Dominic Cascio speaks

Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

Where did this statement from Dominic Cascio come from?

Anybody have a source? :)
 
Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

Jason Malachi = Italian
Cascio Familly = Italian

1+1 =2

Maybe the Vatican is behind it? Let's call Dan Brown, or is he tweeting about this whole thing already? ;)
 
Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

Funny how they have work tapes, but their harddrives with the original files were destroyed/erased?
 
Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

what do u mean by people in the industry are talking about jackson?
please care to elaborate.

People who work in the music industry are talking about the way the Jacksons have handled this.

Think about it, that list from the Estate/Sony naming Teddy Riley, Bruce Swedien, Brad Buxor, Michael Prince, Frank Dileo, Matt Forger, Stewart Brawley, Dr Freeze, Greg Phillanganes, Dorian Holley and then people like Fifty Cent, Tricky producing/working on those songs implicates them too - those are a lot of big industry names and they've basically suggested that each of those people is lying and/or being paid off by Sony. Everyone can see how pissed that Teddy Riley was about being accused of lying, imagine what the other people are saying. It was a really really really stupid move on their part.

Jason Malachi = Italian
Cascio Familly = Italian

1+1 =2

I'm Italian too, goshdarnit I'm also involved :(

What??? You're saying there's no world conspiracy involving Sony to destroy MJ and brainwash every human being to believe this voice is MJ's and make money?? FOOL!!! It's the ultimate revenge!! Their plan is to destroy the artist that makes the most money for them and can make even more, can't you see? It may sound contradictory, but who cares? It's true!!

:lol: :lol: :lol:

All through the cunning use of just three fake songs...
 
Last edited:
Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

Where did this statement from Dominic Cascio come from?

Anybody have a source? :)

Yes! The source is ... drumroll ... Dominic Cascio! ;) Sorry for being silly. I just did a quick Google search with part of the statement and found a French forum where someone had posted this statement saying it's a reply to his or her questions on Facebook. Not sure if I'm allowed to post the link to this French forum on here.
 
Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

This place is so hysterical it reminds me a lot of Trading, where the slightest rumour sends the markets off in waves of hysteria that causes massive price movements.

1st the Cascios were the baddies now the jacksons are the baddies, whos tomorrow? Maybe they'll bring out a movie a bit like the facebook one, they could just show peoples reactions on here.


fwiw When I 1st heard Breaking News I knew it had the feel of an MJ track infact the same chords have been used from other songs like give into me (the bit where he sings 'she always takes it with a...').

But I can only presume the audio they recorded was a single channel low khz track as they have padded it out with someone else so we are getting possibly 20% MJ.

Credit people with some intelligence I do not listen to anyone elses opinion only my own ears.
 
Well, I gotta say this. I have mine own theory what is real truth behind fake/not fake vocals. I am not going to say anything because I already got my 10 days ban for a negative opinion about BN song I based on snippets on Nov. 6th. Now everybody is discussing controversy of Breaking News with no problem. Here we go… LOL So I better say nothing, however I have to admit that the story from Dominic Cascio matches perfectly with my own theory. So folks, enjoy the discussion and the magic of Michael Jackson. :)
 
Last edited:
Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

I firmly believe there is about to be a lot of egg on people's faces including the fans.

I'm sorry to say but how in hell did we all get so duped into believing all this when we have years and years of experience in the world of Michael Jackson and the lies he has had to endure.

Maybe we should all sit back and go hold on lets see all the evidence before we incriminate because at this moment we are all guilty of doing just what the tabloid press and the likes of Diane Dimmond and so on did.

I do believe there is a tape demo recording and amateur video going to be leaked where you can see and hear Michael singing.

:agree:


I do not trust the Jacksons in the least. They have lost all credibility, imo. There's too many examples of their lack of disrespect and loyalty to Michael to list here. This is another example as to why Michael was wise to distance himself from them. Just because you have the same DNA does not make you automatically trustworthy.

The Cascios on the other hand have remained loyal and respectful to Michael. No tabloid stories, no running to Oprah, nothing, quiet. And not just after his passing but during his toughest time during the trial- totally steadfast loyal. Now that to me is a "real family". And Michael felt that, that's why he called them "His first family of love". I'm glad he had that normalcy, happiness and joy while he was living with them in NJ. Michael felt loved for him as a person and not for his money or his fame. Now the Cascios want to share what Michael was excited about with the fans, with the world. I thank them for that.

And btw, nobody has ever hidden the fact that James Porte (vocalist) recorded the background vocals. Michael used background vocalists during History and Invincible. What is so unusual about that. I have always believed it was Michael, the first time I heard this song, and I've been a fan for close to 25 yrs. I love the song.

Just keep an open mind, and wait until the album comes to hear the final version before you judge it. They judged Michael his entire life, don't do this again with these songs. Wait and see. I cannot wait for this album. I have a gut feeling it will be epic!! :D
 
Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

People who work in the music industry are talking about the way the Jacksons have handled this.

Think about it, that list from the Estate/Sony naming Teddy Riley, Bruce Swedien, Brad Buxor, Michael Prince, Frank Dileo, Matt Forger, Stewart Brawley, Dr Freeze, Greg Phillanganes, Dorian Holley and then people like Fifty Cent, Tricky producing/working on those songs implicates them too - those are a lot of big industry names and they've basically suggested that each of those people is lying and/or being paid off by Sony. Everyone can see how pissed that Teddy Riley was about being accused of lying, imagine what the other people are saying. It was a really really really stupid move on their part.



I'm Italian too, goshdarnit I'm also involved :(



:lol: :lol: :lol:

All through the cunning use of just three fake songs...

thank u .
 
Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

I have discovered this thread recently and haven't had the time to read all the comments, except the first post expressed by Cascio.

I must say that what Cascio does not seem to understand is that fans are angry just because some words were accentuated, stressed, etc by an alien singer without even warning the fans!

I am sorry, but using the excuse of Michael's death for that is just promoting this unknown singer on Michae'ls track.

By the way, instead of accentuating and adding voices etc, they could have simply made a duet out of this unfinished song with some singers who Michael really appreciated.

Personally, although I've always been an optimist and looked at the bright side of life, I am going to buy the album, but I am really not happy at all about these foreign vocal addings! They've just ruined the track by doing so!
 
Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

I think it was (1) very incomplete (2) bad production (according to Riley), messed with the vocals too much (according to Riley) (3) added some other guy to sing some parts, background.

Question) Why did they bother to include this song?
Answer) Teddy Riley said there isn't much recent material.

I never in my life saw 3T as being the way some are describing them, I just can't.

I also can not see why the Cascio's would be lying either, they were like family to him.

The song sounded strange for sure.
Teddy Riley put a different version on the other day, it sounded better..
 
Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

I think it was (1) very incomplete (2) bad production (according to Riley), messed with the vocals too much (according to Riley) (3) added some other guy to sing some parts, background.

Question) Why did they bother to include this song?
Answer) Teddy Riley said there isn't much recent material.

I never in my life saw 3T as being the way some are describing them, I just can't.

I also can not see why the Cascio's would be lying either, they were like family to him.

The song sounded strange for sure.
Teddy Riley put a different version on the other day, it sounded better..


Well, what can I say, I just loooove the song! I am not sophisticated when it comes to music I guess, and I am glad. If I were to analyze, dissect every song I personally would not enjoy it as much. To me, music is simple, I just listen to MJ music and 99% of the time I just love it immediately. And guess what, that's what happened to me with BN. I am so glad it is in the new album. I would have been disappointed if they had pulled the 3 tracks.

