Kingofpop4ever3000
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 1,533
- Points
- 0
Re: Michael Jackson's doctor wants to keep his license
Thank you. It angers and sickens me that with everything we know about what Murray did and didn't do in total disregard for Michael's health and medical safety that he is still making excuses for that crap. To me, Murray is just trying to hide behind Michael's sour public image with the media and haters. And now he's complaining because the medical board isn't buying this bullish "Poor Conrad Murray" charade of his. Why should the medical board have to kiss Murray's behind after he did something so stupid with a patient? I don't care what anybody thinks of Michael Jackson. Murray injected him with Propofol in clear violation of the medical ethics code whether Michael asked for it or not. And even worse, Murray left Michael alone with that stuff flowing through his veins with no monitoring equipment or nobody watching him. There was no good reason for this. Isn't Murray's conviction final unless he wins his appeal? Even so, if the appeals court has any decent sense at all, they will keep him right where he is.
Murray's license is as good as gone...he is in denial if he thinks any differently. These court things are merely technicality's...it is obvious that he is still in denial about killing Michael. He never will admit he was wrong and he will continue to play the victim. He makes me sick
Thank you. It angers and sickens me that with everything we know about what Murray did and didn't do in total disregard for Michael's health and medical safety that he is still making excuses for that crap. To me, Murray is just trying to hide behind Michael's sour public image with the media and haters. And now he's complaining because the medical board isn't buying this bullish "Poor Conrad Murray" charade of his. Why should the medical board have to kiss Murray's behind after he did something so stupid with a patient? I don't care what anybody thinks of Michael Jackson. Murray injected him with Propofol in clear violation of the medical ethics code whether Michael asked for it or not. And even worse, Murray left Michael alone with that stuff flowing through his veins with no monitoring equipment or nobody watching him. There was no good reason for this. Isn't Murray's conviction final unless he wins his appeal? Even so, if the appeals court has any decent sense at all, they will keep him right where he is.
Last edited: