Murray Documentary "Michael Jackson and the Doctor"

Re: MSNBC to air Murray Documentary "Michael Jackson and the Doctor" / Interview part 1 transcript @

""Had I known what I know today in retrospect, that Mr. Jackson was an addict, and he had shared that information with me, addicts may behave in a way that is unreasonable and you may consider it," Murray said in the interview."

Did he forgot the part of the police interview where he said MJ was a Propofol addict?
 
Re: MSNBC to air Murray Documentary "Michael Jackson and the Doctor" / Interview part 1 transcript @

Another thing, does Gorjian participate in this documentary as well? Since everyone is mentioning Chernoff/Flanagan, what about Gorjian?

No, he is not in it
 
Re: MSNBC to air Murray Documentary "Michael Jackson and the Doctor" / Interview part 1 transcript @

""Had I known what I know today in retrospect, that Mr. Jackson was an addict, and he had shared that information with me, addicts may behave in a way that is unreasonable and you may consider it," Murray said in the interview."

Did he forgot the part of the police interview where he said MJ was a Propofol addict?
i thought that part was just priceless. he says he was trying to wean him off....... but didn't know he was addicted? 2+2=6 according to murray!
 
I think he wants to say that MJ was incontinent at night... b e c a u s e he - and during trail his lawyers - said that the day of "the accident" MJ had no IV drip (so no propofol but the initial bolus of 25, and no need for catheter)... but BG AA saw the condomcatheter and said so in testimony! So why the condomcatheter in his own fictive story)?? See my first line... Why story of incontinence : because of that catheter THAT morning.
agree
 
Re: MSNBC to air Murray Documentary "Michael Jackson and the Doctor" / Interview part 1 transcript @

^^^^^ if others want to watch it, then let them do so. People need to stop getting angry over what others do (that isnt necessairly directed towards you, but ive seen it on other boards). Some are intrested and want to see what is said. If youre against it dont come in a thread about the documentary directing insults towards those who want to watch it.
 
Re: MSNBC to air Murray Documentary "Michael Jackson and the Doctor" / Interview part 1 transcript @

but what i dont get what i watched wasnt about michael being incontinent? where was that said?

Also what i wonder, how did cm found the defense? because in the docu flanagan is bad :S I didnt saw the kitchen fight, maybe it was out of that docu i saw on you tube, but i do saw him say fuck you to chernoff?

The lethal dose of propofol was it ruled a homicide because cm gave it home *and admitt it in police interview* or because of the hight? because after all this we can say it was as high as surgery? still in the docu he says 25 mg only what no can be truth.

Also i wondered if someone tape him in jail, would love to see his sorry as there :)
Michael had friends, like liz and in the docu cm claimed michael said he had no one else but CM.. dont believe that

What i do believe is randy philips story, that he told cm that BS.. what do you guys think?
 
How to file a HIPPA complaint:

<style>@font-face { font-family: "Courier New"; }@font-face { font-family: "Times"; }@font-face { font-family: "Wingdings"; }@font-face { font-family: "Cambria"; }p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman"; }h1 { margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 24pt; font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-weight: bold; }a:link, span.MsoHyperlink { color: blue; text-decoration: underline; }a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed { color: blue; text-decoration: underline; }p { margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 10pt; font-family: "Times New Roman"; }span.Heading1Char { font-family: Times; font-weight: bold; }p.hidedetails, li.hidedetails, div.hidedetails { margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 10pt; font-family: "Times New Roman"; }div.Section1 { page: Section1; }ol { margin-bottom: 0in; }ul { margin-bottom: 0in; }</style> http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/complaints/index.html

If you believe that a covered entity violated your (or someone else&#8217;s) health information privacy rights or committed another violation of the Privacy or Security Rule, you may file a complaint with OCR. OCR can investigate complaints against covered entities.

COVERED ENTITIES - A covered entity is a health plan, health care clearinghouse, and any health care provider that conducts certain health care transactions electronically. For more information, please review our Understanding Health Information Privacy section or look at our responses to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on our web site.
COMPLAINT REQUIREMENTS - Your complaint must:

  1. Be filed in writing, either on paper or electronically, by mail, fax, or e-mail;
  2. Name the covered entity involved and describe the acts or omissions you believe violated the requirements of the Privacy or Security Rule; and
  3. Be filed within 180 days of when you knew that the act or omission complained of occurred. OCR may extend the 180-day period if you can show "good cause."
ANYONE CAN FILE! - Anyone can file a complaint alleging a violation of the Privacy or Security Rule. We recommend that you use the OCR Health Information Privacy Complaint Form Package. You can also request a copy of this form from an OCR regional office. If you need help filing a complaint or have a question about the complaint or consent forms, please e-mail OCR at OCRMail@hhs.gov.

HIPAA PROHIBITS RETALIATION - Under HIPAA an entity cannot retaliate against you for filing a complaint. You should notify OCR immediately in the event of any retaliatory action.
HOW TO SUBMIT YOUR COMPLAINT - To submit a complaint, please use one of the following methods.
If you mail or fax the complaint, be sure to send it to the appropriate OCR regional office based on where the alleged violation took place. OCR has ten regional offices, and each regional office covers specific states. Send your complaint to the attention of the OCR Regional Manager. You do not need to sign the complaint and consent forms when you submit them by e-mail because submission by e-mail represents your signature.
File A Complaint Using Our Health Information Privacy Complaint Package
File A Complaint Using Our Health Information Privacy Complaint Package
·Open and fill out the Health Information Privacy Complaint Form Package in PDF format. You will need Adobe Reader software to fill out the complaint and consent forms. You may either:

      1. print and mail or fax the completed complaint and consent forms to the appropriate OCR regional office; or
      2. e-mail the completed complaint and consent forms to OCRComplaint@hhs.gov.(Please note that communication by unencrypted e-mail presents a risk that personally identifiable information contained in such an e-mail, may be intercepted by unauthorized third parties.)
Hide Details
File A Complaint Without Using Our Health Information Privacy Complaint Package
File A Complaint Without Using Our Health Information Privacy Complaint Package
·If you choose not to use the OCR Health Information Privacy Complaint Form Package, please provide the information specified below by either:

If you prefer, you may submit a written complaint in your own format. Be sure to include the following information:

    1. Your name
    2. Full address
    3. Telephone numbers
    4. E-mail address (if available)
    5. Name, full address and telephone number of the person, agency or organization you believe violated your (or someone else&#8217;s) health information privacy rights or committed another violation of the Privacy or Security Rule
    6. Brief description of what happened. How, why, and when do you believe your (or someone else&#8217;s) health information privacy rights were violated, or how the Privacy or Security Rule otherwise was violated
    7. Any other relevant information
    8. Your signature and date of complaint
If you are filing a complaint on someone&#8217;s behalf, also provide the name of the person on whose behalf you are filing.
The following information is optional:

      1. Do you need special accommodations for us to communicate with you about this complaint?
      2. Who else can we call if we cannot reach you?
      3. Have you filed your complaint somewhere else? If so, where?
Hide Details
File A Security Rule Complaint
File A Security Rule Complaint
· You may file your Security Rule complaint using our Health Information Privacy Complaint Package
 
Re: MSNBC to air Murray Documentary "Michael Jackson and the Doctor" / Interview part 1 transcript @

I cannot deal with this dick....

He is visibly upset and angrily says:
"The first security guy that showed up finally when he realized it was an emergeny, comes to the door and his name is Alberto Alvarez. He got to the door and he remains static"!!.

How on earth was alberto suppose to know it was an emergency and that alberto remained static, newsflash, im sure most people would react that way if they were called into a room and came across a DEAD person...

I know everyone here have already said murray is not human, shows no remorse and puts the blame on everyone and he comes off really angry and defensive in this documentary.. but really wow...he is just evil

that's why you call 911. they are trained for emergencies, they can stay calm and they can act accordingly.
 
Re: MSNBC to air Murray Documentary "Michael Jackson and the Doctor" / Interview part 1 transcript @

i was searching some of this on the net and came across this: a juror spoke?!

In a separate interview broadcast Wednesday, one of the jurors said there were contentious moments, including yelling and cajoling, during the two days of deliberations.

Debbie Franklin, 48, told ABC-TV's "Good Morning America" in the first juror interview so far that most of the jurors had decided on guilt Friday, the first day of deliberations.

But, she said "not everyone was convinced that Dr. Murray was solely responsible for Michael Jackson's death."

"Toward the end of the day, we finally took a vote," Franklin said. "It was not unanimous and we talked a little more about it."

The panel decided to think it over during a weekend break.

"It was stressful," said the mother of two, who is a paralegal. She said there was "yelling and we had to keep saying, `Nobody talk while this person is talking. Raise your hand if you have something to say."

The majority managed on Monday to convince all jurors that Murray was negligent and his mistakes led to Jackson death, Franklin said.

"He had addictions. He asked other doctors to do it (give him the operating room anesthetic propofol). They said no. He was looking for somebody to say yes. And Conrad Murray said yes," she said.

