Christian Members

Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

The text from Romans you quoted could be interpreted as a text condemning wild passion without being in a relationship, e.g. sleeping around. I am a 'beginner' Christian so to speak, hopping churches and what not, but this kind of persistance on texts that could be explained hateful against a group in society just really turns me off. I find no wisdom in being so judgemental whatsoever. If I read the gospels I certainly do, but Paul and his staccato sets of rules seem to be the only thing that come up in debates. There is so much more to get out of the Bible, but somehow these little hateful notes seem to be he only things that are worth mentioning and the only things that come up in debates. It's a pity and sometimes I feel like the Christian community for a great part is the Pharizeers all over again. Get to the point please. I must say this thread and other Christian talk has put me off from Christianity a bit, not from God of course, but just the clique who claim to know how to interpretet him. Sometimes I feel like I'm reading a different Bible than them. Oh well, I will not interupt this thread any further as it seems not appreciated to talk about different interpretations and their consequences. Bye!

I am sorry you feel that way,
I think you have already stated that your bible is different from the rest of us, but from what I know, the bible is one, only written in different laungauges.And you seem to be persistent in your believe because, even when we direct you to clear and straight words of God about this, you still deny it. How can you interpret what I quoted from Roman as just passion without relationship? They are talking about intercourse! natural and unnatural! There is no relationship here?
Look, at the end you are entittled to your own believe and so am I, so I guess there is no point arguing here because you have your own reason to defend this and i don't have to know, but if it is for Christianity reason, it should come from the bible.
You said you are begginer in Christianity, welcome to the Christian family but please don't try to teach others what you youself have not known especially when you can't make reference from the bible to prove it! What facts and how can you back it from the bible that what you are saying is true? You have to know that, Jesus is in the specifics not generality. Otherwise, there would be no believers and non believers. Every human being on earth know and believe in God in general.
Remember, this is a thread about BELIEVERS IN JESUS CHRIST? and I glad you have joinned, you are christian. Therefore, we shouldn't be talking about what we believe only, it should be what we believe that has bases in the bible. Becuase our knowledge about Jesus is written in the bible. So, lets read the bible as much as we can before starting to make statements about what is in it.
 
Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

I am sorry you feel that way,
I think you have already stated that your bible is different from the rest of us, but from what I know, the bible is one, only written in different laungauges.And you seem to be persistent in your believe because, even when we direct you to clear and straight words of God about this, you still deny it. How can you interpret what I quoted from Roman as just passion without relationship? They are talking about intercourse! natural and unnatural! There is no relationship here?
Look, at the end you are entittled to your own believe and so am I, so I guess there is no point arguing here because you have your own reason to defend this and i don't have to know, but if it is for Christianity reason, it should come from the bible.
You said you are begginer in Christianity, welcome to the Christian family but please don't try to teach others what you youself have not known especially when you can't make reference from the bible to prove it! What facts and how can you back it from the bible that what you are saying is true? You have to know that, Jesus is in the specifics not generality. Otherwise, there would be no believers and non believers. Every human being on earth know and believe in God in general.
Remember, this is a thread about BELIEVERS IN JESUS CHRIST? and I glad you have joinned, you are christian. Therefore, we shouldn't be talking about what we believe only, it should be what we believe that has bases in the bible. Becuase our knowledge about Jesus is written in the bible. So, lets read the bible as much as we can before starting to make statements about what is in it.

Do not react so glib. His or her Bible is no different from yours and you know perfectly well what they were trying to say. It just so happens that it doesn't suit your own personal agenda. You're no more concerned with the word of God than anyone else. The problem with translation is that the language, words, and terminology were all completely different when the passages were actually written. The world was completely different. You can't pretend to know exactly how to apply any given passage or verse to todays world. You can only guess and assume. That is why there are so many different religions. Did you think they all sprung out of nowhere? No. One person didn't agree with the others interpretation and so they broke off and created their own sect of like minded people. Everyone has their own take because the Bible is very vague, contradicting, and can be interpreted in countless ways. There is no one Bible. The Bible is many things to many different people. Do not be so arrogant to think that there is only one way, your way, to interpret God's word. And let's also not be so arrogant to think that God's sinful creation - man (who indeed wrote the Bible) - could resist from inputting his own sinful ideals in to the text. The bible represents the era, and is very hard to apply to today's world. If we all truly lived by God's word, then we wouldn't shave, cut our hair, or wear mixed blends of clothing. We would still own slaves and women would be servants to men. I believe in God and purpose, but I do not believe that everything in the Bible is exactly as it was or should have been. Mankind loves taking liberties to empower themselves and condemn those who are different. Something tells me God is far less concerned with who we love and spend our lives with than he is with rape, murder, famine, and war. To even begin to compare them to same sex relations is absurd.

P.S. Do you like lobster? Oops!... You're going to hell! Stop picking and choosing what to quote to justify your own insecurities, fear, bigotry and hatred. If you're a true Christian then you must follow ALL of God's teaching and remember that one big fat giant golden rule that almost all seem to conveniently forget.... DO NOT JUDGE OTHERS. It is not our place. Only God can judge. If only people would follow that golden rule, we would have far less problems in this crazy world. And I don't mean to single you out personally, for my message applies to everyone. Please don't take it personally.
 
Last edited:
Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

I am sorry you feel that way,
I think you have already stated that your bible is different from the rest of us, but from what I know, the bible is one, only written in different laungauges.And you seem to be persistent in your believe because, even when we direct you to clear and straight words of God about this, you still deny it. How can you interpret what I quoted from Roman as just passion without relationship? They are talking about intercourse! natural and unnatural! There is no relationship here?
Look, at the end you are entittled to your own believe and so am I, so I guess there is no point arguing here because you have your own reason to defend this and i don't have to know, but if it is for Christianity reason, it should come from the bible.
You said you are begginer in Christianity, welcome to the Christian family but please don't try to teach others what you youself have not known especially when you can't make reference from the bible to prove it! What facts and how can you back it from the bible that what you are saying is true? You have to know that, Jesus is in the specifics not generality. Otherwise, there would be no believers and non believers. Every human being on earth know and believe in God in general.
Remember, this is a thread about BELIEVERS IN JESUS CHRIST? and I glad you have joinned, you are christian. Therefore, we shouldn't be talking about what we believe only, it should be what we believe that has bases in the bible. Becuase our knowledge about Jesus is written in the bible. So, lets read the bible as much as we can before starting to make statements about what is in it.

Ok, I have to respond to you response, because I think we are totally misunderstanding each other here. First of all, I'm not trying to teach anyone anything, I just wonder how hateful thoughts about groups of society could possibly begin with the Bible. I say I'm a beginner Christian because I'm hopping churches and am not baptised (yet). But I have read the Bible and know what's in it. And because I read it, I was curious what wisdom was distilled from it by people, mainly priests as their main interpreters. And although I've been to really inspiring sermons, I have also seen (mainly on tv) and heard many views that were just intolerant and by far not compassionate. I was flabbergasted that people could derive such things from the Bible (new testament), because I can't. Not even from hardliner Paul who is quite strict and could be, if you try hard enough, be interpreted as anti-gay and womanunfriendly. Again, many Christians remind me of the Pharizeers, in a way that they bind themselves strictly to the rules as they learned them and meassure others by them, but lack totally in any spiritual understanding of compassion. You can say the Bible is clear as day, but it isn't. That's the main reason why we have a zillion different churches. Because people interpret the Bible differently, and no, homophobia is not required to be called a Christian. I'm glad the Bible isn't just a set of rules (although a big part of the Old Testament is), do's and don'ts. That would be so boring to read and uninspiring. I thought this thread could be a place for discussion and debate as long as you are a believer, but as you qualified me against 'the rest of us', I dont really think I have a place here. Final goodbye now. Bye! PS. You misspelled Michael's name in your signature.
 
Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

You guys stop it, now. This is a non debate thread. If you don't like what is being said here, then don't post here. This is not a thread for people to try and prove what they believe to anyone. If that is something you want to discuss, create another thread and discuss it there. I have a lot I can say here about people's comments, but this is not the place to start that kind of debate. We are not to be judgers of one another. But by means of the Bible we can tell right from wrong. The Bible clearly condemns homosexuality. In a religious thread where people say they follow the Bible, you should not be surprised to see that notion. If you have a problem with that kind of thinking, then may I suggest you leave this thread alone?

Again, if you want to debate, don't come in here posting. Thank you.
 
ginvid;3343337 said:
You guys stop it, now. This is a non debate thread. If you don't like what is being said here, then don't post here. This is not a thread for people to try and prove what they believe to anyone. If that is something you want to discuss, create another thread and discuss it there. I have a lot I can say here about people's comments, but this is not the place to start that kind of debate. We are not to be judgers of one another. But by means of the Bible we can tell right from wrong. The Bible clearly condemns homosexuality. In a religious thread where people say they follow the Bible, you should not be surprised to see that notion. If you have a problem with that kind of thinking, then may I suggest you leave this thread alone?

Again, if you want to debate, don't come in here posting. Thank you.

I agree that we shouldn't be debating the existence of God in a believers topic, but I really don't think that's what is happening. In fact, that's not what is happening. No one said they don't believe, but that they don't entirely believe in man's interpretation. It's perfectly acceptable to discuss our beliefs (and especially important in cases of bias, misinformation, and condemnation). And really, you can't have religious discussions without some form of debate (whether you believe or not). That's silly. And actually, the Bible doesn't clearly condemn homosexuality. It doesn't clearly condemn any group of people. It flips and flops all over the place. It only matters what is in the heart of the person who reads it as to how it's interpreted. I realize you're a mod and trying to instill peace, but you're also asking the impossible and trying to act as if condemning homosexuals is perfectly okay because the bible says so. Well, it doesn't say so. That's the problem in itself. Christians often pick and choose Bible verses in order to validate how they were raised and taught, but that simply is not being Christian-like.

People worship only their misinterpretations of the Bible while ignoring the rest. Take the issue of homosexuality (the issue your addressing). There are six verses in the Bible (out of 31,174) that can be misinterpreted as being against homosexuality; in fact, three of these verses are against homosexual rape, two of them forbid a physical impossibility (men not having vaginas), and one of them is a scare-tactics announcement of what happens to heterosexual men and women who engage in idolatry. The Bible contains 321 verses that condone slavery; instead of their rants against homosexuality, why do we never hear fundamentalists crying out to bring back slavery?

There are exactly SIX verses in the entire Bible that appear to condemn homosexuality. Here they are:

  • Genesis 19:1-3. In this passage, two angels arrive in Sodom in the evening. Our hero Lot, knowing that life is dangerous in Sodom, insists on sheltering them for the evening. But every man in Sodom, both heterosexual and homosexual, surrounds Lot's house. The gang demands that the angels come out for a little homosexual gang rape. Lot offers his virgin daughters for the gang-rape, but the men insist on the angels, so the men closest to the door are stricken blind. The angels announce that they, the angels, are about to destroy Sodom, empowered by Yahweh.
    The sins that are condemned are inhospitality and gang-rape, and the gang-rape is planned by a gang that is composed of primarily heterosexual men — husbands and fathers. (Heterosexuals, like right-handed people, comprise approximately 90 percent of humanity, both now and then.)
  • Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13. Both of these verses prohibit a physical impossibility, a man lying with a male as if with a woman. The priestly writers, writing down in about 530 BCE oral tradition dating from perhaps a thousand years earlier, make no mention of love between men or women of the same gender, much less fellatio, cunnilingus, or other ways of exchanging pleasure.
    Remember, now, these verses date from at least 2,500 years ago, and the original oral tradition may be up to a thousand years older. There were only a few million human beings on the face of the planet; life was “nasty, brutish, and short.” People took seriously God's command to be fruitful and multiply. Indeed, if Jesus had been a bachelor, no one would have listened to a word he had to say, commandment-breaker that he would have been seen as. Remember also that these are not the only two verses in Leviticus. If you're going to claim that homosexuals are sinners based on these two verses, you must also:
    • keep kosher (ch. 11) — as part of keeping kosher, you may eat no fat and no blood (3:16-17, 7:22, 17:10-16), meaning no potato chips, no French fries, no rare steak, etc.; you may eat no lobsters, clams, oysters, octopus, shrimp, or crawfish (11:12), no tuna casserole (mixes “meat” and milk), and no ostrich (11:16) or crocodile meat (11:30).
    • You may wear no cotton-polyester blends, or any other kind of blend of fabrics (19:19).
    • You shall not “defer to the great,” making ex President Bush's pandering to the wealthy explicitly sinful (19:15).
    • You must observe Rosh Hoshanah, Yom Kippur, and the festival of Booths (23:23-43).
    • If an insect or lizard crawls across your cookpot, you must break your cookpot into pieces and throw it away. (11:30) When this rule was written, cookpots were molded out of clay by the lady of the house. Today most cookpots are stainless steel or aluminum — but if you're going to insist on 18:22 and 20:13, you must also insist on 11:30.
    • You may not cross-breed animals (19:19). There's nothing in the Bible against cloning, however.
    • You must stone Lance Burton and all other “wizards” to death; ditto for all astrologers and all mediums (19:26-27, 19:31, 20:6, 20:27).
    • You may not have a tattoo (19:28).
    • You must put Bristol Palin to death for the sin of sex outside of wedlock (20:10-16). Also most other citizens of the U.S. over the age of about 16 — there's no statute of limitations in the Bible.
    • A God-fearing man may not marry a divorcée or a rape victim (21:7). (Most of the rules in Leviticus pertain only to men, since women are considered subhuman by many of the authors the Bible.)
    • If the daughter of a priest becomes a prostitute, she must be burned to death (21:9). How compassionate the priestly authors of Leviticus were!
    • You will be exiled if you see a close relative naked, even accidentally (20:17-22).
    • No priest may have acne or any other kind of blemish or physical imperfection (21:16-23).
    • Anyone who blasphemes — Marilyn Manson for example — must be stoned to death (24:13-23).
    • When a prisoner is executed in a capital punishment case, the executioner must also be put to death. Ditto for whoever puts the executioner to death. And so on, ad infinitum. (24:17, 21)
    • It's perfectly all right with “the gods” (elohim) if you want to own slaves, but they may not be of the same nationality as yourself. Leviticus recommends that the U.S. obtain its slaves from Mexico, Russia, Cuba, and Greenland. (25:44-46; not Canada, because Canada is a dominion rather than a nation.)
  • If you do not follow these rules, and many others, as scrupulously as you insist on applying these two verses of Leviticus, you are a hypocrite, and may safely be ignored.
  • Romans 1:18-22. According to this passage, hardened idolaters are given up to lust and impurity. Heterosexual women commit “unnatural” acts, as do heterosexual men. Moreover, these idolaters are filled with every kind of wickedness and evil, from murder to gossip. The crime is idolatry, not homosexuality.
  • 1 Cor. 6:9-10 and 1 Tim. 1:8-11. The first passage says, and this is an exact translation into modern colloquial English, “Do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit God's Perfect World? Do not be deceived! Fornicaters, idolaters, adulterers, softies, manf—kers, thieves, the greedy, drunkards, revilers, robbers — none of these will inherit God's Perfect World.” The second passage says, in modern English, The law is not for the innocent, but rather for the lawless, the ungodly, and unholy, for “those who kill their father or mother, for murderers, fornicaters, manf—kers, slave traders, liars, perjurers,” etc.
    St. Paul probably coined the word “manf—kers.” The fact that these people are lumped in with serious criminals — murderers, slave traders, perjurers, etc. — shows that St. Paul did NOT mean to include all heterosexual women among the "manf—kers." Nor did St. Paul include as serious criminals people who ingest a little marijuana (a common weed in his part of the world and era), sass their parents, or read other people's mail. “Softies” was probably meant to refer to the receiving partner in anal sex, but once again, no one brings up fellatio, cunnilingus, or other ways to exchange pleasure. I believe that with the word “manf—kers,” St. Paul was once again invoking rape — the first-century equivalent of the abuses that go on in men's prisons, NOT the first-century equivalent of mutual love and commitment.
So there we have it — a condemnation of homosexual gang rape; two prohibitions of a physical impossibility (and by the way, Lev. 11:6 says very clearly that hares chew their cud!); a scare-tactics announcement of what happens to heterosexual men and women who engage in idolatry; and two condemnations of homosexual rape. Six verses out of 31,174, which in case you're interested is 0.000192468 percent. The Bible also contains 321 verses that condone slavery (1.0297 percent). The verse in Genesis dates from approximately 920 B.C.E., although it is probably older. The verses in Leviticus were probably inscribed onto parchment around 500 B.C.E., when the highest level of technology available was the war chariot. The verses in Romans and 1 Corinthians date from approximately 60 C.E. The verses in 1 Timothy probably date from approximately 90-120 C.E. Anyone who claims to be a Christian, however, is compelled to ignore these verses altogether, since they are superseded by the two Great Commandments: to love God with all one's heart and mind and soul and strength, and to love other human beings as much as you love yourself. Period. No exceptions. Jesus did NOT say, “except black people, except women, except homosexuals, except left-handed people, except children, except Romans (or Roman Catholics), except feminists, except liberals.” Jesus said EVERYONE. If you just said, “Yes, but—”, stop right there. “Yes, but” is NOT Christian.
 
