^I guess to prove that they are biased, and not open to accept any negative comments?
Thank you too.
^I guess to prove that they are biased, and not open to accept any negative comments?
And that is why witnesses are not allowed to view each others' testimony...Walgren is asking the same question on redirect and both have given the same answer.
In that case, how do you know their rewards is just the happiness they feel from helping a friend and not the fame?
What was your question?wow alot of posts, but none of you answered mine
can someone help me with something?
i didnt know it but is it true that shafer based some of his testimony on dr white, the same dr white that was in contempt of court?????? What happend there and when was it i missed it?? was in live or behind the cameras?
And if the two had a fight was it on michael?????????????
(they known each other 30 years a read) What is dr white opinion???
Pls help me..
It is still a reward. The initial thing was that they get something out of it even though they did not get paid. That is the point. They are getting something from the interview. Even if you say they feeel happiness, they are still getting something from it, that is, happiness. This is the end of this because I cannot go into my graduate school arguments right now, I want to listen to the trial.
Unless you got the bill, that's kind of a bold statement to make.
Just because you don't like what they have to say doesn't mean their bad people and need to be character assassinated. Murray did saved most of their lives and it only highlights how he utterly failed and treated Michael more as a cash cow than a patient or a friend.
this is boring. yacking on about her treatments. how murray saved her cause she wasnt getting any better. after other drs had treated her then she had a second heart attack. murray treated her. and saw she had blaockages and repaired 2 of them and do the thirs later. whatever hospital i was at he came to see me.
opinion treat his paitents with care? never had a dr that was more caring. the other dr missed my problem but murray didnt.
is he the type to rush through things.? no he doesnt. she laughs when you go there u are gonna be there for a while!
gready money hungry? no hes taking care of paitents pro bono i know for a fact hes done it awwwwwwww how lovely
cross
who contacted you to testify? one of the lawyers. miranda savcik? yes. she asked for a testimonial? i gave something yes. miranda works for media master. answer i didnt know who she worked for? walgren shows her email address says media masters! its a PR firm that works for lawyers. i didnt know i was trying to be helpful
when u learn murray was working for mj? he never once said mjs names. he told me he was taking a break and said im closing my practice.. you didnt ask him why? he said he was taking a break. i was worried cause i didnt trust any other dr
all you problenms were with your heart? yes
all done in a hospital at sunrise hospital. murray got a disciplinary letter from sunrise! in 2006 murray paitent had a had heart problem cause of tubing issues. loads of calls were made to muray he didnt get back for 3hrs? later. murray said get another dr. they couldnt get one so he said get another nurse. murray then turned up later even though the paitents could have been in serious trouble. no shes hasnt heard about it
first dr made loads of medical records and gave them to dr murray? yes he did.
redirect. hospital rule that a dr has to ring in within 1.30 hrs.
now isnt the time to play devils advocate. you give interivews ppl get put up you get expenses. thats how it works
I am not sure. I saw your post about no answer about this so hopefully someone can answer rthis for you.
I am not playing devil's advocate. I just don't like when people dismisses other people's feelings or experiences because others don't agree with them. It's the same problem I had when posters were calling all of Murray's girlfriends whores and hookers because they work at strip clubs and they had a relationship with Murray.
Quite frankly, it makes people look like judgemental jackasses.
several witnesses have stated they would love murray even if he was gulity and nothing would change their mind. case closed. i doubt they would say that if mj was their son
u can say that again.For a lack of better words, it a argument of morality.
Oh please with the questions about Murray's greed. If he were as conscientous as Chernoff is trying to make out, Murray would drive an economy car and live modestly. Instead he was throwing money at strippers and denying support for his children.
My guess is they won't be calling Rev. Williams since they are trying to portray Murray as Dr. Pious. Rev. Williams would lay it out exactly WHY Murray ultimately decided to go to London with MJ. M-O-N-E-Y!