StacyJ
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 2,840
- Points
- 0
Memefan;3294115 said:I think the Jacksons' silence says it all.
Memefan,
what does their silence say to you?
Memefan;3294115 said:I think the Jacksons' silence says it all.
StacyJ;3294564 said:what does their silence say to you?
obviously none of Alejandro's baby daddy's are bothered they want this woman to succeed her succeeding and staying where she is, means they don't have to pay for her and the kids they've conceived. Many of them have a history of conceiving and abandoning children, dropping them off at Hayvenhurst so that they can escape their obligation while dating other young woman and doing the same thing again. It seems like this is an endless cycle.StacyJ;3294564 said:Memefan,
what does their silence say to you?
of course we would.. u'd have at least have 5 DIFFERENT Jackson's tweeting on Twitter about it by now..Big Apple2;3294566 said:I bet if the Caciso's released some more songs the Jackson family deemed "fake," we would hear from them with a quickness. LOL!
mynameiscande1;3294567 said:From this it seems to me Alejandre is not just wanting a roof over her head but actually seeking financial assistance from the Estate.
Would she have to request a stipend first as Mr Jackson did before she could be offered assistance by the Estate?
And if so is there a time limit for this such as there is when you want to contest a will?
Are there any circumstances under which a court could award a guardian ad litem for non beneficiaries?
Big Apple2;3294600 said:In my opinion, a parent is STILL financially responsible for their 18 year-old college children. I mean, a parent just doesn't wake up on their child's 18th birthday and declare: "Happy 18th Birthday, I'm not longer responsible for you." LOL!
An 18 year-old may go to college and get a part-time job in order to help out at home. Or if the family is financial stable, the college student may not have to get a part-time job.
And if an 18 year-old decides not to go to college, I hardly think that child would have the warewithall to obtain a job that paid well enough for the 18 year-old to live independently of their parents, unless the 18 year-old had a Trust Fund, and that's still no guarantee that an 18 year-old would be willing and prepared to leave Mommy & Daddy's crib.
In my opinion, if Randy Jackson were a "supportive," "nurturing" parent, he would still want to be financially responsible for his college bound children.
I agree with this, I'm a college student (though 19 already), I've got a part time job, but in no way am I able to caugh up enough money to support myself all by my own. My mama is still responsible for me, I live under her roof, she's doing whatever she is capable of doing.Big Apple2;3294600 said:In my opinion, a parent is STILL financially responsible for their 18 year-old college children. I mean, a parent just doesn't wake up on their child's 18th birthday and declare: "Happy 18th Birthday, I'm not longer responsible for you." LOL!
An 18 year-old may go to college and get a part-time job in order to help out at home. Or if the family is financial stable, the college student may not have to get a part-time job.
And if an 18 year-old decides not to go to college, I hardly think that child would have the warewithall to obtain a job that paid well enough for the 18 year-old to live independently of their parents, unless the 18 year-old had a Trust Fund, and that's still no guarantee that an 18 year-old would be willing and prepared to leave Mommy & Daddy's crib.
In my opinion, if Randy Jackson were a "supportive," "nurturing" parent, he would still want to be financially responsible for his college bound children.
twinklEE;3294615 said:Anyways back on topic, imo Randy is still responsible for his adult kids, his obligations didn't just stop because they turned 18.
Prince Of Pop;3294672 said:I said it before, I'll say it again, she needs to get off her lazy ass and support herself and her kids. She's a leech. PERIOD. If she thinks she should be in that house because "MJ would have wanted it that way", then she's as looney as these women who claim to be MJ's "secret wife" and the "Mother of his children".
Prince Of Pop;3294672 said:I said it before, I'll say it again, she needs to get off her lazy ass and support herself and her kids. She's a leech. PERIOD. If she thinks she should be in that house because "MJ would have wanted it that way", then she's as looney as these women who claim to be MJ's "secret wife" and the "Mother of his children".
twinklEE;3294423 said:There are only 2 minor children involved in this mess, those sons of Jermaine, all the other 'kids' of Alejandra are grown adults and well capable of earning a living for themselves, and/or getting a part time job.
Of course it is, for her to even have the AUDACITY to make those deluded claims she is making, is reason enough to include her to the looney page of the records book.Big Apple2;3294710 said:The way homegirl is going on, you would think that SHE was Michael's ex-wife, instead of Jermaine's ex-wife and that those were Michael's children with her, instead of Jermaine's children with her.
In ALL of my year's, I have NEVER heard of an "EX-Sister-In-Law" making these types of claims. In my opinion, this is definitely one for the record books.
Amenelusive moonwalker;3294739 said:at the end of the day jerm and randy dumped their ex and their kids on katherine and mj. have them move into hayvernhurst casue katherine will look after them and mj pays the bills so no need to worry about giving them money.and even now they still want that to continue. nothing more than deadbeats
Agree with u too, there is no other way to put what she is.Prince Of Pop;3294672 said:I said it before, I'll say it again, she needs to get off her lazy ass and support herself and her kids. She's a leech. PERIOD. If she thinks she should be in that house because "MJ would have wanted it that way", then she's as looney as these women who claim to be MJ's "secret wife" and the "Mother of his children".
thank you for that Ivy..ivy;3295576 said:Probably she isn't the owner. Alejandra claims she is and therefore that the estate cannot evict her.
When I searched the online records it showed MJ & Latoya but the online information wasn't updated , it was a few years old.
Assuming that TMZ actually went and checked the most recent records in person from the recorder office, it seems like Latoya isn't the owner/part owner.
rainny;3295674 said:My understanding was that Latoya co-owned the house with Michael at one point, but
that it was not longer the case.
:clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping:Memefan;3295684 said:Yeah me too. Katherine transferred her 5% in the house to Latoya to hide that asset from the Koreans. When Latoya married Gordon, Katherine asked for her 5% back...but Latoya refused and kept it.
But at some point MJ might have bought her 5%. Anyway, I trust the estate more than a crazy greedy woman who slept with 2 siblings.
They listed the house as an estate owned asset in their September 2010 progress report.