TheChosenOne
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 2,629
- Points
- 63
I think that not everything is about Michael.
If that is the case then she should have done it a long time ago and when he was still here. It would have helped him more I think.
Oh I fully agree....maybe she is tryng to justify and ease her own conscience...for not being there in the past....I dont know when it comes to these Jackson's....:no:If that is the case then she should have done it a long time ago and when he was still here. It would have helped him more I think.
I think so too, but basic human decency should prevail here. Why wait until the guy is almost ready to meet his maker, since I have heard her say before that he was only old school. The Jacksons have too much of their personal business outside. Now people will label their family as dysfunctional--although we knew this already, but why give people ammunition to stigmatize you and your kin?
Please don't ruin this thread with your negativity, we know you hate Janet, why you even bother watching is beyond me but trying to find anything to critizie about her is pathetic. Janet could bring flower's to Michael's resting spot like she did last year and you'd dismiss the flowers she brought and criticise her for not crying for the camera's claiming she has no love for Michael :smilerolleyes:I didn't get that at all... I saw no love from her at all..
Please don't ruin this thread with your negativity, we know you hate Janet, why you even bother watching is beyond me but trying to find anything to critizie about her is pathetic. Janet could bring flower's to Michael's resting spot like she did last year and you'd dismiss the flowers she brought and criticise her for not crying for the camera's calaiming she has no love for Michael :smilerolleyes:
You've let your emotions cloud your judgement. Whatever vendetta you have against janet is something you need to solve on your own because your post have become redundant.
She did talk about her most famous brother, Michael Jackson, calling him "very sweet, very gentle, incredibly smart, always about love."
"He knew who he was," she said.
WOW SHE ACTUALLY SAID SOMETHING NICE.. I wonder why the change? she hasn't said anything nice about him since his death
she probably has one of her "peoples" reading MJ fan sites...
Janet is one of those family members who showed their true colors when MJ passed..
she better recognize...her brother has an army of fans that care about his image and legacy and see thru all the :bs
inviting ABC into your home to so you can call your brother a "drug addict" is NOT cool... it is not how you treat some one who is "very sweet, very gentle, incredibly smart, always about love."
I enjoyed this interview. It's the first time I actually kind of liked Piers' interviewing style since he took over for Larry King. I think Janet liked him and felt relatively comfortable with him (crucial for the person giving the interview). And he asked her some unusual questions that made Janet stray ever so slightly away from her "script".
Also, what is this interview Piers had with Michael? When did it take place? Was it taped or was it for a magazine? I would like to see or read it.
It was a 1999 phone interview with the Daily Mirror
~Credit goes to JohnC for the download link~
Daily Mirror (1999)
http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?g0t5vt2kt341igp
Here is a Mp3 Audio of it
I enjoyed this interview. It's the first time I actually kind of liked Piers' interviewing style since he took over for Larry King. I think Janet liked him and felt relatively comfortable with him (crucial for the person giving the interview). And he asked her some unusual questions that made Janet stray ever so slightly away from her "script".
Also, what is this interview Piers had with Michael? When did it take place? Was it taped or was it for a magazine? I would like to see or read it.
take this for what it is worth guys..I am NO psychologist....but I just had a thought...maybe Janet dicided to write about her relatiosnip with Joe because who knows..maybe somwhere in her mind she may think that if SHE puts her own personal pain out there from Joe..maybe she thinks that she is helping Michael....Maybe she thinks that if she says how bad Joe treated her.....people would take Michael more seriously as to the way Joe treated hm. IDK.....orcould be just what we have been saying all along...he is just using Michael's name to sell her book
seriously?
it came out yesterdaydid her book come out already? how are the sales?
I am not famous and I am not Michael Jackson's sister.. anyway I don't think Janet had or currently has his back.
I doubt she really cares about what his fans think
Strangely, this seems to be true. Through the years, you never got the impression that she cares all that much if we have problems with what she says or not. Personally, I don't get this type of thinking because who shoos away support from those who would be most open to supporting you too?
But anyway, i'm glad to see this interview went well and wasn't at all disrespectful to MJ.
Janet is exactly like Rabbie Shamuly ...when they want to promote a new book.... Michael is a kind angel BUT if the interviwe is not a bout promoting a book then Michael is a crazy drug addict !
business....it is all about business Janet !
if the nteview is with Oprah then MJ is bad if with the CNN then MJ good !
MOM Kathey did the same , the interview with Oprah MJ addict ,if the Interview with Geraldo then MJ was fine....Business !
speaking of Liza..... am still wondering what she ment when she said.."the shit is gonna hit the fan now"....when she was on that interview after Michael passed. Sorry didn't mean ti hijack this thread....I am just still curious about that .
Why does a person who is a drug addict or has any sort of problems with drugs have to be crazy? some of you judge people too much. Of course the interviews are different depending on who interviews you and what you have the interview for. The other interviews had segments sepecifically for discussing how janet felt about her brother's death, we have heard what she has to say and there is no use bringing up the touchy subject in every interview. Now janet has a book which has nothing to do with how Michael passed so why would she need to talk about the probalem's she felt her brother had, this book is about Janet's problems and how she has delt with them.Janet is exactly like Rabbie Shamuly ...when they want to promote a new book.... Michael is a kind angel BUT if the interviwe is not a bout promoting a book then Michael is a crazy drug addict !
business....it is all about business Janet !
if the nteview is with Oprah then MJ is bad if with the CNN then MJ good !
MOM Kathey did the same , the interview with Oprah MJ addict ,if the Interview with Geraldo then MJ was fine....Business !