Katherine Jackson documentary called "Remembering Michael"/ fans asked to help with funding

[ivy]

Re: Katherine Jackson documentary called "Remembering Michael"/ fans asked to help with funding

No you are not, and if she isn't supposed to be behind this scam, why PPB was interviewed without her permission or her being there, or does she rent kids by hour to anyone who needs kids to support their money crapping ideas?

KJ's camp is gone quiet. I think there are lots of things going on behind the scenes such as how to restore KJ image as "loving" gran-mother and "grieving" mother, and how others are making KJ to do things:doh:

Let's be brutally honest here, shall we.

Suddenly news breaks and there's a video , a funding page that asks for $3.2 Million for Katherine Jackson documentary. Even if people love and support Katherine 100%, this is something that doesn't necessarily sit well with the fans for many reasons. Such as even simply asking fans for financial support and the money being asked to pay for MJ Estate. Fans also suspected that Howard Mann could be involved in it simply based on the fact that he had a contract with Katherine for a documentary. Mann's past (porn, infringing MJ's copyrights, connection to Vaccaro and so on) casts a shadow on this documentary.

Combined all together no one - not even 100% supporters of Katherine - can support this documentary so suddenly the mood turns defensive. Try to deflect it to Howard Mann and Howard Mann only. It is claimed that Katherine doesn't know, isn't aware of money being asked and it's all Howard Mann and so on. It's all to deflect all the anger and unhappiness on Howard Mann and to spare Katherine in the process.

Now from Sonia Lowe's tweets/ Linkedin we know she and Howard Mann is involved in this documentary but there's nothing to suggest that Katherine is a unwilling participant. Let's go over what we know : She signed a contract with Howard Mann, she supported him when Estate sued him, Mann was still around late 2012 having access to AEG emails. So as far as we know she is still partners with Mann and made no effort to get out of the contract.

Joe Jackson's publicist emailed me saying this is exclusively Katherine and MJ's kids project. Apparently she also contacted to a Hoax Website (don't ask me why) saying the same thing. William Wagener saying that a person closed to Katherine contacted to him saying this is her project and the video - the one she's wearing a blue dress and asking fans for help- was just recorded last week (2 days before the release of the project). I emailed Katherine's lawyers Sanders and Ribera asking to verify this project so no one gets scammed. I know other fans emailing and calling them as well. They don't respond or return calls. So when combined people close to Joe confirm this is Katherine's project and Katherine's lawyers aren't saying "no this is a scam". Silence can also speak volumes. So however you look to it, this is an official project supported and endorsed by Katherine.

edited to add: Also let's not forget the picture of Katherine in blue dress posing with the CEO of Fundanything. It's apparent that she posed for that picture when she was recording her fund request video. It also proves that she met and knew that there would be a funding project.

So from my perspective, this is a Katherine Jackson project and she's a willing participant. Yes Mann / Lowe is involved as well but I don't personally think this is Mann and Lowe alone. To believe that there needs to be an official announcement by Katherine. No disrespect to fans but their assumptions do not count as facts to me, I need verifiable receipts.

 

[Bubs]

Re: Katherine Jackson documentary called "Remembering Michael"/ fans asked to help with funding

I'm 99.9% sure KJ is behind this but now need to back-track as this scam blew on her face.
They have gone to damage control mode and that is the reason they are quiet.

I personally don't think the money they were asking was for license the music but get money for Howard Mann so he could pay to the estate the 3 million he owns from his previous scam.

 

[krikzil]

Krizkil, you may believe it is acceptable for Gest and Cascio to profit from their memories (including omissions and/or embellishments) of Michael and not for Mann to through Michael’s beneficiaries. I believe that is a contradiction.

Hmm...didn't offer an opinion on Gest's documentary or Cascio's book because they have nada to do with the discussion at hand. (It is always fascinating though, how you routinely deflect with tangents like this.) At any rate, your attempt to conflate them with Mann falls flat. They weren't releasing projects which violated Estate copyrights, or doing it yet again despite being successfully sued by the Estate. They didn't enter a shady business deal with Katherine Jackson or directly exploit Mike's kids through her. Neither Cascio or Gest concocted a scheme to defraud fans to the tune of $3.2 million or aided such a scheme like KJ is doing here.

I have no problem if Mann wants to distribute this film. My issue is with the funding for licensing fees.

So yes, your contradiction remains: Mann profits from both, the only difference is in scale. Heck, he takes 75% to KJ's 25% of the film so I find it curious you support it based on those grounds alone.

Katherine is not a producer for this film so she will not see any monies from this funding; Mann/Lowe will if they do not give $3.2M in full to the executors. Ivy has already explained Katherine will see 25% of profits. Profits should not be confused with funding. Katherine will not receive any monies from this funding no matter how many times that is erroneously suggested and repeated.

The bold actually made me grin. But anywho....just as I'm not confused on the book profits vs the funding, I'm not naive enough to think KJ won't reap a portion of the money raised given she's schilling for it and is in business with this Mann creature. Erroneous? Nah. Past behavior is always a good indicator for present and future behavior.

You also cannot guarantee that if those funds are realized that the executors will not accept the licensing fee. Michael’s estate is still in debt, in case you forgot so, they may not be in the position to reject that sum and their statement did not suggest they would reject that sum.

The Estate isn't going to license a thing to a project connected to Mann, someone they had to sue in the past. They aren't going to put a seal of approval on something so amateurish either. As for their Statement, seemed pretty clear on how they view this project from where I sit. The quick buck schemes may be how the Jacksons roll, but Branca has better options.

 

[LastTear]

Re: Katherine Jackson documentary called "Remembering Michael"/ fans asked to help with funding

That's from a fan who defends the Jackson family no matter what the cost and doesn't get/represses that Katherine Jackson is very much involved in this project as is Howard Mann.
I found it kinda funny that most of the Jackson family admirers - the usual suspects - have not tweeted anything about that project since we've learnt about it. That always happens when they are unsure whether to love or hate something depending on what the Jacksons say.

I am stunned that fans could be so desperate to show Katherine in a nothing less than perfect light that they would impersonate Prince in order to LIE and deceive to the whole fan community.

If you love and adore someone you should do so and include their possible flaws and all.

 

[Annita]

Re: Katherine Jackson documentary called "Remembering Michael"/ fans asked to help with funding

It seems Sonja Lowes twitter doesn`t exist any longer.

https://twitter.com/SoLowe

 

[passy001]

Re: Katherine Jackson documentary called "Remembering Michael"/ fans asked to help with funding

It seems Sonja Lowes twitter doesn`t exist any longer.

https://twitter.com/SoLowe

it's too late. the evidence is already out in the wild.

 

[Allusio]

Re: Katherine Jackson documentary called "Remembering Michael"/ fans asked to help with funding

That's from a fan who defends the Jackson family no matter what the cost and doesn't get/represses that Katherine Jackson is very much involved in this project as is Howard Mann.
I found it kinda funny that most of the Jackson family admirers - the usual suspects - have not tweeted anything about that project since we've learnt about it. That always happens when they are unsure whether to love or hate something depending on what the Jacksons say.

Thanks for saying this... I didn't know.

 

[kreen]

Re: Katherine Jackson documentary called "Remembering Michael"/ fans asked to help with funding

Has anybody asked the obvious : if the money if for licencing fees, why is it even needed at all? This is a talking-head documentary : why do they need "Billie Jean" or "Heal the World" playing in the background? It's not like a biopic where obviously if you can't show the main character singing his songs it's pointless. This is a montage of interviews : it doesn't need "Earth Song" playing while Blanket talks about the time he planted a tree with daddy.

 

[LastTear]

Re: Katherine Jackson documentary called "Remembering Michael"/ fans asked to help with funding

^^^^ Questions have been asked - and deleted.

 

[ivy]

Re: Katherine Jackson documentary called "Remembering Michael"/ fans asked to help with funding

Has anybody asked the obvious : if the money if for licencing fees, why is it even needed at all? This is a talking-head documentary : why do they need "Billie Jean" or "Heal the World" playing in the background? It's not like a biopic where obviously if you can't show the main character singing his songs it's pointless. This is a montage of interviews : it doesn't need "Earth Song" playing while Blanket talks about the time he planted a tree with daddy.

They will probably tell the history of Michael from childhood to the stardom - Epic guy, Gladys Knight, Joe's fortune teller story etc all points to that. So they probably want to show the accompanying videos/ music rather than just talking about it. For example when Katherine tells people how Michael wore her sparkly jacket, they might want to show the Billie Jean performance.

 

[SoCav]

Re: Katherine Jackson documentary called "Remembering Michael"/ fans asked to help with funding

^Yep, that's probably it. Even disregarding the whole way they are going about this, does this still really interest anyone? We've heard most of these stories countless of times over the years, in different formats. The only way I'd be interested in hearing the same old stories again is if they'd include and focus on home movies of Michael, not dissimilar to the Private Home Movies special. But I don't think that's going to happen.

 

[Tygger]

Bubs, no clarification post?

Ivy, Mann’s actions towards Michael were unsavory at best yet, some fans believe Mann is not unsavory in his actions towards Michael’s mother and/or Michael’s mothers actions are not unsavory towards Mann which is interesting to me. Gest and Cascio have also had issues with Jackson family members including Michael and yet fans readily purchased their products allowing them to generate profits by using the Jackson name. If you or anyone else wants to compare the actions of Mann, Gest, and Cascio, feel free however, they are all unsavory to me.

I am glad to see my post caused you do more investigation into this issue. You have discovered Katherine is listed as co-producer on the funding site. That does not prove she will see any monies in funding with Mann/Lowe at the helm.

I love it how you write stuff like you were in the room with Katherine or have access to the bank accounts and know everything for a fact. In reality you are only making personal assumptions and then act like they are indisputable fact.

and you know it's nothing more than your belief and opinion. So why do you insist - on every single post I must add- to force people to accept your opinions as a fact?

You are doing the same. The difference is you have consistently and repeatedly stated you viewed my beliefs as fact for whatever your reasons. I do not view others’ beliefs as fact. I view them as what they are: the poster’s views.

When you suggest Mann/Lowe are being unsavory it is your view. When I agree with that view and it seems to you I do not put enough accountability on Katherine, the view weirdly becomes a fact that you feel the need to negate. That is your perception and choice and as I have said previously (and repeatedly), I have no control over how you want to perceive my posts.

Mann was still around late 2012 having access to AEG emails

Yes, Katherine left all AEG emails conveniently in the room I left and you entered to view Mann's retrieval.

Now let us continue with the brutal honesty: with Katherine as a producer, fans with distaste for the Jacksons should be even more inclined to not fund licensing fees that I believe is a scheme. The film itself is NOT a scheme; the licensing fee funding most likely is. The only guaranteed method of Katherine profiting is through the distribution and purchase of this film. If the film has licensing material, it will depend on those who contribute to the licensing fund AND the executors accepting the monies from that fund if it is handed over. Those are two distinct, separate issues being confused as one for whatever purpose.

Force the producers (which includes Katherine) of this film to release it without ANY licensed materials. Then do not purchase the film so no producer will profit. Some fans will still be able to discuss every word of the film which includes memories of Michael’s beneficiaries. Even if some fans have distaste for a quarter of those beneficiaries, they most likely want to hear what that beneficiary will say if only to pan it for sport. Someone will purchased the film (that should not included licensed materials), upload it wherever, and the discussion can begin. Simple indeed.

Krizkil, Gest nor Cascio sought funding publically to utilize any licensed materials. I personally do not remember if they utilized any licensed materials. Again, that is a separate issue. They do, however, have a less than spotless past with Michael. As I stated above, if you feel Gest and Cascio are not unsavory, fine, that is not how I view them. Therefore, if Mann profits from this film which is not a scheme, I again have no problem with it as I had no problem with Gest and Cascio profiting despite not favoring them while others fans did and still do. If that is a contradiction to you, that is fine; it is not for me.

The bold actually made me grin.

She stated it, I repeated it. I can see how you find that humorous.

But anywho....just as I'm not confused on the book profits vs the funding, I'm not naive enough to think KJ won't reap a portion of the money raised given she's schilling for it and is in business with this Mann creature. Erroneous? Nah. Past behavior is always a good indicator for present and future behavior.

Book profits? Regardless, this is interesting! What other scam have fans willing funded that Katherine has profited from?

The Estate isn't going to license a thing to a project connected to Mann, someone they had to sue in the past. They aren't going to put a seal of approval on something so amateurish either. As for their Statement, seemed pretty clear on how they view this project from where I sit. The quick buck schemes may be how the Jacksons roll, but Branca has better options.

Laughs. Show me the sentence that states the debt-ridden estate will not accept the licensing fee of $3.2M. It is your view they will not accept it; the statement states nothing of the sort. I will not even comment on less than professional HQ products being offered.

 

[btp4real]

Re: Katherine Jackson documentary called "Remembering Michael"/ fans asked to help with funding

i would rather give my hard earned cash to something useful in this life......Not the Jacksons lifestyle....mj must be spinning in his grave

 

[sfosteredi]

You are right. KJ has always been into business and knows thing and two about it. She ain't this clueless woman that people are taking advances of her. She herself is willing participator with these money crapping schemes.
This is what she wrote in her book and nothing has changed since then.
"People in the music business know the truth about my relationship with my kids. When a record-company executive or a business associate has a hard time reaching one of the children, he typically attempts to make contact through me. Also, I am frequently asked to approach a specific child with a business proposition. If I think that the proposition has merit, I present it. (However, I am careful not to approach the children too often. I don’t want them to begin thinking, Uh-oh, here comes Mother again, trying to talk us into doing something"

Now days they approach her with proposition to exploit MJ's name and his kids, and she seemingly accepts all of them.

Replace the bolded words with "Michael". Now it's an accurate statement. It's what she should have said

 

[ivy]

Ivy, Mann’s actions towards Michael were unsavory at best yet, some fans believe Mann is not unsavory in his actions towards Michael’s mother and/or Michael’s mothers actions are not unsavory towards Mann which is interesting to me.

simple she signed a contract, she made no efforts to get out of contract. So either she's a willing participant or totally powerless. what is your pick?

I am glad to see my post caused you do more investigation into this issue. You have discovered Katherine is listed as co-producer on the funding site.

LOL. It was written on the webpage from the start and I have seen it Sunday night. It was just the basic ability of reading dated days back. I'm glad that my reading ability was able to correct your erroneous information.

That does not prove she will see any monies in funding with Mann/Lowe at the helm.

I clearly wrote three possibilities so you saying this is meaningless as I did not make such claim. What it proves you make determinations without even properly reading the webpages. What it proves when you claimed "Katherine is not a producer for this film so she will not see any monies from this funding" you were wrong and she was indeed a co producer.

repeatedly stated you viewed my beliefs as fact for whatever your reasons.

do you seriously don't see the reason for it? Seriously? You don't realize your writing style?

For example this one : "Katherine will not receive any monies from this funding no matter how many times that is erroneously suggested and repeated."

Can't you see that you are making a definitive statement that doesn't leave room for any other possibility? Can't you see that you are claiming everyone else is absolutely wrong? Reality is that you don't know, I don't know, no one knows. Katherine might or might not receive any money from this funding. So you cannot say others are wrong, I cannot say you are wrong. No one knows.

Suggestion: Changing tone or even adding "I believe" to your sentences can solve this issue.

When you suggest Mann/Lowe are being unsavory it is your view.

nope it's not my view. It's based on a court of law which determined with a verdict they infringed MJ's rights and have to pay $2.5 Million. Their past actions is a fact.

Yes, Katherine left all AEG emails conveniently in the room I left and you entered to view Mann's retrieval.

Mann under perjury and in a court deposition admitted that he leaked the emails. That's is hard proof that he had access to emails. It's a fact that he somehow had the emails and gave it to the journalist. I never made claims about how he had access.

Can you see the difference?

 

[Ashtanga]

Re: Katherine Jackson documentary called "Remembering Michael"/ fans asked to help with funding

Katherine is not naive :nono: and is fully aware of her actions. -_- See how much time has passed that story this corny documentary broke in the press... So far no official statement from her or her lawyers about the matter. To me this behavior Katherine, her silence and no effort to break ties with Mann, says a lot to me..... Or am I completely wrong? :fear:

 

[marebear]

Re: Katherine Jackson documentary called "Remembering Michael"/ fans asked to help with funding

I am so tired of this.

 

[xosweetseducingsighsxo]

Re: Katherine Jackson documentary called "Remembering Michael"/ fans asked to help with funding

Katherine is not naive :nono: and is fully aware of her actions. -_- See how much time has passed that story this corny documentary broke in the press... So far no official statement from her or her lawyers about the matter. To me this behavior Katherine, her silence and no effort to break ties with Mann, says a lot to me..... Or am I completely wrong? :fear:

I don't know who Katherine's trying to fool... She's really been revealing her true colors these past few months.

 

[pug]

I understand why some are donating their money to this fundraiser. There are those who want anything they can get their hands on related to Michael Jackson including this garish and amateurish poster for this documentary. Just looking at that lets me know it will be downhill from there. But some fans will just have to have it and are willing to send in a contribution in order to get the “reward”. I won’t be surprised if this film comes out looking like something shot on a Super V-8 camera. Why can’t they go the route Michael would have taken and enlisted the services of those who are at the top of their game in the industry? Where is the award winning documentarian, the professional narrator and interviewer? An over the hill porn peddler and his girlfriend, really? Is this why they would not give a word of support for Spike Lee’s Bad documentary?

I’m curious to know what Katherine’s motive is. The monthly allowance she gets from the Estate is more than many people make in a year, why is she always on a money hustle? She is a wealthy woman, why would she ask non-wealthy people to come out of pocket for her vanity project. It is a vanity project –most people who care about the matter know that Michael loved his mother and children very much, what is the point of a documentary to reiterate that?

She has said in the past that she is not a greedy woman. Her dress and jewelry don’t strike me as signs of a greedy personality. Many believe she is trying to syphon money to the rest of her family. The only one you ever heard crying broke is Jermaine. Even he seems content with his well to do wife and not paying his obligations. Jackie was fairly successful in his business even before Michael passed and Marlon seemed to be doing well in his real estate business. Tito has been touring with his blues band for years. The guys still get Jackson Five and The Jacksons royalties. I can only imagine Rebbie having issues. After all, with her husband dealing with the cancer for the last several years it’s possible there was little income and savings may have drained. How much could it cost to help her get on her feet? She may only have Social Security coming in if they had to use retirement funds for her husband’s cancer treatments. Couldn’t other family members help if necessary? Janet is a millionaire married to a millionaire. I don’t get it.<o></o>

 

[ivy]

Re: Katherine Jackson documentary called "Remembering Michael"/ fans asked to help with funding

KJ Documentary video is no longer available in USA and all rewards / merchandise is gone from the site.. Smells like a cease & desist

 

[Mechi]

Re: Katherine Jackson documentary called "Remembering Michael"/ fans asked to help with funding

Michael never... never ever wanted his private life pulled out there!
This is not keeping his legacy! No way!
To do all this to Michaels children is just so wrong!
It's no miracle that Paris is going through so much... and I'm pretty sure she's suffering just more open than the two boys...
I pray all three will find their ways... away from this family again! sheeesh

 

[passy001]

Re: Katherine Jackson documentary called "Remembering Michael"/ fans asked to help with funding

KJ Documentary video is no longer available in USA and all rewards / merchandise is gone from the site.. Smells like a cease & desist

yippeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!

 

[Tygger]

Re: Katherine Jackson documentary called "Remembering Michael"/ fans asked to help with funding

what is your pick?

I believe her actions are unsavory towards Mann. How do you like those apples?

I'm glad that my reading ability was able to correct your erroneous information.

laughs. I am a humble person and I enjoy learning so I do not have any issue with being corrected by anyone. I do not believe it is coincidence you posted this tidbit now and not previously. However, for maximum effect, you probably should have posted that tidbit earlier. It still does not mean she will see any monies through funding. As a co-producer (most likely in name only) she may realize profits.

Reality is that you don't know, I don't know, no one knows. Katherine might or might not receive any money from this funding. So you cannot say others are wrong, I cannot say you are wrong. No one knows.

This is a wistful thought however, it is too late for those sentiments. Unfortunately, I have learned the only tone some discussions can take are combative tones most times. There is barely space for opposite views as you haven proven to others in your responses to me time and time again. Yet another thread with the same commentary from you. Again, you have taken focus away from a topic to address whatever issue you have with me and/or my posts for your own reasons that I have no control over.

I never made claims about how he had access.

You are speaking to someone who has read your posts.

Back to topic: I am glad if a cease and desist was delivered. Anything to stop this funding for licensing material the film does not need. The letter did not even need to be publicized for fans to see the effect.

 

[Bubs]

Replace the bolded words with "Michael". Now it's an accurate statement. It's what she should have said

I meant to show with that paragraph that KJ has been in the business long enough, and knows it like back of her hand. There have fans that tries to say that KJ is this helpless little woman that other people are taking advantages of her, but I personally don't think that is the case, and the paragraph I posted proves that KJ indeed is business woman (albeit bad one) and has ears for business propositions.
What she wrote in to her book was written in 90's and she wrote what happen then, but today people come to KJ with their ideas of how to make money of MJ and his kids. She seemingly accepts most of them if she sees it fit.

There is another example of KJ business sense:
By the middle of the year, Michael had already begun work on his next album, a mix of new and old songs. But he wasn&#8217;t the only busy Jackson in 1989. I could have used a program to help me keep track of his brothers&#8217; recording projects. Jackie&#8217;s first solo album in sixteen years, Be the One, was released in March by Polygram. By fall, Jermaine had released his third album on Arista Records, Don&#8217;t Take It Personal, and Randy his first-ever solo album, Randy and the Gypsies, on A&M.

I have to be honest: While I enjoyed listening to their records, I hadn&#8217;t been thrilled to see the brothers spending so much of their energy on their solo work.

&#8220;You&#8217;re going to run the risk of flooding yourselves out,&#8221; I told them when their albums were still in the planning stages. &#8220;There will be too many Jacksons out there. People are going to be saying, &#8216;Which Jackson album should I buy this time?&#8217;&#8221;

&#8220;Your focus should be on keeping the Jacksons going. You&#8217;re much stronger as a group than you are as solo artists, anyway.&#8221;

While the bolded part makes sense, she does that herself today with MJ and his kids.
The estate is releasing good stuff not too often, but at the same time "family"is bring out all sort of rubbish related to MJ, and that is saturating the market.

 

[LastTear]

Re: Katherine Jackson documentary called "Remembering Michael"/ fans asked to help with funding

The video is also no longer available in the UK (although I have noted that previously the video seems to come and go), the rewards also do not show.

As far as donations go they are way off target and have not even made the figure that they should have made on the very first day of the launch.

@Tygger

This is a wistful thought however, it is too late for those sentiments. Unfortunately, I have learned the only tone some discussions can take are combative tones most times. There is barely space for opposite views as you haven proven to others in your responses to me time and time again. Yet another thread with the same commentary from you. Again, you have taken focus away from a topic to address whatever issue you have with me and/or my posts for your own reasons that I have no control over.

I think you have missed the point Ivy was making, I'm sorry but your posts are very often written as fact when they are actually simply your opinion or wish. Any combativeness you feel is borne out of frustration as it takes so long filtering through what is fact and what is opinion, as far as I'm concerned your and anyone's opposing view is very welcome. I enjoy learning another's point of view. If you would just make it clear when something is simply your opinion it would save the 'repeated commentary', and we could concentrate on discussing both opinions on the subject. xx

 

[Bubs]

Re: Katherine Jackson documentary called "Remembering Michael"/ fans asked to help with funding

KJ Documentary video is no longer available in USA and all rewards / merchandise is gone from the site.. Smells like a cease & desist

So far they have collected $4,270 of $3,200,000 goal, but I don't think they are going to get anywhere near to goal. I was wondering if all the rewards are gone, what they are going to give people who already donated?
Jermaine Jackson autographed photo or Latoya giving a private lap dance

 

[serendipity]

Serendipity, you will have to point out the excuse I made and who I am excusing in that post. Again, this is about Mann attempting to fund a licensing fee which I believe to be a scheme for him and Lowe. Some fans are not focused on that because this is another opportunity to voice their distaste for whichever Jackson for whatever their reasons. Katherine will only realize 25% of the film&#8217;s profits NOT from funding the licensing fee.

Let me answer you: You are excusing Katherine! You're trying hard to pin it all on solely on Mann, so Katherine somehow remains all innocent of that. Like I said it was HER to made a contract with him and HER who handed him MJ's minor kids on a silver platter -- how do you explain this??

Second, if you believe this is a scheme solely by Mann, WHY is Katherine sitting there aiding him to scam fans? Explain that, please.

And finally, I could care less if Katherine makes money or how much (though she likely will, both from profits and as a co-producer) -- the point is, SHE IS HELPING A CROOK SCAM THE FANS! Has she come out to warn the fans that this is a scheme and she's not involved? No, she hasn't.

 

[ivy]

Re: Katherine Jackson documentary called "Remembering Michael"/ fans asked to help with funding

I do not believe it is coincidence you posted this tidbit now and not previously. However, for maximum effect, you probably should have posted that tidbit earlier.

It is posted on the very first post on Sunday night into Monday morning.

and for the rest : you just don't get it. If you can't see the issue your tone/style causes and still blame others for it you are a lost cause. And frankly it would only make your experience here unpleasant - unless of course that's your goal.

 

[Dancing the Dream]

Re: Katherine Jackson documentary called "Remembering Michael"/ fans asked to help with funding

Love how the papers say ''Paris 'broke down'''...lol she was smiling when talking about Michael.

 

[sfosteredi]

Re: Katherine Jackson documentary called "Remembering Michael"/ fans asked to help with funding

Love how the papers say ''Paris 'broke down'''...lol she was smiling when talking about Michael.

Right. And that's exactly why PPB should not be put on display like this. The media distorted MJ's words every time he spoke. He can't speak now so they are doing it to the kids. They shouldn't be in front of a camera until age of 18. (Blanket especially). And then only for accepting an award for MJ, saying thank you, etc.not talking about private memories of their Dad.