Oh i see. It's just a different perspective that allows you to see that being raped as a child by an adult male is not cool and just might cause problems. It's such a load of baloney, i can't see anyone outside the child abuse industry swallowing it. All the historic child sex abuse cases that we're having in the uk, all the victims didn't come forward for decades because they were victimised by big powerful celebs/public figures and they didn't think they'd be believed, not one has come up with the idea that they didn't quite twig that they were being abused for all those years. It's just so different with mj, he was investigated to within an inch of his life and all his child friends were automatically assumed by the justice auths and the media to be his victims - there were just no barriers whatsoever to their coming forward in mj's lifetime, in fact they were actively encouraged. It is just grotesquely unfair and against natural justice to come forward now when mj is dead and can't defend himself when he spent the last 17 yrs of his life facing an overwhelming witch hunt against him.
Well ddimond got that wrong. 3 of the so called 'victims' never made claims of abuse yet they were still put forward to the jury as past victims. The judge didn't allow safechuck because i guess there wasn't even a halfway reliable 3rd party witness to any abuse.
Thanks, yes sneddon overstepped once again with his accusations in those motions.
