Who on Twitter said this?? I think people need to let go of an incident that happened almost twenty years ago, decisions made by in large by different people under extreme circumstances. Even though we as MJ fanatics know that Michael was innocent, Pepsi dropping Michael was not a personal vendetta or action against Michael. Pop stars have been dropped by sponsers for far less than being accused of child molestation. Pepsi is a company, an entity, therefore I see no problem with the Estate using a former sponser to promote the anniversary of a brilliant album. Michael obvious burried the hatchet considering he began to to business with them yet again. Maybe some fans need to do the same. IMO of course.
