). Which is something I approve. I think KJ might well be a great gradma actually. But I think as a guardian, she's not suited because she has a way of considering Michael's money which could be damaging to the kids. She's not unbiased if you will, in the sense that she knows a lot of her other kids struggle for money and career, and the only money she's getting now will disappear when she's gone. And I believe she wants them to be back on track before that. It's not a bad thing per say, she's a mother, but I dont share that "communist" way of seeing Michael's money aka the kids'.

I'm not suggesting it's either having no childhood or being poor. As a matter of fact, there were many factors behind Michael's success. But, working hard (extremely hard) is one of the reasons for Michael's success. Ever heard about the "10,000 hours theory" - no master can become a master without at least 10,000 hours of practice under his belt. Bill Joy, the cofounder of Sun Microsystem, would stay in the computer lab from dusk till dawn for years. Bill Gates would go to the computer lab in University of Washington at 3 am to work on programming when he's 15 - 16 year-old.

3) Because he wanted to. Not because he was forced to by a bullying father

As for sending a young boy to a strip club to play, it's wrong from our perspectives. But, have you ever considered it from Katherine's perspective? We are talking about a black family of 10 in Gary, Indiana, in the 60's. Katherine saw how the boys in the neighborhood got into trouble or how bleak the outlook was for so many other families. What would you do if you were in her shoes? I'm not giving her excuse (I have to be clear), but I can't deny that she may mean well in her heart. 3) Probably, I never said she meant him to be miserable. Only that she made what is to me very bad decisions as a mother. To me, the end doesnt justify the means, especially when it comes to children.

Yes, great success is always a result of great suffering. Is it worth it? Michael actually answered the question himself. He said he would not do it another way.He also said many other things about growing up and being lonely and miserable. A trauma he never recover from. I think if offered a hard working chilhood with the possibility of having friends and times to play, he wouldnt have turned it down.

:)

Do I think we are going to change anything by talking here? of course no. But, once more, isnt that the point of a forum, exchanging ideas and opinions? That's all we're doing anyway. Whether we know those kids or not, we are only expressing opinions on public matters. No one here can judge what they are fed, how late they go to bed, who they hang out with. I'm not giving any piece of advice to KJ, or the kids on their lives. I'm just expressing my personal opinion on what they let me see. Because I can, like I'm allowed to have an opinion on the war in Palestine even though it wont change a thing and I'm not directly affected.
 
Last edited:
Re: Paris Jackson to appear on Ellen - December 8th (Begins acting career)

Like you said, Paris's feelings towards the movie seem genuine. Then, what is she or her guardian supposed to do? Turn away to avoid people from taking advantage of her name; even though Pais likes the book and wants to be an actress?

yes that's what parenting is.

For example my cousin he REALLY really wanted to be a musician and drop out of high school. My uncle said no, you'll get that diploma then you can do whatever you want. He bought him a set of drums and arranged lessons so that he can learn an instrument but he was adamant that his son got his diploma first.

so "genuine feelings" doesn't make it okay. Still a parent should be able to see the bigger picture and say no when needed. It doesn't mean not being supportive.
 
Re: Paris Jackson to appear on Ellen - December 8th (Begins acting career)

AT the moment, paris is just lending her father's name as well as the time and maybe future reputation to this project. In another few years when she gets her inheritance it will be requests for finance that these people will be looking for as well - i guarantee.

I'm surprised that posters are just prepared to accept this as a low-budget movie. To me the bizarre nature of the whole project is really off-putting and to think it is one that the daughter of the world's greatest entertainer is associated with is just embarrassing. The book was published in 06, not by a publishing house but by the author's entertainment company. Why not a reputable publisher, was it rejected as not good enough? The author's plans for distributing the book through schools are just plain odd. DChristien claims it is some great charitiable act to grant 50% of profits to schools but publishers always build in 50% discount when selling to bookshops to cover the necessary overheads. And why on earth would schools get involved in selling this unknown book? They are places to teach children not retail sales environments. Are schools even allowed to be used to sell commercial products - this isn't a charity, the author is getting the other 50% of profits. He's had 5 yrs to sell this book, how many copies of this book, the basis of the movie, has he sold, how many schools have signed up to his 'distribution network'?

There are just so many wtf issues with the whole project and no, i'm not reassured that some retired chatshow host is doing one of the voiceovers. And i don't think it very 'gallant' or responsible for the grown men behind the enterprise allowing a young 13 yrs old girl, weeks after the trial of her father's killer, to front the project in photoshoots and tv chatshows. It smacks of exploitation.
 
Re: Paris Jackson to appear on Ellen - December 8th (Begins acting career)

Parents need to be parents and use the word no.
 
Re: Paris Jackson to appear on Ellen - December 8th (Begins acting career)

And i don't think it very 'gallant' or responsible for the grown men behind the enterprise allowing a young 13 yrs old girl, weeks after the trial of her father's killer, to front the project in photoshoots and tv chatshows. It smacks of exploitation
------------------

well said
 
Re: Paris Jackson to appear on Ellen - December 8th (Begins acting career)

Well, I will say this, again, Paris Jackson is creating a new standard for "Natural Beauty".

parisjackson3500x762.jpg


Please, pray with me, that making this movie will be a positive, learning
experience for Paris Jackson. :angel:
 
Re: Paris Jackson to appear on Ellen - December 8th (Begins acting career)

Paris is pretty yes, but if you ask me Madonna's daughter Lourdes is gorgeous as well.
 
Re: Paris Jackson to appear on Ellen - December 8th (Begins acting career)

To communicate, to defend, to educate... I'm sorry if I sound mean, but do you communicate, defend your acations and educate total strangers about your own parenting skills? Why would fans expect Katherine explain the way she take care of the children to us? It's actually none of our business how the children are being raised. The only people she needs to address to is herself, Michael and the children. Not us.

Of course, I agree with you that things changed tremendously since Michael's passing. Believe me, I'm not happy with some of the changes. I don't think Michael would have been okay with all the changes. But, you know what, even if he's still here, he might not approve all of the things his children choose to do. Just like how my mom would not approve some of the things I did when I was a teen.

No you don't sound mean :) the question I was answering was 'what if', I haven't needed to explain myself (as yet) to strangers but I was answering based on the question as to what KJ could do. Katherine does not need to answer to us, but we will have an opinion and without knowing the whole story we have to make of it what we will.

You said it yourself here, that you don't think Michael would have been ok with the changes. As I said ages ok on this thread, I'm old school and I am really struggling to find it in me not to care what Michael would think.
 
Re: Paris Jackson to appear on Ellen - December 8th (Begins acting career)

:)

Do I think we are going to change anything by talking here? of course no. But, once more, isnt that the point of a forum, exchanging ideas and opinions? That's all we're doing anyway. Whether we know those kids or not, we are only expressing opinions on public matters. No one here can judge what they are fed, how late they go to bed, who they hang out with. I'm not giving any piece of advice to KJ, or the kids on their lives. I'm just expressing my personal opinion on what they let me see. Because I can, like I'm allowed to have an opinion on the war in Palestine even though it wont change a thing and I'm not directly affected.

I don't condemn people for having opinons and expressing them. But, it becomes problematic when the opinons are perpetually bitter and angry. Many made assumptions without concrete proof. Many jumped to conclusions too quickly. For instance, we are talking about a children's film here, many make it sound like Paris is about to make some explicit sextapes. Some predict she's going to be a z-lister or on a path to failure. Some like to bring up the unrelated belt signing into the discussion. I say, wait a minute, why can't we wait and see the outcome first, especially when none of us here can change anything?

Fans are blind to our own double standard. We don't like the fact that Michael's parenting skills were criticized day in and day out. We don't like the fact that the Berlin balcony accident was being brought up repeatedly. Yet, we allow ourselves to pass judgement on Katherine's parenting skills and repeat her mistakes, just like the way people did to Michael.

yes that's what parenting is.

For example my cousin he REALLY really wanted to be a musician and drop out of high school. My uncle said no, you'll get that diploma then you can do whatever you want. He bought him a set of drums and arranged lessons so that he can learn an instrument but he was adamant that his son got his diploma first.

so "genuine feelings" doesn't make it okay. Still a parent should be able to see the bigger picture and say no when needed. It doesn't mean not being supportive.

Ivy, is Paris quitting school to focus on acting? Last night, she tweeted about studying for quizzes and finals. So, do we know for sure Katherine did not ask Paris to do well in school and get her diploma first?

And, isn't it true the Jackson name can always attract interest? Her last name will always be taken advange of. As long as people still have interest in Michael Jackson, her name will be valuable. So, again, what can she do to avoid people from taking advantage of her name, wait until someone with a bigger name than Michael Jackson to knock on the door?

No you don't sound mean :) the question I was answering was 'what if', I haven't needed to explain myself (as yet) to strangers but I was answering based on the question as to what KJ could do. Katherine does not need to answer to us, but we will have an opinion and without knowing the whole story we have to make of it what we will.

You said it yourself here, that you don't think Michael would have been ok with the changes. As I said ages ok on this thread, I'm old school and I am really struggling to find it in me not to care what Michael would think.

I don't get it. We don't like people forming an opinion on Michael without knowing the whole story; yet, it's acceptable to form any negative opinion on Katherine without knowing the whole story? Like Pace said, I'm far from approving all fo Katherine's choices. But, I have to remind myself that I don't see the entire picture, so I can't assume she's a bad guardian.

I care about what Michael would think. I'm a Michael Jackson fan. So, I care about what he would think about his children are being raised and I also care about what he would think about his mother being judged, attacked or called names.
 
Re: Paris Jackson to appear on Ellen - December 8th (Begins acting career)

I'm surprised that posters are just prepared to accept this as a low-budget movie. To me the bizarre nature of the whole project is really off-putting and to think it is one that the daughter of the world's greatest entertainer is associated with is just embarrassing. The book was published in 06, not by a publishing house but by the author's entertainment company. Why not a reputable publisher, was it rejected as not good enough? The author's plans for distributing the book through schools are just plain odd. DChristien claims it is some great charitiable act to grant 50% of profits to schools but publishers always build in 50% discount when selling to bookshops to cover the necessary overheads. And why on earth would schools get involved in selling this unknown book? They are places to teach children not retail sales environments. Are schools even allowed to be used to sell commercial products - this isn't a charity, the author is getting the other 50% of profits. He's had 5 yrs to sell this book, how many copies of this book, the basis of the movie, has he sold, how many schools have signed up to his 'distribution network'?

There are just so many wtf issues with the whole project and no, i'm not reassured that some retired chatshow host is doing one of the voiceovers. And i don't think it very 'gallant' or responsible for the grown men behind the enterprise allowing a young 13 yrs old girl, weeks after the trial of her father's killer, to front the project in photoshoots and tv chatshows. It smacks of exploitation.
I'm not getting this either. Everyone else will immediately see through this, but we the actual fans don't?
 
Re: Paris Jackson to appear on Ellen - December 8th (Begins acting career)

Yeah people, this is just the beginning.... :fear: :(






Paris is pretty yes, but if you ask me Madonna's daughter Lourdes is gorgeous as well.

Yes. And I feel that the two (Lourdes and Paris) will be competitors. :fear: Lourdes wants to be an actress and is studying for this and she makes a little participation in the movie directed by Madonna, W.E. Let's see.... :fear:
 
Paris starring in her first film is ALL OVER the media now.

Paris Jackson Lines Up Her Acting Debut: Inevitable or Unbelievable? - E! Online
The news of Paris being in the movie is all over the news now.

Michael Jackson would be so proud.

Here we thought that Paris Jackson getting verified on Twitter was the big news these days, when it turns out the 13-year-old has landed herself a starring role in a movie!

And what sort of film has the pop icon progeny attached herself to?

C-IT Entertainment is working on getting Lundon's Bridge and the Three Keys—based on a young adult fantasy novel of the same name—off the ground, starring Paris as heroine Lundon O'Malley.

The book is the first in a five-part series by Dennis Christen about a young girl who is kidnapped from her rightful place on land by the evil Jellyfish Queen of the Ocean and then becomes the key to stopping once and for all the ongoing battle between creatures of the land and the sea.

Paris would be the human entity in what will otherwise be an animated film, featuring, according to the title's website, the vocal talents of Joey Fatone, Larry King and Larry's wife, Shawn, among others.

The pre-pre-production materials bill the film as "a timeless family adventure" and state that 50 percent of the profits from the ultimate finished product will be donated to schools.

"I Wanna Leave My Footprints On The Sands Of Time. When I Leave This World I'll Leave No Regrets. I'll Leave Something For Them Not To Forget," Paris tweeted yesterday.

What do you think? Was it inevitable that Paris would go into showbiz, or would it be a better idea for her to lie low, at least until she's older?
 
Re: Paris Jackson to appear on Ellen - December 8th (Begins acting career)

Yahoo! has this on the front page and she's getting crucified. I know they always hate on everything, but this is still a kid.
I try my best to not go to Yahoo boards besides TMZ, they are the most cruelest towards MJ and his kids. It's sickening.
 
Re: Paris Jackson to appear on Ellen - December 8th (Begins acting career)

@love is magical. I have never called Katherine any names. My feelings are based on events since Michael died and not just guess work.

Btw From my post ages ago, given that Breaking News was used as a promo for this film, I wonder if Paris now believes it's Michael's vocals.
 
Back
Top