Graf
Proud Member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2009
- Messages
- 3,981
- Points
- 63
But Tsukiji, even if these tracks are 100% Michael Jackson, it's still begs the question as to why over 50% of the fans are doubting that it actually is him in the first place.
- Some massive amount of editing must have been done if it's him, to the point where it doesn't sound like him. It is not acceptable to place them on the album.
- If MJ is in a sub-optimal recording environment and what they have to work on is un-releasable, then don't even consider it for the album.
- The songs are very weak. Monster is probably the strongest of the 3, but that's not saying much. A lot of us believe that these are so bad that they're tarnishing his legacy.
I get what your saying...because I've gone back and forth soooooo many times..Although I don't agree they are weak songs, just IMO
Your right though, I think it probably would have been best to just keep them off the album..because all they have done has caused trouble..but the reality is, I think they wanted to have a good solid bunch of recent material to put on the album...even if the Vocals were rough, and had to be processed or whatever..They are good songs though, more than fans realize, I think the "Controversy" taints it for many, but they are pretty damn good just from a music quality perspective IMO.