Conrad Murray News and discussion thread [No Links allowed]

TRANSCRIPT: CONRAD MURRAY DAYBREAKITV INTERVIEW PART 2

Int: How would you describe your relationship with Michael Jackson?

CM: Just a great friendship of course, but I was also his doctor but I spent more time with Michael as a friend compared to the time I had treated him medically.

Int: You said … you have said that you feel that he is somehow with you? That he talks to you is that correct?

CM: No, I certainly don’t hear voices and that’s been misconstrued in the press. Certainly, I dream of Michael, I have written letters to Michael and I’ve also felt his touch actually when the verdict of the civil trial was announced not too long ago, I actually felt his touch and I fought the tears.

Int: Do you actually feel honestly, in your heart, you believe that you did all that you could to save Michael Jackson?

CM: I’ll say this. I’ve done everything that I can, I did nothing wrong and contrary to everything that has been said, I did not kill Michael Jackson. I think that is absolutely wrong when they make that statement. Michael Jackson was found basically lifeless and all I did was to make every effort, I was so relentless in my effort to help Michael Jackson. He lived in a 14,000 square foot home, three floors, with no walking.. landline telephones, despite no effort by the paramedics. I got in the ambulance with him, I took him to the hospital and I did everything I can to help my friend.

Int: Well obviously the jury didn’t agree because they found you guilty and you served two years in prison. Now you oversaw, as you said, Michael Jackson’s healthcare. You say you were his friend but you were also his doctor, how can you justify that cocktail of sedatives and anesthetics that you prescribed for Michael Jackson?

CM: Well let’s talk about you know the… first you said the jury did not agree. If you were a member of a jury and you were sitting there and the Chief Prosecutor, David Walgren altered evidence in the middle of the courtroom and when we approached the judge he said he did not do that and then he writes a stipulation that was absolutely wrong. That would be considered obstruction of justice and it would be malfeasance by a public official

Int: But why did you prescribe all these sedatives to Michael Jackson, all these strong drugs, why did you do that as a doctor, why did you do that for him? Was it because of his paying you?

CM: Because of what?

Int: Because he was paying an awful lot of money?

CM: Oh no, not at all, not at all. I received not a single dime from Michael for his care, I have taken care of Michael since 2006, years before he passed away and despite my care and services to Michael, I never charged him. I paid for medicines, which clearly I was reimbursed but I’ve never charged him and I’ve never collected any of the $150,000 that has been shown to the world that I was receiving all of this income. I did not. I actually wanted to help Michael. When I was told by AEG that Michael was so penniless that he could not afford his home that he lived in, he could not afford toilet paper to wipe his… himself, he could not pay for popsicles for his children, nothing at all. This man was completely impecunious, I was stunned, but despite that I stayed with Michael because I wanted to help him.

Int: Can I just ask you? You say you wanted to help him, why did you then not advise him to cancel that tour, that forthcoming tour when he was clearly, clearly not physically and mentally perhaps capable of doing it but certainly not physically, why as his physician and as you said, his friend, did you not say, “Michael you can’t do this”?

CM: Well I’ve asked Michael time and time again, and Michael said he was up to sixty percent of his performance ability. I could not tell him to stop the show, not to go to the show, my whole goal was that maybe he would be strong enough eventually to go to England. Michael was in debt over 40 million dollars. His only last piece of property was wagered as a mortgage against the money that he was being charged against. AEG was bankrolling Michael - all of the money and he was getting further and further in debt. He was, basically in a hopeless situation, he was despondent, he was discouraged and I don’t think he had the ability to get to do the shows. He knew that. He wanted to have hip surgery to delay it. He considered trying to do brain surgery (smiles) and you know, it was just odd. Michael was demoralized in so many ways.

Int: We don’t know his financial situation, you’re saying that about the promoters, we don’t actually know that. Do you honestly believe, as you said, that you should be allowed to practice medicine again?

CM: I have practiced medicine for 23 years. I am a critical care specialist. I have taken care of those who have flatlined, the worst of the heart attacks, the cardiogenic shocks. I have saved those patients. In 23 years I have never had one disciplinary action by any medical boards in the United States, through all of the states that I have practiced. I have been in the most litigious states in the country and I have had no warnings and no reprimands. Not until this strike. This is the only blemish on my record and I am going to do my best to right a wrong that has happened to me.

Int: Mr. Murray thank you for joining us this morning, it’s been fascinating.

