Brian Oxman's word is pretty much meaningless as far as him stating "he said it would be taken to the supreme cout." The question remains did he, as was stated by the executors?
We DO know that the Jackson's questions have never been answered, nor ours for that matter. They are still being asked with only smoke screens as replies.
Your numbers seem to be way off as well. It was a well reported fact the Branca and McCain
each profited $12.5 million from the $ony deal alone.
I will admit I wasn't aware that KJ could have challenged without loosing her inheritance but that doesn't change the fact it has been pretty convenient that the errors and inconsistencies have never been addressed in a court, nor have they been addressed in anyway.
This article makes some good points. One that was over looked in the Jackson shit storm that hit the media at this time. Another convenient event. I am posting it to show it isn't just a bunch of "crazy fans" and "crazy Jacksons" that have issue with the Will. When Prince turns 18 I hope he does see the questions from an adult light and finally get some answer for his family and the world.
"What is disputed is the validity of the will itself and the integrity of John McClain and John Branca.
Few probably remember this, but on July 1, 2009, when Jackson’s disputed will was first filed in Los Angeles Superior court by McClain and Branca, their rushed bid to take immediate control of Jackson’s fortune was denied.
Two days before that filing by the now-executors, Katherine Jackson was named temporary guardian of the children and administrator of the estate until a July 6, 2009 hearing. On July 1, 2009, Branca and McClain effectively asked the court to immediately appoint them executors and overturn Katherine Jackson’s temporary administration of the Estate.
At the time Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Mitchell Beckloff said, “I understand your argument that there was a race to the court house. It seems to me that we should know by Monday if there’s another will out there.”
That Monday came and went without another will ever surfacing. None of which, of course, means the 2002 will is invalid –
or valid for that matter. However, it is worth noting the speed at which Branca and McClain were moving.
The terms of the will distribute Jackson’s assets to a separate legal entity – the “Michael Jackson Family Trust.” This Trust benefits Jackson’s mother, three children, and unspecified charities.
But according to the Mayoras and perhaps other legal observers,
“The entire document is far from the quality one would expect from any experienced estate planning attorney. Usually, wills and trusts of this nature are prepared and signed together. And estate planning documents prepared for someone of Michael’s wealth and status are almost always much more comprehensive and well-planned than Michael’s will and trust.”
They add,
“Certainly there are a number of questions that would be very interesting to see explored through a lawsuit brought by people who actually do have proper legal standing. It may be that there are legitimate explanations for the question raised by the Jackson family. Perhaps someday it will all play out in court.”
It may be that Prince Michael Jackson, the oldest of Jackson’s children, will do exactly that. Now 15-years-old, in just three years he will be 18 and able to challenge the will – and the executors.
Seeing as Branca and McClain currently enjoy a specially negotiated arrangement that allows them to earn 10% on nearly every deal they broker for the Estate as well – as their fees as Executors – some might say that day can’t some soon enough."
http://www.inquisitr.com/279947/mic...ke-flawed-and-fraudulent/#sf3wG93ocSIsV0dy.99