Paris Jackson cover story for Rolling Stone: "Paris Jackson: A Life After Neverland"

[redfrog]

Saying a sexual assault victim shouldn't share her story because 'it serves no purpose' is unbelievable and sickening.

No, it's common sense. It's not that she talked about it because she wanted to expose
the molester. So what's the point? Name just one logical reason why Paris telling that to the whole world was a good idea.

 

[Ms. BlueGangsta]

. Oh good gosh. I'm happy for Paris, but I don't feel like going through this all over again. What I mean is the drama aspect to it.

She didn't make the drama though.
The media did, and for the wrong reasons.
IMO, there should have been more sympathy for her about the sexual assault.

 

[Ms. BlueGangsta]

No, it's common sense. It's not that she talked about it because she wanted to expose
the molester. So what's the point? Name just one logical reason why Paris telling that to the whole world was a good idea.

Listen.
Your doing the absolute most right now.
If the girl wanted to talk about it (the sexual assault) she can, and she did.
Point blank period.
I don't get why you're so mad about this interview when all things considered/overall it wasn't too bad.
MJ hating dumbasses were going to have something to say regardless of what she said because they're MJ haters anyways and will twist anything about MJ into something negative.

Edit: My biggest problem with the interview overall is that it was given to the Trolling Stone.

 

[michaeljackson&lisamarie]

She didn't make the drama though.
The media did, and for the wrong reasons.
IMO, there should have been more sympathy for her about the sexual assault.

. True, true, true.

 

[redfrog]

Listen.
Your doing the absolute most right now.
If the girl wanted to talk about it (the sexual assault) she can, and she did.

She did. But that doesn't change the fact it served no purpose and it was used against
MJ i.e. it was totally unnecessary.

I don't get why you're so mad about this interview when all things considered/overall it wasn't too bad.
MJ hating dumbasses were going to have something to say regardless of what she said because they're MJ haters anyways and will twist anything about MJ into something negative.

Unforced errors make me "mad". I just think it was stupid to say those things knowing how the media and the
general public (not just rabid haters) have treated MJ. I also think she flat out lied about Mj , I don't buy for second
that he told her "he ****ing slaughtered the natives". That's all Paris's style not MJ's.
Bottom line: no need for more bullshit especially when it can be easily avoided.

 

[Lil]

No, it's common sense. It's not that she talked about it because she wanted to expose
the molester. So what's the point? Name just one logical reason why Paris telling that to the whole world was a good idea.

You're being very harsh here.

It is never "unnecessary" for anyone to talk about such experiences. Especially in this case, there's lots of young girls who idolise Paris - a number of them might struggle with the same issues, and hearing her talk about it could be a form of support to them. Anyone with a platform willing to talk about this, is doing a good thing. If it helps one person it has served a purpose, and even if it doesn't it can be important to Paris herself and she has every right to talk about it.
I don't see how you can't understand the importance of that, or how - in your mind - that is less important than some nutjob possibly thinking she was talking about Michael while it was clear as day she wasn't.
Never thought I'd say this to someone, but maybe you need to be a little less obsessed with things being "used against MJ" and realise not everything is an attack on Michael and not every single shred of negativity towards him is the end of the world. This isn't even about him.

 

[AliCat]

When where? She said no such thing. It's just tabloid junk I think News of the world invented the whole thing.
Debbie refused to answer the questions about how the kids were made in the rebuttal interview.

Debbie Rowe did an Interview, in 2008, is where she states this. "Of course it was artificial insemination."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...er-Michael-Jacksons-children-Debbie-Rowe.html

I did read where Debbie went to the Beverly Hills Fertility Clinic, run by Dr Mark Surrey, where a fertility specialist, Dr Hal Danzer, had implanted the
fertilised egg. We know Debbie has talked about how she was a vehicle for Michael to have children. I have also read that Debbie doesn't know who the sperm donor is. Is this fact, if there are legal documents involving a court case involving Debbie Rowe and Michael Jackson, then the Freedom of Information Act would be enacted.

 

[Ms. BlueGangsta]

I honestly didn't see anyone say that MJ could have been/was the one that sexually assaulted her, but I don't go out of my way to find MJ hate either.
When it happened Michael was dead, and she said it was a stranger, so there's zero chance he could have done it.
Anyone saying that Michael did it are idiots who's opinion(s) are invalid.
You just have to ignore idiots/haters sometimes.

Glad everyone else in here didn't go overboard like redfrog.
They need to chill.
It's not that serious.

She felt like she needed to get that off of her chest, she did, and I'm happy she did.

 

[redfrog]

You're being very harsh here.

