8701girl;3559517 said:Wow frank said that to roger???? oh boy frank what have u done!?
no one knows what Frank told Friedman or not. It's all an assumption. And I mean during the 2005 trial Michael's own civil attorney had questioned the paternity of the children in an statement. Friedman himself wrote that Dileo told him about an IV in 2005. Like I said Marc Shaffel have been blabbing about IV- Spider bite thing for some time. So some want to put it all on the Frank but there are other people that were "sources" to multiple media.
la_cienega;3559559 said:This is what Frank says. I find it hard to believe that Michael was so affable about yet another lawsuit, this time involving people Frank, his friend, had brought in. He says his intentions were genuine in his book, what else would he say?
and what else do you have to show that he's lying? Wasn't this event in 2002 - 2003? Yet Michael and Frank stayed close until the trial. By all accounts Michael's feeling of betrayal didn't happen until mid trial in 2005 and it was due to his belief that Frank didn't want to testify.
I don't know what kind of friendship everyone has but ups and downs, good times and fights etc are all a part of a regular friendship.
Friedman seems very convinced about it and we've seen Frank dodge the question in an interview, I imagine the two have spoken about it. The Blanket mother story is ripped directly from what we know Frank has now said. If he spoke to Friedman about Blanket, why not about the other kids? Doesn't the Blanket mother story reported by Friedman also involve another man's sperm?
Friedman's own words
In the 2005 trial, as I reported then, a slip of the tongue by one of the attorneys indicated that he was not their biological father. I was told by good sources that Rowe was inseminated from a sperm bank. In the long run, it doesn’t matter.
As for Blanket, aka Prince Michael II, I also reported back in 2005 that he was the product of Jackson’s sperm and a hired surrogate. That’s why there is no mother’s name on the birth certificate.
http://www.showbiz411.com/2009/07/01/20090701debbie-rowe-is-the-kids-mom-michael-jacksons-their-dad
As for Omer Friedman said he wasn't Michael's son and kinda said he cashes on his connection to Michael. He also identified his source as "a person that was with Michael when he met Omer for the first time" , according to Frank's book he wasn't there when Michael met Omer. Also Friedman's story is dated to 2004. Again according to Frank he didn't met with Friedman till 2005.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,133727,00.html