Re: Unappropriate Charges In Case
how about adding the opinion of someone from the legal field to the mix? (Remember what T-Mez said?)
although I will not argue with any medical expert, I believe that it's important to remember that the charges also depends on "what can be proven in court without reasonable doubt".
You can charge any guilty person with higher charges but unless you can prove it, it doesn't mean a thing.
You need add in the possible defense strategies and other factors etc.
sometimes the question is are you willing to gamble and risk a guilty person walk with higher charges or does it worth to go with a lesser charge for an almost guaranteed conviction?
PS: Ginvid is right, the more technical the case gets, the more experts takes the stand, the more the terminology is introduced it becomes harder for the jury to follow and understand it and they are less likely to give a guilty verdict. (jurors also want to be certain if they are going to send someone to a prison, the less they understand the less confident that they are with their decision which means more likelihood of not guilty verdict). It's recommended to keep such cases as simple as possible.
I have been speaking with someone in the medical field who's been looking into all this. This person works with medical examiners, coroners and has credentials to pronounce and participate on teams of investigation.
the most unconscionable action-so unbelievably hazardous and frankly should be looked at as way beyond what so far Murray is charged with - and should be at least voluntary-rather than involuntary MS-I don't believe the prosecution would be over reaching seeking a conviction for M2.
how about adding the opinion of someone from the legal field to the mix? (Remember what T-Mez said?)
although I will not argue with any medical expert, I believe that it's important to remember that the charges also depends on "what can be proven in court without reasonable doubt".
You can charge any guilty person with higher charges but unless you can prove it, it doesn't mean a thing.
You need add in the possible defense strategies and other factors etc.
sometimes the question is are you willing to gamble and risk a guilty person walk with higher charges or does it worth to go with a lesser charge for an almost guaranteed conviction?
PS: Ginvid is right, the more technical the case gets, the more experts takes the stand, the more the terminology is introduced it becomes harder for the jury to follow and understand it and they are less likely to give a guilty verdict. (jurors also want to be certain if they are going to send someone to a prison, the less they understand the less confident that they are with their decision which means more likelihood of not guilty verdict). It's recommended to keep such cases as simple as possible.