An Associated Press reporter approached Franklin for an interview Wednesday but she refused. She said all jurors had agreed not to speak to the media, but she did not explain why they made that agreement or why she spoke to ABC.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/11/conrad-murray-interview_n_1088055.html


what bothers me about this jurors account of events is that even the jury has Michael down as an addict. I fail to see WHERE ANYONE has proven that Michael Jackson was an addict, Sorry this is MY opinion....I just dont get it ,,,at all...sigh Even the jury missed the point that Michael had a sleeping problem THAT doesn't make him and addict...that makes him want to SLEEP...and he trusted Conrad Murray ..A DOCTOR to monitor him while he did just that,,,,sleep.
 
Re: MSNBC to air Murray Documentary "Michael Jackson and the Doctor" / Interview part 1 transcript @

On my part, I'm not interested in actually watching Murray's fugly mug and act, but I'm curious about what he says (I know he's lying through his teeth). For that, I read the transcript thread started by Ivy. I've also read all the comments here, and I believe he's a deranged sicko as well.

The fact that he has absolutely no remorse to spare over his negligence to care for his patient, which caused that person to die is strange and scary. He's surely not in denial. He deserves to be locked away for good, because no remorse means he will continue to behave in this manner - put money over life, and be a potential threat to other human beings as Judge Pastor rightly said.

Thanks to his fucked up documentary, when I do a google news search for Michael, half the results are talking about Michael's bed wetting. I knew it was a matter of time, before all the tabs started running with all the negative comments about Michael in the documentary. What saddens me is that although it confirms our beliefes of Murray's sociopath tendencies, the media at large ignores Murray's obvious lies and strange behaviour, but continues to focus on Michael in a negative light. Michael is the victim once again. Not his killer.
 
Re: MSNBC to air Murray Documentary "Michael Jackson and the Doctor" / Interview part 1 transcript @

Read up, about how to file a HIPPA complaint. What Murray did was absolutely unconscionable! A medical professional is supposed to keep medical information about a patient, PRIVATE. That does not include testimony in court. It DOES include Murray saying, in a televised documentary, that Michael was incontinent! And even that "info" about his feet, was private information. Michael would be appalled if that happened to him in life, and someone has to protect him, in death. Not sure if HIPPA regulations apply to the deceased, but probably. . . .

Murray has already been convicted, but this might ensure that he does not practice medicine, ever again. . .
 
Re: MSNBC to air Murray Documentary "Michael Jackson and the Doctor" / Interview part 1 transcript @

On my part, I'm not interested in actually watching Murray's fugly mug and act, but I'm curious about what he says (I know he's lying through his teeth). For that, I read the transcript thread started by Ivy. I've also read all the comments here, and I believe he's a deranged sicko as well.

The fact that he has absolutely no remorse to spare over his negligence to care for his patient, which caused that person to die is strange and scary. He's surely not in denial. He deserves to be locked away for good, because no remorse means he will continue to behave in this manner - put money over life, and be a potential threat to other human beings as Judge Pastor rightly said.

Thanks to his fucked up documentary, when I do a google news search for Michael, half the results are talking about Michael's bed wetting. I knew it was a matter of time, before all the tabs started running with all the negative comments about Michael in the documentary. What saddens me is that although it confirms our beliefes of Murray's sociopath tendencies, the media at large ignores Murray's obvious lies and strange behaviour, but continues to focus on Michael in a negative light. Michael is the victim once again. Not his killer.

that is just so so sad...Michael does NOT deserve that...Murray is a son of a bitch...how can he do somthing like this to his "friend"..that he "loved"??? Michael DID NOT do anything to Murray. Murray did it to HIMSELF when he killed Michael. Michael is the VICTIM in this, I swear I hope that someday..... somewhere...somone will teach Murray a lesson about lies. is It is bad enough that he killed Michael...now he has to go around smearing his name too. Son of a bitch.,
 
Re: MSNBC to air Murray Documentary "Michael Jackson and the Doctor" / Interview part 1 transcript @

^I hope so, I hope it backfires on him. He's disgusting. Most who considered him to be a good doctor before this documentary, may have a change of heart. The way he belittles his patient with others, reveals intimate details and shows little compassion or remorse should put off anyone, including the people who kept wailing about what a good doctor he was.
 
Re: MSNBC to air Murray Documentary "Michael Jackson and the Doctor" / Interview part 1 transcript @

what bothers me about this jurors account of events is that even the jury has Michael down as an addict. I fail to see WHERE ANYONE has proven that Michael Jackson was an addict, Sorry this is MY opinion....I just dont get it ,,,at all...sigh Even the jury missed the point that Michael had a sleeping problem THAT doesn't make him and addict...that makes him want to SLEEP...and he trusted Conrad Murray ..A DOCTOR to monitor him while he did just that,,,,sleep.
I may be reading the jury member's statement wrong but I don't think that she is speaking for the entire jury with the "he had addictions" statement. I think that is her belief. I agree with you, I don't see where anyone has proven addiction either.
 
Re: MSNBC to air Murray Documentary "Michael Jackson and the Doctor" / Interview part 1 transcript @

I am sorry. I am not going to watch this. I just can't. I am reading everyone's thoughts and I feel like I going to burst into tears in a second. I am just waiting for Michael to get the respect he deserves and the peace he deserves. I find this whole thing hurtful to Michael.

I always knew Murray felt he did nothing wrong. You could see it at the trial. He looked bored, he rolled his eyes a lot and at times would not look at who was speaking. Flannigan looked like an evil old man that hated Michael. It seems I was right about that. I am surprised Chernoff said anything about the media portraying a Michael a certain way. I hope this gets Murray in a lot of trouble. I hope this causes a lot of problems for him. I hope the judge and the prosecutors will watch or hear about this. He did it will the trial was going on and longer. He is sick.

I just hate Murray. For someone I don't even know I can honestly say I hate this guy so much.
 
Re: MSNBC to air Murray Documentary "Michael Jackson and the Doctor" / Interview part 1 transcript @

Murray and his lawyers were so stupid to believe that this documentary would be good for them? :bugeyed Really? :lol: :sigh: This was a shot in the foot. :doh:
 
Re: MSNBC to air Murray Documentary "Michael Jackson and the Doctor" / Interview part 1 transcript @

MSNBC TO LA TOYA JACKSON
Go Pound Sand
We're Airing the Doc Murray Doc


La Toya Jackson made a valiant effort to stop MSNBC from running the Conrad Murray documentary Friday night, but in the end business is business and the network will air the show.

La Toya tells TMZ ... MSNBC Prez Phil Griffin responded to La Toya's plea directly, but she says, "due to their first amendment rights, I am unable to prevent its airing."

La Toya wants viewers to put anything Murray says in perspective, saying, "What I would encourage the public to take away from the situation is that Michael is an irreplaceable artist and human, whose talent and love for the world will forever go unmatched."

I don't understand her comment about what she wants people to take away from the situation. I would hope she would remark that Muarry's statement to police showed many lies in relation to the evidence, so people should keep that in mind in evaluating the accuracy of his statements in the doc. Further he had an opportunity to speak in his own defense in court which he declined (that is his right), which should make viewers question whether speaking out to safeguard one's freedom is of less importance than being paid for a doc and going on TV.

I mean, most people know Michael is an exceptional artist and human, but Muarry will not be attacking that in the doc, so how can people come away with the idea that Michael is an exceptional artist if the doc is not about that!!! Sometimes I wonder about LaToya.
 
Steve Hewlett Interview with Dr. Murray for UK Channel 4

Steve: Did Michael Jackson at any point ask you to give him Propofol?

Murray: (thinks a while) Yes

Steve: And as his doctor what was your medical opinion? It was justified generally or not justified?

Murray: I did not recommend it.

Steve: As I understand it the use of Propofol was.. your use of Propofol for him as your patient became common place.

Murray: Not in that sense. If Propofol.. I would have never recommended it. I would never have recommended Propofol to Mr. Jackson

Steve: So as a doctor if a patient demands something and you don't recommend it. In your medical opinion it's not justified are you going to give it to him?

Murray: No

Steve: Then why did you?

Murray: Well I did not give him something, I met him with something. And I felt by meeting him with such an agent on his own, he needed to get rid of it and try to resume a more normal state of sleep.

Steve: But you were using Propofol. I read that you bought 4 gallons of it.

Murray: Well you know that was sensanalization . Whether or not they want to call it 4 gallons , 55 gallons...

Steve: But you did buy some Propofol

Murray: Yes I did

Steve: mostly to use with him

Murray: Yes I did

Steve: So then you are supplying a substance to him which you think in medical terms not warranted.

Murray: Well he has an issue and I will use a scenario and you have to look at this again. If I came to your house and you were a friend of mine unexpectedly I saw you with a gun in your hand. I can do one of two things and maybe succeed. I can tell you to stop it and you may listen to me or I may take hours to get you to hand over that gun. Okay? So I would say basically it took me a while to take away from Michael something I thought he should not use.

Steve: So you say you were working with him to get him off it

Murray: Yes that's basically it.

Steve: You described Michael as drug seeking as suffering from some form of dependency that you found multiple IV sites and poor veins structure.

Murray: In the course of ??? IV in him, I felt that his veins were horrific. They were very cordlike and they were like spider webs. And I said to Michael "the only time I have seen this type of vein appearance in a patient is people that are drug users, drug abusers and his response in a very childish voice which I can clearly imitate but I choose to not do that "really?" and I said "yes" and that was the end of that. He would not account for that.