I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. But just wait until the album and see. :)
 
Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

THAT is the part I had and still have a problem with. Especially since Michael sounds totally like MICHAEL on "Keep Your Head Up", but doesn't sound like him on "Breaking News". So I still can't figure that one out....They say it's MJ, so fine...I take that as them telling the truth. Just please explain to me and demonstrate to me how MJ can sound like MJ on one song recorded in the same studio...and not sound at all like MJ on another song recorded in the same studio


I have been wondering the same thing. I have no doubt that lead vocal on KYHU is 100% Michael. But BN does not sound like him. The whole different studio/different equipment explanation doesn't work for me.

I firmly believe there is about to be a lot of egg on people's faces including the fans.

I'm sorry to say but how in hell did we all get so duped into believing all this when we have years and years of experience in the world of Michael Jackson and the lies he has had to endure.

I wasn't duped. When I first heard the rumors I just shook my head. It sounded like the typical family/tabloid wingnut conspiracy garbage. But then I heard the song. I doubted the verses were sung by Michael because it does't sound like him to me. I would never be embarrassed because I expressed my opinion.

Maybe we should all sit back and go hold on lets see all the evidence before we incriminate because at this moment we are all guilty of doing just what the tabloid press and the likes of Diane Dimmond and so on did.

I do believe there is a tape demo recording and amateur video going to be leaked where you can see and hear Michael singing.

I agree we should not judge until we have seen all of the evidence. I am now leaning toward the theory that they just messed with Michael's vocals too much and that's why it does't sound like him. I really like the song though, so I hope there is proof that it really is him, because then I can enjoy it.

Either way, every other song I have heard from the album sounds like Michael, so of course I am buying the album. Perhaps Sony showed bad judgement in putting BN on the album but that is no reason to boycott, imo.
 
Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

I wasn't duped. When I first heard the rumors I just shook my head. It sounded like the typical family/tabloid wingnut conspiracy garbage. But then I heard the song. I doubted the verses were sung by Michael because it does't sound like him to me. I would never be embarrassed because I expressed my opinion.

Same here.
 
Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

Well, what can I say, I just loooove the song! I am not sophisticated when it comes to music I guess, and I am glad. If I were to analyze, dissect every song I personally would not enjoy it as much. To me, music is simple, I just listen to MJ music and 99% of the time I just love it immediately. And guess what, that's what happened to me with BN. I am so glad it is in the new album. I would have been disappointed if they had pulled the 3 tracks.

I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. But just wait until the album and see. :)

Ditto. I love BN sooooo very much.
 
Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

May sound rude to some, but you're right. I just can't stand it anymore... I come to this forum and all I see is "fake fake fake - they're lying!! it's not MJ!!! I know it - even if I wasn't there and don't have any proof it isn't him!!". Sheesh. Stop it already. Then there are those people who think they are the "keepers of the truth" and try to sound smart and "oh so above us all" while pointing out that it's not MJ and trying to put people down if they believe it is him. I am sincerely sick of those ones. It's not even about having a different opinion anymore - it's about being "in the lovely defense of the truth and MJ's legacy" and claiming there's a huge conspiracy around. I guess they feel better fooling themselves that they're protecting MJ somehow imposing their beliefs on others (even if they weren't there and take the risk of being proven wrong sooner or later).



What??? You're saying there's no world conspiracy involving Sony to destroy MJ and brainwash every human being to believe this voice is MJ's and make money?? FOOL!!! It's the ultimate revenge!! Their plan is to destroy the artist that makes the most money for them and can make even more, can't you see? It may sound contradictory, but who cares? It's true!!

Sorry, couldn't resist.

i wish MJ could have enjoyed this kind of defense.

you're doing what you claim.
if you have to go 'so called fans' and such, you're not helping your argument.
all i hear is 'buy the fricking album, already!!!!'
not a good look to make those demands. and..the threat to fans that they are destroying his legacy, is very much, see through. it's pretty cardboard to think that not buying this album will somehow destroy MJ's legacy, when there's a lot to his legacy. and getting all explosive and mocking really doesn't help the case. usually there is no foundational argument under those kinds of histrionics.

*hearing the echoes of people who used to accuse MJ of not having a b.s. detector*

anyway...Teddy Riley saying there's not much recent material, is very telling. it's not what was advertised earlier.

and as Cascio speaks, he comes across as some on this forum. he'd get banned, if he was a member, for how he's picking sides of the Jackson family and blasting them, and his speech is extreme, and he's very accusatory. he's not helping his case. if he was comfortable with his position, he wouldn't come across that way.

this ain't about being a music expert. the music buying experience for me, was never something i had to think about, no matter what. i was just a consumer buying music from an artist that gave me a good feeling. period.

and with Michael, i had good pure feelings and magic, coming from him, that made me feel like buying his music, while he was here..throughout all the time i ever bought his music, whether or not there was turmoil surrounding him, the turmoil NEVER came directly FROM him.

now that he is gone, there are people conveniently using the turmoil that SURRONDED him, and twisting the feelings that go with that turmoil, and are using all of that, to protect the fact that the turmoil, this time, is coming FROM the source of the project, and making the music buying experience something that it's not supposed to be....complicated.

this isn't supposed to be artificial; a dictatorship, complicated, or a marxist regime, a science project, or a test of peoples' intelligence, or a project designed to make a consumer feel like they are looked down upon, or an exercise in guilt tripping... it's just supposed to be pure and real, and simple; a music buying experience, that feeds magic to the soul.
 
Last edited:
Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

Funny how they have work tapes, but their harddrives with the original files were destroyed/erased?

The Cascio's weren't the ones who said that, it was Sony. And honestly from what they did to Michael's vocals on "Hold My Hand" it's completely plausible for one to think that they edited the majority of these songs, to the point that his voice may be unrecognizable to some.
 
Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

The Cascio's weren't the ones who said that, it was Sony. And honestly from what they did to Michael's vocals on "Hold My Hand" it's completely plausible for one to think that they edited the majority of these songs, to the point that his voice may be unrecognizable to some.

What did they do on "Hold My Hand"? His voice has obviously had some type of digital effect or production work done on it, but its clearly still Michael Jackson.
 
Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

What did they do on "Hold My Hand"?

His voice has obviously had some type of digital effect or production work done on it


And from my understanding, it was Akon that did that. So is it not possible that someone may have went overproduced some of the material? And not everyone believes that it sounds nothing like Michael, some can hear Michael, some can't, some think it's %100 percent Michael, some think it's %50 percent and lower. Point is, it's possible they were all edited to some extent, and Breaking News happened to be one of those songs.


And according to TMZ and Harvey Levin (Not saying they should be held as the most credible and reliable source) the version that Sony put out online was the wrong one and the final one that will show up on the album is different. Take it for what it's worth though...
 
Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

I don't think normal production work that is present on most commercially available tracks is comparable to whatever was done on Breaking News and the other questionable tracks.
 
Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

i aint apologizing for ish, they said this was a new michael jackson song and didnt mention any other singers until they were being grilled about the fake, they tried 2play us so...umm no.
 
Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

I don't think normal production work that is present on most commercially available tracks is comparable to whatever was done on Breaking News and the other questionable tracks.

Fair enough, but I don't think digitally altering a singers voice, especially Michael is normal production work.
 
Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

i aint apologizing for ish, they said this was a new michael jackson song and didnt mention any other singers until they were being grilled about the fake, they tried 2play us so...umm no.

exactly.if Michael were to do this, he'd be toast on this forum. it's so baltantly obvious. but sony or the cascios...not so much toast, apparently.

I don't know the Casico's either, but I do know that unlike a lot of of other folks in Michael's life (including his OWN family), they didn't immediately run to the tabloid media with a bunch of stories once Michael was no longer with us.

