Soso Deaf
Proud Member
again, let's not bring michael into this discussion.
he may be free here but he'll get his come the day of JUdgement....please, anyone who'd stoop to the low of working w/ someone that outright played ur ass is pathetic...
maxx...ever hear the song lil wayne did for r(ah)? and then for him to work w/him on making it rain...pretty pathetic.
I've posted my thoughts on this all ready, but those who continue to keep saying 'he got away with it' etc..
He did not get away with anything..
Wather he did it or not.. His final judgement was not yesterday..
He will stand infront of the Judge of all Judges, the King of All Kings..
If he did it, he can be forgiven..
I always think of this when I get angry at someone.. JESUS while being crucified.. He did not condem those who were nailing his hands.. He asked God to forgive them..
If he could do that in the MIDDLE of that.. WE can forgive someone for something we are not even sure what went down...
INNOCENT or GUILTY it's not in our hands to judge and chastize..
Which ever person that has never sinned.. Feel free to cast the first stone...
PLUS, I'll say it one more.. I doubt anyone of us fallowed the case the closely.. Aside from the big Kelly fans in here.. I dabbeled in the facts, learned somethings, but don't know it all.. I was not in the court, never read the court transcripts...
U have just as much reason to believe he's guilty as those who think Michael was guilty.. (very little or NONE)
@andythemysfit: Why not? Hitler is / was villainous.
yep and I don't pimp my kids and I don't get star struck. no body in hollywood would have control and reign over my kid because I'm a detailed parent. but this case was over before it even started because it don't take no 6 years, you don't sent a video to a newspaper when the police station is around the corner. motives and intentions spoke for themselves off jump.Have you got young daughters?
yeah i heard that song and it was a song. if you are going with this where I think you are then I'm telling you right now I've never got the feeling that R.Kelly was making light of his case or the situation. making music is just like what actors and actress's do, it is there craft and it doesn't mean anything more or less.he may be free here but he'll get his come the day of JUdgement....please, anyone who'd stoop to the low of working w/ someone that outright played ur ass is pathetic...
maxx...ever hear the song lil wayne did for r(ah)? and then for him to work w/him on making it rain...pretty pathetic.
and datsy, can we leave michael's name out of this?
LOL i didn't know about the awards.why are there Grammy's and plaque's in the background? How many people do you know who have awards in their home? Come on now, it's obvious that it's R. Kelly on the tape. I don't think it's been tampered with at all.
Okay, lets say it actually isn't R. Kelly on the video (which it clearly is, but just for argument sake lets say it isn't), why are there Grammy's and plaque's in the background? How many people do you know who have awards in their home? Come on now, it's obvious that it's R. Kelly on the tape. I don't think it's been tampered with at all.
Also, explain his marriage to 15 year old Aaliyah when he was nearly 30 years old? There is a marriage license that proves they were married and that she lied about her age and said she was 18, eventhough she was 15 at the time. All signs point to guilty here.
LOL i didn't know about the awards.
though in other circumstances i'd think our Bobby would happily brag the piss out of the whole situation. anyone heard about his self-confessed "good good lemonade"?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfEKkyiFaG4
tight remix, though.
well everybody is entitled to there opinion,but without a witness or a victim and nobody coming forward and 6 year wait and suspect testimony you got a shaky case.maxx im not insinuating anything. i like his songs b/c the beats and he is talented but that doesn't mean he'snot a vile person.
sure u can get justice AND money but some parents pimp their children out for money...hell, it happens all the time . does that mean the child should have to suffer b/c they were brainwashed into thinking everything was ai'ight?!
stepping is good for your health and the music is strong.Hey mistermaxxx, i know you ready to step in the name of love right?
**** him, poor michael had to go through hell for something he never did, and this low life gets off, even after haveing hard evidence that it was him on the tape.
You know what? This proves that the legal system is a joke. You know what - compare this trial to MJ's because everyone else is doing it! That sicko can party but MJ can't! This whole thing disgust me and I knew the jurors knew that he did it but R. Kelly must have paid them to aquit him. Disgusting. MJ suffered for nothing but Kels can do whatever he wants. I hope they caught him again.
guys...no mike in this thread...c'mon.
there can't be shaky testimony if there's a tape showing the crime.
have the jurrors said much else except for the bit on tmz? did they believe she was underage and knew it was her on the tape etc. surely the judge must have intrusted them to not make decisions just based on whether the girl testifyed or not.
CHICAGO - Much was made of whether R. Kelly was the man in the sex tape at the center of his child pornography trial. In the end, the R&B superstar walked away because the jury wasn’t convinced the female in the graphic video was the 13-year-old girl who prosecutors said she was.One juror even said he was certain it was Kelly on the tape. But by no means was that the crux of the charges.
“You want to be 100 percent sure it’s Kelly and (the alleged victim),” he said. “What we had wasn’t enough.”
‘People’s Exhibit No. 1’
Kelly and the now 23-year-old alleged victim had denied they were on the videotape. She never testified, nor did her parents, which several jurors cited as a weakness in the prosecution’s case.
One juror said he thought the woman’s body appeared too developed for 13. Another said prosecutors left too many questions unanswered.
The alleged victim’s family also presented a puzzle for the jury. Three relatives testified they did not recognize her as the female on the tape, while other relatives said that it was her.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25174823/
Hello people.
I have some rules here that I want everyone to respect:
1. Please, please, PLEASE do not even compare this trial to Michael's trial in ANY WAY! I do not care if you are trying to "make a point". Mike's trial and Kels' trial are two different things.
2. This thread is for news and discussion ONLY. Nothing else.
3. Please, try to be respectful and if you have somthing to post that is news worthy, please post it. Make sure the news information comes with links. Sidenote: I am iffy of posting things from gossip blogs such as tmz, bossip, or perezhilton.com. However, that doesn't mean that you cannot post them. Just that, I will not post them on here.
4. Do not bash others. Just make a point and leave it at that.
.