wendy2004
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 5,456
- Points
- 0
Must be desperate if they start bringing religion into it
why do u hope that wendy?
Rev. Williams has some interesting testimony/information to offer which might be useful to the prosecution during cross-exam.
Oh btw, apparently the defense dropped the 'eating' lopz theory, which is why they focus on the pee yesterday.
The problem with the pee is that it's not really an accurate read in regards to what was taken recently within a matter of hours becuz it's still storing information of what someone had in their system from as much as 72 hours prior. I originally thought the urine might be useful but after hearing Anderson (I think it was him) testify that the bladder is like a storage center that holds onto residues from days earlier I realized it can't be 100% accurate about WHEN something entered the system.
I noticed Flanazepam said it was the 7:30am urine that was in the jar which is interesting cuz Murray claimed in his police interview that he went, during his 2 minute escapade to the loo... to empty old pee. smh
So, my guess is Murray had not collected anymore urine from MJ since he relieved himself at 7:30am. This is VERY interesting and related to the thing I couldn't talk about in yesterday's thread (or the day before??). They are looking for a timeline for something...but they won't be able to find it. Murray's interview has severely locked them in...and that's a good thing. 7:30am is VERY IMPORTANT. The Prosecution even used this time in their timeline as to when they feel something may have gone wrong. 7:30am is the starting window.
Last edited: