I guess Marc Schafel was TMZs source.
Sullivan's book showed schaeffel to be on the inside with mrs jackson (altho i'm sure schaeffel over played how important he was) and maybe debbie needed such an insider with the jacksons to get access to the children as opposed to going through the courts. I can imagine the jacksons are very protective of their influence over ppb and are not particularly keen on an 'outsider' having access. Just a thought. Sullivan mentioned just how ingratiating and eager schaeffel was to be seen as some type of 'fixer' - he certainly ingratiated himself to mj.I'm not judging Debbie, but she knows enough about Schaffel (she called Schaffel a vulture at Michael's 2005 trial, for God's sake!) and now she befriends him? WTH is wrong with these people?
Sullivan's book showed schaeffel to be on the inside with mrs jackson (altho i'm sure schaeffel over played how important he was) and maybe debbie needed such an insider with the jacksons to get access to the children as opposed to going through the courts. I can imagine the jacksons are very protective of their influence over ppb and are not particularly keen on an 'outsider' having access. Just a thought. Sullivan mentioned just how ingratiating and eager schaeffel was to be seen as some type of 'fixer' - he certainly ingratiated himself to mj.
Yes, maybe. I just hope Debbie did not forget since 2005 what type of character Schaffel is (it's in her own testimony!) and watches her and the kids' back. Someone around her is definitely giving scoops to the tabloid media about the kids and Debbie's interaction with them (I can only hope not with Debbie's consent). Roger Friedman admitted he has an informant and complained how the informant then went to TMZ with the story instead of leaving it to him exclusively. We know from the 2006 civil case between Schaffel and Michael that Schaffel cooperated with Friedman there and that's why (and because he's around Debbie) I immediately thought of Schaffel being the informant of Friedman now again.
I'm so happy Debbie and Paris are in contact. I always liked her.
Here's another picture Debbie posted
Debbie posted this pic of Paris and Sophie ( Paris's friend) on IG last night, today monring I noticed that I'm not allowed to follow her on IG anymore, I followed her since Nov 2012...but I think it's good that Debbie wants to share her own pictures with people she knows
I'm not really up to speed on ig so don't completely understand your post, but if you;re saying that debbie rowe's ig is private, only meant to be seen by those she allows to follow her, then i wonder why you think it's right that you post her photos on a public messageboard - they'll end up on tmz next. Same goes for the other photos in this thread that are being posted - if they're meant to be totally public by debbie, fine, but if she's only sharing with a select few then it's not fair.
Oh thanks for the explanation, i misunderstood. If she posts them to the general public then there's no harm done.Debbie's IG is always private but she accepted me, but that's only when it comes to her IG, her Twitter and facebook are public and she posts the same pictures on her "public" twitter and facebook, that's why other members here could see and post her photos too...
I agree that was uncalled for. With all the drama guess this person don't like the Jacksons much? But, they need to realize that Katherine as Paris Guardian is the one that is allowing Paris to even be near Debbie and the rest of em.debbies relative took a cheap shot at Michael/the Jacksons on one of the photos Debbie published on her facebook. Debbies cousin or nephew actually wrote "Im glad she looks more like us and not like the other side". He quickly deleted the post but several people saw it.
complete utter douche bag, like he wanted to claim her as their