What's better? Yokohama 1987 or Bucharest 1992?

What's better? Yokohama or Bucharest?

  • Yokohama, 1987

    Votes: 158 46.2%
  • Bucharest, 1992

    Votes: 184 53.8%

  • Total voters
    342

simon89

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
741
Points
0
Location
London
I started this thread on MJNO, and thought I would revive it on here.

So what do you prefer?
 

Memia

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
173
Points
0
No doubt whatsoever BAD TOUR owns everything.
 

Cinnamon234

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
3,366
Points
0
Location
U.S.A
I prefer the Bad Tour over The Dangerous overall, but in this case I have to say "Bucharest" was the better show. The dancing was better, more creative sets, better lighting, better energy from the crowd-just pretty much everything except for the "Human Nature" performance was better at the "Bucharest" show.
 

simon89

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
741
Points
0
Location
London
...pretty much everything except for the "Human Nature" performance was better at the "Bucharest" show.

It's amazing too see how many rate and comment a concert, performance (or whatever) based on the Human Nature performance and in general. But it's also nice, as HN is the first thing I watch on a concert, too see the different moves each time.

I do it myself!
 
Last edited:

Girlygirl

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
24,441
Points
0
Location
united states
yokohama!!
girlhappyqh3.gif
 

GAV001

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
190
Points
0
Location
England
I love the Bucharest concert, it's just a perfect show. The stage, the costumes, the dance moves, the setlist is all perfect. I watch the Bucharest show alot more than the Yokohama one.

All this talk of Bucharest is making me want to watch the concert now: 'goes to get Bucharest dvd'
 
Last edited:

lilseanb

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
963
Points
18
Bucharest 92 because of thw whole show...had bucharest been competeing with a Bad tour concert from the 88 leg then the BAd tour would have won hands down!
 

daphnieas

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
2,819
Points
0
Location
Guatemala
Yokohama. Better dancing, more live vocals, better setlist, better outfit (anything better than the gold leotard).

The gold leotard was awful, I'll give you that.
I just watched both, Yokohama is def better in the sense that it's a LIVE show, he's actually singing, but performance and energy conerned Bucharest wins for me.
 

the floacist

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
270
Points
0
Location
New York
I prefer the Bad Tour over The Dangerous overall, but in this case I have to say "Bucharest" was the better show. The dancing was better, more creative sets, better lighting, better energy from the crowd-just pretty much everything except for the "Human Nature" performance was better at the "Bucharest" show.

If I recall, wasn't the girl he picked for 'Shes Out Of My Life' in the Bad tour here not interesting at all? I mean, she seemed excited but it was like, I'm-winning-a-free-prize-at-a-game-show excited. I was like HELLO.:huh: :lol:

This is a tough one, I think I'm going with Yokohama. Bucharest is great too.
 

michaelsson

Proud Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2007
Messages
4,543
Points
48
Yokohoma is boring compared 2 bucharest/ Bucharest was lighter brighter bangin and the crowd was rockin and the japan crowd was kind jus lookin like omg its mj lol but not really groovin like bucharest
 
Top