I don't think what Jermaine said in this interview by any means undermines what Michael said occurred. I think Jermaine is acknowledging that they have two different perspectives on what took place. So Joe used the belt. I am thinking that many members here are not black and/or did not grow up in a black household. In our families, if you got spanked with just a belt, consider yourself fortunate. Let me see, in my life, I have gotten spanked with a bottle open, extention cord, the new braches of a tree so that it will whip you and not break, floppy shoes, books, you name it, it has happened. My Mom used to line all of the kids up and go one by one giving us a spanking. We used to get a bunch of welt marks. After we stopped crying, we would compare who had the most/biggest welt marks. And, I don't think for one minute I was abused. My brothers and sisters laugh about it now. We laugh about how we got our butts torn up. When my sister spanks her children now, I don't say anything either. She disciplines her children as she sees fit. I don't think I will spank my children if I ever have any, at least not regularly and definitely not with an object, but I dare some nosey busy body to try to tell me I'm being abusive. People can say it is illegal all they want, but I guarantee you it is still a very common occurence and the people who do it do not consider it illegal or damaging.
I find it very interesting that people who acknowledge that something like beatings and calling names can cause emotional abuse to a child for decades, yet, they will not allow Janet that name calling from Michael could influence her just as much. The same reasoning, that everybody did it, is the same reasoning that people say to downplay Janet - that all kids make fun of each other. If you are going to call it out in one line it has to apply even if it is being done by your favorite.
I am sensitive to what Michael went through as a person and understand that in his eyes it was very traumatic. That is why as parents we have to know our children and their dispositions because one form of discipline may be a walk in the yard to one child but extremely damaging to another. I feel for Michael and all he went through and I appreciate him speaking out about his experience. It is experiences like this that make me think hesitantly about spanking any children I might have. He is the first person in my whole life who I ever heard of speaking of spankings as abuse. Almost universally to all people who I speak to that were spanked, we all joke about the experience and are even thankful for it. I appreciate Janet talking about sibling name calling and how it effected her. Since I was always the fatest one in my family (I'm even fatter than my mother and my grandparents. MY GRANDPARENTS!) and I was always teased for it by my family. People tell me I'm not that big, but when your mother after having 4 children and weighing 98 lbs at 5'6, being 5'4 and over 170 is considered Shamu. And, it hurts the most coming from the family member you are closest to even if other engage in it as well.
I appreciate that Jermaine has his own perspective and I appreciate that he acknowledges how it was for him. If he doesn't see it as abuse, then we have to be understanding of other people's perspective. No two people are exactly alike.
I find it very interesting that people who acknowledge that something like beatings and calling names can cause emotional abuse to a child for decades, yet, they will not allow Janet that name calling from Michael could influence her just as much. The same reasoning, that everybody did it, is the same reasoning that people say to downplay Janet - that all kids make fun of each other. If you are going to call it out in one line it has to apply even if it is being done by your favorite.
I am sensitive to what Michael went through as a person and understand that in his eyes it was very traumatic. That is why as parents we have to know our children and their dispositions because one form of discipline may be a walk in the yard to one child but extremely damaging to another. I feel for Michael and all he went through and I appreciate him speaking out about his experience. It is experiences like this that make me think hesitantly about spanking any children I might have. He is the first person in my whole life who I ever heard of speaking of spankings as abuse. Almost universally to all people who I speak to that were spanked, we all joke about the experience and are even thankful for it. I appreciate Janet talking about sibling name calling and how it effected her. Since I was always the fatest one in my family (I'm even fatter than my mother and my grandparents. MY GRANDPARENTS!) and I was always teased for it by my family. People tell me I'm not that big, but when your mother after having 4 children and weighing 98 lbs at 5'6, being 5'4 and over 170 is considered Shamu. And, it hurts the most coming from the family member you are closest to even if other engage in it as well.
I appreciate that Jermaine has his own perspective and I appreciate that he acknowledges how it was for him. If he doesn't see it as abuse, then we have to be understanding of other people's perspective. No two people are exactly alike.
Katherine's religion does not teach any of that at all. So, you can try to explain her actions based on the common religious teaching (especially since Katherine didn't become a JW til she was an adult) but I don't think we should try to lump it into JW teachings.I think the thing we have to take in mind is the religious angle and the decade Katherine grew up in.
She came from a strict religion and a decade that dictated that males were the superior sex. A woman's job was to serve a man and bear his children. That man also ruled over the household, that includes the kids. So the man can do what he wants with his kids, including beating them. This was particular, and still is to an extent, particular bad in the black committees.
I can't properly explain it, but I suggest you all read or watch the Color Purple. It gives an insight of the relationship between black man and woman back in the day.
What I'm trying to say is that Katherine is a person of her time. In her day, women simply didn't stand up to their husband, even if they abuse their kids, even sexually in some cases. If you did undermine your husband, he could beat you and no one would say anything. You also couldn't leave the man because such acts were frowned upon, even if the woman had good reason to leave. Just look a Shirley Temple when she got a divorce.
This isn't defending or justifying her actions, but it does explain them.
As for why she tried to leave Joe once he had cheated on her. Since it was the 80s, divorce were seen as more okay. Joe also couldn't use her kids to emotional blackmail her. See, some women actually lost their kids if they tried to divorce. However, she still stood with the man for whatever reason.
Abuse is complicated, which is why it hides in the shadows. Truth is, we will never know the entire story of that family.