It is never "unnecessary" for anyone to talk about such experiences. Especially in this case, there's lots of young girls who idolise Paris - a number of them might struggle with the same issues, and hearing her talk about it could be a form of support to them. Anyone with a platform willing to talk about this, is doing a good thing. If it helps one person it has served a purpose, and even if it doesn't it can be important to Paris herself and she has every right to talk about it.

Nobody should automatically believe someone just because he or she says I was sexually assaulted.
Automatic sympathy is what enables false accusers why Robson, Arvizo Michael Egan and or that ridiculous Summer Zervos believe they can get away with it.

Do I believe Paris was assaulted just because she says so? No, even though she is not trying to make money with her claim
like Robson and the other liars, she could just invent it for attention and sympathy. She has a history of attention whoring
and the whole "child porn" episode was insane, accusing her former boyfriend without proof and playing the victim.
Bottom line: people should not drop sexual assault allegations left and right without facts to back them up.
It's wrong and if a real abuse victim automatically believes her without any evidence that's wrong too.

Never thought I'd say this to someone, but maybe you need to be a little less obsessed with things being "used against MJ" and realise not everything is an attack on Michael and not every single shred of negativity towards him is the end of the world. This isn't even about him.

It's not the end of the world it was just unreasonable, unnecessary, and easily avoidable.

 

[barbee0715]

If Paris was assaulted, then she should be able to talk about it. I did not see any kind of flack whatsoever reflected toward Michael about it, but I personally raised an eyebrow at her guardians.
Sorry, but sometimes I think she's being neglected in the "parenting" department. All kids have different needs and mature differently, and I think she definitely needs a parent.18 or not.

 

[redfrog]

Debbie Rowe did an Interview, in 2008, is where she states this. "Of course it was artificial insemination."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...er-Michael-Jacksons-children-Debbie-Rowe.html

I didn't know she talked to the Daily Mail. That is one of the most disgusting rags which have waged a war against
MJ over the years and it's obvious what their agenda was with this article. Just look at this:

The bride was 37, Jackson 38, and the best man was an eight-year-old boy (a friend, of course, of the groom).

It wasn't a friend. It was Anthony Jackson, Mj's cousin. But of course they had to put it THAT way.


Do you think Debbie indeed said this? It's clearly not true. Debbie Rowe was nowhere around
MJ in 2008. No other report by anyone corroborates this.

"I don't need money. Michael and I are fine. I see him and the kids all the time. They live in Las Vegas now, just a three-hour drive away."

So this quote sounds like this tabloid hack made it up rather coming from Debbie herself, who let's not forget
refused to discuss how the kids were made during the rebuttal interview. I doubt she changed her attitude
for the Daily Mail.

"Of course it was artificial insemination. Paris was conceived in Paris, that's how she got her name. Michael wanted to call her Princess, but I thought that was stupid."

I don't believe MJ had sex with Debbie, I think he lied about that just to get rid of Bashir's questions regarding the subject
but I also don't believe Debbie ever told that to this or any other scribe. This is clearly a hitpiece. Just look at this part:

Incredibly, it is not the memory of the bloodied newborn being torn from her arms which moves Rowe to tears now - but the sudden admission that she couldn't bear Jackson any more children.

And Debbie talked to this cretin? MJ really couldn't trust anyone.

 

[barbee0715]

Didn't Debbie sue the Daily Mail or some London tabloid. I have no doubt that they made up their own quotes.

And yes, Anthony stood up for Michael, as well as his OTHER best man, Dr. Metzger, who they conveniently left out.

 

[InvincibleMJ]

I find it more alarming that anyone in this world, and specifically someone who claims to be a MJ fan, is so dismissive of sexual abuse of a 14 year old girl (even of MJ's own daughter) for any reason. Especially when there's no sense in this freak out. How can anyone be so cold about it?

Reading that Paris has gone through this broke my heart.

 

[Ms. BlueGangsta]

If Paris was assaulted, then she should be able to talk about it. I did not see any kind of flack whatsoever reflected toward Michael about it, but I personally raised an eyebrow at her guardians.
Sorry, but sometimes I think she's being neglected in the "parenting" department. All kids have different needs and mature differently, and I think she definitely needs a parent.18 or not.

When it comes to that, yes, I'm sure she could use more parental guidance, and she probably is being neglected when it comes to parenting, but sometimes a kid is going to do what they want to do parenting be damned.
We don't know exactly when the assault happened.

She herself said she hung around "a lot of older people doing a lot of crazy things."
She also said this.
"I was doing a lot of things that 13-, 14-, 15-year-olds shouldn't do. I tried to grow up too fast, and I wasn't really that nice of a person."
She snuck and got tattoos while she was underage too.

So I think that Paris was going to put herself in some unsavory situations regardless of parenting.
The only person to blame for her sexual assault is the person that did it.

I find it more alarming that anyone in this world, and specifically someone who claims to be a MJ fan, is so dismissive of sexual abuse of a 14 year old girl (even of MJ's own daughter) for any reason. Especially when there's no sense in this freak out. How can anyone be so cold about it?

Reading that Paris has gone through this broke my heart.

For me it's not even about it being Paris.
I just think it's wrong to tell anyone to not talk about a traumatic experience if they decide they want to talk about it.

 

[InvincibleMJ]

^ Same here.

 

[Lil]

Nobody should automatically believe someone just because he or she says I was sexually assaulted.
Automatic sympathy is what enables false accusers why Robson, Arvizo Michael Egan and or that ridiculous Summer Zervos believe they can get away with it.

Do I believe Paris was assaulted just because she says so? No, even though she is not trying to make money with her claim
like Robson and the other liars, she could just invent it for attention and sympathy. She has a history of attention whoring
and the whole "child porn" episode was insane, accusing her former boyfriend without proof and playing the victim.
Bottom line: people should not drop sexual assault allegations left and right without facts to back them up.
It's wrong and if a real abuse victim automatically believes her without any evidence that's wrong too.

Ridiculous. You're turning everything around - just because there's people who will lie about it doesn't mean no one should get any sympathy or be believed until they can 'prove' they actually were abused. Paris had nothing to gain from saying that, she didn't name any names and she's not suing anyone for money. There were plenty of other topics in that interview to get her sympathy if that's what she wanted; the death of her only parent, depression, drug addiction, multiple suicide attempts - but one sentence about sexual abuse and oh she probably 'invented it for sympathy and attention'.. right.
Besides all of that, knowing what her dad went through, do you really think would go and lie about being abused herself??

 

[HIStoric]

Ridiculous. You're turning everything around - just because there's people who will lie about it doesn't mean no one should get any sympathy or be believed until they can 'prove' they actually were abused. Paris had nothing to gain from saying that, she didn't name any names and she's not suing anyone for money. There were plenty of other topics in that interview to get her sympathy if that's what she wanted; the death of her only parent, depression, drug addiction, multiple suicide attempts - but one sentence about sexual abuse and oh she probably 'invented it for sympathy and attention'.. right.
Besides all of that, knowing what her dad went through, do you really think would go and lie about being abused herself??

Absolutely... and redfrog, what you're going on about is one of many reasons why so many sexual assault victims never speak out.

 

[Annita]

Paris Jackson I'm Getting the 'Star' Treatment

Paris Jackson is going to be a TV star ... officially -- she's booked her first acting gig on Lee Daniels' "Star" ... TMZ has learned.

Sources tell us Paris met with Daniels last week for a screen test on the "Empire" spin-off. Turns out she's a natural.

We're told she's already in Atlanta filming but it's unclear how big the role is or how many episodes she'll be shooting. We know acting is one of Paris' goals. We're told she's been taking acting classes for years.

As we previously reported, Paris and her camp want 2017 to be her breakout year and so far, so good. She kicked it off on the cover of Rolling Stone.

http://www.tmz.com/2017/01/30/paris-...medium=twitter

 

[bluemoon7]

No, it's common sense. It's not that she talked about it because she wanted to expose
the molester. So what's the point? Name just one logical reason why Paris telling that to the whole world was a good idea.

EVERY victim of violence may speak to whoever they want to and/or need to, privately or publicly!

For various reasons, I admire every public person who speaks up about the violence they have suffered.

 

[Antwort]

My heart goes out to Paris and anyone who has been through any of the ordeals she mentioned. I'm really happy though to see that she is able to move beyond the traumas of the past, enjoy life and feel comfortable in her own.........big boots I hope she will go from strength to strength professionally and also have a lot of love and stability in her private life.

Since there has been intense discussion about the supposed repercussions of this interview on Michael's image, I'd like to point out the most important lines in article with regards to this issue.

Paris and Prince have no doubts that their father was innocent of the multiple child-molestation allegations against him, that the man they knew was the real Michael. Again, they are persuasive – if they could go door-to-door talking about it, they could sway the world. "Nobody but my brothers and I experienced him reading A Light in the Attic to us at night before we went to bed," says Paris. "Nobody experienced him being a father to them. And if they did, the entire perception of him would be completely and forever changed."

I am convinced the children are the strongest and most credible advocates of Michael's innocence. To suggest otherwise is almost lunacy. They have always defended him boldly and I am sure they will carry on doing exactly that.

Having said that I am not going to bash her for what she said in this interview - I don't think overall it is a bad interview and I definitely do not feel entitled to demand them to publish a DNA test about something that is really only their business with their father. Just because people in this world feel that it is a public matter it doesn't make it so. That's actually way out of line and both fans and the general public should know where their place is.

I couldn't have put it better myself even if I tried. Those words echo my very own sentiments. The sense of boundary has truly been lost for some..........

Okay I'm willing to entertain the possibility that Paris may have exaggerated a little, but maybe that runs in the family. As much as I love Michael. He did like to exaggerate on a lot of stuff. My baby was king of exaggeration.lol.

Couldn't help but smile at this particular comment. There could very well be some truth in it :cheeky: And although Mike may not have cursed "like a sailor" all of the time and especially in front of the kids, I think it's pretty safe to say that he could have a colorful language every once in a while. It would have been strange after all he went through not to resort to it. Plus, it has been scientifically proven that people who swear tend to be more honest. Wasn't there also a Bon Jovi line about "the one who cusses and spits"?

 

[michaeljackson&lisamarie]

Paris Jackson I'm Getting the 'Star' Treatment

Paris Jackson is going to be a TV star ... officially -- she's booked her first acting gig on Lee Daniels' "Star" ... TMZ has learned.

Sources tell us Paris met with Daniels last week for a screen test on the "Empire" spin-off. Turns out she's a natural.

We're told she's already in Atlanta filming but it's unclear how big the role is or how many episodes she'll be shooting. We know acting is one of Paris' goals. We're told she's been taking acting classes for years.

As we previously reported, Paris and her camp want 2017 to be her breakout year and so far, so good. She kicked it off on the cover of Rolling Stone.

http://www.tmz.com/2017/01/30/paris-...medium=twitter

I'm happy for Paris, but I have to ask. Can Paris even sing? I don't know, maybe her role won't involve singing, but if it does. I hope the girl can actually sing.

 

[Ms. BlueGangsta]

I'm happy for Paris, but I have to ask. Can Paris even sing? I don't know, maybe her role won't involve singing, but if it does. I hope the girl can actually sing.

As you said, being in a show about singing doesn't equal having to sing.
I've also never known her to seriously want to sing as a career or anything (but I don't follow the kids so IDK).
Either way she should be fine because even if she can't sing auto tune exist.

It might not even be set in stone that she's going to be on the show.
It all depends on where TMZ 'learned' from and their 'sources.'

Edit:If it's legit though I'm happy for her, and I wonder if the part will be permanent or a one time thing.
She better snatch those roles and get them coins.:lol:

 

[michaeljackson&lisamarie]

As you said, being in a show about singing doesn't equal having to sing.
I've also never known her to seriously want to sing as a career or anything (but I don't follow the kids so IDK).
Either way she should be fine because even if she can't sing auto tune exist.

It might not even be set in stone that she's going to be on the show.
It all depends on where TMZ 'learned' from and their 'sources.'

. LOL. You're right about that auto tune and TMZ. I wish Paris well. I just want her to be happy and successful.

 

[redfrog]

I find it more alarming that anyone in this world, and specifically someone who claims to be a MJ fan, is so dismissive of sexual abuse of a 14 year old girl (even of MJ's own daughter) for any reason. Especially when there's no sense in this freak out. How can anyone be so cold about it?

Reading that Paris has gone through this broke my heart.

It's not a 14 year old girl who is making these claims but a 18 year old woman. Even if it was a 14 year old I would not automatically believe her.
I am cold because I've seen way too many people lying about sexual abuse and no way I will believe anyone
without evidence especially not Paris who falsely accused someone of leaking "child porn" before. The guy reacted to that accusation with class. Paris had absolutely no proof that he leaked those photos and calling them child porn was way over the top.
What were her motives to do that? Inexcusable.

Didn't we hear the exact same thing with regard to Chandler and Arvizo? Oh a boy or a man would not lie about sexual abuse, no way.
I'm not saying that Paris is lying. I'm saying that just because she says it happened does not mean it indeed happened.

Ridiculous. You're turning everything around - just because there's people who will lie about it doesn't mean no one should get any sympathy or be believed until they can 'prove' they actually were abused. Paris had nothing to gain from saying that, she didn't name any names and she's not suing anyone for money. There were plenty of other topics in that interview to get her sympathy if that's what she wanted; the death of her only parent, depression, drug addiction, multiple suicide attempts - but one sentence about sexual abuse and oh she probably 'invented it for sympathy and attention'.. right.

She may have very well invented it yes, why not? It's easy. And she invented similar accusations before for attention, drama and
sympathy. All I'm saying I won't believe it just because she says so. Especially not with her history.
She accused Murray and unnamed people of murder and conspiracy too, without any evidence. The girl is a drama queen and more than capable of dropping BS for effect.

Absolutely... and redfrog, what you're going on about is one of many reasons why so many sexual assault victims never speak out.

Ah please. In America especially accusers have a much better chance of getting automatic sympathy and the accused
automatic condemnation than scepticism. I didn't hear anyone question Paris's story. Noone. That's just insane, don't you think?
No question asked. If someone says I was assaulted let's just feel sorry for her or him.
Even that lunatic woman who falsely accused Al Gore of sex assault got instant sympathy and Gore instant ridicule.
This is why false accusers are so confident they can get away with it. If you want to believe
everyone who cries "I am a victim", without any evidence, do it. I won't.

 

[Annita]

Paris Jackson will guest star on Fox drama, 'Star'

Bill Keveney , USA TODAY8:10 p.m. ET Jan. 30, 2017

(Photo: Pascal Le Segretain, Getty Images)


The daughter of the King of Pop will make her acting debut on Fox's Star, a show that follows a girl group seeking musical fame and fortune.
Paris Jackson, 18, daughter of the late Michael Jackson, will appear in an upcoming episode of the first-season drama (Wednesdays, 9 ET/PT), which is produced by Empire's Lee Daniels and stars Queen Latifah, Fox announced Monday.
Jackson will play Rachel Wells, who is described as "a young, super-chic, stylish and intimidating social media guru who oversees a publicity shoot of the girl group and deliberately goads Star (Jude Demorest) and Eva (guest star Sharlene Taulé) into pushing some boundaries."

http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/t...star/97266816/

 

[barbee0715]

Paris Jackson will guest star on Fox drama, 'Star'

Bill Keveney , USA TODAY8:10 p.m. ET Jan. 30, 2017

(Photo: Pascal Le Segretain, Getty Images)


The daughter of the King of Pop will make her acting debut on Fox's Star, a show that follows a girl group seeking musical fame and fortune.
Paris Jackson, 18, daughter of the late Michael Jackson, will appear in an upcoming episode of the first-season drama (Wednesdays, 9 ET/PT), which is produced by Empire's Lee Daniels and stars Queen Latifah, Fox announced Monday.
Jackson will play Rachel Wells, who is described as "a young, super-chic, stylish and intimidating social media guru who oversees a publicity shoot of the girl group and deliberately goads Star (Jude Demorest) and Eva (guest star Sharlene Taulé) into pushing some boundaries."

http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/t...star/97266816/

Hmm-doesn't sound like a very likable part, does it?

 

[michaeljackson&lisamarie]

Paris Jackson will guest star on Fox drama, 'Star'

Bill Keveney , USA TODAY8:10 p.m. ET Jan. 30, 2017

(Photo: Pascal Le Segretain, Getty Images)


The daughter of the King of Pop will make her acting debut on Fox's Star, a show that follows a girl group seeking musical fame and fortune.
Paris Jackson, 18, daughter of the late Michael Jackson, will appear in an upcoming episode of the first-season drama (Wednesdays, 9 ET/PT), which is produced by Empire's Lee Daniels and stars Queen Latifah, Fox announced Monday.
Jackson will play Rachel Wells, who is described as "a young, super-chic, stylish and intimidating social media guru who oversees a publicity shoot of the girl group and deliberately goads Star (Jude Demorest) and Eva (guest star Sharlene Taulé) into pushing some boundaries."

http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/t...star/97266816/

. Good for Paris. I'm happy for her. I wish her the best.

 

[KOPV]

Do yall think it's safe to assume her role in 'Star' would air in season 2 since the season is already airing?

 

[Annita]

Paris deleted all her last photos with Snoddy from her instagram, the last she posted were from Paris. Now they are all gone. Last Snoddy-photos are now from the Hawai-Holiday in Christmas-time. So it may be true the relationship is over. I have to say I am not missing him.

https://www.instagram.com/parisjackson/?hl=de

 

[Ms. BlueGangsta]

Paris deleted all her last photos with Snoddy from her instagram, the last she posted were from Paris. Now they are all gone. Last Snoddy-photos are now from the Hawai-Holiday in Christmas-time. So it may be true the relationship is over. I have to say I am not missing him.

https://www.instagram.com/parisjackson/?hl=de

If they legit have broke up all I have to say is yasss Paris, dump that racist bitch.:lol: