Murray Trial - October 13 - Day 12 - Discussion

Defence and Prosecution just agreed on stipulation with respect to the saline bag that had the cut...in relation to fingerprints...basically there were 4 finger prints...but none identified
 
how can there be witness scheudule problem when the witness is there and expected to be on the stand for hours?

Maybe he had a prior appointment and couldn't get out off or maybe the defence expert had an appointment for the rest of the day...who knows
 
Defence and Prosecution just agreed on stipulation with respect to the saline bag that had the cut...in relation to fingerprints...basically there were 4 finger prints...but none identified

thanks so thats the one with the bottle in
 
stipulation coming from walgren. previous exibit 166 finger prints saline IV bag 4 prints were on it but no ID was made from the prints

is that the iv bag that had the diprivan bottle in it? or the saline bag that was still hung up


Murray's fingerprint was found on 100ml Propofol bottle found inside the IV bag.
Fleak's fingerprint was found on the syringe on the table.
IV bag with the slit had 4 fingerprints on it. 2 fingerprints was found on saline bag and 20ml Propofol . 1 fingerprint was found on 20 ml propofol bottle. but no identification was made about these fingerprints. The following people were eliminated by manual comparison: Michael Jackson, Conrad Murray, Alberto Alvarez, Michael Amir Williams, Faheem Muhammed, Scott Smith, Mark Goodwin, Martin Blount, Jimmy Nicholas, Blanca Nicholas, Elissa Fleak, Kai Chase.
No useable fingerprints on : 2 midozolam vials, 1 lorazepam vial, 2 lidocaine vials, 1 lidacaine vial, eyedrops, tube marked bq, a bottle labelled ephedrine/caffeine/asprine , 2 100ml propofol vials, 7 20 ml propofol vials, 2 lidocaine vials, 1 lidocaine vial, 2 lorazepam vials, 4 flumanezil vials, 3 midazolam vials, IV tubing, IV y connector tubing, syringe with needle.


It's about IV bag with propophol. Earlier I was very astonished why there was no Alvareze's prints on it
 
Dr Kaimangar

Flanagan

MJ was dehydrated , it was a complicating factor; yes, based on CM's interview.

CM said he was treating dehydration : yes, there was a bag of saline, but there was no charts, so we don't know how fast, or how much saline MJ was receiving. Can't know if dehydration stament was appropriate. Can not determine if hydratation was appropriate based on urine production.

So you can not determine if MJ was dehydrated : No, CM said that in his interview.

25 mg propofol : would expect the sedation to last 6 to 10 mn, depending on what kind of other medication has been given.

About MJ's case : 25mg propofol would last 6 to 10 mn, if there is no other medication he would wake up after thes 6 to 10 mn

Would it be unusual for a patient to continue to sleep : yes, I would expect the patient to wake up. If If he doesn't wake up , that's very troubling.

Even if the patient is tired : yes, I have to make sure its not the effect of the sedative. I would assess if he's responsive to stimula, that is my responsability. The dose doesn't matter, you absolutely need to figure out what is going on. You need to continue monitoring and find out if this is sleep or sedation. My obligation is the well being of my patient, not what the patient considers important for him.

Nk thinks that additionally to the 25 mg, MJ had a drip, based on CM's interview.

NK thinks MJ had a respiratory depression that culminated in cardiac arrest, based on CM's interview.

What is the first thing CM should have done : given lack of tools (to ressucitate), should have called for help. Should have dealt with the airway and called 911 immediately. If there is somebody around, you ask this person to call 911. You ask them to call 911, you don't ask them to come or just ask for help. If you're alone, you put 911 on loudspeaker.

Were you aware that the front gate was locked ? Objection, sustained

Were you aware that there was no landline phone? Yes, but CM had a cell phone

Are you aware of the time to call 911 in this case : when you talk to the operator, the EMTs are on their way, so it doesn't matter how long you talk to the operator, the operator is able to guide you.

If MJ took lorazepam and propofol : would CM be responsible : yes, absolutely

If a patient was prescribed ambien, and took everything at once, would you consider the doctor who prescribed responsible ? No.

Walgren , re direct :

If Mr Flanagan fell to the floor right now, would you wait 12 mn, and then call his legal secretary to ask her to send a legal clerk ? Objection, sustained. (personal note : I loved that question)

You would call 911 immediately : yes.

Did I provide you with dr Kleins records : Yes

Was CM aware at least 3 weeks before MJ's death that MJ was seeing Klein, based on his interview : yes.

Taiwain study : highly monitored patients, and was only an experiment. So MJ was being subjetct to an experiment by CM ? Yes, but with no precautions.

Did CM have any idea if MJ had insomnia, or what kind of insomnia MJ had : no

Describe doctor patient relationship : it's putting the patient first, knowing when to say no, when the patient asks for inappropriate treatment.

Assuming MJ asked for propofol, a life threatening substance, it was CM's responsaillity to refuse, even if he was begging ? Yes, absolutely.

Lack of records : example of figures given by Murray about MJ 's oxygen levels : high 90s 90% : Without records you can not know, can not understand the figure. If a patient starts with 99s and 100%, then 90s 90% is a very dangerous figure, means that there is a problem.

CM was grossly negligent , and directly caused MJ's death. : Yes.

Flanagan , re cross :

CM shouldn't have done CPR first ? He should have called for help. He didn't ask the chef to call 911 specifically, he should have.

Are you aware that the chef was asked to call security and she didn't ? No

Are you aware that the call to MAW (head of security) was done a signifant time after CM asked Kai Chase to call security. No

Are you aware that when AA arrived, CM immediately asked to call for an ambulance : No

Walgren :

CM should have called 911, or asked to call 911 because as a doctor he understood the emergency and knew he had no tools to deal with it.

Dr Schafer

is an anesthesiologist, professor of anesthesiology at Columbia, adjoint professor of pharmacometrics at Stanford.

Designed the guideline for propofol dosing , showing package inserts for propofol.

Lost me, explains what pharmacology is, the importance of precision dosing, what happens when a drug is in the body, general terms.



Stipulation : relates to fingerprints, : saline bag that was cut : 4 latent prints in the black line. The prints are indentifiable, but no identification has been made.

Recess until Monday.
 
Last edited:
And guess what, the computer that I was using to take notes during the , the one that gave me headaches today, just started to work perfectly well .....:beee:
 
so whats different on this stipulation than the other one??

There's no difference. Maybe he decided to repeate it again after all investigators testimony about touching and replacing evidences. So there are fingerprints but we can't ID them. I'm just guessing
 
Watching news and it's being stated that jurors are taking lots of notes. Not sure if this was mentioned in yesterday's thread but it was said they were very engaged when Steinberg was on the stand and when he and Flanagan got into the debate about the drip, jurors were flipping thru the pages of their transcripts w/Steinberg to the pages he referenced.

Today, there is one male juror who has been furiously writing during the entire trial and whereas some of the others are kinda dropping off with Shaefer's science bit, this one male juror is still writing up a storm. So we have at least ONE juror who is clearly taking this uber-seriously. The downside, it was noted, is that this guy is so busy writing that he's not looking up to take note of witness' body language.

Otherwise, it seems the jury has not been slacking on attention in this case. My hope is that IF some of them are slacking off today it's becuz Steinberg and Nader pretty much killed the need for more notes. HA!

Also, the analysis is that what Steinberg and Nader provided was not only information that's related to this case but it was also info the jurors could use and relate to in their everyday lives when dealing with their doctors and seeking treatment.
 
Last edited:
I'm sure I saw a moment of pure fear cross CM's face just after the pros and defence went up for that last sidebar.....I think he's worried about Shafer.

It will be interesting to see how White supports the defence, since Shafer and White have been such close colleagues, and worked on the first 'propofol dosing' paper together.
 
is it me or the doctor yesterday mentioned the lack of sunlight as a huge factor in causing insomnia he was talking about ICU patients , but no one stressed that fact ,how much vitiligo played role in MJ's insomnia, It would have been great to do that instead of talking about drug withdrawal and anxiety , the expert is downplaying the problem talking about 'secondary' issues .

very true
 
he also stated something of great importance at the beginning of today's testimony responding to Flanagns's statements on MJ resistance to Murray's treatement "the patient HAS THE RIGHT TO REFUSE YOUR TREATEMENT and you have to try and find why he REFUSED, because he had a reason to refuse , what was that reason?!! ".

Yes, that's an important point. Goes along EXACTLY with the failure of Murray to obtain a written consent that includes benefits AND risks of any treatment or procedure he was going to do on Michael. As far as we know, Michael did NOT "refuse treatment," (Murray WAS treating him!) but he might have, if he'd had a chance to read such a document? Points for the prosecution!

It would have been wonderful if he told him at that time MJ had VALID REASONS to say no to the lorazepam freaking treatment Murray was offering. Hopefully Walgren will stress this point during re direct.

But, clearly Michael WAS taking the lorazepam. We have NO evidence that he "said no to the lorazepam." None, at all. (back to the written consent form, that was not THERE!)

yeah what's up with the demerol talking? watch Walgren asks the expert to stress even if he was addicted and abusing demerol Murray had to know what he was doing behind his back !!!!

Since Michael is not here to testify, and Murray is apparently not going to testify, we have no way of knowing it WAS "behind Murray's back," or not? (As we know, Murray has MAJOR problems telling the truth. . . .) It was obvious that Michael was seeing other doctors, and a matter of public knowledge (i.e. paparazzi photos). Given that, Murray had an OBLIGATION to obtain complete medical records on Michael. Failing that, he could have refused to treat and/or referred him to someone else, i.e. sleep clinic. Getting that information was Murray's responsibility, and no one else's.

Bring those demerol records and tell the jurors the slurred speech was due to Murray's freaking treatment.

Not sure it MATTERS? As the two expert witnesses clearly stated, Murray had a responsibility to obtain a thorough knowledge of Michael's physical condition, and any other treatments or medications he was taking. Lacking this knowledge, and if he couldn't obtain it, Murray's obligation was to refuse to treat Michael, at ALL. Because how could he possibly treat someone with no medical records, including Murray's, himself! I find it astounding that there were NO medical records from Murray, for the entire year of 2009! We don't know WHY Murray recorded the slurred speech, nor do we know the cause, i.e. treatment by Murray, or another doctor?
 
Last edited:
Today, there is one male juror who has been furiously writing during the entire trial and whereas some of the others are kinda dropping off with Shaefer's science bit, this one male juror is still writing up a storm. So we have at least ONE juror who is clearly taking this uber-seriously. The downside, it was noted, is that this guy is so busy writing that he's not looking up to take note of witness' body language.

I remember T-Mez was asked what he thought about jurors writing down notes in detail etc (apprantly the jurors in MJs trial also wrote down notes a lot) and T-Mez said he didnt know if he liked that actually (cant recall the reason to why he said it ut yeah he said it)
 
http://twitter.com/abc7MurrayTrial
abc7MurrayTrial ABC7 Murray Trial
That's why they are unavailable beginning this afternoon and all day tomorrow. #conradmurraytrial
37 minutes ago

abc7MurrayTrial ABC7 Murray Trial
There will be no trial until Monday. Both Dr. Shafer and Dr. White have an International Conference in Anesthesia to attend in Chicago.
38 minutes ago
 
Just had an expert on Sky saying the Defense may come back with a plea bargain, can they do that now?
 
s it me or the doctor yesterday mentioned the lack of sunlight as a huge factor in causing insomnia he was talking about ICU patients , but no one stressed that fact ,how much vitiligo played role in MJ's insomnia, It would have been great to do that instead of talking about drug withdrawal and anxiety , the expert is downplaying the problem talking about 'secondary' issues .

he did but he also said such reason could be corrected by melatonin tablets I believe. could Michael's insomnia be that easily treated?

yeah what's up with the demerol talking? watch Walgren asks the expert to stress even if he was addicted and abusing demerol Murray had to know what he was doing behind his back !!!!

Since Michael is not here to testify, and Murray is apparently not going to testify, we have no way of knowing it WAS "behind Murray's back," or not? (As we know, Murray has MAJOR problems telling the truth. . . .) It was obvious that Michael was seeing other doctors, and a matter of public knowledge (i.e. paparazzi photos). Given that, Murray had an OBLIGATION to obtain complete medical records on Michael. Failing that, he could have refused to treat and/or referred him to someone else, i.e. sleep clinic. Getting that information was Murray's responsibility, and no one else's.

Don't you think that even without medical records he should have known about demerol? Look to his statement 3 weeks ago he hears Michael calling Klein's office saying that he had to see Klein. and Michael's production team saying to Murray Michael's worst days are after he saw Klein and he's wasted for 24 hours.

any legit doctor even though didn't know Demerol would have stopped medication and ask what made that person so wasted
 
So Dr Shafer and Dr White are going to be on opposite sides here? They aren't supposed to talk about this while they are in Chicago, isn't that correct? I just don't understand how Dr White can justify propofol being used like it was. The 2 doctors that testified were so passionate against in a home setting.

Talk about anxiety then you are talking abou me!!
 
They keep bringing up demerol and demerol yet it wasn't found in Michael. Everything he had was what Murray had given him. It's very confusing at times.
 
Yeah its very strange having two ppl who are so close to each other. and the defence lied at the begining saying white was shaffers boss when its the other way around. Do we know what white is gonna say? been any mention cause lije u say i dont know how anyone can defend this so maybe he wont.and after hearing the testimony today
he might get cold feet!

do we have any info about defence witnesses bar murrays paitents cause we havnt really heard much
 
Theres a hearing tom at 10.30 to discuss witnesses, exhibits, jury instructions abd other issues. no cameras
 
The battle on Monday between Dr. Shafer and Dr. White will be interesting. But, will Dr. White really say Murray using Propofol at a home with no proper equipment was safe? Muarry didn't even know what kind of Insomia MJ had. He just gave Propofol like an experiment. SMH Gonna be a long 3 day weekend! Ugh!
 
They keep bringing up demerol and demerol yet it wasn't found in Michael. Everything he had was what Murray had given him. It's very confusing at times.

the defense is saying that MJ was having withdrawal symptoms from Demerol, so that's why they didn't find any in him. Those withdrawal symptoms, according to the defense, made MJ's insomnia worse, complicating Murray's job, and could explain, still according to them, an irrational reaction from MJ who then took 8 pills of lorazepam and self administered propofol.

Problem of this theory : Murray knew about Klein, knew MJ was strange sometimes when he came back from Klein's office, had known that for about 3 weeks before MJ's death. This theory also implies that MJ was left alone, with propofol and lorazepam within his reach.

Add this to CM's lapd interview, his lies to the paramedics and ER staff.... I don't see any defense.
 
They keep bringing up demerol and demerol yet it wasn't found in Michael. Everything he had was what Murray had given him. It's very confusing at times.

That seems to be part of their defense. That MJ was in demerol withdrawal (having not seen Klein recently) and that's why it was so hard to get him to sleep.
 
That seems to be part of their defense. That MJ was in demerol withdrawal (having not seen Klein recently) and that's why it was so hard to get him to sleep.
So why didn't he die before the 25th then? MJ was never seeing Klein everyday. So are they gonna say he had withdrawals before the 25th too? Pff
 
Back
Top