And I'm sure they have a bunch of stories, they can SELL if they wanted to, but they never did. I have to give them credit for that, since everybody and their momma basically ran to the media with a story, pictures and/or video footage to sell.

well, if they think they got some songs to sell, why have stories to tell? don't want one to get in the way of the other, i'm guessing.

it's so easy and tempting to use the invisibility and elusiveness of the songwriting and producing process to want to pull one over on me, an MJ fan, who is, frankly, vulnerable, just as it is easy for those, in the mdia, who did, to use the invisiblity of the buying habits of my next door neigbor to skew the numbers in past Michael Jackson album sales so as to look like they were not in Michael's favor. hey..the naysayers once were so comfortable with the invisible, they tried it on the visible...remember when they used to say that small crowds were coming to MJ events, when the videos would show that the amount of fans attending were HUGE? and they would say that there were only reporters attending, when, in fact, there were FANS in attendance?

`
by the way, the speed at which the cascios made 'imporovements' on Breaking News, proves the idea that they might have rushed that copyright, between june 25 and 27 of 2009. could have been power of suggestion, too, as the 'imporvements' sound no different to me.
 
Last edited:
Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

exactly.if Michael were to do this, he'd be toast on this forum. it's so baltantly obvious. but sony or the cascios...not so much toast, apparently.



well, if they think they got some songs to sell, why have stories to tell? don't want one to get in the way of the other, i'm guessing.

it's so easy and tempting to use the invisibility and elusiveness of the songwriting and producing process to want to pull one over on me, an MJ fan, who is, frankly, vulnerable, just as it is easy for those, in the mdia, who did, to use the invisiblity of the buying habits of my next door neigbor to skew the numbers in past Michael Jackson album sales so as to look like they were not in Michael's favor. hey..the naysayers once were so comfortable with the invisible, they tried it on the visible...remember when they used to say that small crowds were coming to MJ events, when the videos would show that the amount of fans attending were HUGE? and they would say that there were only reporters attending, when, in fact, there were FANS in attendance?

`
by the way, the speed at which the cascios made 'imporovements' on Breaking News, proves the idea that they might have rushed that copyright, between june 25 and 27 of 2009. could have been power of suggestion, too, as the 'imporvements' sound no different to me.
:yes: I agree

One thing that's interesting is that 3T has remained civil and tweeted their opinions on the matter BUT Teddy and now Dominic have pretty much went on rants against the brothers
 
Last edited:
Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

um... At least when we heard "THIS IS IT" we didn't have to wonder who was singing?

thanks for the Public Service Announcement Dominic... but I have ears. I don't have a damn Twitter and I don't need the Jacksons to tell me what Michael's voice sounds like.

Thanks but BYE with that weak statement!
 
Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

So... was the statement from Eddie released already???
 
Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

well, if they think they got some songs to sell, why have stories to tell? don't want one to get in the way of the other, i'm guessing.

Sorry, but in my opinion, if it was all about a MONEY GRAB, the Casico's could have started selling stories on June 26, 2009, just like a lot of other folks did, including Michael's OWN family, but they didn't.

They actually could have started SELLING stories years ago, but they didn't.

When they came back from spending Christmas with Michael in Bahrain, when everybody and their momma were WONDERING what Michael was doing while in Bahrain, the Cascio family could have made a "boat-load" of money had they sold those "Christmas In Bahrain with Michael Jackson" stories, but they NEVER did! (WE ALL would have enjoyed hearing "Christmas In Bahrain" stories. LOL! But it never happened.)

It's also very interesting that while Michael lived with the Casico family for 4-months at their New Jersey home, we NEVER saw any paparazzi pictures of Michael or his children. I believe the Casico's were VERY protective of Michael and that's why we never saw any pictures or heard any stories and to this day, we still haven't.
 
Re: Dominic Cascio speaks (Upcoming statement from Eddie soon)

Totally agree with Michaelsson, 144,000 and MJ Brainiac.
 
Back
Top