Status hearings discussion thread / all threads merged

  • Thread starter elusive moonwalker
  • Start date
I note that there is no signature on the letter.I doubt if AEG would/could fire NG unless Michael wanted her gone. And was she employed by them or by Michael?????I can't believe LMP is mentioned in the trial, she hasn't spoken to Michael since 2005 for gods sake!
from what ive read she was rehired to look after the kids in london.so in that sense aeg would be paying her i would think.
 
Re: August 29th hearing

@Justthefacts That interview was by Daphne Barrack, the same as with Aaron Carter, lots of things apparently said but they don't materialise.
 
Re: August 29th hearing

All these statements from Grace, Karen and LMP are filled with misinformation and opinions. They statements make me see that they really do not know much about Michael's private life. They see him faint, but don't know why. He never told them because he did not include them in his private self. That should say a lot about them. No wonder they are bitter and run to the police quickly to give statements. As was said before, everyone of these women want to be known as the person closest to Michael, almost like a wife. Yet the one who was a wife, didn't know much about him either.
 
Re: August 29th hearing

from what ive read she was rehired to look after the kids in london.so in that sense aeg would be paying her i would think.

but when was she last seen with MJ and his kids? My understanding not in 2009 . She was fired earlier but AEG documented everything inculding her termination .
 
Re: August 29th hearing

A lot of people were trying to make it look like they did there best to save Michael. Grace and Lisa talk about Michael has being a long term drug user. Michael's body was too healthy for that. Drug abuse destroys your heath and state of mine there is no way Michael could have been taken drugs for as long as these people said he was and his body stayed so healthy no

this.
 
Re: August 29th hearing

A court case depends on FACTS, not crap gleaned from tabloids. The defense's statements look like they were entirely harvested from tabloid statements. If the judge would have allowed it, the defense could have trotted out all the hearsay testimony in the world, but it doesn't mean a thing against the autopsy report. The AR CLEARLY shows that there was no organ damage from long-term drug-use, and there was no Demerol in Michael's system (which blows the defense theory that he was detoxing). And it makes Klein irrelevant.
 
Re: August 29th hearing

How did we know if the defanse did not spice up the motion?

Karen Fay on twitter is saying this

"This "media" report has misinformation regarding my testimony. If I am called to testify I will speak the truth. I am sure the defense will not like to hear my truthful responses to their questions. Neither would the prosecution. RT @De_Weav: Please @wingheart be careful, Conrad might twist your words cause they plan to call you http://t.co/XRTrcvA"
 
Re: August 29th hearing

^^Well I do not know about the twisting of words that Karen speaks of, but remember she had made some comments at the beginning of the rehearsals about how great Michael was doing and everything was all peachy. Then, remember we were shocked to hear what she said after he died. When the fans asked her about these different comments she could not clarify her statements. So, for me, Karen's "opinions" change based on who she is with and circumstances.

Autumn, right, this judge wants facts, and that is why he kicked out some testimony and expects the trial to be shorter than the "experts" expected. So all the opinions of Karen and co will go out.
 
Re: August 29th hearing

How did we know if the defanse did not spice up the motion?

Karen Fay on twitter is saying this

"This "media" report has misinformation regarding my testimony. If I am called to testify I will speak the truth. I am sure the defense will not like to hear my truthful responses to their questions. Neither would the prosecution. RT @De_Weav: Please @wingheart be careful, Conrad might twist your words cause they plan to call you http://t.co/XRTrcvA"

Her tweet here just says it all, Michael is the one thats gonna be screwed by anything she says.
 
Re: August 29th hearing

How did we know if the defanse did not spice up the motion?

Karen Fay on twitter is saying this

"This "media" report has misinformation regarding my testimony. If I am called to testify I will speak the truth. I am sure the defense will not like to hear my truthful responses to their questions. Neither would the prosecution. RT @De_Weav: Please @wingheart be careful, Conrad might twist your words cause they plan to call you http://t.co/XRTrcvA"

Her tweet here just says it all, Michael is the one thats gonna be screwed by anything she says.

karen always seems to change her mind and can never keep up with what she says! lol

Poor michael even in death ppl will still lie & cheat bout him
 
Re: August 29th hearing

I dont remember grace being with MJ/PPB in 2009 either
 
Re: August 29th hearing

Well if Grace was gone since 08, she is another one who ran to the police even though she was not around. What does working for him in 08 have to do with the actions of Murray. Now we know the family and also the kids did say they did not like Grace, so there must be something more to Grace's behavior that we do not know about.
 
Re: August 29th hearing

Im really curious to see what Karen Faye is going to say now.

Btw, Grace was still working for Michael in 2009. She probably wasnt his nanny, but his assistant. And where is this 'she was fired in 2008' coming from? Just because you didnt see her with him doesnt mean she wasnt around. That doesnt make any sense.
 
Re: August 29th hearing

PPB? Really? This is an official information or justrumors? :unsure:

I do not understand... Why Katherine called her back? :unsure: PPB could have said: NO, we do not want Grace. :scratch:

Thing is with the jacksons recent actions i get the feeling they dont care for the kids feelings at all
 
Re: August 29th hearing

Exactly she makes no sense. U cant testify against both sides

well no you cannot testify for both sides but as in the Casey Anthony case her parents were called to the stand by both sides and they were forced to answer questions for both sides....maybe that is what she is getting at?
 
Last edited:
Re: August 29th hearing

Could this mean that she believes Murray was just a tool?
But anyway Elusive is right, you can't testify against both sides, it makes no sense.

Of course. Remember, she believes that AEG is to blame for everything that happened to Michael in his last months. Afterall, they forced him to do those concerts, hire Murray and take drugs, force him to rehearsals when he wasn't well, and kept him from his family. Oh, and AEG forced her to write those praising messages on her facebook to hide the truth.

Seriously, I really want Karen to be call. I don't care if it's the defense or the DA that does it. I just want to see her rip apart for the lying, sociopathic, stalkers that she is.

Sorry, but I really hate people who are willing to let a murder walk for their own selfish gains. Especially when the person who was murder was supposedly your 'friend'.
 
Re: August 29th hearing

Of course. Remember, she believes that AEG is to blame for everything that happened to Michael in his last months. Afterall, they forced him to do those concerts, hire Murray and take drugs, force him to rehearsals when he wasn't well, and kept him from his family. Oh, and AEG forced her to write those praising messages on her facebook to hide the truth.

Seriously, I really want Karen to be call. I don't care if it's the defense or the DA that does it. I just want to see her rip apart for the lying, sociopathic, stalkers that she is.

Sorry, but I really hate people who are willing to let a murder walk for their own selfish gains. Especially when the person who was murder was supposedly your 'friend'.

I agree.
 
Re: August 29th hearing

Going by Karen's tweets posted here, it makes her look delusional
and possibly everything else from her is just HEARSAY
with nothing to back up.
At this point, she makes a useless witness for both sides if you ask me.
 
Re: August 29th hearing

karen Faye is all over the place with her 'statements'. She told me in a facebook private mesage everything was fine in approx May 2009 and then suddenly when MJ passed away her whole story changes. I used to correspond with her and post on her facebook page but stopped when she started all this loopy AEG, Michael unwell loopy ranting.
 
Re: August 29th hearing

Btw, Grace was still working for Michael in 2009. She probably wasnt his nanny, but his assistant. And where is this 'she was fired in 2008' coming from? Just because you didnt see her with him doesnt mean she wasnt around. That doesnt make any sense.

Well, the children had a nanny named Rosalita, so it seems that Grace was not really there. And her name is on the witness list....







Thing is with the jacksons recent actions i get the feeling they dont care for the kids feelings at all

Yes. :(
 
Re: August 29th hearing

^^Well I do not know about the twisting of words that Karen speaks of, but remember she had made some comments at the beginning of the rehearsals about how great Michael was doing and everything was all peachy. Then, remember we were shocked to hear what she said after he died. When the fans asked her about these different comments she could not clarify her statements. So, for me, Karen's "opinions" change based on who she is with and circumstances.

I think Karen Faye was just playing the PR game . Whenever you are involved in a project like that you have to project an image of well-being with the show and with the star. Maybe she did have concerns but was constrained from expressing them. I mean Sheryl Crow waxed lyrical about her experiences with Michael during the Bad tour when she interviewed for the TV special. After that she told a different story. She felt freer to express what she really felt.

In any working environment, and particularly in a creative one, there will be tensions and people will get sick and be tired, etc. But that does not mean that things would not turn out right in the end. It is a process that will have its ups and downs. I just wish Ms Faye would not make the downs seem so dramatic!

I feel LMP is committed to ensuring that Michael's legacy does not surpass her father's. She fails to realise that that horse has already bolted.

Grace - don't know enough about her to comment.
 
Re: August 29th hearing

How did we know if the defanse did not spice up the motion?

Karen Fay on twitter is saying this

"This "media" report has misinformation regarding my testimony. If I am called to testify I will speak the truth. I am sure the defense will not like to hear my truthful responses to their questions. Neither would the prosecution. RT @De_Weav: Please @wingheart be careful, Conrad might twist your words cause they plan to call you http://t.co/XRTrcvA"

What the hell does she mean by this?!

Exactly she makes no sense. U cant testify against both sides

Could this mean that she believes Murray was just a tool?
But anyway Elusive is right, you can't testify against both sides, it makes no sense.

well you can testify for both sides if your argument seems to help and hurt both sides. Casey Anthony's parents were like that one minute blaming her another minute defending her.

defense not liking what she says : probably she'll blame murray for the kill shot
prosecution not liking what she says: probably she'll blame other doctors, other drugs, other people etc

so she put out a nice vague reasonable doubt on the table.
 
Re: August 29th hearing

I feel LMP is committed to ensuring that Michael's legacy does not surpass her father's. She fails to realise that that horse has already bolted.

LOL! i hate to break it to lmp but michael surpassed her father in the 80s! Sure he have many ppl impersonating him for shows & has graceland but really thats all it is. Michael was the one that had THE BIGGEST SELLING ALBUM OF ALL TIME! not elvis
 
Prosecutors Want Michael Jackson Medical Records Sealed

<!-- get socials 2 --><!--INFOLINKS_ON-->Prosecutors working on the upcoming manslaughter trial surrounding Michael Jackson's death are seeking to keep reports from the coroner and fire officials sealed until after the case goes to court.
The King of Pop's personal physician, Dr. Conrad Murray, is accused of administering the drug that killed Jackson in June, 2009 and jury selection for the trial is due to begin next week (08Sep11).
Bosses at Jackson's concert promoters, Aeg Live, are in the midst of a civil suit with executives at Lloyd's of London over the insurance policy for the Thriller hitmaker's doomed This Is It shows, for which the singer had been preparing for at the time of his death.
That suit requires the parties involved to look over official records surrounding the cause of Jackson's passing - but prosecutors fear disclosure of the documents could cause key information to be leaked to the media before Murray's trial is complete.
Los Angeles Deputy District Attorneys David Walgren and Deborah Brazil made the request to keep the records private in court papers filed on Wednesday (31Aug11), expressing that the case had already received "significant, unrelenting media attention".
Jackson had been insured by Lloyd's of London for $17.5 million (£10.9 million) for the concert series. Company officials are fighting a pay out, arguing that the singer did not disclose the full list of drugs that he was taking at the time of his death.
http://www.contactmusic.com/news.ns...ichael-jackson-medical-records-sealed_1243028
 
Last edited:
Back
Top