CM: Thank you so much.

Int: Thank you very much indeed.

Transcription By: @SGAA_MJ
 
Re: Conrad Murray News and discussion thread [No media Links allowed]

This is a link of video of the ladies from The Talk going after Murray and telling him to shut-up.


Admin - If you feel the need to move this, please do. But I thought it may be a very appropriate link for the subject matter in this thread.
 
Last edited:
Re: Conrad Murray News and discussion thread [No media Links allowed]

"I think that is absolutely wrong when they make that statement. Michael Jackson was found basically lifeless and all I did was to make every effort, I was so relentless in my effort to help Michael Jackson."

He acts like he just happened upon the scene.
 
Re: Conrad Murray News and discussion thread [No media Links allowed]

When you hear him talk he sounds so delusional?
No wonder they did not let him speak at his trial!!
There is something wrong here, it just does not make sense that a doctor talks like this..specially the "Love him parts" and then the i know more but i am not telling..(sixty minutes interview Aus.)
Someone gave him advise on how to do the interviews so he is getting more out of it.
He will come out with his stupid book to tell all......he is not going to do it now.
 
Re: Conrad Murray News and discussion thread [No media Links allowed]

I despise this "man" (for lack of a more family-friendly word) and his attempt to justify killing Michael, actually trying to play the role of VICTIM. :puke:

Already I've had to un-tag myself (FB) in links from friends that think I'd be interested in seeing my wall flooded with anything concerning him. I put them all on notice that they will be blocked AND deleted from my friends list if they continue.

While I can't completely avoid seeing his face and hearing his name, I don't have to put up with that sh*t on my own page!
 
Last edited:
Re: Conrad Murray News and discussion thread [No media Links allowed]

Conrad Murray is the hero of his own narcissistic fantasy world. Everything is someone else's fault, he's always the victim, and no one will ever get him to take responsibility for anything.
and that's exactly why he should never be allowed to practice medicine again!

It's disgusting how he loves the spotlight on him, all the drama and is bathing in feeling a pity for himself cuz the world is so 'unfair' to him... then again he is so obviously mentally disturbed... I'm just missing the journalism pointing out the obvious.
 
Re: Conrad Murray News and discussion thread [No media Links allowed]

"I think that is absolutely wrong when they make that statement. Michael Jackson was found basically lifeless and all I did was to make every effort, I was so relentless in my effort to help Michael Jackson."

He acts like he just happened upon the scene.

He gave himself away, he was supposed to claim he arrived as MJ stopped breathing, what with his dumb girlfriend claiming she could hear MJ in the background making coughing hacking sounds or whatever, he was supposed to claim he was still alive when he found him.

He's just confirmed MJ was already dead.
 
Re: Conrad Murray News and discussion thread [No media Links allowed]

gif-jail-sigh-gif.gif






It's ridiculous one journalist sit with Murray to hear a lot of shit. All this is crazy and insane. The Jackson family is not screaming about this shit interview?

The Jackson family are to blame for this, they could of stopped it all but instead they picked AEG rather than justice.
 
Int: I’m hearing you but you’re not accepting that you thought you were doing the right thing by trying to get him off it but still using it. Frankly, you should have never given it to him in the first place.

CM: Listen to me if I had wanted to blackmail Michael Jackson it wouldn’t take that phone call, it would be far worse than that. It would shatter the world. Okay?

GreenEyes;3933456 said:
What an incredibly arrogant threat by that guy. The interviewer is grilling him about why he continued to give him propofol, and all Murray can come up with is a threat of blackmail by making a phone call that would shatter the world. What kind of psychopath is this guy???:unsure:

There's a break/jump in the interview here. Murray's bit was not in response to the interviewer's comment, but was his reply to a question about MJ's slurred, apparently drugged speech that was played in Murray's trial, and whether it was intended to be used as blackmail.
 
Int: I’m hearing you but you’re not accepting that you thought you were doing the right thing by trying to get him off it but still using it. Frankly, you should have never given it to him in the first place.

CM: Listen to me if I had wanted to blackmail Michael Jackson it wouldn’t take that phone call, it would be far worse than that. It would shatter the world. Okay?

GreenEyes;3933456 said:
What an incredibly arrogant threat by that guy. The interviewer is grilling him about why he continued to give him propofol, and all Murray can come up with is a threat of blackmail by making a phone call that would shatter the world. What kind of psychopath is this guy???:unsure:

This is truly and sincerely HORRifying!

