Snow White luvs Peter Pan
Proud Member
Prince and Paris had no idea Deborah was related to them biologically on June 2009, they realized later.
a marriage is a marriage! (the thoughts/reason's behind it does not make it real or unreal)
They are in court documents. Ivy summarized it about a week or two ago on another forum for another discussion, so I will quote her post here:
okay
okay please do not take offense to this question because it's not my intention to offend you. If this is how you feel. then why are you even asking if their marriage was real or not?
Thanks for the quotes
Although I am not the type to believe what has been written on a forum ...I do try to see it both ways really!
Michael earned 11 million dollars a year that time...so I think it ain't that much ..he spends 250.000 dollars in a few minutes buying antiques in Beverly
I don't think the money was a problem for Michael
Other artists pays hundreds of millions to get rid of their wifes/husbands
Prince and Paris had no idea Deborah was related to them biologically on June 2009, they realized later.
You can refuse to believe it but they remain facts nevertheless.
The point is not if it was a problem for MJ or not to pay out that sum. The point is that he paid money to Debbie Rowe for the kids, so they were not "gifts" and they were not given "out of love". It was a business arrangement. And maybe that money was not much for MJ, but certainly much for someone like Debbie Rowe who worked as a nurse at the time and could stop working after she was paid out handsomely by MJ.
okay then let me put it this way. It was a real marriage on paper, the legal sense like respect77 said on the previous page.I'ts not my intention to offend others too.
I asked because you said that marriage wasn't a real one
@purdyyoungthang your posts in response to joyce's post pretty much said it all. you laid the whole truth and facts out there, BRAVO.
I want to believe ..its not that I refuse but these are not the real documents ..its like reading an book we never know if it's really true or not.
I wouldn't give up my kids for 100 million each! and I need to work too.
Because everyone knew Debbie is the Mother of P&P I don't think Michael would have liked it to divorce her and leave her with nothing ...what would the media have said about that? Maybe he wanted to gave her a good life...after all she is the mother of his children.
I do not know Ivy as someone who just makes up such things. And it's pretty much a known fact anyway that Debbie Rowe was paid for those kids. It was discussed in courts.
Michael did not want her to raise them. He put even Diana Ross above the kids' biological mother in his will. That should tell you something.
And he was so keen on giving her a good life that Debbie Rowe sued him and threatened a custody battle because he stopped paying... That looks nothing like a gift out of love.
And she so loves Michael even now that she pimps his children out to TMZ and other tabloids and teams up with a person who said so horrible things about Michael.
Debbie Rowe is just one of the many opportunists in Michael's life.
Anyone remember what this thread was about originally?
I do not know Ivy as someone who just makes up such things. And it's pretty much a known fact anyway that Debbie Rowe was paid for those kids. It was discussed in courts.
Michael did not want her to raise them. He put even Diana Ross above the kids' biological mother in his will. That should tell you something.
And he was so keen on giving her a good life that Debbie Rowe sued him and threatened a custody battle because he stopped paying... That looks nothing like a gift out of love.
And she so loves Michael even now that she pimps his children out to TMZ and other tabloids and teams up with a person who said so horrible things about Michael.
Debbie Rowe is just one of the many opportunists in Michael's life.
And the ikyness continues.....
Tomorrow the newly engaged Miss Rowe will be on Entertainment Tonight tomorrow to discuss her recent engagement, (the vulture was right by her side) as well as the latest on Paris.
Man, you all don't even know how disgusted I am with this woman and ET had the nerve to present this as 'A Jackson Wedding Exclusive!'
And the ikyness continues.....
Tomorrow the newly engaged Miss Rowe will be on Entertainment Tonight tomorrow to discuss her recent engagement, (the vulture was right by her side) as well as the latest on Paris.
Man, you all don't even know how disgusted I am with this woman and ET had the nerve to present this as 'A Jackson Wedding Exclusive!'
And the ikyness continues.....
Tomorrow the newly engaged Miss Rowe will be on Entertainment Tonight tomorrow to discuss her recent engagement, (the vulture was right by her side) as well as the latest on Paris.
Man, you all don't even know how disgusted I am with this woman and ET had the nerve to present this as 'A Jackson Wedding Exclusive!'
Hope Debbie doesn't mention Paris in her next interview. She has to realize Paris might feel used. If she wants to promo her engagement or that singer guy she should do it on their own merits but not bring Paris into that.
And as sad as it is, sometimes I think it's better for the kids to know who really care for them and love them for who they are and not for what people can get from them. They are so young, they should be living their wonderful teenage years with the assurance that their loved but I think it's better they know now than later. I believe it will be worst if they maintain a relationship with someone thinking they're being loved to only learn, years from now, that they were used. It's a very sad situation.
Aquarius;3988723 said:Hope Debbie doesn't mention Paris in her next interview. She has to realize Paris might feel used. If she wants to promo her engagement or that singer guy she should do it on their own merits but not bring Paris into that.