Latest on MJJC

Michael's Manhood Thread - 18+ (Read The First Post For Rules!)

was cleaning up my folders the other day and came across this one again..

2hmix4x.jpg


..still not over it :ph34r::rofl:


tumblr_n6inwrdF2R1rb5xlko5_250.gif

:bugeyed
 
Last edited:
how long has it been since these were posted? :lol:

tumblr_m00syrE03I1r35omdo1_400.jpg


eZZP9BG.png


tqcfkuC.jpg


Bush & Tompkins were geniuses, this has to be one of my favorite outfits on him.. (even the shoes!)
 
Guys, look at this, look at this, look at this! OMG. OMG. OMG!!!


126597615_4356311_12316448_899362056765862_6892139340641094787_n.jpg


126596417_4356311_12346501_899343783434356_4559695953217260256_n.jpg


126599334_4356311_ZUREINMALIGENVERWENDUNGIMZUSAMMENHAN_1_.jpg



-TbWKjiInYs.jpg



This is NOT photoshop!

'US photographer Greg Gorman poses in front of a picture he took of late US musician Michael Jackson in Los Angeles in 1987, during the 'Color Works' exhibition at the Museum of Photography in Berlin, Germany, 03 December 2015. The exhibition runs until 22 May 2016.'
Click to expand...

He was interviewed by the German newspaper Die Welt, because he has an exhibition in Germany. Here is what he said:

ICON: Have you also made friends with these people?

Gorman: I am a good friend of Pierce Brosnan, also John Hurt. I am not a name dropper but I had a good rapport with Michael Jackson as well. Sometimes he called me and we talked.

ICON: There is a photo of Michael Jackson at the exhibition that has never been seen before.

Gorman: Right. Always when I photographed Michael we talked for two hours beforehand. About the concept and what we wanted to do. On that day when this photo was made he told he how he admired my akt photos. So we decided to make a photo that is a bit more revealing. I guess that's why it hasn't been seen for so long. This photo of Michael is exhibited for the first time ever.

ICON: Is this your favourite from the exhibition?

Gorman: I am glad that it's there, yes. But I also like my photo of David Bowie and of Andy Warhol - it's difficult to decide what I like more, they both invoke nice memories in me.
Click to expand...

http://www.welt.de/icon/article149561411/Ich-fotografiere-nur-was-Widerrede-geben-kann.html
 
Welp, we've all seen pics/clips of him wearing less, so that's not a big deal. The look on his face is so somber, detached from the photo, as if he was having an out of body experience.

I'm not feeling it. It's actually kind of sad, not sexy...

And I'm not ducking any shoes, either. I'm batting them back... :coffee:
 
Last edited:
SheilaMJFan4Ever said:
Welp, we've all seen pics/clips of him wearing less, so that's not a big deal. The look on his face is so somber, detached from the photo, as if he was having an out of body experience.

I'm not feeling it. It's actually kind of sad, not sexy...

And I'm not ducking any shoes, either. I'm batting them back... :coffee:
Click to expand...
Definitely sad-reading Gorman's interview on what he looks for in models: innocent, vulnerable, lithe bodies, strong eyes-he found a perfect subject.
 
Never thought I'd see bad era Michael in his underwear... gosh! :tongue_roll:
I don't see it as a sad picture perse, it's definitely meant to be more artistic than sexy - but seeing him like this is just... phew :heat: those legs man..
 
SheilaMJFan4Ever said:
Welp, we've all seen pics/clips of him wearing less, so that's not a big deal. The look on his face is so somber, detached from the photo, as if he was having an out of body experience.

I'm not feeling it. It's actually kind of sad, not sexy...

And I'm not ducking any shoes, either. I'm batting them back... :coffee:
Click to expand...


No offense but something is wrong with your radar.
His expression is just right for this photo!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top