Isn’t there any way at all to stop C. Murray provoking in me such Anguish and Fright?
Some may say stop reading anything relating to C. Murray words and sentences…

But I refuse to just “admit” that that man can carry on hurting me, MJ and his family at his own pleasure: yes, pleasure! It feels to me he is getting “pleasure” hurting us with his speeches…

I do pray every day that he will stop… I do not comprehend how our Lord is allowing his behavior :boohoo
 
Re: Conrad Murray News and discussion thread [No media Links allowed]

He gave himself away, he was supposed to claim he arrived as MJ stopped breathing, what with his dumb girlfriend claiming she could hear MJ in the background making coughing hacking sounds or whatever, he was supposed to claim he was still alive when he found him.

He's just confirmed MJ was already dead.


To clarify, his girlfriend said she heard a cough. She never said it was Michael coughing. She then hung up and tried to call again, but message. The phone logs backed this since they had her number back to back on Murray's phone logs. It could have been Murray coughing when he discovered Michael dead.

In either case, Murray told so many lies he doesn't know what story he is telling. One minute, Michael is dead and beyond saving so calling 911 right away is not important. Then he turns around and claims that he kept Michael alive and there was some sign of life before the MTs came.

In either case, Murray will continue going on soft ball interviews with people he knows will not ask him about his contradictions.

This man is very sick and he was bound to kill someone the way he is acting. It was only a matter of time and his victim happened to be Michael.
 
Re: Conrad Murray News and discussion thread [No media Links allowed]

Debbie is right, that is one ugly unshaved dog anus of a face. I pity his children. I hope his instrument abandons him when the $$ dries up.
 
Re: Conrad Murray News and discussion thread [No media Links allowed]

Murray is nuts and it's scary that this insane man was a medical doctor

I cannot get over the fact that Michael didn't see that he was full blown loony! Then again if you take into consideration A Klein, and some others that were Michael's doctors, he probably thought CM is as much normal doc as Klein.

The aeg trial showed that all doctors and nurses who came into contact with mj were under the illusion they were 'friends' with mj, and acting like spurned partners when mj forgot to send them a birthday card.

I agree. They all wanted to be Michael's best friends, but CM was so desperate to be known as MJ's "bestis" that he went on public telling he was Michael's personal penis holder. Doesn't get any better than that, and I doubt other doctors wants to reclaim his place.

---------------------------------


Thanks for people who posted transcripts to these interviews. It is a bit easier to read his interviews than watch his face, and listen his lies after lies.
 
Last edited:
Re: Conrad Murray News and discussion thread [No media Links allowed]

In either case, Murray will continue going on soft ball interviews with people he knows will not ask him about his contradictions.

I have to admit that at least these two interviews that he gave on telly (Aussie 60 min and ITV UK), they weren't that bad in a sense that they did grill him about his actions.
I think if we knew the next media that is going to interview him, we should send questions to that media what to ask from CM. Seemingly those reporters haven't been followed this case as intensely as we have, so if they have tough questions to ask from CM, he is bound to cripple under questioning. He didn't testify during the trial because he cannot keep up with his lies, but if he is questioned on telly, he'll make a fool of himself and loses his track, and people can see through his facade. For example, if they ask him how it is possible that there are no MJ's finger prints on meds bottles or anything else, how does he think MJ killed himself and so on questions.
 
Re: Conrad Murray News and discussion thread [No media Links allowed]

The worst so far was that Mail on Sunday interview which was sympathetic to him and also instead of focusing on Murray's responsibility, they just wanted him to talk ish about Michael. British tabloids...
 
Re: Conrad Murray News and discussion thread [No media Links allowed]

Heartbroken all over again :(
 
Re: Conrad Murray News and discussion thread [No media Links allowed]

Murray also tries to handle the doctor/patient confidentiality issue although i didn't actually see any interviewer mention it. He makes it v clear that he's mj's closest friend, and that he knows mj far better as a friend rather than a doctor, hence knowing all his 'secrets'. But he fails miserably as he describes stuff that only a doctor wd know, and in any case i don't know how anyone cd believe mj wd see this crude, vain moron as a sympathetic confidante. I'm sure mj just tolerated murray, Mj seemed real anxious before tii to find another doctor for london even tho' murray was doubtless desperate to accompany him on tour. The aeg trial showed that all doctors and nurses who came into contact with mj were under the illusion they were 'friends' with mj, and acting like spurned partners when mj forgot to send them a birthday card.

Well, it is obvious that Michael trusted Murray very much. He allowed the doc to put him under and watch him. He also waved off the concerns of others thinking Murray was taking care of him. I am certain Michael wanted another doctor since he probably though the job he was asking of Murray was too big for him. He was basically asking Murray to stay up all night and watch him.

With that said, I doubt he told Murray his darkest secrets. Michael was very trusting, but he also was very protective of his personal information. Like Karen. Michael knew her for over 25 years, gave her a nickname, and Karen really does not know much about Michael. Same with the people who knew him since they can only give tidbits about Michael or rehash tab stories about him.

For such a public figure, there is precious little known about the deeper person that he was. It seemed the people who do know are very particular about what they share.
 
Last edited:
Re: Conrad Murray News and discussion thread [No media Links allowed]

The worst so far was that Mail on Sunday interview which was sympathetic to him and also instead of focusing on Murray's responsibility, they just wanted him to talk ish about Michael. British tabloids...

And people call us fans crazy and delusional for saying that the media as an agenda against Michael
 
Re: Conrad Murray News and discussion thread [No media Links allowed]

I agree Ramona. I know this off-topic but I feel Michael 'confided' in certain people with certain 'personal' stories to see what would end up in the public domain and he would know if he could trust that person.

I feel, though, that Michael had a way of making people feel as though they were special to him. And some people got carried away. I mean how would you feel/react if Michael Jackson told you that you were the best thing that ever happened to him? For some the power of that went to their heads and for Murray, it drove him completely mad.
 
Last edited:
Bubs;3933554 said:
I have to admit that at least these two interviews that he gave on telly (Aussie 60 min and ITV UK), they weren't that bad in a sense that they did grill him about his actions.
I agree, although the interviewers were not clued up as to the details of the case, they didn't just give murray a free ride to set out his own agenda. I obviously don't like murray being given a platform but he's out of jail now and he's fair game to the media to interview. We've just had rolling stone interview charles manson. I googled and apparently rs also interviewed manson back in 1970 and won some national magazine award for it. It's not just mj's killer that gets the media treatment.

Agree with respect, what i did find totally disgusting was the mail on sunday article - that completely crossed the boundary for me. It was totally craven to murray, never put forward the facts of the trial or questioned any of murray's assertions, published completely personal private information about mj - it was just a disgrace. And this from a woman reporter who was given an exclusive interview with paris a few months ago. Unlike the 2 tv interviews i think it is an example of a breach of the media code. The pcc code for editors says, 'the press must take care not to publish distorted information', that 'everyone is entitled to respect for his or her private and family life. Editors will be expected to justify intrusions into an individual's private life without consent.' Also, 'editors should not use the fame, notoriety or position of a parent or guardian as the sole justification for publishing details of a child's private life'. The mos article was grossly distorted, can you imagine an mj interview being allowed to be unchallenged in a similar article, and it was so wrong to allow a doctor to spew forth for £££ private personal patient information, including stuff about the children. That reporter was just so ammoral in her collusion with murray.

Complaint procedure is on this website, www.pcc.org.uk
If ed milliband can make a big fuss about the dailymail saying his dead father hated the uk, then i think we can make a fuss about that article. It's on the biggest english speaking news website in the world, so don't anyone go thinking it's just the uk that sees this, it gets a huge proportion of its traffic from the us.
 
Last edited:
Re: Conrad Murray News and discussion thread [No media Links allowed]

To be honest i don't care if there are some people in the media who are giving Murray a grilling. They are still giving him a platform (and probably paying him) and it's still disgusting.
 
Re: Conrad Murray News and discussion thread [No media Links allowed]

I agree Ramona. I know this off-topic but I feel Michael 'confided' in certain people with certain 'personal' stories to see what would end up in the public domain and he would know if he could trust that person.

I feel, though, that Michael had a way of making people feel as though they were special to him. And some people got carried away. I mean how would you feel/react if Michael Jackson told you that you were the best thing that ever happened to him? For some the power of that went to their heads and for Murray, it drove him completely mad.

Tell me about it. It is like people who Michael cut off all turn to bitter, spiteful ex-lovers. I mean, look at Wade who has lost his freaking mind. Not even mentioning Michael's other accusers who turn against him not only for money, but bitterness and anger. It is almost like Michael became so kind of drug to some people and they through major withdrawals without him. I cannot think of any other celebrity that even come close to the amount of bitter exs Michael left behind.
 
Re: Conrad Murray News and discussion thread [No media Links allowed]

To be honest i don't care if there are some people in the media who are giving Murray a grilling. They are still giving him a platform (and probably paying him) and it's still disgusting.

I know it is disgusting, no doubt about it. I just don't know whether there is any difference media behaviour whether we boycott articles of him or not. Like Bonnie Blue already mentioned, RS did an interview with C Manson, and not long ago they had this Boston Bomber on cover. We know the way media carries away is totally unfair, but seemingly they are not going to change, so if nothing else, we need to work with them.

If it doesn't make any difference, perhaps we should think what way we can do a nudge to these reporters to dig deeper with their questions, and CM himself digs himself in the deep s..t hole (pardon my language). CM is narcissistic sociopath, and he will go bonkers when he is questioned of his actions or he makes fool of himself on national tv (even internationally) because he cannot lie his way out of the mess.
Hopefully when he realizes that reporters are not believing his lies, he will fade away.
 
Re: Conrad Murray News and discussion thread [No media Links allowed]

This is a link of video of the ladies from The Talk going after Murray and telling him to shut-up.


Admin - If you feel the need to move this, please do. But I thought it may be a very appropriate link for the subject matter in this thread.

All of those ladies were right, especially the one who said "if you weren't sure about CM bad ethics before,now you are".
 
Re: Conrad Murray News and discussion thread [No media Links allowed]

The worst so far was that Mail on Sunday interview which was sympathetic to him and also instead of focusing on Murray's responsibility, they just wanted him to talk ish about Michael. British tabloids...
Well, there is always going to be a few idoits to be sympathetic to folks like Murray. Remember, Charles Manson has some compassioners even though he killed people and admitted to doing it with his followers; however, most people are upset over this.
 
Last edited:
Re: Conrad Murray News and discussion thread [No media Links allowed]

All of those ladies were right, especially the one who said "if you weren't sure about CM bad ethics before,now you are".
It was clear CM was bad before. ANyone who though he was not bad is either dumb or just playing stupid.
 
Re: Conrad Murray News and discussion thread [No media Links allowed]

Terrell - the impression I get my friends is that they felt Murray would not have wanted to intentionally harm Michael (who would? a friend of mine asked) but things got out of control for him. Alot of friends did not think that Murray could have had malicious intent against Michael, despite what they read and saw about the trial because, for them, no one would want to hurt Michael.
 
Re: Conrad Murray News and discussion thread [No media Links allowed]

Terrell - the impression I get my friends is that they felt Murray would not have wanted to intentionally harm Michael (who would? a friend of mine asked) but things got out of control for him. Alot of friends did not think that Murray could have had malicious intent against Michael, despite what they read and saw about the trial because, for them, no one would want to hurt Michael.

Malicious intent or not, but it's clear that Murray has no remorse, no sense of responsibility at all. It was all Michael's fault, according to him.
I could understand a certain level of sympathy towards Murray if he showed remorse, if he took responsibility for his actions. But it's hard to understand any kind of sympathy towards this guy who sees himself as a hero, rather than someone whose negligence killed someone. And on top of that he even breaks doc-patient privilage left and right and sells out his victim to tabloids for money. Any sympathy towards him can only come from either utter ignorance about his actions both on June 25, 2009 and since, or utter hatred towards MJ.
 
Re: Conrad Murray News and discussion thread [No media Links allowed]

Murray wasn't charged with malicious intent or intent to do MJ harm. So I agree with your friends in that aspect. That is not the problem. Your friends should be aware It was his unethical medical treatment and gross negligent actions as a Dr. that cause Michael's death, regardless of his intent. His personal feelings about MJ whether genuine or not don't factor in and have nothing to do with it. He was a terrible unethical negligent DR. He put his patient in danger every night and didn't monitor him. His negligent actions in treating Michael were considered CRIMINAL ( Involuntary Manslaughter) by the court and the medical boards that pulled his license, He went to Jail for his Criminal actions as a Doctor not as MJ's friend. A doctor should know better and friend wouldnt be speaking of all MJs embarrassing medical problems in public. So he is a terrible Doctor and a Terrible friend as well.
 
Back
Top