(voice over) about phone calls

Murray: In my interview I said at least 10:40. 10:30 we were beyond that and at that time he pleaded for milk. In consideration to giving him that I had to get appropriate medication, get the syringes, and prepare it so he really got Propofol around 10:50. So here's Mr. Jackson. he gets an injection of Propofol which is 25 mg, that's it.

Steve: In the initial statement you said you gave Michael propofol, watched him until you were comfortable and then left the room for 2 minutes to visit the restroom and when you came back Michael was in some form of distress. That time frame doesn't make sense because you were on the phone talking to various people for something like 45 - 50 minutes.

Murray: I would say.. This is what I can tell you I have done. So he got medicine around 10:50, he drifted into sleep around 5 minutes, I sat there. As I said in my statement I waited as long as I felt, I was comfortable that the effects of the medicine Propofol was gone.

Steve: And then you left the room?

Murray: how long was that? Normally Propofol would last about .. the effect on the end organ.. the sleep state.. would be gone in 10 minutes. I sat there for at least 30 minutes. If you look at the calls as they are coming through. The very first call came from my daughter. I did not even pick it up.

Steve: but you were out a lot more than 2 minutes?

Murray: No I'm still at the bedside.

Steve: Taking calls at the bedside?

Murray: Let me clarify for you. After giving him Propofol I sat there long enough with Mr. Jackson looking at him , checking his vital signs , checking his oximeter, making sure that his pulse is fine, making sure he was asleep and he was asleep but as deep as normally he would sleep because he was not snoring. And then by 11:20 -11:25 I decided well look if the calls are going to start calling and I need to call .. He&#8217;s not comfortable, the effects of Propofol is more than 20 minutes gone...

Steve: but the point is this you never mentioned the phone calls to the police

Murray: They didn't ask me.

Steve: but you are supposed to.. you're telling them what's happening.

Murray: Listen to me. I sat there and we never interrupted the police, we never told them what they could ask , what they could not ask. They never asked me the question. I did not think it was important.

Steve: Let me ask you the question what do you think happened? It has been speculated that Mr. Jackson has swallowed lots of Propofol but that's now been discounted. It has been suggested by some people that you hooked him up to a drip and as a longer term infusion of Propofol he ended up with poisonous concentration of Propofol in his blood. There's another suggestion that he may have medicated himself. What do you think happened?

Murray: I cannot answer your questions. I mean you ask so many things that requires a story on its own. I think first of all let's go back to 11:20 when I left his side because when I left his side the effects of the Propofol was gone. I went to the adjacent.. Mr. Jackson was in the master room that was comparted .. Separated into 5 compartments or chambers. I was in the chamber that was right adjacent to where he was, feeling that at least he got up or he called for me I would hear him. I then conducted phone calls right in the bedroom next door because I did not want to disturb his sleep. At the end of my conversations or tehreabout with the last phonecall I was making rather than going back to him right away I thought to go ahead to the farthest , the distant chamber to urinate. That I did. And that's when I talk about 2 minutes. I went to the very very last chamber to urinate and then came back. But all of the time I was in the adjacent room I felt I was close to Mr. Jackson. Does that help you?

Steve: It does. Do you understand why people think that you are culpable here? On the face of it there are no medical notes, it's not appropriate to use Propofol at home, you have no ??? systems, there was no CPR board that you could do comprehensions on, there was no mention of Propofol to the paramedics or doctor in the hospital. It does look like a catalog of errors on your part.

Murray: Let me ask you a question. You can call it a catalog or any term you'd like but I'll ask you this. What does this culpable mean and culpable of what?

Steve: Because you are a doctor.

Murray: Am I culpable of being a doctor?

Steve: No because you are a doctor you are culpable.

Murray: Culpable of what?

Steve: because we expect standards of practices, we expect good, we expect high standards from doctors. That&#8217;s why they are certified.

Murray: I think my standards have been impeccable. Now if you tell me Dr. Murray it's was really stupid a careless thing you should had notes, I would say you know what I agree. If you tell me I'm culpable I want to know what is culpability. Are you saying because I did not have any medical notes was responsible for his death?

Steve: No but the absence of medical notes makes it very hard to get to the bottom of what indeed did happen. That's the whole point of medical notes. You record as you go. You are the doctor.

Murray: It was not.. I always write notes. The setting in which I was didn't give me the opportunity to do it and clearly I did not. Was this a mistake on my part? Absolutely. But the absence of notes was not responsible for his death.

Steve: It does look like for $150,000 a month you essentially did whatever Michael Jackson asked you. Less doctor more supplier.

Murray: I am in no way any of which you have just mentioned. And $150,000 you mention, guess what I'm yet to receive a dime of it.

Steve: Do you accept that it looks staggeringly incompetent at least?

Murray: Then you know what I would say probably for doctors that write incomplete notes.. Doctors don&#8217;t write notes or that write incomplete notes that includes me, you know what you just included the 90% world's population of doctors.

Steve: let me ask you one more question

Murray: I have to stop.

Steve: Let me ask you this. I read in an article that you said to a journalist "If I simply tell the truth I would be exonerated" . Why have you not taken the stand?

Murray: I did not tell that to a journalist.

Steve: It's from Daily Beast.

Murray: Daily Beast?

Steve: You say "If I simply tell the truth I will be exonerated"

Murray: You read the Daily Beast?

Steve: I do.

Murray: Really?

Steve: with hindsight would you have done anything different?

Murray: Part 2

(Murray gets up and leaves)
 
Steve Hewlett Interview with Dr. Murray for UK Channel 4

Steve: Did Michael Jackson at any point ask you to give him Propofol?

Murray: (thinks a while) Yes

Steve: And as his doctor what was your medical opinion? It was justified generally or not justified?

Murray: I did not recommend it.

Steve: As I understand it the use of Propofol was.. your use of Propofol for him as your patient became common place.

Murray: Not in that sense. If Propofol.. I would have never recommended it. I would never have recommended Propofol to Mr. Jackson

Steve: So as a doctor if a patient demands something and you don't recommend it. In your medical opinion it's not justified are you going to give it to him?

Murray: No

Steve: Then why did you?

Murray: Well I did not give him something, I met him with something. And I felt by meeting him with such an agent on his own, he needed to get rid of it and try to resume a more normal state of sleep.

Steve: But you were using Propofol. I read that you bought 4 gallons of it.

Murray: Well you know that was sensanalization . Whether or not they want to call it 4 gallons , 55 gallons...

Steve: But you did buy some Propofol

Murray: Yes I did

Steve: mostly to use with him

Murray: Yes I did

Steve: So then you are supplying a substance to him which you think in medical terms not warranted.

Murray: Well he has an issue and I will use a scenario and you have to look at this again. If I came to your house and you were a friend of mine unexpectedly I saw you with a gun in your hand. I can do one of two things and maybe succeed. I can tell you to stop it and you may listen to me or I may take hours to get you to hand over that gun. Okay? So I would say basically it took me a while to take away from Michael something I thought he should not use.

Steve: So you say you were working with him to get him off it

Murray: Yes that's basically it.

Steve: You described Michael as drug seeking as suffering from some form of dependency that you found multiple IV sites and poor veins structure.

Murray: In the course of ??? IV in him, I felt that his veins were horrific. They were very cordlike and they were like spider webs. And I said to Michael "the only time I have seen this type of vein appearance in a patient is people that are drug users, drug abusers and his response in a very childish voice which I can clearly imitate but I choose to not do that "really?" and I said "yes" and that was the end of that. He would not account for that.

(voice over) about phone calls

Murray: In my interview I said at least 10:40. 10:30 we were beyond that and at that time he pleaded for milk. In consideration to giving him that I had to get appropriate medication, get the syringes, and prepare it so he really got Propofol around 10:50. So here's Mr. Jackson. he gets an injection of Propofol which is 25 mg, that's it.

Steve: In the initial statement you said you gave Michael propofol, watched him until you were comfortable and then left the room for 2 minutes to visit the restroom and when you came back Michael was in some form of distress. That time frame doesn't make sense because you were on the phone talking to various people for something like 45 - 50 minutes.

Murray: I would say.. This is what I can tell you I have done. So he got medicine around 10:50, he drifted into sleep around 5 minutes, I sat there. As I said in my statement I waited as long as I felt, I was comfortable that the effects of the medicine Propofol was gone.

Steve: And then you left the room?

Murray: how long was that? Normally Propofol would last about .. the effect on the end organ.. the sleep state.. would be gone in 10 minutes. I sat there for at least 30 minutes. If you look at the calls as they are coming through. The very first call came from my daughter. I did not even pick it up.

Steve: but you were out a lot more than 2 minutes?

Murray: No I'm still at the bedside.

Steve: Taking calls at the bedside?

Murray: Let me clarify for you. After giving him Propofol I sat there long enough with Mr. Jackson looking at him , checking his vital signs , checking his oximeter, making sure that his pulse is fine, making sure he was asleep and he was asleep but as deep as normally he would sleep because he was not snoring. And then by 11:20 -11:25 I decided well look if the calls are going to start calling and I need to call .. He&#8217;s not comfortable, the effects of Propofol is more than 20 minutes gone...

Steve: but the point is this you never mentioned the phone calls to the police

Murray: They didn't ask me.

Steve: but you are supposed to.. you're telling them what's happening.

Murray: Listen to me. I sat there and we never interrupted the police, we never told them what they could ask , what they could not ask. They never asked me the question. I did not think it was important.

Steve: Let me ask you the question what do you think happened? It has been speculated that Mr. Jackson has swallowed lots of Propofol but that's now been discounted. It has been suggested by some people that you hooked him up to a drip and as a longer term infusion of Propofol he ended up with poisonous concentration of Propofol in his blood. There's another suggestion that he may have medicated himself. What do you think happened?

Murray: I cannot answer your questions. I mean you ask so many things that requires a story on its own. I think first of all let's go back to 11:20 when I left his side because when I left his side the effects of the Propofol was gone. I went to the adjacent.. Mr. Jackson was in the master room that was comparted .. Separated into 5 compartments or chambers. I was in the chamber that was right adjacent to where he was, feeling that at least he got up or he called for me I would hear him. I then conducted phone calls right in the bedroom next door because I did not want to disturb his sleep. At the end of my conversations or tehreabout with the last phonecall I was making rather than going back to him right away I thought to go ahead to the farthest , the distant chamber to urinate. That I did. And that's when I talk about 2 minutes. I went to the very very last chamber to urinate and then came back. But all of the time I was in the adjacent room I felt I was close to Mr. Jackson. Does that help you?

Steve: It does. Do you understand why people think that you are culpable here? On the face of it there are no medical notes, it's not appropriate to use Propofol at home, you have no ??? systems, there was no CPR board that you could do comprehensions on, there was no mention of Propofol to the paramedics or doctor in the hospital. It does look like a catalog of errors on your part.

Murray: Let me ask you a question. You can call it a catalog or any term you'd like but I'll ask you this. What does this culpable mean and culpable of what?

Steve: Because you are a doctor.

Murray: Am I culpable of being a doctor?

Steve: No because you are a doctor you are culpable.

Murray: Culpable of what?

Steve: because we expect standards of practices, we expect good, we expect high standards from doctors. That&#8217;s why they are certified.

Murray: I think my standards have been impeccable. Now if you tell me Dr. Murray it's was really stupid a careless thing you should had notes, I would say you know what I agree. If you tell me I'm culpable I want to know what is culpability. Are you saying because I did not have any medical notes was responsible for his death?

Steve: No but the absence of medical notes makes it very hard to get to the bottom of what indeed did happen. That's the whole point of medical notes. You record as you go. You are the doctor.

Murray: It was not.. I always write notes. The setting in which I was didn't give me the opportunity to do it and clearly I did not. Was this a mistake on my part? Absolutely. But the absence of notes was not responsible for his death.

Steve: It does look like for $150,000 a month you essentially did whatever Michael Jackson asked you. Less doctor more supplier.

Murray: I am in no way any of which you have just mentioned. And $150,000 you mention, guess what I'm yet to receive a dime of it.

Steve: Do you accept that it looks staggeringly incompetent at least?

Murray: Then you know what I would say probably for doctors that write incomplete notes.. Doctors don&#8217;t write notes or that write incomplete notes that includes me, you know what you just included the 90% world's population of doctors.

Steve: let me ask you one more question

Murray: I have to stop.

Steve: Let me ask you this. I read in an article that you said to a journalist "If I simply tell the truth I would be exonerated" . Why have you not taken the stand?

Murray: I did not tell that to a journalist.

Steve: It's from Daily Beast.

Murray: Daily Beast?

Steve: You say "If I simply tell the truth I will be exonerated"

Murray: You read the Daily Beast?

Steve: I do.

Murray: Really?

Steve: with hindsight would you have done anything different?

Murray: Part 2

(Murray gets up and leaves)
 
Re: MSNBC to air Murray Documentary "Michael Jackson and the Doctor" / Interview part 1 transcript @

You know, I am not the biggest letter writer to TV stations. However, these incredible HIPPA violations make me research that topic even more. And, Murray isn't the only one. For someone who worked in that field- it is one of these things that disturbs me even more.

It might be worthwhile to see if one of us knows an 'expert' in the field- this is outrageous. Not just for Michael- but all of us have a vested interested in our medical information being kept PRIVATE.
 
Re: Murray Interview & Documentary Full Transcripts - so you don't have to watch it

place holder
 
Re: MSNBC to air Murray Documentary "Michael Jackson and the Doctor" / Interview part 1 transcript @

What i do believe is randy philips story, that he told cm that BS.. what do you guys think?

I believe that is what Randy Phillips told CM also.:mat:
 
Re: MSNBC to air Murray Documentary "Michael Jackson and the Doctor" / Interview part 1 transcript @

I refused to look at this thing, so thanks all for the comments. A big problem I have is why is Michael's photos and objects still in that house long after his death so that a camera and crew can go in there and take pictures. Did the family only take out things that they could sell on the internet (cough cough).

Let's face it, when an unmarried family member dies, the parents/siblings/adult children/next of kin go to the house and clean it out. They remove all personal objects, so why were Michael's personal objects still in that house. Not only did the doctor and friends not care about Michael, it seems his family also did not care about him and his privacy as well. The result is we have nasty Flanny and his wife make comments about objects in Michael's home. I also have my room filled with black and white baby pictures, so I guess I am a sicko too.

Personally I do not believe about the bed wetting. I think Muarry spilled the pee when he was emptying it. I do not believe that Michael never had a manicure and pedicure. I do not believe that AEG boss made that statement. It seems Muarry wants to get back at him and Ortega for sending Michael home and there must have been some strong words spoken which bruised Muarry's super ego. Randy did not give Michael his personal money. The money Michael received was all set in an agreement where Michael got an advance. This reminds me of the statement that Michael was afraid they would cancel the show, and Randy had to say on the stand that there was a contract and both sides had to agree about a cancellation. Of course Muarry does not know this, so he made up a story about Michael fearing they would cancel the show.

Unfortunately the masses will believe Muarry's claims, even though they might think Muarry is a criminal and slim ball.
 
Re: MSNBC to air Murray Documentary "Michael Jackson and the Doctor" / Interview part 1 transcript @

Because Sociopath Murray shows no remorse in this documentary he did to make money off of his crime,
perhaps, the judge will sentence him to 4 long years in the California San Quentin State Prison.:assassin:
 
Re: MSNBC to air Murray Documentary "Michael Jackson and the Doctor" / Interview part 1 transcript @

I refused to look at this thing, so thanks all for the comments. A big problem I have is why is Michael's photos and objects still in that house long after his death so that a camera and crew can go in there and take pictures. Did the family only take out things that they could sell on the internet (cough cough).

those are coroner's and LAPD's pictures taken on the day Michael died.
 
Re: MSNBC to air Murray Documentary "Michael Jackson and the Doctor" / Interview part 1 transcript @

About that TMZ article here why would Randy pull Muarry to the side and tell him that when they did not even want to sign Muarry's contract and were trying to get Michael to find a doctor in England. It is not as though Randy and Muarry were friends for him to pull Muarry to the side. Please. muarry knows Randy did not want him on that tour and he is pissed off.
 
Re: MSNBC to air Murray Documentary "Michael Jackson and the Doctor" / Interview part 1 transcript @

I don't understand her comment about what she wants people to take away from the situation. I would hope she would remark that Muarry's statement to police showed many lies in relation to the evidence, so people should keep that in mind in evaluating the accuracy of his statements in the doc. Further he had an opportunity to speak in his own defense in court which he declined (that is his right), which should make viewers question whether speaking out to safeguard one's freedom is of less importance than being paid for a doc and going on TV.

I mean, most people know Michael is an exceptional artist and human, but Muarry will not be attacking that in the doc, so how can people come away with the idea that Michael is an exceptional artist if the doc is not about that!!! Sometimes I wonder about LaToya.


I think in many ways the family doesn't want this doc to be pull and that's why Toya gave this half response. If you take what Murray says at face value, he is saying exactly the same thing as some people in the family. That Michael was an addict, controlled by AEG, sick, and pushed to his limits. In their bid to win against AEG I wouldn't be surprise if they cherry-picked Murray's statements.
 
Re: MSNBC to air Murray Documentary "Michael Jackson and the Doctor" / Interview part 1 transcript @

Personally I do not believe about the bed wetting.QUOTE]


Exactly, why were the the defense (and maybe the prosecution), talking about the urine jug being in the bedroom when the coroner's investigator came in, not to mention (as I believe), that Murray said he went to dump the jugs before finding Michael dead if Michael was a bed-wetter? And why didn't the defense say anything about Michael wetting the bed during the trial since they were bringing up addiction, Michael begging for propofol, etc? And what about the waste bag that was supposedly attached to Michael so he wouldn't have to get out of bed to go to the bathroom and he still would not wake up in a puddle? Did any of Michael's employees ever say that they had to let Murray or somebody else into Michael's room to clean it because "It smelled" as Murray claims? This is beyond crazy, in my opinion
 
Last edited:
Back
Top