bouee
Proud Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2009
- Messages
- 2,369
- Points
- 0
Yes, definitely strange.... didn't MJ receive a skin transplant for his burns ?(hope you understand me, I'm not sure of the word) In that case where would the scar be ?? Also, on the drawings page 40 it says something about an area that seems to be more or less in the same area as the burns, but I can't read it (it's hand writing)The burn scar on his head was NOT mentioned, although tiny scars (one-fourth to one-half inch) WERE mentioned. That seems very strange to me. That was surely his most significant scar, and the report said "his hair was short and tightly curled." It must have been very visible?
someone else on this thread said that was because it's complicated to diagnose lupus, it takes several tests, blood tests to diagnose it, so that could explain why lupus is not stated in the autopsy report.It does not state that he had lupus. He had various issues with his lungs that the report said about, "Would have caused adverse health effects." There was inflammation and long-term scarring. That lung damage could have been caused by lupus, but the report does not state the cause.
IDK.... The charges (or lack of them) shocked me also.Propofol was found in blood and urine. It was ALSO found in his stomach, and the fluid in his EYES. Given that it leaves the body very quickly, that would seem to indicate a massive "bolus" (I.V. push), all at once. A "killing" dose, would seem likely. The Involuntary Manslaughter charge is a joke. . .. . . or worse.
The anaesthesist report talks about a propofol dose that corresponds to general anaethesia, not a lethal dose. His/her report basically says (well that's my understanding ) that what was lethal was the lack of proper care (proper monitoring, ressucitation equipment, etc ...) and the fact that propofol was mixed with lozarepam made it worse (made the risk of stopping breathing higher ) . I don't know if that changes something with the charge..
Excellent question. And he lied.It seems obvious that Murray concealed evidence. Why was he not charged with that?