Jason Malachi = Italian
Cascio Familly = Italian
1+1 =2
what do u mean by people in the industry are talking about jackson?
please care to elaborate.
Jason Malachi = Italian
Cascio Familly = Italian
1+1 =2
What??? You're saying there's no world conspiracy involving Sony to destroy MJ and brainwash every human being to believe this voice is MJ's and make money?? FOOL!!! It's the ultimate revenge!! Their plan is to destroy the artist that makes the most money for them and can make even more, can't you see? It may sound contradictory, but who cares? It's true!!
Where did this statement from Dominic Cascio come from?
Anybody have a source?
I firmly believe there is about to be a lot of egg on people's faces including the fans.
I'm sorry to say but how in hell did we all get so duped into believing all this when we have years and years of experience in the world of Michael Jackson and the lies he has had to endure.
Maybe we should all sit back and go hold on lets see all the evidence before we incriminate because at this moment we are all guilty of doing just what the tabloid press and the likes of Diane Dimmond and so on did.
I do believe there is a tape demo recording and amateur video going to be leaked where you can see and hear Michael singing.
I'm Italian too, goshdarnit I'm also involved
People who work in the music industry are talking about the way the Jacksons have handled this.
Think about it, that list from the Estate/Sony naming Teddy Riley, Bruce Swedien, Brad Buxor, Michael Prince, Frank Dileo, Matt Forger, Stewart Brawley, Dr Freeze, Greg Phillanganes, Dorian Holley and then people like Fifty Cent, Tricky producing/working on those songs implicates them too - those are a lot of big industry names and they've basically suggested that each of those people is lying and/or being paid off by Sony. Everyone can see how pissed that Teddy Riley was about being accused of lying, imagine what the other people are saying. It was a really really really stupid move on their part.
I'm Italian too, goshdarnit I'm also involved
:lol: :lol: :lol:
All through the cunning use of just three fake songs...
I think it was (1) very incomplete (2) bad production (according to Riley), messed with the vocals too much (according to Riley) (3) added some other guy to sing some parts, background.
Question) Why did they bother to include this song?
Answer) Teddy Riley said there isn't much recent material.
I never in my life saw 3T as being the way some are describing them, I just can't.
I also can not see why the Cascio's would be lying either, they were like family to him.
The song sounded strange for sure.
Teddy Riley put a different version on the other day, it sounded better..
THAT is the part I had and still have a problem with. Especially since Michael sounds totally like MICHAEL on "Keep Your Head Up", but doesn't sound like him on "Breaking News". So I still can't figure that one out....They say it's MJ, so fine...I take that as them telling the truth. Just please explain to me and demonstrate to me how MJ can sound like MJ on one song recorded in the same studio...and not sound at all like MJ on another song recorded in the same studio
I firmly believe there is about to be a lot of egg on people's faces including the fans.
I'm sorry to say but how in hell did we all get so duped into believing all this when we have years and years of experience in the world of Michael Jackson and the lies he has had to endure.
Maybe we should all sit back and go hold on lets see all the evidence before we incriminate because at this moment we are all guilty of doing just what the tabloid press and the likes of Diane Dimmond and so on did.
I do believe there is a tape demo recording and amateur video going to be leaked where you can see and hear Michael singing.
I wasn't duped. When I first heard the rumors I just shook my head. It sounded like the typical family/tabloid wingnut conspiracy garbage. But then I heard the song. I doubted the verses were sung by Michael because it does't sound like him to me. I would never be embarrassed because I expressed my opinion.
Well, what can I say, I just loooove the song! I am not sophisticated when it comes to music I guess, and I am glad. If I were to analyze, dissect every song I personally would not enjoy it as much. To me, music is simple, I just listen to MJ music and 99% of the time I just love it immediately. And guess what, that's what happened to me with BN. I am so glad it is in the new album. I would have been disappointed if they had pulled the 3 tracks.
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. But just wait until the album and see.
May sound rude to some, but you're right. I just can't stand it anymore... I come to this forum and all I see is "fake fake fake - they're lying!! it's not MJ!!! I know it - even if I wasn't there and don't have any proof it isn't him!!". Sheesh. Stop it already. Then there are those people who think they are the "keepers of the truth" and try to sound smart and "oh so above us all" while pointing out that it's not MJ and trying to put people down if they believe it is him. I am sincerely sick of those ones. It's not even about having a different opinion anymore - it's about being "in the lovely defense of the truth and MJ's legacy" and claiming there's a huge conspiracy around. I guess they feel better fooling themselves that they're protecting MJ somehow imposing their beliefs on others (even if they weren't there and take the risk of being proven wrong sooner or later).
What??? You're saying there's no world conspiracy involving Sony to destroy MJ and brainwash every human being to believe this voice is MJ's and make money?? FOOL!!! It's the ultimate revenge!! Their plan is to destroy the artist that makes the most money for them and can make even more, can't you see? It may sound contradictory, but who cares? It's true!!
Sorry, couldn't resist.
Funny how they have work tapes, but their harddrives with the original files were destroyed/erased?
The Cascio's weren't the ones who said that, it was Sony. And honestly from what they did to Michael's vocals on "Hold My Hand" it's completely plausible for one to think that they edited the majority of these songs, to the point that his voice may be unrecognizable to some.
What did they do on "Hold My Hand"?
His voice has obviously had some type of digital effect or production work done on it
I don't think normal production work that is present on most commercially available tracks is comparable to whatever was done on Breaking News and the other questionable tracks.
i aint apologizing for ish, they said this was a new michael jackson song and didnt mention any other singers until they were being grilled about the fake, they tried 2play us so...umm no.
I don't know the Casico's either, but I do know that unlike a lot of of other folks in Michael's life (including his OWN family), they didn't immediately run to the tabloid media with a bunch of stories once Michael was no longer with us.
And I'm sure they have a bunch of stories, they can SELL if they wanted to, but they never did. I have to give them credit for that, since everybody and their momma basically ran to the media with a story, pictures and/or video footage to sell.
:yes: I agreeexactly.if Michael were to do this, he'd be toast on this forum. it's so baltantly obvious. but sony or the cascios...not so much toast, apparently.
well, if they think they got some songs to sell, why have stories to tell? don't want one to get in the way of the other, i'm guessing.
it's so easy and tempting to use the invisibility and elusiveness of the songwriting and producing process to want to pull one over on me, an MJ fan, who is, frankly, vulnerable, just as it is easy for those, in the mdia, who did, to use the invisiblity of the buying habits of my next door neigbor to skew the numbers in past Michael Jackson album sales so as to look like they were not in Michael's favor. hey..the naysayers once were so comfortable with the invisible, they tried it on the visible...remember when they used to say that small crowds were coming to MJ events, when the videos would show that the amount of fans attending were HUGE? and they would say that there were only reporters attending, when, in fact, there were FANS in attendance?
`
by the way, the speed at which the cascios made 'imporovements' on Breaking News, proves the idea that they might have rushed that copyright, between june 25 and 27 of 2009. could have been power of suggestion, too, as the 'imporvements' sound no different to me.
well, if they think they got some songs to sell, why have stories to tell? don't want one to get in the way of the other, i'm guessing.