Mikejoefan
Proud Member
Now that pic on the magazine don't look like that^
His chin is way to long and he looks very pale. anyway we will see in few days.
His chin is way to long and he looks very pale. anyway we will see in few days.
Latest on MJJC
The Resurrection of Michael Jackson - Music Monthly
- Thread starter mickyj007
- Start date
144000
Proud Member
Well I mean there are some fotos taken that night that were unflattering because they unleashed an onslaught of FLASH on the man...and that's why he looks extra extra pale sometimes. Like here:
i think that's a fabulous pic...even if the photogs KNEW what they were doing when they unleashed the massive collective flash. if we are to look at a standard of comparison..as to what we think is normal...we'll call this 'pale'. if we look at MJ as the standard..perhaps we call ourselves..'flushed'.
it all depends on how you look at it. i think of MJ's look as original..unique...the MJ look. period. and it's beautiful. and i see it as a new standard of not making comparisons. or..no point of reference...or no standard of comparison. since there are other people with vitiligo....and that newscaster called his...a blessing....and God created MJ too..
i figure....i can just say MJ looks good..and leave it at that.
AAAAaannd i really do think THIS is the pic that cover was made from..BIG difference:
That IS the picture they used. Forget about the arm extension. That would have been edited in.
But that right there is the pic they used.
144000
Proud Member
I gotcha. I think MJ looks good by any standard....But yeah I think now they definitely did some work on that cover foto.
lol...u thought different before...
they say eyes can deceive...lol...sight is...temporal..lol
Very poor fotoshoping job lol. They cut off part of his elbow and stuck a HUGE random hand on it. :lol: And they DID make his face longer and they DID make his lips redder (like usual) And the cut out the massive heap of volume that is his hair :lol: (I love the hair Mike, he's just got the urge to Herbal LOL)
lol...u thought different before...
they say eyes can deceive...lol...sight is...temporal..lol
No i said he had some unflattering pictures...like anyone. But in general, now and in the past I think he's good looking.
144000
Proud Member
lol..well..i'll never get a degree in studying faces that intricately..i've never done that:lol:
DenisRS
Guests
Since there is much of debate on colours, I have to clear out some points (my university specialization was synthesis of audio and video):
1) Michael Jackson is naturally "very very pale" since black people have thick skin and it technically can not be blushful unlike white people's (when they are ashamed, for example). Blush hue should be applied on Jackson by make-up to avoid that effect. However, that blush is very subtle and there is no way it looks as red as on the most of photos. So few photos that J5Master found and published here are actually the closest to natural colour saturation, what is very correct and rare. Usually there is autoadjust saturation in the works in photo camera and/or post-processing, which makes shadows on the face look like red and lips as if Jackson wears "red lipstick", which was never actually registed in reality (the colour of lips is just pink);
2) there is not necessary anything wrong with the chin.
1) Michael Jackson is naturally "very very pale" since black people have thick skin and it technically can not be blushful unlike white people's (when they are ashamed, for example). Blush hue should be applied on Jackson by make-up to avoid that effect. However, that blush is very subtle and there is no way it looks as red as on the most of photos. So few photos that J5Master found and published here are actually the closest to natural colour saturation, what is very correct and rare. Usually there is autoadjust saturation in the works in photo camera and/or post-processing, which makes shadows on the face look like red and lips as if Jackson wears "red lipstick", which was never actually registed in reality (the colour of lips is just pink);
2) there is not necessary anything wrong with the chin.
Yeah, I am glad you see it. I am so used to depict these things, becuase as a photographer I work with photoshop almost everyday, even distort ( with good intentions ) facial features ( for example form a big nose I can make it smaller with photoshop ). But also you can make red lips and yelow teeth, and herpes around mouth, way too easelly.
:lol:
Last edited:
I agree Cecilia, it is almost devilish the way they played around with it. How you doing girl, long time no see.
Girl I am on here, finally! And so glad with this site! And sooo glad to see you so active here, bringing light and joy as always!:kiss:
....
Ankita, I think I've received an email from you? Is it you? I'll respond back these days! Thank you so much for your kind and lovelly words!!! :wub:
Last edited:
Butterfly
Proud Member
not sure why people are debating about the pic on the cover when it's more then cool that he is on the cover of a magazine AGAIN
the THRILLER returns and that's what is important.
the THRILLER returns and that's what is important.
Mikejoefan
Proud Member
Those pics j5 posted are great but that cover gots ta go. seriously!
missmoonwalker
Proud Member
Does anyone know! is the magazine only for sale on the sunday?
goldiewashington
Proud Member
I think Mike takes so much time between new projects that it is always considered a comeback or resurrection. Even though it is maddening that he takes so much time it is probably his anal retentiveness that makes him great.
qbee
Proud Member
Will i. Am stated it was becuase he is also the
King of fine tune ..
when asked why Michael just does'nt release it ..
AllTheLovelyFlowers
Proud Member
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2011
- Messages
- 7,223
- Points
- 0
The king of fine tune! That's funny. But true.
So how long will it be before someone posts the article?
So how long will it be before someone posts the article?
Last edited:
Big Apple2
Proud Member
I was thinking the same thing. Is there any chance that there will be a early release of this Music Magazine?
In America, our newspaper inserts usually come in BEFORE the actual newspaper does, most stores that carry newspapers already have all of the "inserts" for this Sunday's paper. I was wondering if the samething happens in the U.K.
michaelsson
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2007
- Messages
- 4,663
- Points
- 83
LMAO! @ that cover
144000
Proud Member
could be...good observation.
damien shields
Proud Member
asuming yu aint read this thread. thats where the pic was taken from, WMA red carpet
damien shields
Proud Member
Not too long now guys..
woo hoo!! cant wait. hope its positive. guaranteed to be full of re-hashed quotes we have already heard!
Do you think this is part of Sony's promotional campaign? (if it does infact shed light on new album details that we're previously unaware of).
I.e. do you think Sony and the Observer are working together on this article, moreover, could the article have been initiated by Michael's record label? What are your thoughts..
I.e. do you think Sony and the Observer are working together on this article, moreover, could the article have been initiated by Michael's record label? What are your thoughts..
Last edited:
damien shields
Proud Member
i think it would be more of the "unofficial" type article. like where they use quotes they have gathered and so on, compile them all, add their own bits, but have nothing from the man himself or any lable. Michael is a great way to sell magazines so why wouldnt they try it?
cant wait to see scans! hopefully someone is quicker than the month it took to see akon talkin about Hold My Hand :lol: