Controversial MJ Documentary Leaving Neverland [GENERAL DISCUSSION THREAD]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">BBC radio 2 might be but <a href="https://twitter.com/Heart80s?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Heart80s</a> which is a sister station to <a href="https://twitter.com/Heartfm?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Heartfm</a> are not! They played <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MichaelJackson?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MichaelJackson</a> this morning in the UK. great choice of song too! &#128077; <a href="https://t.co/fCbdkKhy1g">pic.twitter.com/fCbdkKhy1g</a></p>&mdash; Michael Jackson - King &#10084;&#65039; (@ijcsly_mj) <a href="https://twitter.com/ijcsly_mj/status/1102182244590981121?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">3. März 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The responses to this tweet &#128514; <a href="https://t.co/2qYbKUIijK">https://t.co/2qYbKUIijK</a></p>&mdash; Samar @TheMJAP (@TheMJAP) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheMJAP/status/1102012646272966658?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">3. März 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I protected Mr. Jackson in his final days. Only a coward will dishonor him for gain. <a href="https://t.co/lmByCZEylm">pic.twitter.com/lmByCZEylm</a></p>&mdash; Bill Whitfield (@MJBODYGUARDS) <a href="https://twitter.com/MJBODYGUARDS/status/1101676257136132096?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">2. März 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">There will Always be ppl talking BS about MJ, we as his fans, supporters and Protectors will be there to defend him. Don’t worry about what they say, just let them know WE AIN’T HAVING IT!</p>&mdash; Bill Whitfield (@MJBODYGUARDS) <a href="https://twitter.com/MJBODYGUARDS/status/1101721717699801088?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">2. März 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Just donated US$ 3000 to American MJ innocent campaign led by Jennifer Marino <a href="https://twitter.com/All4LoveJen?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@All4LoveJen</a> ! With love from China!! <a href="https://t.co/DU9bTKqdxn">https://t.co/DU9bTKqdxn</a> <a href="https://t.co/KTVePQzhWH">pic.twitter.com/KTVePQzhWH</a></p>&mdash; Keen Zhang (@mkgenie) <a href="https://twitter.com/mkgenie/status/1102190671190884352?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">3. März 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Absolutely not, Roland! I will always love Michael Jackson's music. You should definitely chat with <a href="https://twitter.com/tajjackson3?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@tajjackson3</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/BJackson82?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@BJackson82</a> and the <a href="https://twitter.com/Jacksons?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Jacksons</a> as well, to get further details about this. They're telling their truth about the nonsense of Wade.</p>&mdash; Jeremy Horn (@Jeremy_Horn) <a href="https://twitter.com/Jeremy_Horn/status/1102041212071096320?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">3. März 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">LONDON PROTEST THIS WED MARCH 6 AT CHANNEL4 OFFICES. ALL DAY 8AM - 8PM<br><br>We need HUGE NUMBERS otherwise you know what the media will say....<br><br>122-124 HORSEFERRY ROAD, LONDON SW1P 2TX. CLOSEST TUBE STATION IS ST. JAMES PARK<a href="https://t.co/Hlt5DjNx46">https://t.co/Hlt5DjNx46</a>…<a href="https://twitter.com/tajjackson3?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@tajjackson3</a> PLEASE SHARE <a href="https://t.co/cRn7hjfYOv">pic.twitter.com/cRn7hjfYOv</a></p>&mdash; Sandy (@seeskaper) <a href="https://twitter.com/seeskaper/status/1102054472413577217?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">3. März 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

I was in the swimming pool today with my brother, his wife and their three children. I saw how other parents were playing around and having fun with their kids, sheer joy. This made me think of how people (especially with children) have watched LN and they hear the most disgusting stories about a grown up man with young boys. It's perfectly normal that these reviewers felt horrible and found it a hard thing to watch. Anyone in their right mind would feel that way.

I am willing to bet a lot of money that these reviewers didn't know the slightest thing about Wade and Safechuck beforehand. They were not aware of all the things we are aware of, things that really completely let this "documentary" fall flat on its face. I really wonder how those reviews would have ended up if some had actually did some research first. Some people just are simple minded, they see it, are disgusted by it and they conclude that Michael must have absolutely done it.

I've said it before, but please let there some people in that panel tonight on Dutch TV that can set these matters straight. Please!
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Whilst of course i believe MJ was both framed and innocent. The general public do not think so . Also I think The Jacksons by speaking out actually make things look WORSE. Simply because of a few facts, number 1 - MJ did not want anything to do with his brothers and father ( excluding Katherine) as he saw them as leeches, number 2- Jermaine's "new found" attitude and mimicking MJ's speaking voice et al, 3- Where were the brothers when MJ was being accused for the first time. Maybe if they stepped in then , things would have been different. The UK media are already saying that they are only defending him because they are scared of losing out on the money and in a devils advocate position , they have a point. Also where are MJ's so called friends , Diana , Minelli etc now. MJ was simply used by people who could get a quick buck ( and often a BIG buck ) out of him and that is the biggest tragedy of all. MJ did not molest ANY kid and the worst part is there are people out there that KNOW this and yet go along with this rubbish.
 
https://allhiphop.com/rumors/oprah-...p-dances-on-his-grave-NNbh0cgyJE2VBeHD6DJDbw/

Oprah Says It Is Time To Cancel Michael Jackson, Tap Dances On His Grave!

(AllHipHop Rumors) I cannot believe Oprah is pushing and peddling this to the masses of people. I guess a click is a click! I am not supporting the click though! MJ has been murdered several times over, even in death and HBO and Sundance are doing another drive-by on his legacy with this new documentary "Leaving Neverland."

...oprahmagazine
Up until a few days ago, OprahMag.com’s digital director @ariannagab was a Michael Jackson defender and had go-to lines about separating the artist from the man or how there was never any real proof that he abused children. But then @oprah and #LeavingNeverland finally convinced her to let go of the King of Pop. Her Aha-moment: Leaving Neverland is much bigger than Michael Jackson. It’s bigger than Michael Jackson's fans, bigger than defending the soundtrack to your childhood. Instead, it is about the millions of people in this world who never got to have a childhood because of the sexual abuse they experienced before their young brains were even developed enough to know what was occurring. Tap the link in our bio to read the touching essay.

The digital dude decided to write a whole op ed piece on why he's "letting go of MJ." AND? So what? To my knowledge, the King of Pop didn't go to jail, wasn't persecuted and WAS pursued for YEARS. They even took pictures of his genitals to try to make something stick. Now accusations are another thing. Anybody can accuse....

I am riding with MJ and I am absolutely not going to stop playing Off The Wall or Thriller - EVER. MJ ain't R. Kelly. But some seem to want to ride the wave and have their two cents as if it was predicated on some investigation. It is based on feelings,emotions and clicks on a web side. Ride the wave. But, I'm going to surf another wave.

My wave is that wave that's not hear for the overt annihilation of the legacy of the man that transformed how we took in music, created the all time greatest selling album, Thriller. F##k The Eagles. And, he did tons and tons of good, while he was here. Was he an odd duck? Hell yeah! And I think anybody would be if they came up like him, but does that make him a child rapist? NAH HOMIE.

Check out what the family said on The Breakfast Club.

Taj and Marlon Jackson defended MJ and I salute them.

I wonder if Oprah will make a statement like this for Harvey Weinstein, whom she has been seen cavorting with.
 
Paris78;4244635 said:
https://allhiphop.com/rumors/oprah-...p-dances-on-his-grave-NNbh0cgyJE2VBeHD6DJDbw/

Oprah Says It Is Time To Cancel Michael Jackson, Tap Dances On His Grave!

(AllHipHop Rumors) I cannot believe Oprah is pushing and peddling this to the masses of people. I guess a click is a click! I am not supporting the click though! MJ has been murdered several times over, even in death and HBO and Sundance are doing another drive-by on his legacy with this new documentary "Leaving Neverland."

...oprahmagazine
Up until a few days ago, OprahMag.com&#8217;s digital director @ariannagab was a Michael Jackson defender and had go-to lines about separating the artist from the man or how there was never any real proof that he abused children. But then @oprah and #LeavingNeverland finally convinced her to let go of the King of Pop. Her Aha-moment: Leaving Neverland is much bigger than Michael Jackson. It&#8217;s bigger than Michael Jackson's fans, bigger than defending the soundtrack to your childhood. Instead, it is about the millions of people in this world who never got to have a childhood because of the sexual abuse they experienced before their young brains were even developed enough to know what was occurring. Tap the link in our bio to read the touching essay.

The digital dude decided to write a whole op ed piece on why he's "letting go of MJ." AND? So what? To my knowledge, the King of Pop didn't go to jail, wasn't persecuted and WAS pursued for YEARS. They even took pictures of his genitals to try to make something stick. Now accusations are another thing. Anybody can accuse....

I am riding with MJ and I am absolutely not going to stop playing Off The Wall or Thriller - EVER. MJ ain't R. Kelly. But some seem to want to ride the wave and have their two cents as if it was predicated on some investigation. It is based on feelings,emotions and clicks on a web side. Ride the wave. But, I'm going to surf another wave.

My wave is that wave that's not hear for the overt annihilation of the legacy of the man that transformed how we took in music, created the all time greatest selling album, Thriller. F##k The Eagles. And, he did tons and tons of good, while he was here. Was he an odd duck? Hell yeah! And I think anybody would be if they came up like him, but does that make him a child rapist? NAH HOMIE.

Check out what the family said on The Breakfast Club.

Taj and Marlon Jackson defended MJ and I salute them.

I wonder if Oprah will make a statement like this for Harvey Weinstein, whom she has been seen cavorting with.

Bang goes her attempt at president thank GOD . She is the leftist of the left. Although only when it suits her.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Those tweets are great by his bodyguard. And that tweet by someone asking if we are still gonna continue listening to MJ, I replied there with some facts.

I am honestly ashamed of my fellow human beings that they are so easy and fine with throwing someone under the bus. If these accusers had been actually NORMAL and credible I could understand it but this? THIS?

And if Oprah truly said that, I will tap dance on her ****ing grave. Jesus christ man. How sick and evil is this bitch? Does this bitch actually have a audience at all anymore? She's totally ignoring anything about Weinstein. HOW... I ask you, how are people ok with her?
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

And that little bit about this Arianna Gab that she used to be a defender and the magazine too until Oprah convinced her to let him go. That part makes me sick to my stomach. Seriously **** this miserable piece of trash to hell.

I really really hope this will have a good outcome but I can't deny that i have very little faith in that now. Some very powerful forces are behind this. Not a word about the scumbag Weinstein but look at what they all say about MJ with zero, zero evidence and two very very full of shit accusers. I find it incredibly scary.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

I have complete faith in Michael after reading all the facts.

I will play MJ's music to my young neices, nephews and my own children one day.

I will continue Michael's legacy in my own way.

His legacy will go on, it has come this far.


But you need to play your part in your own small way.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Thats a local bbc station. Doesnt mean radio 2 havnt.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

After reading that brilliant statement from The Estate, I can say I've never been more proud of them. I deeply appreciate how fiercely they protect Michael and his legacy as us fans do.

So thank you to The Estate
 
SeeingVoices said:
Channel 4 are FURIOUS about the poster campaign in London!! Hahaha..

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...l-Jackson-innocent-launched-London-buses.html

The double standards are of epic proportions.

They want to put out a provocative mockumentary and expect no-one to combat it. I don't think so.

It's very clear their agenda is silence our voice and destroy MJ.

I think they under estimated out tenacity.

They absolutely underestimated the power, drive and passion of MJFam. Painting fans with a broad stroke of &#8216;irrational supporters&#8217; won&#8217;t help them either. Their agenda is clear, but another thing is also clear, beyond the temporary chaos and noise they are creating right now - they WILL FAIL in their sick, twisted mission.


1nn5 said:
The Estate has elected to keep Michael&#8217;s social media focused on the TRUTH about Michael Jackson, and not a space to react to the lies in the forthcoming documentary. Part of the reason is Michael has over 75 million followers on social media - none of the networks broadcasting this come even close to that. Why would it benefit Michael to bring the documentary to the attention to even MORE people, offering it free publicity?

It is the Estate&#8217;s job to keep in mind an objective view and execute a strategy that best benefits Michael both now and for generations to come, and acknowledging the documentary on Michael&#8217;s social pages does not achieve that objective.

MJRemixed said:
The estate are spot on with that. They are handling it correctly. They know what they are doing. Notice all the recents posts have been focused and reminding the world all the good mj did when he was alive.

Absolutely agree with that. I firmly believe the Estate and many others are working behind the scenes and will defend Michael and his good name, when and how it matters most. We must allow them the time and space to accomplish that in the most efficient and lasting of ways. It may look like they aren&#8217;t doing anything to combat the PR slaughter and media lynching, but I do believe they are taking the right approach and at the proper time and with the proper methods they will act, forcefully and efficiently to demonstrate to the world the truth of Michael&#8217;s innocence. The latest statement indicates exactly that.

It may all seem dark and hopeless now and it will probably feel even more so over the next couple of weeks. But I must insist &#8211; I do not believe for a second that these horrible current events represent the end of the Michael Jackson story and certainly not the end of his legacy.

I also wish fans gave the general public more credit. As I&#8217;ve said from the very beginning of this mess, I trust the common sense of decent people. Of course there will be the ones who will eat this garbage up. There will also be well meaning people who will take this at face value and without the other side of the story, will be inclined to believe the so-called &#8216;victims&#8217;. However, once facts will be presented, I am convinced most reasonable people will see through this coordinated media lynching and money grab.

Soundmind said:
I have just come across a tweet about Oprah hosting them with 5000 comments overwhelmingly in mj's favour.

And in due time, after the current storm, that attitude will be even greater. Back in February/March 2003 when there was great media uproar about the Bashir documentary, I also noticed overwhelming support for Michael online, from folks all across America. I believe the same will be true now.

I hope the potential irony isn&#8217;t lost on anyone &#8211; back in 2003, the Bashir documentary, in a most painful and long ordeal, provided Michael with the chance to have the words NOT GUILTY ring out throughout the world for 14 times. What the media is trying to do now is to overturn that 2005 verdict, which left most of them with plenty of crow to eat. Wouldn&#8217;t it be awesome, if a &#8216;documentary&#8217; they aimed at destroying Michael, will prove, once again, to be the start of Michael&#8217;s vindication? I would call that not just poetic, but amazing justice.

Stafforshire Bullterrier said:
I think you meant this one

https://mobile.twitter.com/GeraldoRi...16132740517890

Covering #MichaelJackson molestation trial in 2005 I recall effective testimony from #WadeRobson that Jackson had Never molested him. After Jackson's death, Robson tried to get job w Jackson estate projects. They didn't hire him. Now-in #LeavingNeverland-Robson claims he molested

-------

And some replies there where people post the different contradicting stories, good stuff.

And since the similarities to the previous ordeal do not end here, I am not in the slightest surprised to see Ebony magazine, Steve Harvey and Geraldo Rivera defending Michael once again. May God bless them and everyone else who has come to Michael&#8217;s defense, then and now. They are doing a service not only to Michael and those of us who love him very much, but they are doing a service to truth, decency, genuine justice and bring deeply needed honor to the journalism trade which has been taken over by completely amoral people.

ay0wvb.jpg


Unfortunately, others are not equally brave.

Soundmind said:
This is what the media did in 2005 that's why when MJ was acquitted the public could not believe it because they were told for two years by that point that there was a mountain of evidence against him, the journalists were leaving the court every hour and so to give updates with sordid details about the evidence and how guilty mj looked. Liars and manipulators. FAKE NEWS.

Other than the lonely voices, like Linda Deutsch, most of them ran to &#8216;report&#8217; every single last of the vicious lies spewed by the prosecution, only to forget to bring about the complete annihilation of Sneddon&#8217;s witnesses on cross-examination. A most similar tactic is being employed now. They provide these liars with a platform without questioning their motives, ignore the factual arguments pointing out their inconsistencies and on top of it all, they have the audacity to claim that neither Michael&#8217;s family, nor his fans should be allowed to defend him because they lack the objectivity needed to explore such a story. The sheer hypocrisy, the mental contortions and the nerve of these people is nothing short of incredible. Thankfully, most of the public is already desensitized to their twisted ways and propaganda.

Considering that there are plenty of individuals and organizations out there doing their worst to undermine Michael&#8217;s integrity and legacy, I really think fans should not contribute any further. While it is natural to be fearful about the upcoming events, being all gloom and doom won&#8217;t help anyone.

StaceyMJ said:
I'm in agreement about the over negativity here...we know how awful and damning this could be, of course we do. We don't need to lament in that overly. We need to keep each others spirits up and keep on fighting the good fight. That is all we can do, and have faith that the truth will prevail. It does us no good to dwell at this point.

Ksat9 said:
I&#8217;m new to this site, but because of this mockumentary I needed somewhere to vent with the rest of the MJ fans.
My emotions have been a complete roller coaster these past few weeks.
Regardless of what happens I will state this, I will NEVER have faith and trust in the media ever again.
They weren&#8217;t even reporting the cases when it happened yet they have all jumped at the chance to report on this nonsense.
The fact that so many &#8220;journalists&#8221; have refused to fact check and are actively spreading the lies of people like Maureen Orth disgusts me.
Those three stooges have literally contradicted their stories and have exposed their lies so many times that if any reputable journalist has the guts they could expose them.
It may be ugly next week and it may be ugly throughout March, but I feel deep in my heart that the truth when it comes to those two will come out.

Now, this is the kind of message from a new member I can embrace and support fully. Welcome, Ksat9. Keep up the fighting spirit!!!

dam2040 said:
The good fight continues! Look how POWERFUL we are! Billboards and ads everywhere!

We love you Mike and will NEVER stop fighting! Let's go!!

Of course, the good fight continues. We will keep on fighting and in the end we will also win. LOVE and TRUTH will have the last words, best better believe that.

14o856w.jpg


*fist-bumps the computer screen*
 
Last edited:
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

Jimmy seems more credible than Wade in any interview I've seen so far.
Wade always has that "ha! Look at me now" smirk on his face. Like he's enjoying the limelight.
And it's a similar smile you see when someone is lying.


James more credible than wade in the interviews? I mean if looking constipated looks like being credible...

I see James extremely nervous, worried, and scared in the interviews. That stress on his face is not because of the 'abuse', it's the reaction of lying on camera and knowing it.. pay attention to what he squirms about, its not the abuse - he squirms when they talk about them possibly lying or talking in defense of Michael..
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"



I have no idea how to post something from twitter, but anyway... https://twitter.com/tajjackson3/status/1102126008231059456

[FONT=&quot]Taj Jackson?Verified account @tajjackson3 6h6 hours agoMore


[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Taj Jackson Retweeted 🌴[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]The top room and all rooms in the theater were see through. There never was one way glass. This is another lie by Safechuck. You had to close the curtains for any privacy.
[/FONT]

 
Last edited:
Can the MODs please explain why this thread has been moved to “trials and tribulations”?

Also shall we start a separate thread for people who are losing momentum with this? I need to keep positive. I’m spending hours commenting on Facebook, twitter and YouTube. I actually feel quite encouraged by most of the general public’s comments and sense that something is amiss here. Then I come to MJJC and get all depressed again. Not blaming anyone. It’s a very difficult time. But it’d just be nice to keep the negative thoughts in one place and the fighting talk in another?
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

After reading that brilliant statement from The Estate, I can say I've never been more proud of them. I deeply appreciate how fiercely they protect Michael and his legacy as us fans do.

So thank you to The Estate

Yes, the estate are stepping up to the mark this time. I just wanted to say to fellow fans and friends - Hold your heads up high, we will get through this victorious. In Michael's words 'Lies run sprints but the truth runs marathons'. Given time this will all start to implode on the two guys. Keep the faith.
 
MJJ2theMAX;4244654 said:
Can the MODs please explain why this thread has been moved to &#8220;trials and tribulations&#8221;?

Also shall we start a separate thread for people who are losing momentum with this? I need to keep positive. I&#8217;m spending hours commenting on Facebook, twitter and YouTube. I actually feel quite encouraged by most of the general public&#8217;s comments and sense that something is amiss here. Then I come to MJJC and get all depressed again. Not blaming anyone. It&#8217;s a very difficult time. But it&#8217;d just be nice to keep the negative thoughts in one place and the fighting talk in another?
I also think that might be a good idea.
 
"6. Jackson had an extensive collection of adult erotic material he kept in a suitcase next to his bed, including S&M bondage photos and a study of naked boys. Forensic experts with experience in the Secret Service found the fingerprints of boys alongside Jackson’s on the same pages. Jackson also had bondage sculptures of women with ball gags in their mouths on his desk, in full view of the boys who slept there."

https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywoo...-the-michael-jackson-sexual-abuse-allegations


Where's the evidence for this? Have I missed something? Particularly the sculptures?
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

I am also optimistic, though also cautious, in what concerns the general public's response. The comments I've read so far on Youtube and Facebook have been mainly pro MJ, so keep up the good work, guys. We're going to get through this as well!
 
SIDEWALKS;4244657 said:
"6. Jackson had an extensive collection of adult erotic material he kept in a suitcase next to his bed, including S&M bondage photos and a study of naked boys. Forensic experts with experience in the Secret Service found the fingerprints of boys alongside Jackson&#8217;s on the same pages. Jackson also had bondage sculptures of women with ball gags in their mouths on his desk, in full view of the boys who slept there."

https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywoo...-the-michael-jackson-sexual-abuse-allegations


Where's the evidence for this? Have I missed something? Particularly the sculptures?

The sculptures were found in a drawer in his office. They did not find MJ's fingerprints on the same pages as others. that's a lie. And considering that star recognised a magazine that was issued in August 2013, 5 moths after they left neverland, says everything we need to know about the credibility of the magazines as evidence. Not to mention that Gavin and Star hold them during the grand jury hearings and only after that they were sent to forensic tests.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

The sculptures were found in a drawer in his office. They did not find MJ's fingerprints on the same pages as others. that's a lie. And considering that star recognised a magazine that was issued in August 2013, 5 moths after they left neverland, says everything we need to know about the credibility of the magazines as evidence. Not to mention that Gavin and Star hold them during the grand jury hearings and only after that they were sent to forensic tests.

Thanks for explaining!
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

I am also optimistic, though also cautious, in what concerns the general public's response. The comments I've read so far on Youtube and Facebook have been mainly pro MJ, so keep up the good work, guys. We're going to get through this as well!

Same here. But I am so so, SO glad that we kept posting facts full of proof about Michael and my hope is that the people posting all those pro MJ comments have also checked out all those facts. It's so incredibly important that viewers of LN are in the know about the facts, so damn important.

I just wonder how we're going to find out how the general public reacts to it. Personally I barely talk to any strangers in my neighborhood, only with a few friends of mine in Xbox Live and they are already fully in defense of Michael. Are we going to find out just by checking to see new social media comments? We've already had a ton of reviews, doubt many more will come and they probably won't even be worth our time anyway, unless these writers did their research on these two sickening guys.
 
SIDEWALKS;4244657 said:
"6. Jackson had an extensive collection of adult erotic material he kept in a suitcase next to his bed, including S&M bondage photos and a study of naked boys. Forensic experts with experience in the Secret Service found the fingerprints of boys alongside Jackson&#8217;s on the same pages. Jackson also had bondage sculptures of women with ball gags in their mouths on his desk, in full view of the boys who slept there."

https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywoo...-the-michael-jackson-sexual-abuse-allegations


Where's the evidence for this? Have I missed something? Particularly the sculptures?


I just called out someone online for saying this, I did not know a new article was stating this.. They really never let up
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

I looked after these good documentarys I didn't know on youtube but couldn't find it:

Hard Copy/ The Jackson Scam (1995)
US /Doc/ Michael Jackson 60 minutes/ (2003)
US/Doc/ Michael Jackson The life of an icon (2011)
US/Doc/ Michael Jackson The Untold Story of Neverland (2011).********[MUST SEE !!!!!!!]

Only in maaany parts:
UK/US/Doc/ Michael Jackson The One and Only (2006)

Sad that
US/Doc/ Michael Jackson Bad 25 Film (2012)
US/Sony/ Motown to Off the wall (2014)
Is not free watchable[/QUOTE]

Estate should go ahead and run these two Spike docs on Sunday and Monday as well. You can't get them for free and many of us don't have them. It would be a nice thank you for all the 'fighting' that has been done so far.
 
SIDEWALKS;4244657 said:
"6. Jackson had an extensive collection of adult erotic material he kept in a suitcase next to his bed, including S&M bondage photos and a study of naked boys. Forensic experts with experience in the Secret Service found the fingerprints of boys alongside Jackson’s on the same pages. Jackson also had bondage sculptures of women with ball gags in their mouths on his desk, in full view of the boys who slept there."

https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywoo...-the-michael-jackson-sexual-abuse-allegations


Where's the evidence for this? Have I missed something? Particularly the sculptures?


The sculptires were in mjs office. They were small wooden african figures that you buy off street sellers. It was laughed at in court when sneddon tried to imply the were pornographic. Just his racism more like



Below is info from respects and pg13's posts.big thanks to them

themichaeljacksonallegations.com/2016/12/27/has-child-pornography-ever-been-found-in-michael-jacksons-possession/#books

The books mentioned above are the ones below. The article tries to imply they were found with the porn mags which is false.the article also tries to imply arvizos prints were on them aswell. The only ones his prints were found on (adult porn mag) were from a suitcase. Both prints were found on the mags. Obvioisly mjs cause they were his. Its impossible to date them yet of course the implication is that they were put there at the same time. You have to laugh at the title of the V.F article and then how they try to twist the facts to make it sound a certain way

the "The Boy - A Photographic Essay" book is the one with an inscription from a fan called Rhonda and dated 1983.

It's basically during the filming of The Lord Of The Flies.

The other one you're referring to is "Boys Will Be Boys" which had this inscription:

"Look at the true spirit of happiness and joy in these boys' faces, this is the spirit of boyhood, a life I've never had and will always dream of. This is the life I want for my children."


they were NOT found with his porn.

It was in a file cabinet.

the detective who confiscated them in 1993 said they called in the maid from home and she brought the keys. She named Blanca Francia , which doesn't make any sense since she didn't work for MJ since 1991. I wonder if he mistook her for Adrian McManus. Or if it was indeed Francia then something shady was going on with that. Why would an ex-maid who hasn't worked for him for 2 years have the keys to this?

Anyway, to me the fact that a maid had the keys to that file cabinet further points to no nefarious intentions on MJ's part. If it was something he intended to hide he would have kept the keys with himself or hide it somewhere. Not give it to his staff.


The pornographic magazines and DVDs

The pornographic magazines, posters from pornographic magazines and DVDs found in Michael Jackson’s possession were all heterosexual (or the kind of lesbian themed which are also targeted to heterosexual men) and all legal.

The list of items seized:

Photo of female image
Photo of female image
Photo of female image
Photo of female image
Photo of female image
Hustler centerfold, 10 August 1992
Playboy centerfold, Miss October
Playboy centerfold, Miss November
Playboy centerfold, 16 Miss March
Hustler centerfold, June 1993
Playboy centerfold, unknown date
Penthouse Page No. 153-154
Centerfold, Miss May
Penthouse, Page 8
Penthouse centerfold
Playboy centerfold
Penthouse centerfold
Penthouse, August 1991
Penthouse centerfold
Club International centerfold
Penthouse, double page 6/211
Penthouse centerfold
Penthouse, May 1992
Hustler, Centerfold Special Holiday Honey 1991
Penthouse centerfold
Penthouse centerfold
Penthouse, November 1991
Playboy Magazine, Centerfold Miss November
Playboy Magazine, Centerfold Miss February
Playboy Magazine, Centerfold Miss December
Al Golstein’s 100 Best Adult Videos Advertisement
Playboy Magazine, Centerfold
Hustler Magazine Cover, May 1992
Page from Unknown Magazine
Stiff Dick for Lynn Magazine (In Notebook)
Barely Legal Magazine
Just Legal Magazine, (Premier Issue) (In Notebook)
Finally Legal Magazine (In Notebook)
Playboy Magazine, February 1993 (In Notebook)
Hustler Magazine, Barely Legal (In Notebook)
Playboy Magazine, December 1994 (In Notebook)
Playboy Magazine, May 1994 (In Notebook)
Hustler Magazine, Barely Legal (In Notebook)
Penthouse Magazine (In Notebook)
Visions of Fantasy Magazine, A Hard Rock Affair (In Notebook)
Visions of Fantasy Magazine, Sam Jose’s Black Starlett (In Notebook)
Double Dicking Caroline Magazine (In Notebook)
Big Tits and a Hard Stud Magazine
Hustler Magazine
Celebrity Skin Magazine (In Notebook)
Oui, March 1998 in binder
Over 50, Volume 5, #9, 1996 in binder
XX rated, April 1995
Close Up, April 1995 in binder
Just 18, Volume 4, Issue No. 10
Plumpers centerfold
Hustler, August 1992
Hustler, April 1998
(No cover) in binder
Penthouse, March 1992 in binder
Juggs, June 1996 in binder
44 Plus, June 1996 in binder
Plumpers, May 1996 in binder
Club International, March 1998 in binder
Live Young Girls, September in binder
Finally Legal, July 2003 in notebook
Finally Legal Freshman Class
Orgy, August 2002 in binder
Purely 18, October 2002 in binder
Purely 18, December 2002 in binder
Tight, November 2002 in binder
Hawk, November 2002 in binder
Hawk, January 2003 in binder
Live Young Girls, June 2003 in binder
Girlfriends in binder
Live Young Girls in binder
Parade
Finally Legal, February 2003 in binder
Girls of Barely Legal in binder
Hawk, February 2003 in binder
Girlfriends, Special Editions in binder
White binder containing The Girls of Penthouse, August 19 2003 in binder
White binder containing Barely Legal, July 200 21 in binder
Gallery 5/2002
Binder containing Playboy
Couples Volume 2, Issue 2
White binder containing Barely Legal, Anniversary 2002
White binder containing Naughty Neighbors, December
Hustler Barely Legal [31]

DVDs:

Pimps Up, Hos Down (1998 documentary)
Fresh Picked Pink
Dirty Teens Come Clean
Hot! Wet! Tight! Pink!
**** Me, I’m Legal
Michael Ryan’s Believe It Or Not
Sloppy Dogs Presents: **** Me, I’m a Bad Girl
Adult World #2

TWO ARTICLES:

Page 28 from “G-Spot”
“The Second Female G-Spot” Article (In Notebook) (see: The Second Female G-spot)

The prosecution never claimed this material to be illegal, in fact, they admitted that all of this was legal, commercially produced material and none depicted illegal activities such as child porn. They claimed, however, that Jackson used these to “groom” children for sexual abuse as the 2003 accuser Gavin Arvizo and his brother Star Arvizo alleged that Jackson showed them such material. We address this claim extensively while we discuss the Arvizo allegations in this article (particularly the chapter “What about the pornographic magazines?”), so here we only note that this is a totally unproven theory, a claim that originates from accusers with serious credibility issues (for more details about the Arvizos’ allegations see The 2005 Allegations section of our website).

Most of these adult magazines were found in Michael Jackson’s nightstand, in a box at the base of his bed and in a briefcase in a closet of his bedroom suite. Some others were found in a cabinet in his office bathroom and in the master bathroom inside his bedroom suite. Jackson’s fingerprints were found on them, and his attorney Thomas Mesereau in his opening statement admitted that they were Jackson’s magazines:

“The prosecutor told you that there were girlie-type magazines and sexually explicit material in Mr. Jackson’s home, and there were. Mr. Jackson will freely admit that he does read girlie magazines from time to time. And what he does is he sends someone to the local market, and they pick up Playboy and they pick up Hustler, and he has read them from time to time. He absolutely denies showing them to children.” [32]

The prosecution spent days displaying the magazines that they had confiscated from Jackson’s bedroom on a big screen [33]. Observers wondered what point they were trying to make with the detailed, graphic presentation of this completely legal collection that only pointed to Jackson’s sexual interest in women, especially that several of the presented magazines had publishing dates after the accuser has long left Neverland. Many felt that by this presentation the prosecution was just trying to publicly humiliate Jackson and prejudice a presumably conservative Santa Barbara jury against him in the absence of real, relevant evidence.

The Internet pornography

In the 2003 search police also confiscated sixteen computers from Neverland, including three computers (which contained four hard drives in total) from Jackson’s bedroom, and sent them to the FBI for a forensic examination of their hard drives. None of the computers contained any illegal material or had any traces of access to illegal material on the Internet, including no attempts to find such material [34]. Once again, according to court transcripts and court motions, only legal adult heterosexual pornography and images of nude women were found cached in his hard drives from 1998 through 2003 and as Jackson’s lawyer pointed out in his closing statement at the 2005 trial: “No illegal child pornography, either in a website or anywhere else. No websites where you try to meet children, like pedophiles often do, and the rest [35].”

Not even the prosecution could claim that any of this material was illegal, but they argued that they wanted to introduce them to show that Jackson knew how to use a computer (something he never denied). Judge Rodney Melville, however, ruled that this material was irrelevant and did not allow the prosecution to refer to this evidence in court [36].




The Arvizo kids claimed that Jackson showed them pornographic magazines from a briefcase on two occasions: first in the downstairs area of his bedroom then on the second occasion upstairs. However, when they were asked to describe the details of the alleged situations in their testimonies the brothers contradicted each other on several points again:

Gavin claimed the first occasion happened on the same day they got back from Miami (February 7) and the second occasion about one-two weeks after they came back from the Calabasas hotel. They came back from the Calabasas hotel on March 2 and they left Neverland for good on March 12, so this would put the date of the second occasion according to Gavin’s account around March 9-12, the very last days of their stay at Neverland. Star never mentioned anything about Jackson allegedly showing them adult materal on the same day they came back from Miami on February 7. On contrary to his brother’s claims Star’s claim was that the first time Jackson showed them such material was “after the Calabasas hotel” which would be after March 2 and the second occasion was “a few days later”. When the prosecution asked Star Arvizo “Do you recall how many — how much time elapsed between the first time you saw the materials downstairs till the time you saw them upstairs” the boy answered “A few days”[6] Please notice that according to Gavin’s account, however, more than a month elapsed between the first occasion (February 7) and the second occasion (March 9-12).
About the first occasion Gavin claimed that Jackson told them the briefcase that contained the material was Frank Cascio’s and he made fun of Cascio while showing them the magazines. Star claimed Jackson did not make any comments while showing them the material. About the second occasion Gavin claimed they went through almost the full content of the briefcase (“we saw, like, practically everything”[2]) and the whole thing lasted about 30 minutes to one hour. Star claimed they saw only about three or four magazines.
About the first occasion Star first claimed the briefcase was open when they first saw it, then later in his testimony he claimed it was closed.

The prosecution claimed that the fact that Gavin’s and Star’s fingerprints were found on some of the magazines that were found proves their claim that Jackson showed them these magazines. However, there are several problems with that conclusion. One is that, like we showed above, the boys went to Jackson’s room when the singer was not there, so they were perfectly able to rummage through his stuff, find and touch those magazines on their own. In actuality, that would be consistent with their behaviour around other people as well, as Jackson’s lawyer Thomas Mesereau pointed out in his closing argument based on various testimonies that were heard at the trial:

"And the only forensic evidence they had to hang their hat on are fingerprints on some girlie magazines that were owned by Michael Jackson. And you know that everywhere the Arvizo children went, they would rummage through drawers, rummage through the house. They did it at the dentist’s office. They did it in Vernee Watson Johnson’s home. This is the way they behave." [12]

(By the way, the only stash of adult magazines where the Arvizo boys’ fingerprints were found were the magazines in a briefcase. Their fingerprints were not found on the adult magazines that were found in Jackson’s nightstand or in a box at the base of his bed or anywhere else. It seems they only ever came into contact with the briefcase stash.)

It was also shown during the trial that the Arvizo boys weren’t at all as naïve and innocent about pornography as the prosecution tried to portray them. A Neverland employee Julio Avila testified on May 24, 2005 that he once caught Star Arvizo walking around with an adult magazine and when he asked him where he got it from he told him he took it from home. [13] Another Neverland employee Maria Gomez testified on May 16, 2005 that she saw adult magazines in Star Arvizo’s backpack while she was once cleaning the guest unit where they were staying. [14] A general description of the Arvizo boys’ overall behaviour and how it differed from the prosecution’s portrayal of them will be discussed in detail in the next chapter.

In his opening statement Jackson’s attorney Mesereau stated that rather than showing the magazines to the boys Jackson actually caught them once with them and took them away from them.

"The prosecutor told you that there were girlie-type magazines and sexually explicit material in Mr. Jackson’s home, and there were. Mr. Jackson will freely admit that he does read girlie magazines from time to time. And what he does is he sends someone to the local market, and they pick up Playboy and they pick up Hustler, and he has read them from time to time. He absolutely denies showing them to children. And, in fact, the magazines the prosecutor referred to were in a locked briefcase. And Mr. Jackson will tell you he found those kids going through his magazines, and grabbed them from him and locked them in his briefcase." [15]

Gavin’s story regarding the magazines indeed makes a very odd “grooming” story. Remember that the prosecution’s theory was that Jackson showed the Arvizo boys the magazines to groom them – ie. to lower their inhibitions and/or arouse them before sexually molesting them, because that is what pedophiles typically use pornographic magazines for. However, Gavin’s magazine scene looked like this in his testimony at the trial.

Now, when you first saw the suitcase, where was it in that room.

It was next to — it was to the left of that couch thing.

And did you ever see Mr. Jackson pick up the Exhibit 470.

Yeah, like I was hanging out with him in there, and he was like putting on his makeup or something, I don’t know. And then he — he grabbed the — grabbed the suitcase, and then he told me — he told me it was Frank’s. And he showed me, he was like, “This is” —

Okay. Well, what did he show you.

He was, like, “Look at the” — “Look at this stuff. Frank’s stinking a-s-s.” Frank’s stinking — it was S- — Frank’s stinking ass.

All right. What was inside the suitcase.

Adult materials.

And how many did you look at with Mr. Jackson.

Well, he showed me just one — like he showed me, and there was this girl in there and then he put it away.

And how was the girl.

She had her legs spread open, and her vagina was, like, showing.

All right. Did you ever see that suitcase again.

Yes.

Where.

We had it — like, we had it up in his — near his bed, and then we were looking at all the stuff.

Who was “we”.

Me, my brother and Michael.

And do you recall, where in the bedroom was the suitcase when you first saw it that time.

The first time I saw it, it was in the rest room kind of thing. And then the second time we — I don’t know if we brought it up there or, like, Michael brought it up there or something. I don’t know. But it was up next to his bed. And we were all going through the thing and we were making fun of Frank.

Did you look at the magazines.

Yes.

How many magazines do you think you saw.

We saw, like, practically everything, but there was a few we didn’t look at.

How much time do you figure you were looking at all those things.

30 minutes to an hour, probably.

Did Mr. Jackson make any comments during the time — other than the ones you’ve talked about, any other comments that he made at any of the photographs or the magazines.

Not really. We just were, like, making fun of Frank. [2]

These alleged scenes do not make much sense as attempts at arousing the Arvizo boys in order to molest them since, according to their own story, they were not immediately followed by molestation or any sexual act. According to the Arvizo’s story the alleged molestation of Gavin happened on totally different occasions and with no pornography being shown to him. As for lowering inhibitions, according to Gavin’s story Jackson tried to distance himself from this material claiming they were Frank’s (ie. Frank Cascio’s) and he supposedly made fun of Frank for it using such words as “stinking”. It would be a strange way to tell a child having such material is cool. However, Jackson distancing himself from the material would make a lot more sense if the Defense’s version is the true version of the story – ie. that instead of showing the boys these magazines Jackson actually took them away from them and was telling them that it was wrong to look at them.

A story by music producer Mark Ronson as told in 2008, confirms that Jackson was not at all OK with children looking at adult material, let alone encouraging them to do so.

"Producer Mark Ronson once tried to make his childhood pal Michael Jackson watch porn – but the pop superstar hated the experience and wasn’t amused.

Ronson, whose father Laurence was a band manager, used to spend his time in the company of John Lennon’s son Sean and Jackson as they were growing up.

The trio would frequently have sleepovers – but when Ronson and Lennon used to switch over the TV to the pornography channel, Jackson was left cringing with embarrassment.

He recalls, “It’s a weird story, but I didn’t touch him. We (Ronson and Lennon) used to watch the porn channel because we were like 10 and, ‘Oh my God, tits!’ So Michael was in bed. And me and Sean said, ‘Michael do you want to see something cool?’

“We turned the dial to the porn channel and there were strippers shaking their tits around. We were like, ‘Michael, Michael, how cool is this?’ We turned around and he was cringing, saying, ‘Ooh stop it, stop it, ooh it’s so silly.’ We were like, ‘Michael, you have to look, maybe you’re not seeing it right, it’s naked girls!’

“He was not down with the programme whatsoever! I think he had really strong feminist views on porn.”

Ronson’s comments were made during the taping of British gameshow the Sunday Night Project, which is due to air in the U.K. on Sunday (22Jun08).[15]"

It should be noted that before the Arvizo children went into Jackson’s room and found his adult magazines not any earlier accuser claimed that Jackson showed them such material in order to groom them or for any other reason. Pornography claims were simply not a part of either Jordan Chandler’s or Jason Francia’s allegations. All pornography claims only became a part of these stories (whether by later accusers Wade Robson and James Safechuck* or the media) after it became publicly known during the Arvizo process that Jackson had such material at all and the prosecution had the very much publicly stated theory that Jackson used it for abuse
 
Last edited:
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

I've been doing some thinking on how the majority of reviews are so positive and how they all seem very sure Michael was guilty. So apparently they cover the fact that these two guys have defending Michael for years on end, right? And they have a "expert" saying it's all very normal behavior, trying to reassure the viewer that this is the real deal, real victims. It's pretty clear Reed made sure to cover all bases in that regard. I doubt they admit that Wade didn't even know it was abuse even when he was in his twenties, but if they do, should be interesting to see what their excuse is. I'm sure we'll hear about that soon.

I can definitely believe that Reed made all of this as credible and believeable as possible. After all he has already made a pedophilia doc in the past. So all these reviewers see that for the first time in a "documentary" and they just believe it, didn't bother to do any research afterwards. Again, I'm glad we as the fans did our job and we can only hope that the viewers of this trash keep all the cold hard facts about these two in mind when they see all this.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

** I just saw a new interview with Dan Reed with E! and he's dogging MJ fans pretty damn bad...

and people wonder why we take it personal.
 
Re: Sundance Festival 2019 - Controversial MJ Documentary "Leaving Neverland"

People gotta stop with this BS.
What does being a fan have to do with being realistic. I've been a fan for 30+ years. First concert I saw was the Bad tour when I was twelve. Walls literally plastered with posters (most of them I actually still have). Went to History Tour and had tickets for TII. Stood at his hotel during Dangerous. Drove up to the Gates of Neverland twice and visited his gravesite twice. Yeah. I'm no fan :D

Does being a fan mean you can never doubt anything? In this case I don't think Reed and Wade are the most trustworthy people. Safechuck maybe, haven't seen the doc.

2005 article about Wade and Barnes:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/06/AR2005050601708.html??noredirect=on

Ok, I now realize I may have worded this very poorly.

It was never my intent to call anyone into question based on whether or not they are a "real" fan. When I meant was that most people I have encountered in my life personally who have tried to perpetuate negativity towards MJ had never liked him in the first place and always had a negative bias against him, and when the media or other public figures try to push tabloidy garbage like this it gives these types of people a sense of validation and they start riding the wave pushing their negative agenda even further. I have literally had people in my life who were so resentful or bitter of my fandom of a particular person or celebrity that they would literally go out of their way to look up negative "facts" about them in order to get me to stop talking about them, or "convert" me into a hater.

I fully believe MJ's innocence 100%, and I still would whether or not I was a lifelong fan of his based on the facts I know. It is not wrong for anyone on this forum to have doubts about anything and I never meant to imply that it was. My only intention was to show support for MJ during this bleak time for his legacy.
 
Back
Top