Last edited:
Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

So when the Bible condemns homosexuality, does that mean you all think that what Elizabeth Taylor stood up for was wrong so she committed many sins?
 
Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

^ Ginvid, are you denying that the Bible could be interpreted in different ways? I think among the Christians I know personally, only about 30% of them would agree with your 'clearly condemns' and two of the other 70% have a Master's degree in Theology. It really depends on how you were taught to interpret. The New Testament, also the passages that were quoted here, are not clear about that at all. I hope you will not delete this post as I'm not trying to tell everybody my beliefs, this entire discussion sprung from a question from a member and only got the responses you agree with. I was just placing a question mark by these responses, because it just doesn't seem that evident to me at all. Maybe, like you say, I shouldn't be surprised, but I am.
 
Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

Look, I really don't care how many of your friends have what degree in theology. I am sorry to be rude, but I have had enough of this. I have studied this topic many, many times. It was my thesis in school and I had to go up against my teacher who was a theologist as well. I even went back to the original Greek words when writing my thesis to get an understandiing of what they were trying to say. (It just irks me when someone tries to use the "I'm a theologist" line as a reason why they automatically know so much more than me.) I guess I should have been more clear, it is "clear" for me because I took the time to make it clear. The Bible does not flip flop all over the place. It is very harmonious, no matter how people try to make it otherwise. The Bible does condemn homosexuality. It condemns fornicators. it condemns adulterers. Etc. So to say the Bible doesn't condemn any group over any other is totally false. And as for how you want those Scriptures to read, I have read these supposed interpretations many times before. And I have nothing to add but to say they condemn homosexuality. This person who came up with this wants to believe that homosexuality is not wrong so they choose to say that because they are listed with hardened criminals, they must mean something different??? Are you hearing that logic. It is clear in what it said, but because that person doesn't want to accept it as that, it has to mean something different than what it says??? Also, it doesnot matter how many times something is condemned in the Bible. The fact that it is condemned is reason enough for me.

And this thread has been here for some years and has managed to be argument free despite its religious topic. Do you know why? Because people, even though they may have disagreed greatly, were respectful of what the OP asked.

Jesus is the one who gave that command to love people as you do yourself. But that didn't stop him from condeming those who were willful sinners and calling the Pharisees offspring of vipers and children of the Devil. being Christian and showing love does not mean that you have to accept everything that a person does. But it does prevent you from doing nonsense like protesting at their funerals or throwing stones at a person based on how they live. Or thinking that a person is beneath you based on how they live. THAT is Christian love. People see a Bible verse condemning homosexuality and automatically think the Bible is homophobic. But that is far from true. The Bible does not have levels of wrongdoing. If you do this, you are only a little sinner, if you do this, you are a big sinner. It catagorizes what is right and what is wrong. it doesn't leave a grey area, because since we are not judges we do not have to be concerned with the grey area. God is the one who judges and only he can read hearts. That is why we have to be very careful in how we come up against. We only see the action. God sees the reason behind the action. What drives a person and what is going on internally.

I hope I am being clear enough. If not I will speak by PM so as not to derail this thread any further. I want to respect what was asked by me and encourage others to do the same.

But again, I am not here to debate these kinds of things. But anyone may start a new thread and discuss them if they choose to.
 
ginvid;3343395 said:
Look, I really don't care how many of your friends have what degree in theology. I am sorry to be rude, but I have had enough of this. I have studied this topic many, many times. It was my thesis in school and I had to go up against my teacher who was a theologist as well. I even went back to the original Greek words when writing my thesis to get an understandiing of what they were trying to say. (It just irks me when someone tries to use the "I'm a theologist" line as a reason why they automatically know so much more than me.) I guess I should have been more clear, it is "clear" for me because I took the time to make it clear. The Bible does not flip flop all over the place. It is very harmonious, no matter how people try to make it otherwise. The Bible does condemn homosexuality. It condemns fornicators. it condemns adulterers. Etc. So to say the Bible doesn't condemn any group over any other is totally false. And as for how you want those Scriptures to read, I have read these supposed interpretations many times before. And I have nothing to add but to say they condemn homosexuality. This person who came up with this wants to believe that homosexuality is not wrong so they choose to say that because they are listed with hardened criminals, they must mean something different??? Are you hearing that logic. It is clear in what it said, but because that person doesn't want to accept it as that, it has to mean something different than what it says??? Also, it does not matter how many times something is condemned in the Bible. The fact that it is condemned is reason enough for me.

And this thread has been here for some years and has managed to be argument free despite its religious topic. Do you know why? Because people, even though they may have disagreed greatly, were respectful of what the OP asked.

Jesus is the one who gave that command to love people as you do yourself. But that didn't stop him from condeming those who were willful sinners and calling the Pharisees offspring of vipers and children of the Devil. being Christian and showing love does not mean that you have to accept everything that a person does. But it does prevent you from doing nonsense like protesting at their funerals or throwing stones at a person based on how they live. Or thinking that a person is beneath you based on how they live. THAT is Christian love. People see a Bible verse condemning homosexuality and automatically think the Bible is homophobic. But that is far from true. The Bible does not have levels of wrongdoing. If you do this, you are only a little sinner, if you do this, you are a big sinner. It catagorizes what is right and what is wrong. it doesn't leave a grey area, because since we are not judges we do not have to be concerned with the grey area. God is the one who judges and only he can read hearts. That is why we have to be very careful in how we come up against. We only see the action. God sees the reason behind the action. What drives a person and what is going on internally.

I hope I am being clear enough. If not I will speak by PM so as not to derail this thread any further. I want to respect what was asked by me and encourage others to do the same.

But again, I am not here to debate these kinds of things. But anyone may start a new thread and discuss them if they choose to.


Correction: YOU (man) condemn homosexuality. You can't speak for God. As provided, there is no clear evidence to suggest that the creator does. It's all about interpretation. I mean no disrespect, but if you cared enough to read and educate yourself on the matter, then you may feel differently. The subject of what is "right" and "wrong" does have many levels according to the Bible (surprised anyone would argue that) and in the modern and ancient world was/is more so about social upbringing and societal rule conditioning than anything else. Also, I really have no idea what you are getting so upset about (other than your own personal ideals being questioned). As far as I can tell we are all discussing respectfully (unless I missed something?). Feel free to correct me. Again, no one has said they don't believe and are simply sharing very important dialogue. No one is fighting. No one is calling names. You may not like the idea that interpretations of the Bible can vary greatly and diversely, but it makes it no less true. God gave us hearts and minds for a reason. I'm sorry you feel this way. My point is to say that to condemn one, is to condemn us all. You can't pick and choose for your own personal gain. Picking and choosing in order to discriminate is not cool at all.

P.S. If the bolded part is true, then I suggest you take heed of this list of things you may want to steer clear of if you intend on entering Heaven...

  1. Football. At least, the pure version of football, where you play with a pigskin. The modern synthetic footballs are ugly and slippery anyways. Leviticus 11:8, which is discussing pigs, reads “You shall not eat of their flesh nor touch their carcasses; they are unclean to you". And you’re doubly breaking that if you wake up, eat some sausage then go throw around the football. Or go to the county fair and enter a greased pig catching contest.
  2. Round haircuts. See you in Hell, Beatles… and/or kids with bowl cuts, surfer cuts or (my favorite) butt cuts. Leviticus 19:27 reads “You shall not round off the side-growth of your heads nor harm the edges of your beard.”
  3. Fortune telling. Before you call a 900 number (do people still call 900 numbers, by the way?), read your horoscope or crack open a fortune cookie, realize you’re in huge trouble if you do. Leviticus 19:31 reads “Do not turn to mediums or spiritists; do not seek them out to be defiled by them. I am the Lord your God.” The penalty for that? Check Leviticus 20:6: “As for the person who turns to mediums and to spiritists, to play the harlot after them, I will also set My face against that person and will cut him off from among his people.” Seems like a lifetime of exile is a pretty harsh penalty for talking to Zoltar.
  4. Pulling out. The Bible doesn’t get too much into birth control… it’s clearly pro-populating but, back when it was written, no one really anticipated the condom or the sponge, so those don’t get specific bans. But… pulling out does. One of the most famous sexual-oriented Bible verses… the one that’s used as anti-masturbation rhetoric… is actually anti-pulling out. It’s Genesis 38:9-10: “Onan knew that the offspring would not be his; so when he went in to his brother’s wife, he wasted his seed on the ground in order not to give offspring to his brother. But what he did was displeasing in the sight of the Lord; so He took his life also.” Yep — pull out and get smote. That’s harsh.
  5. Tattoos. No tattoos. Leviticus 19:28 reads, “You shall not make any cuts in your body for the dead nor make any tattoo marks on yourselves: I am the Lord.” Not even a little butterfly on your ankle. Or Thug Life across your abdomen. Or even, fittingly enough, a cross.
  6. Polyester, or any other fabric blends. The Bible doesn’t want you to wear polyester. Not just because it looks cheap. It’s sinfully unnatural. Leviticus 19:19 reads, “You are to keep My statutes. You shall not breed together two kinds of your cattle; you shall not sow your field with two kinds of seed, nor wear a garment upon you of two kinds of material mixed together.” Check the tag on your shirt right now. Didn’t realize you were mid-sin at this exact second, did you? (Unless you checked the tag by rolling off your neighbor’s wife while you two were having anal sex in the middle of robbing a blind guy. Then your Lycra-spandex blend is really the least of your problems.)
  7. Divorce. The Bible is very clear on this one: No divorcing. You can’t do it. Because when you marry someone, according to Mark 10:8, you “are no longer two, but one flesh.” And, Mark 10:9 reads, “What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate.” Mark gets even more hardcore about it a few verses later, in Mark 10:11-12, “And He said to them, ‘Whoever divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her; and if she herself divorces her husband and marries another man, she is committing adultery.’”
  8. Letting people without testicles into church. Whether you’ve been castrated or lost one or two balls to cancer isn’t important. The Bible doesn’t get that specific. It just says you can’t pray. Deuteronomy 23:1 reads (this is the God’s Word translation, which spells it out better), “A man whose testicles are crushed or whose penis is cut off may never join the assembly of the Lord.” Oh, and the next verse says that if you’re a bastard, the child of a bastard… or even have a great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandchild of a bastard, you can’t come to church or synagogue either. Deuteronomy 23:2 reads, “No one of illegitimate birth shall enter the assembly of the Lord; none of his descendants, even to the tenth generation, shall enter the assembly of the Lord.”
  9. Wearing gold. 1 Timothy 2:9 doesn’t like your gold necklace at all. Or your pearl necklace. Or any clothes you’re wearing that you didn’t get from Forever 21, Old Navy or H&M. “Likewise, I want women to adorn themselves with proper clothing, modestly and discreetly, not with braided hair and gold or pearls or costly garments.”
  10. Shellfish. Leviticus 11:10 reads, “But whatever is in the seas and in the rivers that does not have fins and scales among all the teeming life of the water, and among all the living creatures that are in the water, they are detestable things to you.” And shellfish is right in that wheelhouse. Leviticus 11 bans a TON of animals from being eaten (it’s THE basis for Kosher law); beyond shellfish and pig, it also says you can’t eat camel, rock badger, rabbit, eagle, vulture, buzzard, falcon, raven, crow, ostrich, owl, seagull, hawk, pelican, stork, heron, bat, winged insects that walk on four legs unless they have joints to jump with like grasshoppers (?), bear, mole, mouse, lizard, gecko, crocodile, chameleon and snail. Sorry if that totally ruins your plans to go to a rock badger eat-off this weekend.
  11. Your wife defending your life in a fight by grabbing your attacker’s genitals. No joke. Deuteronomy actually devotes two verses to this exact scenario: Deuteronomy 25:11-12.
“If two men, a man and his countryman, are struggling together, and the wife of one comes near to deliver her husband from the hand of the one who is striking him, and puts out her hand and seizes his genitals, then you shall cut off her hand; you shall not show pity.” That’s impossible to misinterpret. Ladies, if your husband is getting mugged, make sure to kick the mugger in the pills. Do not do the grip and squeeze (no matter what “Miss Congeniality” might advise). Or your hand needs to be cut off. As a final note, I know that nine of these 11 cite the Old Testament, which Christianity doesn’t necessarily adhere to as law. To which I say: If you’re going to ignore the section of Leviticus that condemns and bans tattoos, pork, shellfish, round haircuts, polyester and football, how can you possibly turn around and quote Leviticus 18:22 (“You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination.”) as irrefutable law? As I said, Christians love to pick and choose.
 
Last edited:
Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

So when the Bible condemns homosexuality, does that mean you all think that what Elizabeth Taylor stood up for was wrong so she committed many sins?

Nobody has answered my question yet.
 
Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

Travis, firstly I am not upset. Secondly, I have no problem with my ideals being challenged. However, this is not the thread to challenge them in. If you created a thread asking for something in particular, even if I did not agree with you, I would respect you enough to what you ask, even if I were to disagree with you respectfully. That is all I want to be understood. I must agree with you. I think everyone has been very respectful in debating this. However, the OP asked for their not to be debate. She didnot ask for debate as long as it was respectful. But none at all. In another thread, I would go back and forth; but, this is not the thread for it.

And why is it that people think that just because you don't agree with them then you have not educated yourself. I don't come to conclusions unless I am educated in matters as important as this. And, I am a big supporter of education. Homosexuality and Science and religion is something I have studied for many years of my life with people of many different opinions, not just with those who feel like I do. I even already state that my thesis in school was on this topic and it was very thorough. I have also spent my school years as a debater, and one rule you must learn is that you have to know what the other side believes in order to know what you believe. So please, don't condescend to me as if I am uneducated just because I feel differently than you.

Also, different interpretations of the Bible most certainly do exist. No one can or is denying that. I don't speak for God. He speaks for himself by means of his written word. And, as you provided, it shows even more clearly to me what the Scriptures say.

Again, I am not asking that people not speak about the matter, I am asking that it be done in the appropriate thread. A thread asking for no debate is not the proper thread.
 
Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

Travis, firstly I am not upset. Secondly, I have no problem with my ideals being challenged. However, this is not the thread to challenge them in. If you created a thread asking for something in particular, even if I did not agree with you, I would respect you enough to what you ask, even if I were to disagree with you respectfully. That is all I want to be understood. I must agree with you. I think everyone has been very respectful in debating this. However, the OP asked for their not to be debate. She didnot ask for debate as long as it was respectful. But none at all. In another thread, I would go back and forth; but, this is not the thread for it.

And why is it that people think that just because you don't agree with them then you have not educated yourself. I don't come to conclusions unless I am educated in matters as important as this. And, I am a big supporter of education. Homosexuality and Science and religion is something I have studied for many years of my life with people of many different opinions, not just with those who feel like I do. I even already state that my thesis in school was on this topic and it was very thorough. I have also spent my school years as a debater, and one rule you must learn is that you have to know what the other side believes in order to know what you believe. So please, don't condescend to me as if I am uneducated just because I feel differently than you.

Also, different interpretations of the Bible most certainly do exist. No one can or is denying that. I don't speak for God. He speaks for himself by means of his written word. And, as you provided, it shows even more clearly to me what the Scriptures say.

Again, I am not asking that people not speak about the matter, I am asking that it be done in the appropriate thread. A thread asking for no debate is not the proper thread.

I can respect that, but at the same time... when a question or theory is presented it's really hard not to answer it. It's also a great educational opportunity. Something else that is hard to interpret in this thread is what is considered debate, when in reality the only thing this topic demanded was that the belief in God not be debated (and it's not). It's very important to me for people to realize that not everything is in black and white - especially when it comes to religion (no matter how badly Christians would like to think so). However, I will now let it rest.
 
Last edited:
Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

Thank you for the debate. I thought it was very insightful. I misunderstood as I thought it was not allowed to have a debate about God's existence, but a debate about the scriptures would be fine. Apparently not. A pity for me personally, because I would love to ask some of you more knowledgeble than me about some passages and their meaning, but debate is always around the corner when talking about the meaning of texts, especially religious ones. Well, I'll leave this thread on a happy note, in the spirit of the thread as it's meant to be... Hallelujah :)
 
Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

Roosje, if you would like to discuss what some passeges mean, why not open up a thread asking your questions? Just because that is not what is wanted for this thread does not mean you can't have your questions answered at all.

But I want to thank you and Travis for being so understanding. Thank you very much!
 
Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

nevermind...
 
Last edited:
Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

Ginvid, thank you!
 
Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

Ginvid thank you. I am tired with this debate that is why I am not going to respond to anyone. It all started with someone asking a question of what the bible say about homosexuality, but it turned out into personality debate. I hope the individual got the answer she/he was looking for. But mean while this kind of discussion makes people pulse before answering to any question here, and that is not the kind of discusion we would like to carry on this thread.
I hope Ginvid answers brought to an end this topic; we can move on we the discussion on the thread itself. I will come back when the thread is back to normal
 
Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

Ginvid thank you. I am tired with this debate that is why I am not going to respond to anyone. It all started with someone asking a question of what the bible say about homosexuality, but it turned out into personality debate. I hope the individual got the answer she/he was looking for. But mean while this kind of discussion makes people pulse before answering to any question here, and that is not the kind of discusion we would like to carry on this thread.
I hope Ginvid answers brought to an end this topic; we can move on we the discussion on the thread itself. I will come back when the thread is back to normal

I'm not comprehending the issue with debating the meaning of a text or scripture??? Shouldn't scripture be intellectualized? Isn't that the only way to come to an educated understanding? All views should be taken in to account, not just one. No one answer is correct. There is no one answer to anything in life. So everything was hunky dory until someone brought up something of contrasting nature? It was all good until you disagreed? And mind you, I'm not addressing you personally. It's a theoretical. No one is denying God/Jesus existence so what is the problem? I don't get it. What is there to "return to normal" from? Where did it go? Someone presented a question and various people gave informative responses. That's what adults do - discuss. I think the discussion taking place has been wonderful. There have been some questionable responses here and there, but we still have managed to be respectful. I for one have enjoyed the open dialogue. We should be proud of ourselves for doing so in such a diplomatic fashion. The only way I could see someone having a problem with the discussion is if they want or expect it to be very cut and dry and one sided, such as "The Bible says gays go to hell" The end. Well, sorry, it doesn't say that and there are several ways of interpreting the very few scriptures that reference homosexuality (if you bothered to read any of my posts). I truly don't understand why anyone would take issue or need to remove themselves from the discussion unless they are themselves uncomfortable with the subject matter due to personal prejudice. I'm not accusing anyone of anything, I'm only trying to understand the heart of the issue. From my apparently limited understanding, I haven't seen anyone do anything inherently "wrong" to derail the topic. If it is normal to simply condemn without thought or compassion, then count me out. I still think it's silly to expect a discussion about God and the Bible to exclude intellectual discussions of the actual topic of conversation. It's like trying to have a conversation about candy, but not being allowed to express your personal favorite.
 
Last edited:
Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

God Bless everyone.
 
Last edited:
Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

I'm not comprehending the issue with debating the meaning of a text or scripture??? Shouldn't scripture be intellectualized? Isn't that the only way to come to an educated understanding? All views should be taken in to account, not just one. No one answer is correct. There is no one answer to anything in life. So everything was hunky dory until someone brought up something of contrasting nature? It was all good until you disagreed? And mind you, I'm not addressing you personally. It's a theoretical. No one is denying God/Jesus existence so what is the problem? I don't get it. What is there to "return to normal" from? Where did it go? Someone presented a question and various people gave informative responses. That's what adults do - discuss. I think the discussion taking place has been wonderful. There have been some questionable responses here and there, but we still have managed to be respectful. I for one have enjoyed the open dialogue. We should be proud of ourselves for doing so in such a diplomatic fashion. The only way I could see someone having a problem with the discussion is if they want or expect it to be very cut and dry and one sided, such as "The Bible says gays go to hell" The end. Well, sorry, it doesn't say that and there are several ways of interpreting the very few scriptures that reference homosexuality (if you bothered to read any of my posts). I truly don't understand why anyone would take issue or need to remove themselves from the discussion unless they are themselves uncomfortable with the subject matter due to personal prejudice. I'm not accusing anyone of anything, I'm only trying to understand the heart of the issue. From my apparently limited understanding, I haven't seen anyone do anything inherently "wrong" to derail the topic. If it is normal to simply condemn without thought or compassion, then count me out. I still think it's silly to expect a discussion about God and the Bible to exclude intellectual discussions of the actual topic of conversation. It's like trying to have a conversation about candy, but not being allowed to express your personal favorite.

I think the answer to your question Travis, is based on what the OP originally asked for the thread. If you read through the thread, it has not been about the Bible or God specifically. It has been about Jesus and what uplifting things you heard, or what spiritually made you smile, that kind of thing. What Bible verse uplifted you. It has never been about dissecting the scriptures. It was always more subjective and not as specific. I think this is the kind of talk that the regulars to this thread are trying to get back to.

Like I said before, it's not that these things can't be discussed, it's just that this thread was not meant for that purpose (If it had, it would not have survived this long because let's face it, Christians are wide and varied and disagree on much. ) If anyone wants to create a thread that actually does dissect the scriptures, feel free to do so. And what you ask for in that thread will be enforced as well.

As a side note, if the people of the thread do not want another episode of what recently happened, might I suggest you also keep with the feeling of the thread as intended.

Thank you all!
 
Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

I found this today and it really blessed me so I want to share it with you all tonight. Jeremiah 17:7-8. "But blessed are those who trust in the LORD and have made the LORD their hope and confidence". "They are like trees planted along a riverbank, with roots that reach deep into the water. Such trees are not bothered by heat or worried by long months of drought. Their leaves stay green, and they never stop producing fruit".
 
Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

I found this today and it really blessed me so I want to share it with you all tonight. Jeremiah 17:7-8. "But blessed are those who trust in the LORD and have made the LORD their hope and confidence". "They are like trees planted along a riverbank, with roots that reach deep into the water. Such trees are not bothered by heat or worried by long months of drought. Their leaves stay green, and they never stop producing fruit".

Thank you for that, Victory!
 
Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

Thank you, Victory, very sweet and much needed words of wisdom. ...
 
Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

Happy Palm Sunday all!
 
Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

Happy Holy Week! God Bless you all!
 
Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

Happy Holy Week to you too Earth_Song1...

May we all be blessed. ...
 
Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

Amen, Alma. I am looking forward to Easter.
 
Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

Me too..^ Will be away at the countryside, smelling the roses. .. I feel like I need nature more than usually these days, the air, the atmosphere in the city is suffocating.. Need some clearing for the mind and soul. ...
 
Re: Any Believers in Jesus Christ Here? (Non-debate thread for believers only)

Me too..^ Will be away at the countryside, smelling the roses. .. I feel like I need nature more than usually these days, the air, the atmosphere in the city is suffocating.. Need some clearing for the mind and soul. ...

I hear ya on that! We are going away the first of the month. Need some time out time!

Hugs!
 
Back
Top