Re: Frank Cascio to write memoir of his friend Michael Jackson / press release at pg12 / Nov 15 ,201
@classic Firstly, in order for one side to concede that they are wrong, we need more information than we have now. Because there is information missing and events are left up to how a person wants to interpret them, you are going to get a variety of interpretations. But a person can't say how another interprets them is wrong for them, just like no one can say how you interpret them is wrong for you. You may not agree with them or understand them, but that doesn't negate them. I am not saying you personally are negating them, I'm just making a general statement. And I agree, things aren't either-or. That's exactly what I was saying. Because there is so much gray area in between without concrete info, you are going to find these circular conversations because there really isn't anything to tip the scale one way or other.
What would help? Actually having the book and looking at that critically. But as I said, some have had enough without that. Some want to wait and see what it says and some very positive towards it no matter what. Even after having the book, there will still be many questions left unanswered. So, personal preference and experience shines through.
I do have to say though, that I thought you said in your post that you still cannot understand, etc, etc (That is what happens when you read on a phone) and that is why I answered as I did. It seemed kind of condescending. But I read your post on my computer and I didn't get that same connotation. So I apologoze for that.
@classic Firstly, in order for one side to concede that they are wrong, we need more information than we have now. Because there is information missing and events are left up to how a person wants to interpret them, you are going to get a variety of interpretations. But a person can't say how another interprets them is wrong for them, just like no one can say how you interpret them is wrong for you. You may not agree with them or understand them, but that doesn't negate them. I am not saying you personally are negating them, I'm just making a general statement. And I agree, things aren't either-or. That's exactly what I was saying. Because there is so much gray area in between without concrete info, you are going to find these circular conversations because there really isn't anything to tip the scale one way or other.
What would help? Actually having the book and looking at that critically. But as I said, some have had enough without that. Some want to wait and see what it says and some very positive towards it no matter what. Even after having the book, there will still be many questions left unanswered. So, personal preference and experience shines through.
I do have to say though, that I thought you said in your post that you still cannot understand, etc, etc (That is what happens when you read on a phone) and that is why I answered as I did. It seemed kind of condescending. But I read your post on my computer and I didn't get that same connotation. So I apologoze for that.