xthunderx2
Proud Member
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2009
- Messages
- 9,883
- Points
- 0
Re: AEG Wants Katherine Jackson Lawsuit Dismissed
all I can say to your whole long post.....Lets just pray that Katherine doesn't get up there and say that.....you are correct in stating that will be the end of the prosecutions case. Like I said before I am not here to bash anyone..I just want the truth...and there is noway the truth is that Michael was a junkie.No, I would not because I've never ever believed MJ was an addict and in order to buy Murray's story you have to first believe MJ was mentaly and emotionally weak and dependent on drugs to function something his family has never failed to speak about.
ohh really, you should have told that to Janet, Katherine and Randy , at least my comments won't be used to clear Murray , theirs will for sure.
.
MJ did not want propofol without the presence of an anetheseologist also during the rehearsals for This is it, we brought up that FACT and discussed it many times here. That was not the point I made
One can't get addicted to propofol? you are telling me that? I educated myself really good on propofol and I know one can't get addicted to it and I was one of those members who kept screaming that for months and no one was listening. And I kept saying Murray can't prove MJ was physically addicted to it , he will say he was psychologically dependent on it and the family's intervention stories will help him alot .
Did Janet know that? She told Oprah propofol was a painkiller. Did Katherine know that? Did Randy know that? Did Joe know that? I knew that because I bother to read and search , his family were busy figuring out how to collect money out of this tragedy.
That was what the defense planned on doing the minute Murray started reading his script to the investigators on 27, June 2009. I did not come up with anything original. I'm discussing the defense strategy. We did that during the trial in 2005. Where were you back then? I used to spend ten hours daily on MJ fan sites discussing the prosecution's case and how the defense would destroy it.
The weakest thing in the prosecution case was Janet Arvizos along with the rest of her family. No one in that jury regardless of how much some of them tried could relate to her or feel their so-called pain. Mez was smart enough to put her on the stand and destroy whatever left of the prosecution case.
In this case, the weakest thing is MJ's family. Katherine taking the stand and repeating what she told Oprah will be devastating to the prosecution case whether you like to admit it or not . Janet taking the stand and telling the jurors " he was an addict what could have we done you can't lead a horse to water " will be devastating to the prosecution's case ADMIT IT AND MOVE ON. What damage someone like Janet will do to Murray if she took the stand? What damage someone like Katherine will do to Murray if she took the stand? God , what mother in this whole world will LAUGH about her son's look on national tv with someone like Oprah? Were you surprised by Oprah's COLD reaction to Katherine words? Wait till you hear the jury's reaction , you will be devastated. Paris humanized Mike 1000000 times Katherine words could ever do.
Don't lecture me on how my posts help the defense. Using common sense back then during the trial the fans were confident no way 12 people would believe the prosecution's story and no way 12 people would agree on convicting MJ. Using common sense now, I'm telling you if anyone of MJ's family took the stand , the prosecution case will be over. Because this time there is at least one juror who will ask himself/herself if his mother saying he was such a junkie why should not I believe he could have done it himself ? Don't even answer.