yaazgurl
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 1,979
- Points
- 0
is this a new interview? any link?
I am sorry. It was on KNX 1070 here in California. It is a 24 hour news radio station.
is this a new interview? any link?
I am sorry. It was on KNX 1070 here in California. It is a 24 hour news radio station.
Flanagan is on tape saying Michael's decline in health not apparent in footage and all you see is Michael performing and how good he is even on his bad days. He says the footage is irrelevant to what happened that night and makes it out that the prosecution is the one that wanted the footage.
No thank you. all I needed if it was recent.
So I'm calling Flanagan a liar. They were the ones that went on to fishing to find a ill MJ on those tapes. They were the ones went beyond the judge's limit of last 2 days and wanted to add June 15 and beyond to show him sick on June 18.
so it turns out there's not any damning footage and all you see is "good" and alert Michael. It seems like their little plan backfired big time and gave prosecution the chance to see a lot more footage and shows Michael was not dying until Murray OD'd
him.
First of all, how the heck does he know that Nancy Grace will automatically play up the prosecution's side. We all know her history with Michael Jackson from the past.
I thought the defense wasn't allowed to discuss the footage in public.
anyway, him saying all that just makes the pain even worse. Michael was in good health, ready to the big come back and he was killed by that person who I refuse to call a doctor.
Ivy and Elusive yes its from today at the hearing because they also have him on tape talking about wanting a sequestered jury. When I first him I thought they made a mistake and said defense attorney but were talking to prosecution but they played it again and its defense because he blames the prosecution for wanting to show footage
Well I sincerely hope the judge keeps it this wayMurray Trial -- Jury Shouldn't Watch Nancy Grace
53 minutes ago by TMZ Staff
Lawyers for Conrad Murray told the trial judge they don't want Nancy Grace to pull a "Casey Anthony" on the jury -- so they asked the judge to prohibit jurors from watching her.
Attorney Michael Flanagan argued that it was impractical to tell jurors they can't watch TV - because they simply will. So Flanagan asked Judge Michael Pastor to sequester the jury, O.J. style. The judge told Flanagan to file a motion and he'd consider it, although the judge did say he thought sequestering was both unnecessary and too expensive.
Flanagan pressed his claim for outtakes from the "This Is It" rehearsals -- something Sony doesn't want to cough up. Sources tell us ... Flanagan wants the outtakes to show there were periods where Michael Jackson appeared to be on drugs.
In a telling comment, Judge Pastor said, "This case is going to focus on the charge, not personal lifestyle."
http://www.tmz.com/2011/07/20/conra...nslaughter-trial-propofol-court-death-doctor/
edited to add: this comment reminds me of Anna Nicole case and how the judge said that Anna Nicole wasn't legally an addict. It seems like the judge wouldn't allow an addict claim - even a recreational drug addict claim about Michael - and keep this limited to propofol.
Yeah whatever Flanagan, you need to go to hell along with your muderer/killer clientFlanagan is on tape saying Michael's decline in health not apparent in footage and all you see is Michael performing and how good he is even on his bad days. He says the footage is irrelevant to what happened that night and makes it out that the prosecution is the one that wanted the footage.
I hope that's the case.No thank you. all I needed if it was recent.
So I'm calling Flanagan a liar. They were the ones that went on to fishing to find a ill MJ on those tapes. They were the ones went beyond the judge's limit of last 2 days and wanted to add June 15 and beyond to show him sick on June 18.
so it turns out there's not any damning footage and all you see is "good" and alert Michael. It seems like their little plan backfired big time and gave prosecution the chance to see a lot more footage and shows Michael was not dying until Murray OD'd him.
update about the footage from AP. Confirms what yaazgurl heard on the radio
Meanwhile, Pastor agreed to travel across town to Sony Pictures Studios to view 16 hours of raw footage from Jackson's rehearsal movie "This Is It," which lawyers want to use as evidence. Prosecutors and defense attorneys spent two weeks examining more than 100 hours of video and have submitted requests for excerpts. The prosecution wants 12 hours; the defense seeks four hours of video.
Flanagan acknowledged outside court that the defense didn't find what they had hoped for - footage of Jackson appearing ill or impaired before his death.
Asked what conclusion could be reached from viewing the Jackson rehearsals, he said, "He is very talented. Even on his bad days, he's good."
"We believe his health is somewhat compromised, but he's not displaying it," said Flanagan. He said the only implication of problems might be days when Jackson was absent from rehearsals.
He now believes that showing footage from the film is irrelevant to the trial.
"I really think it's a big waste of time," he said.
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2011/07/20/entertainment-us-michael-jackson-doctor_8575474.html
LMAO Flanagan, seriously go to hell. Up about a month ago you were yapping about how ''crucial'' and ''important'' those footages were to your defense, you were talking all over town, how the footages would show ur killer clients innocence, but just like ur client u have no conscious whatsoever, I will continue to pray for Murray and his supporters, including lawyers etc to rot in the depth of hell for eternity.update about the footage from AP. Confirms what yaazgurl heard on the radio
Meanwhile, Pastor agreed to travel across town to Sony Pictures Studios to view 16 hours of raw footage from Jackson's rehearsal movie "This Is It," which lawyers want to use as evidence. Prosecutors and defense attorneys spent two weeks examining more than 100 hours of video and have submitted requests for excerpts. The prosecution wants 12 hours; the defense seeks four hours of video.
Flanagan acknowledged outside court that the defense didn't find what they had hoped for - footage of Jackson appearing ill or impaired before his death.
Asked what conclusion could be reached from viewing the Jackson rehearsals, he said, "He is very talented. Even on his bad days, he's good."
"We believe his health is somewhat compromised, but he's not displaying it," said Flanagan. He said the only implication of problems might be days when Jackson was absent from rehearsals.
He now believes that showing footage from the film is irrelevant to the trial.
"I really think it's a big waste of time," he said.
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2011/07/20/entertainment-us-michael-jackson-doctor_8575474.html
update about the footage from AP. Confirms what yaazgurl heard on the radio
Meanwhile, Pastor agreed to travel across town to Sony Pictures Studios to view 16 hours of raw footage from Jackson's rehearsal movie "This Is It," which lawyers want to use as evidence. Prosecutors and defense attorneys spent two weeks examining more than 100 hours of video and have submitted requests for excerpts. The prosecution wants 12 hours; the defense seeks four hours of video.
Flanagan acknowledged outside court that the defense didn't find what they had hoped for - footage of Jackson appearing ill or impaired before his death.
Asked what conclusion could be reached from viewing the Jackson rehearsals, he said, "He is very talented. Even on his bad days, he's good."
"We believe his health is somewhat compromised, but he's not displaying it," said Flanagan. He said the only implication of problems might be days when Jackson was absent from rehearsals.
He now believes that showing footage from the film is irrelevant to the trial.
"I really think it's a big waste of time," he said.
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2011/07/20/entertainment-us-michael-jackson-doctor_8575474.html
love is magical;3439453 said:Can someone fill me in on why the prosecution asked for a delay? What schedule conflict?
smoothlugar;3439599 said:Thank you everyone for the news!!!:yes:
Apparently, because defence wanted to see footage from 15th to 24th June, just in case... and the viewing would take time.
This is from a past hearing:
Re: Prosecutors want another delay in trial of Michael Jackson's doctor
WALGREN: We are not subject to subpoena, 1, we are stuck by the dates requested, we thought it was limited to 2 days, 2. People want to view essential material too, we request stipulations to include people same rights. (...) The vagueness of the labels and disorganized state could be a lengthy process. I’m just relying on what I have heard here. People have spoken to Mr. Chernoff and received a continued date for 3 weeks based on scheduling issues, we have no objection to that, the other issue is back to cost, viewing the material. They are in format that could be readable.
http://teammichaeljackson.com/tmj_328.htm