LastTear
Proud Member
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 3,245
- Points
- 0
Re: Verdict Watch - Discussion- Katherine Jackson vs AEG
I believe hat AEG could have hired Murray but not be responsible for his negligence. The contact I reviewed shows that Michael could fire Murray.
We have already established that some evidence the police found were not accessible to a lay person.
Testimonies that said Michael improved were not by medical professionals who could say such after an evaluation of Michael. Those testimonies were those witnesses' perception of Michael. Again, Michael performed. I do not equate that to health however, that is my view.
The doctor was held accountable by the State when he was convicted of involuntary manslaughter. If you do not want AEG to be held accountable for the doctor then, you may say, they did not hire him. However, the contract you may have reviewed allows AEG to terminate a doctor that they may not have hired. It is rare indeed to be able to terminate someone one did not employ.
I can say AEG did not vet the doctor as it was proven without a shadow of doubt in court. No one from AEG vetted the doctor. Only Jorrie did a ten minute Google search where she could not find half of four offices the doctor fabricated.
I believe hat AEG could have hired Murray but not be responsible for his negligence. The contact I reviewed shows that Michael could fire Murray.
We have already established that some evidence the police found were not accessible to a lay person.