Latest on MJJC

Michael Jackson feat. 50 cent - MONSTER - its the real deal says 50 -READ!

There's still no proof that it's not him on lead vocals. So that's not a fact, the fact that Sony/The Estate has yet to credit anyone else on the lead vocals says a lot. Seems like some of us are forgetting that that's a crime, and they're entitled to be sued if that was truly the case, which hasn't been done as of yet.
 
AnnieRUOkay89 said:
There's still no proof that it's not him on lead vocals. So that's not a fact, the fact that Sony/The Estate has yet to credit anyone else on the lead vocals says a lot. Seems like some of us are forgetting that that's a crime, and they're entitled to be sued if that was truly the case, which hasn't been done as of yet.
Click to expand...

I don't know what to believe at this point, as I can see legit views from fans on both sides of this issue. But nevertheless, I agree with you. If the Cascio tracks are indeed fake, then that is consumer fraud. The Cascios, Sony and the Estate could all be in big trouble with the law. And it wouldn't be hard to take them to court. I'm so tired of this mess. Why don't we just have everyone involved with the album take a lie-detector test and then release the reports to the public? There has to be a way of getting to the honest truth here. Enough is enough.
 
Last edited:
Kingofpop4ever3000 said:
I don't know what to believe at this point, as I can see legit views from fans on both sides of this issue. But nevertheless, I agree with you. If the Cascio tracks are indeed fake, then that is consumer fraud. The Cascios, Sony and the Estate could all be in big trouble with the law. And it wouldn't be hard to take them to court. I'm so tired of this mess. Why don't we just have everyone involved with the album take a lie-detector test and then release the reports to the public? There has to be a way of getting to the honest truth here. Enough is enough.
Click to expand...

Nobody is going to take anybody to court. It is a game and everybody knows the rules:)
 
this is undoubtedly him on the lead vocals. I haven't read yet that it's been run through an analayzer, but hell this sounds less recognizeable than a lot of of songs MJ did while alive.

and the ad lybs on MOnster? come on, that sounds like the same classic MJ we've been listening to for decades. He doesn't even sound any older than he did on Invincible.

Mike's diverse. He was always really, really, really diverse when it came to his vocals. Listen to Invincible. Are you telling me that his vocals on Privacy aren't a lot different from YRMW, and then again 2000 watts? Then again on Shout. One More Chance. These songs ALL sound like they were sung by a different person other than MJ. Yeah they still all kind of sound like him, but so do these songs on "Michael." When I show these new songs to people and say look at his diversity they all go "yeah it sounds different, but you can still tell it's him."
 
Kingofpop4ever3000 said:
I don't know what to believe at this point, as I can see legit views from fans on both sides of this issue. But nevertheless, I agree with you. If the Cascio tracks are indeed fake, then that is consumer fraud. The Cascios, Sony and the Estate could all be in big trouble with the law. And it wouldn't be hard to take them to court. I'm so tired of this mess. Why don't we just have everyone involved with the album take a lie-detector test and then release the reports to the public? There has to be a way of getting to the honest truth here. Enough is enough.
Click to expand...


Lie detector tests can only show whether or not you were nervous while taking the test. It doesn't actually detect lies. It detects anxiety.

Luckily they can run your voice through a computer, just like fingerprints and they can tell for certainty whether it's your voice or somebody else's. It's already been done with Breaking News, I believe all three of the cascio tracks, so I don't know why people are still talking about it. The test confirmed it's him with Porte assisting him on the back up vocals during the chorus.
 
JacksonMan said:
this is undoubtedly him on the lead vocals. I haven't read yet that it's been run through an analayzer, but hell this sounds less recognizeable than a lot of of songs MJ did while alive.

and the ad lybs on MOnster? come on, that sounds like the same classic MJ we've been listening to for decades. He doesn't even sound any older than he did on Invincible.

Mike's diverse. He was always really, really, really diverse when it came to his vocals. Listen to Invincible. Are you telling me that his vocals on Privacy aren't a lot different from YRMW, and then again 2000 watts? Then again on Shout. One More Chance. These songs ALL sound like they were sung by a different person other than MJ. Yeah they still all kind of sound like him, but so do these songs on "Michael." When I show these new songs to people and say look at his diversity they all go "yeah it sounds different, but you can still tell it's him."
Click to expand...


yep. people are so paranoid that they look for parts in songs that may not sound like him, not the majority of parts that DO sound like him.
 
Arklove said:
^^ the funny thing is, we, well, me at least, have NOT said it's NOT him....I'm saying, it sounds NOTHING like him.....We were all actually talking/debating in quite a civilized manner...both believers AND doubters...so, please, enough with the attacks, and a little respect, is all I ask for....
Click to expand...

Saying it sounds "nothing" like Michael is ridiculous. Lacks all semblance of logic to even suggest the Sony would put out a song with vocals that sound "nothing" like Michael Jackson and call it a Michael Jackson song.

Just silly. Please stop embarrassing yourself.
 
There is zero logic on using fake tracks, ESPECIALLY when the fake tracks are not going to make or break the project.

I love Monster but it's no Billie Jean and it's not going to make the album sell 20 million copies so why use it if it's fake.

There is no logical explanation considering there are other songs they could have put on the album.
 
Fentman said:
Saying it sounds "nothing" like Michael is ridiculous. Lacks all semblance of logic to even suggest the Sony would put out a song with vocals that sound "nothing" like Michael Jackson and call it a Michael Jackson song.

Just silly. Please stop embarrassing yourself.
Click to expand...

Why is that ridiculous? It's an opinion...Just like yours...when I have ever spoken to you that way? Never...Do not speak to me that way; you're embarrassing yourself by disrespecting my opinion when I've done nothing to deserve it...
 
Fentman said:
Saying it sounds "nothing" like Michael is ridiculous. Lacks all semblance of logic to even suggest the Sony would put out a song with vocals that sound "nothing" like Michael Jackson and call it a Michael Jackson song.

Just silly. Please stop embarrassing yourself.
Click to expand...

Great! This is exactly the tolerance and respect we keep asking for.

May be you should practice what you preach. Stop embarrassing yourself!
 
'Monster' is the strongest track on the Michael album! It also has all the hallmarks of a huge hit!

Seriously, this song must be the next single released. :)
 
smooth_criminal05 said:
^ I'm told that's the plan. Just after new years it should be released.
Click to expand...

Great news Smooth! In reality, 'Monster' is the logical choice for the next single release.

It would have been a massive shame if 'Monster' were overlooked for another track based solely on the judgment of a few disillusioned online followers with too much time on their hands.
 
Monster is a great track, and I would love it if it's released as a single. But I also think everyone is entitled to their opinion. As long as people don't say for certain that it's Jason Malachi singing the song :cheeky:.
 
Fentman said:
Saying it sounds "nothing" like Michael is ridiculous. Lacks all semblance of logic to even suggest the Sony would put out a song with vocals that sound "nothing" like Michael Jackson and call it a Michael Jackson song.

Just silly. Please stop embarrassing yourself.
Click to expand...


It sounds nothing like Michael Jackson.

And the HA's are ridiculous and sound overdone....but friend, nobody is embarrassing themselves. Well maybe you are now, with that ridiculous comment. We have our own set of ears and we don't hear Michael. You gonna tell us that we are embarrassing ourselves? Riiiiiiiiiiight.
 
If they release Monster as a single, it will make a mockery of Michael Jackson.

It simply doesn't sound like him. fake or not.
 
The bridge in Monster is great.
But it isn't a song you can enjoy in full. I always startle when this weird soundeffects in the 50 cent verse start.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top