StephluvsMJ
Proud Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2007
- Messages
- 2,154
- Points
- 63
I'm sorry if I put this in the wrong place but I just have to rant.
If you all remember back during the trial, if you went out and supported Michael, you were nothing more than a "blind" fan. Someone who loves a celebrity so much, that they can't see the "obvious". I think we kind of saw the detractors in the same way. We were the ones who learned the facts, we were the ones to went through 5 months of court transcripts, we were the ones who won lottery tickets to be inside the court room and see this accuser testify. So, to us, it was everyone else who failed to see the obvious. I used to wonder "why the eff can't they see what we see? Why can't they see that this whole trial is garbage?!" Whenever fans would defend Michael, we would be written of as some type of raving lunatic. We had been called a pedoworshiper, f'loon, w.acko, crazy, insane, obsessed, you name it. Our opinions, even though based on facts, would be dismissed because we were fans. No one would take us seriously. They all believed we were the "blind" ones and they were all objective, reasonable individuals who weren't influenced by celebrity and therefore knew the "truth". Yet, the real truth was staring at them in the face and they couldn't see it. So how were we blind?
Fast forward to Michael's death. Now we are "blind" and in "denial" because we are insisting that Michael wasn't addicted to painkillers when he passed. We can't see the "obvious" apparently. We worship Michael so much, and we see him as such a perfect little angel, that we can't admit he was on painkillers. We could show people the autopsy report, where there is not ONE painkiller in Michael's system, and somehow, someway, they STILL can't see it. It's the same with the Vitiligo. I had a friend contact me on facebook after I posted an article confirming that Michael Jackson had vitiligo. This friend was someone I hadn't actually seen or spoken to since I was 11 years old. But hey, she wanted to add me as a friend, so I accepted her request. So, she wrote to me to tell me that I'm "blind" because I actually believed Michael when "everyone knows he bleached himself white". When I told her it had been confirmed through autopsy, she responded with something along the lines of "the family paid the coroner to include it in the report". Right. So, this "bleaching skin" story that was created back in the 80s because folks didn't have a reasonable explanation for Michael's colour change, is actually more believable than autopsy results, dermatologist statements and medical records?
Shortly before or after Michael's death, I read an article about Whitney Houston. In the article it said something like "Whitney fans are rather like Michael Jackson fans: they bury their heads in the sand". I just said to myself, "in what way have we buried our heads in the sand? Because we believed him to be innocent, we were in denial and we were blind? There were actually reasons behind why we believed Michael Jackson was innocent. There were facts in the case that pointed to innocence. We weren't blindly believing he was innocent. If everyone else weren't so blinded by their own stupid agendas they would be able to see that he was innocent as well."
Does anybody else get frustrated when people dismiss your contribution in a discussion about Michael because they see us as "blind"? I've actually been thinking about this "blind" thing for a while. What is it that makes them think we are so blind? You would think that us being MJ fans, they would know we have researched the man, and we have seen court documents about his trial and documents relating to his death, that they would say "These fans must know what they are talking about. Let's listen to them." But nobody takes us seriously because they see us as crazy, insane lunatics. According to them, our opinions are "biased", our research is "worthless", and our love for MJ has caused us to be "blind" to his faults. Sometimes I feel like "what's the point in trying to defend him if they are just going to dismiss me." Does this get on anyone else's nerves?
(Again sorry about this rant. I had to get it off my chest. And I'm just curious to know if this "blind" stuff bothers other fans as much as it does me. I apologise in advance to the mods if this is in the wrong place. Feel free to move it to the appropriate section.)
If you all remember back during the trial, if you went out and supported Michael, you were nothing more than a "blind" fan. Someone who loves a celebrity so much, that they can't see the "obvious". I think we kind of saw the detractors in the same way. We were the ones who learned the facts, we were the ones to went through 5 months of court transcripts, we were the ones who won lottery tickets to be inside the court room and see this accuser testify. So, to us, it was everyone else who failed to see the obvious. I used to wonder "why the eff can't they see what we see? Why can't they see that this whole trial is garbage?!" Whenever fans would defend Michael, we would be written of as some type of raving lunatic. We had been called a pedoworshiper, f'loon, w.acko, crazy, insane, obsessed, you name it. Our opinions, even though based on facts, would be dismissed because we were fans. No one would take us seriously. They all believed we were the "blind" ones and they were all objective, reasonable individuals who weren't influenced by celebrity and therefore knew the "truth". Yet, the real truth was staring at them in the face and they couldn't see it. So how were we blind?
Fast forward to Michael's death. Now we are "blind" and in "denial" because we are insisting that Michael wasn't addicted to painkillers when he passed. We can't see the "obvious" apparently. We worship Michael so much, and we see him as such a perfect little angel, that we can't admit he was on painkillers. We could show people the autopsy report, where there is not ONE painkiller in Michael's system, and somehow, someway, they STILL can't see it. It's the same with the Vitiligo. I had a friend contact me on facebook after I posted an article confirming that Michael Jackson had vitiligo. This friend was someone I hadn't actually seen or spoken to since I was 11 years old. But hey, she wanted to add me as a friend, so I accepted her request. So, she wrote to me to tell me that I'm "blind" because I actually believed Michael when "everyone knows he bleached himself white". When I told her it had been confirmed through autopsy, she responded with something along the lines of "the family paid the coroner to include it in the report". Right. So, this "bleaching skin" story that was created back in the 80s because folks didn't have a reasonable explanation for Michael's colour change, is actually more believable than autopsy results, dermatologist statements and medical records?
Shortly before or after Michael's death, I read an article about Whitney Houston. In the article it said something like "Whitney fans are rather like Michael Jackson fans: they bury their heads in the sand". I just said to myself, "in what way have we buried our heads in the sand? Because we believed him to be innocent, we were in denial and we were blind? There were actually reasons behind why we believed Michael Jackson was innocent. There were facts in the case that pointed to innocence. We weren't blindly believing he was innocent. If everyone else weren't so blinded by their own stupid agendas they would be able to see that he was innocent as well."
Does anybody else get frustrated when people dismiss your contribution in a discussion about Michael because they see us as "blind"? I've actually been thinking about this "blind" thing for a while. What is it that makes them think we are so blind? You would think that us being MJ fans, they would know we have researched the man, and we have seen court documents about his trial and documents relating to his death, that they would say "These fans must know what they are talking about. Let's listen to them." But nobody takes us seriously because they see us as crazy, insane lunatics. According to them, our opinions are "biased", our research is "worthless", and our love for MJ has caused us to be "blind" to his faults. Sometimes I feel like "what's the point in trying to defend him if they are just going to dismiss me." Does this get on anyone else's nerves?
(Again sorry about this rant. I had to get it off my chest. And I'm just curious to know if this "blind" stuff bothers other fans as much as it does me. I apologise in advance to the mods if this is in the wrong place. Feel free to move it to the appropriate section.)
Last edited: