[Discussion] Sexual Abuse Claims Against MJ Estate - Robson/ Safechuck/ Doe

Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

If people with knowledge don't inform others, people will end up believing the tabloids. During 1993 & 2006 tv & mags were informing the scandalous lies but not the inconsistencies, if it weren't for the fans who did their own work & publish the transcripts many like me would still believe Michael was guilty even when he was proven not guilty. I don't know if you sound angry or if you're making fun of the people who take their time to find facts to rebut the liar. I'm grateful to them because I have the chance to learn the truth.

You keep doing what you always try do which is doing things you like and let others do the things they always try to do which is doing the things they like.

thats not correct. in the 90's there was only a very few infos available. and that was cause there was no internet, smartphones,...
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

like he claimed on the stand he'd only found out a week before his testimony in 05 that his mother got a settlement ten years earlier. the jurrors were right at laughing at him during their breaks
It's kind of funny how Jason Francia is saying he didn't know that Wade Robson has filed a claim against the Estate of Michael Jackson, and yet his Mama is siding with Wade Robson. I guess like the Jackson's nobody knows what is going on. The Jackson's, Jermaine and LaToya, did not know about Taj Jackson being molested by one of his Mom's relatives and bringing this to the attention of the media recently or at least on his twitter account.
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

it really worries me that the burden of proof is so much lower for a civil trial (which is what Wade is brining). The jury will be deciding the case on "the balance of probabilities"...
The 2005 case was a criminal case, where the jury were deciding the case on the basis of being "beyond all reasonable doubt"
i just feel like MJ will be found guilty at a civil trial... and he'll have a guilty label slapped against him...
legacy destroyed and he's not even here to defend himself. so sad.
my only hope is that when his kids are older they will defend him and people will believe them and some of this damage can be undone.
I also worry about the fact Wade is a celeb (albeit fairly minor). He must be friends/ acquaintances with alot of people who are no longer going to feel that they can publically say anything positive about Michael...
I just find his whole thing awful
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Personally i think some fans still dont understand that the media have motives. u think they arent aware of blanca and the others lies. of course they are. but these are the ppl that get them ratings
sell their magazines. No point sending these ppl info on blanca. they dont care. they are using and paying these ppl to attack mj. they know they are full of crap but they dont care aslong as they have someone to push their agenda against mj. look how tiabbi was shut down over his sbpd corruption exposure prog he was gonna do. certain media outlets will always have their agendas and their whipping boy. nothings changed since jack johnson was lynched in the same way as mj. then on top when u have the pedo supporters such as guiterrez and world of wonder. bottom line u can not beat the media and their agendas only to post the facts on articles etc. the media decided along time ago to put the negro in his place while protecting polanski and
others even though the evidence to show how mj was blackmailed was as clear as day it didnt suit the medias agenda.theres never been a witchhunt against one individual as there was and is against mj. the media set their stall out decades ago
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I also worry about the fact Wade is a celeb (albeit fairly minor). He must be friends/ acquaintances with alot of people who are no longer going to feel that they can publically say anything positive about Michael...
I just find his whole thing awful*
**
*Multi-Quote This Message
------

i dont see any supporting him bar z listers

Question for ivy can there actually be a lawsuit against mj as he cannot defend himself/limitations etc or is that why other corps have been filed against hoping for a settlement. someone tell me how u can sue someone whos not here especially in this type of case when its he said she said
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Personally i think some fans still dont understand that the media have motives. u think they arent aware of blanca and the others lies. of course they are. but these are the ppl that get them ratings
sell their magazines. No point sending these ppl info on blanca. they dont care. they are using and paying these ppl to attack mj. they know they are full of crap but they dont care aslong as they have someone to push their agenda against mj. look how tiabbi was shut down over his sbpd corruption exposure prog he was gonna do. certain media outlets will always have their agendas and their whipping boy. nothings changed since jack johnson was lynched in the same way as mj. then on top when u have the pedo supporters such as guiterrez and world of wonder. bottom line u can not beat the media and their agendas only to post the facts on articles etc. the media decided along time ago to put the negro in his place while protecting polanski and
others even though the evidence to show how mj was blackmailed was as clear as day it didnt suit the medias agenda.theres never been a witchhunt against one individual as there was and is against mj. the media set their stall out decades ago


i would add that to my posting....
describes more what i'm thinking.

i dont know what u all are doing the whole day. and the next weeks and months. days and days, weeks and weeks.
but, sitting here, in front of your PC, and reading all this bullshit? are u really planing to do that? for what? only for wasting your time?
time u will never get back in your life? unpayable time, you will lost? the time you can fill out with things u like do that, your hobbies for example?

i experienced that in the 90's and then 2003-2005, and now this time. thats so much time and energy. but i will no longer wasting my time to read all this bullshit. i stopped that many years ago now. to read every weird article about michael jackson the molester, about the haters, tabloids...
i only shaking my head, and laughing about this all, about AEG and USA, and the haters. looks like to me something like that is only possible in that country. "the land of opportunity", it really is.
my time is unpayable.

stand up, go to the kitchen, take a glass of what u like most, and then ask yourself... IS'NT MY TIME MORE IMPORTANT THAN ALL THIS BULLSHIT OF LIES? DO I REALLY NEED TO READ THAT ALL WHEN I ALLREADY KNOW THAT ITS ALL ONLY LIES? DO I HAVE TO KNOW ALL THIS LIES?

for me, i didnt even need to stand up to know what to do... i do what i always try to do, do things i like. :)
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I worry about fans bringing to much attention to this - IM not speaking about defending it by posting on the articles so others can read the facts .. but tweeting and FB and plastering it all over is not a good idea IMO Many people don't even know .. but if you stick in their face its places doubt and gives ammunition to others - especially links to tabloid BS - Its not wise - It doesn't help .. we know from many years of experience with them and why MJ stated burn those tabloids to read it is to feed it ...
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

it really worries me that the burden of proof is so much lower for a civil trial (which is what Wade is brining). The jury will be deciding the case on "the balance of probabilities"...
The 2005 case was a criminal case, where the jury were deciding the case on the basis of being "beyond all reasonable doubt"
i just feel like MJ will be found guilty at a civil trial... and he'll have a guilty label slapped against him...
legacy destroyed and he's not even here to defend himself. so sad.
my only hope is that when his kids are older they will defend him and people will believe them and some of this damage can be undone.
I also worry about the fact Wade is a celeb (albeit fairly minor). He must be friends/ acquaintances with alot of people who are no longer going to feel that they can publically say anything positive about Michael...
I just find his whole thing awful

I have to say I share your worries about the fact a civil trial has a more lax burden of proof. It could go either way and unfortunately people has been bombarded with negative stuff about MJ for decades and that could influence a jury. The whole "no smoke without fire" way of thinking could be there. The fact MJ was accused before. Etc. And you can be sure the media will do its job once again in tuning the public against MJ during a trial. Now, that did not work in 2005, the jury still remained fair. But that was a criminal trial. In a civil trial a jury doesn't have to think it's beyond a reasonable doubt.
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

fantastic link of archives get this out there!
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I worry about fans bringing to much attention to this - IM not speaking about defending it by posting on the articles so others can read the facts .. but tweeting and FB and plastering it all over is not a good idea IMO Many people don't even know .. but if you stick in their face its places doubt and gives ammunition to others - especially links to tabloid BS - Its not wise - It doesn't help .. we know from many years of experience with them and why MJ stated burn those tabloids to read it is to feed it ...

I made one tweet about it and I refuse to publicly address it again.
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Personally i think some fans still dont understand that the media have motives. u think they arent aware of blanca and the others lies. of course they are. but these are the ppl that get them ratings
sell their magazines. No point sending these ppl info on blanca. they dont care. they are using and paying these ppl to attack mj. they know they are full of crap but they dont care aslong as they have someone to push their agenda against mj. look how tiabbi was shut down over his sbpd corruption exposure prog he was gonna do. certain media outlets will always have their agendas and their whipping boy. nothings changed since jack johnson was lynched in the same way as mj. then on top when u have the pedo supporters such as guiterrez and world of wonder. bottom line u can not beat the media and their agendas only to post the facts on articles etc. the media decided along time ago to put the negro in his place while protecting polanski and
others even though the evidence to show how mj was blackmailed was as clear as day it didnt suit the medias agenda.theres never been a witchhunt against one individual as there was and is against mj. the media set their stall out decades ago

I agree. The media knowingly paid people to lie in the past as well. Altogether they paid out millions for the slander or Michael Jackson! They don't care about the truth and presenting the truth. I also agree that there has never been a public figure ever to be subjected to the kind of witch-hunt and verbal lynching as Michael. Incredible.

So I agree that sending material to tabloids is a waste of time. Do we really think Indside Edition doesn't know Adrian McManus is lying? They know full well. They pay her to lie. They won't publish anything to refute her. Do we really think the Sun cares about the inconsistencies is Blanca Francia's testimony?

On the other hand I think fans can and should comment information on public forums whenever the allegations come up, because there might be people lurking who are not sure and undecided and are open to fair arguments and evidence.
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

i dont see any supporting him bar z listers

Question for ivy can there actually be a lawsuit against mj as he cannot defend himself/limitations etc or is that why other corps have been filed against hoping for a settlement. someone tell me how u can sue someone whos not here especially in this type of case when its he said she said

No sorry I wasn't clear. I don't mean celebs will race to Wade's defence.. I just mean that people like, lets say Justin Timberlake, Britney etc etc.. people who have worked with Wade.. won't want to, for example, turn up at Cirque or something.. as it will look quite insensitive. A lot of acts around may have had some contact with Wade over the years and I just worry that less and less acts will be able to stand up and say they were influenced by MJ
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

No sorry I wasn't clear. I don't mean celebs will race to Wade's defence.. I just mean that people like, lets say Justin Timberlake, Britney etc etc.. people who have worked with Wade.. won't want to, for example, turn up at Cirque or something.. as it will look quite insensitive. A lot of acts around may have had some contact with Wade over the years and I just worry that less and less acts will be able to stand up and say they were influenced by MJ

Rumour has it Britney cheated Timberlake with Wade so I doubt JT will defend him.

Certainly there will be who worked with him and liked him and therefore will be on his side. So far I have only seem Z-listers, like Mayte Garcia. Allegedly they used to date so it's not surprising. It's inevitable that he will have his friends who will believe him and defend him.
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Rumour has it Britney cheated Timberlake with Wade so I doubt JT will defend him.

yeah but I'm not saying JT will defend Wade.. or any celebs will come out and support Wade.. that's not what I'm saying

What I mean is that people who have had contact with Wade, or know-of him through entertainment circles.. may stop publically saying positive things about Michael, even just saying things about how they like his music.
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

tbh i think that least of our problems x

-------------------------------------
So I agree that sending material to tabloids is a waste of time. Do we really think Indside Edition doesn't know Adrian McManus is lying? They know full well. They pay her to lie. They won't publish anything to refute her. Do we really think the Sun cares about the inconsistencies is Blanca Francia's testimony?

On the other hand I think fans can and should comment information on public forums whenever the allegations come up, because there might be people lurking who are not sure and undecided and are open to fair arguments and evidence.
---------------------------------

totally agree. dont waste your time sending info to the media who will laugh in your face concentrate on posting comments on articles/mess boards etc. thats the only way to try to water down the medias agenda
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

yeah but I'm not saying JT will defend Wade.. or any celebs will come out and support Wade.. that's not what I'm saying

What I mean is that people who have had contact with Wade, or know-of him through entertainment circles.. may stop publically saying positive things about Michael, even just saying things about how they like his music.

And other people may demonstratively dress in MJ clothes, say loud and clear how they loved him etc. - exactly because they don't believe this crap and are tired of it. It goes both ways. Like Steve Harvey the other day who kept playing MJ's music on his program. Or like Brad Pitt who demonstratively wore an MJ T-shirt during the 2005 trial.

bradpittmjfan.jpg
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Now we have fans circulation a useless petition along with video to promote it _ to be sent to the MJ Estate asking them to sue Wade for defamation. Its been stated Many time there is no law in place against defamation of the dead .. SO the petition is useless and is only bringing embarrasing attention to this whole fiasco ... I know fans mean well but .. we need to stop promoting Wade and his BS .. back off a little and let the Estate take care of it. .. they dont need fans telling them what they need to do .. sheesh

Yes its good to have arguments Posted in case fans need them to reply to articles.. but we don't need to publicly promote those articles to post on them. We don't need to be publically posting or sending anything .. IMO
 
Re: [TMZ] New child molestation claim by Wade Robson

The Jackson clan should sue all these spoiled b@stard brats that used to hang out in Neverland instead of AEG. This is an outrageous nightmare once again!

I couldn't agree more! Instead of having him dissected publicly (again!) they should instead be defending him against this kind of heartless and opportunistic greed!
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Brad was on a film set it was his role. i think ivy mentioned the estate could sue for damages if cali has the law that other states do. but thats along way down the road imo. this will drag on for years like all the other suits that make money for lawyers
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Brad was on a film set it was his role. i think ivy mentioned the estate could sue for damages if cali has the law that other states do. but thats along way down the road imo. this will drag on for years like all the other suits that make money for lawyers

I thought he wore it as a private man. A pity he didn't.
 
Re: [TMZ] New child molestation claim by Wade Robson

I wonder what real abuse victims think of that lawyer's comments. I'll call him and Wade the two stooges. I'm glad Taj came out and said "his truth" :)

It was useless the story of Taj, IF it happened it doesn't help . Tito, Taj's father is still wondering why his son said that publicly, and Jermaine thought it was Mike the molester, when the paparazzi of TMZ told him " your nephew just said he was molested by one of his oncle when he was kid...."

Let's Rob$on speaks, he destroys himself his story, so no need blablabla from the Jack$on$. Rob$on is a very bad actor who want money and will do anything for money (like the Jack$on$). So let him fall in his hole, people and medias see it's just about MONEY.
 
Re: [TMZ] New child molestation claim by Wade Robson

It was useless the story of Taj, IF it happened it doesn't help . Tito, Taj's father is still wondering why his son said that publicly, and Jermaine thought it was Mike the molester, when the paparazzi of TMZ told him " your nephew just said he was molested by one of his oncle when he was kid...."

I don't think it was useless. It won't single-handedly disprove WR in the public eye per se, but at least it might make some people think about it a little if it's likely MJ would be concerned about such things if he was a molester himself. And if a nephew who was a victim of molestation would turn to an uncle for support who is a molester himself. That Jermaine didn't know about it only proves that Michael was among a selected few in the family with whom Taj felt comfortable enough to share. It reflects well on Michael.
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I didn't know this horrible news. :bugeyed I was following only Katherine vs AEG lawsuit news. I'm in shock. :busted: I always admired his talent as a danser and choregrapher, I was a fan somehow. I always believed he was a good guy, one of the biggest MJ admirators. What happens to him? :blink: After so many years of loyalty, why he betrayed a man to whom he owes his success? :blink: I will quickly delete all his videos, photos, articles saved on my computer. I cannot believe. I did not expect such a nightmare.:no: I feel like as if he had betrayed myself. I'm really upset. :(
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

This too shall pass.
 
soulmum;3825977 said:
This too shall pass.

Yes, it will…and if there really is such a thing as karma, I surely hope this guy gets what he deserves for doing this.

He’s pure scum, talking about HIS child, when he thinks nothing about the children of a man who helped him immensely, and as he simultaneously makes a mockery of what true victims of child abuse psychologically endure.

I really do hope there is justice awaiting Wade Robson, if not in the courts, hopefully in life. May whatever that justice is be as merciless and treacherous as he is being now.
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Question for ivy can there actually be a lawsuit against mj as he cannot defend himself/limitations etc or is that why other corps have been filed against hoping for a settlement. someone tell me how u can sue someone whos not here especially in this type of case when its he said she said

depends on what type of lawsuit against who. we haven't seen the lawsuit complaint but TMZ said it was against Michael's companies claiming responsibility, that's basically the same logic of Jacksons versus AEG. I mean what I'm trying to say is that for example you can file a breach of contract lawsuit but not a direct accusation claim. So it all depends and we don't have the info yet.

i think ivy mentioned the estate could sue for damages if cali has the law that other states do. but thats along way down the road imo. this will drag on for years like all the other suits that make money for lawyers

the only way would have been with actual damages with a malice. In other words it would require Estate to show an actual loss of income and prove that Wade is intentionally lying. It's a quite hard requirement so I wouldn't expect a lawsuit coming from Estate.

My opinion is that their best bit would be to try to get this dismissed due to statue of limitations.
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

to hell with robson and his kin michael can never catch a break can he?!
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

Speaking as someone who has experienced molestation as a child, I find Wade Robson's actions very odd. My molester (a family member) died a long time ago and I will say that I did not realise it was molestation until I was older however I did know from a young age that I did not like it. I, unlike Robson, avoided any contact with my molester as much as possible from a young age. I have told a few close friends about my experience but have left it at that. If I had been in the position where I had to defend my molester there is no way on earth I would have done that, especially under oath.

For this reason I do not believe a word of what Wade Robson is saying
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

I agree. He really can't claim to have been ignorant of the kinds of questions he was asked on the stand. He was a fully grown adult. Nobody would buy that excuse from an average adult witness in a court case. So what makes Wade so special? Why do people always insist on treating fully grown adults as if they are babies just because they were around Michael Jackson? It's like no adult has any responsibility for themselves or their actions when Michael Jackson is involved. It's pathetic.

Simple. Everyone is the victim EXCEPT MJ. The rules change when it comes to Michael Jackson.

And yes, it's pathetic.
 
Re: Wade Robson files claim of childhood sexual abuse against MJ-Estate

depends on what type of lawsuit against who. we haven't seen the lawsuit complaint but TMZ said it was against Michael's companies claiming responsibility, that's basically the same logic of Jacksons versus AEG. I mean what I'm trying to say is that for example you can file a breach of contract lawsuit but not a direct accusation claim. So it all depends and we don't have the info yet.



the only way would have been with actual damages with a malice. In other words it would require Estate to show an actual loss of income and prove that Wade is intentionally lying. It's a quite hard requirement so I wouldn't expect a lawsuit coming from Estate.

My opinion is that their best bit would be to try to get this dismissed due to statue of limitations.

In 1996 MJ's lawyers did prove the Neverland fab five acted with malice , MJ was awarded damages. Wade already testified under oath twice . if he is now coming up with totally contradicting statements it will be very much documented he's a liar, what more evidence do they need ?
 
Back
Top