morinen
Proud Member
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2010
- Messages
- 1,074
- Points
- 48
And for all who's saying "they are doing the best they can" - there are some things that simply shouldn't be done. Michael is not here to build statues around the world. Let's accept that and not try to match that, but instead honor him in a classy and respectful manner. But no, they are trying to match his scale, go big - big attention, big hype, big money - and it ends up being plain unethical. Yes, to have a #1 record is good, but not all measures are justified by this end. If you really respect the artist, there is certain tact that should guide you and certain ethical boundaries that you shouldn't overstep.
The public may love it - the public will eat everything: an impersonator hologram, fake songs - because they have no clue and they don't care. They don't care about Michael, they are at best feeding their nostalgia and guilt for ridiculing him when he was alive. They cheered, then went home and moved on to the next artist of the day. So if the only goal is to have #1 and to please the public, you can slap "MJ" on almost everything, hype it up, and it will sell. But will that be respectful to the artist? No. Will that help preserve his legacy? No.
Money is important, I get it. There is the debt, there are 3 children to feed. But when money becomes the only driver, this is what you get. People eat it up, young generation eats it up, but for me it's just painful that they are trying to reduce the unique, magical, sparkling genius in people's memory to this - tracks full of electronic noise and an imitator in red pants.
The public may love it - the public will eat everything: an impersonator hologram, fake songs - because they have no clue and they don't care. They don't care about Michael, they are at best feeding their nostalgia and guilt for ridiculing him when he was alive. They cheered, then went home and moved on to the next artist of the day. So if the only goal is to have #1 and to please the public, you can slap "MJ" on almost everything, hype it up, and it will sell. But will that be respectful to the artist? No. Will that help preserve his legacy? No.
Money is important, I get it. There is the debt, there are 3 children to feed. But when money becomes the only driver, this is what you get. People eat it up, young generation eats it up, but for me it's just painful that they are trying to reduce the unique, magical, sparkling genius in people's memory to this - tracks full of electronic noise and an imitator in red pants.
Last edited: