Rebbie Jackson to be on "The View" on January 27

[twinklEE]

I think Randy was the catalyst for the story and Janet believes everything he says. I also think Janet had/has some jealousy/resentment issues with Michael. Remember before his death, her own career was falling apart. Rebbie. Has seemed to have issues with Michael long before he died. I don't know what it is with her but she's always seemed overly critical of him. I do think she loved him but like him I don't know.

very well said

 

[StacyJ]

I agree... Janet also had some issues with MJ. I noticed a change in her towards him years ago. According to her she 'lost him' after Thriller. And I agree Rebbie had some issues with MJ for a while too. Maybe it had something to do with him being banished from the Witnesses after Thriller I don't know, but for some reason she's a wishy washy woman. I can't stand any of them.

 

[elusive moonwalker]

I think Randy was the catalyst for the story and Janet believes everything he says. I also think Janet had/has some jealousy/resentment issues with Michael. Remember before his death, her own career was falling apart. Rebbie. Has seemed to have issues with Michael long before he died. I don't know what it is with her but she's always seemed overly critical of him. I do think she loved him but like him I don't know.

yeah agree especially with rebbie she showed her issues during 03-05 blaming him for what happened and supporting stacy brown. they are all in with randy. janet tweeted to him around the time of one the hearings something to the extent of im right behind you im in your corner.cant remember exactly what it was about. think it was when they were going on about the will or a similar issue. the ones who arent around randy ie jermaine jackie etc have totally diff stories to tell

 

[Alma]

Yeah, Jermaine, for now, has been defending his brother a lot, never once mentioned this intervention topic, when they asked him, he said he knows nothing of that or wasn't a part of that to know and many times called him a wonderful person... I'll give him that, leaving aside his aspirations and things.

 

[8701girl]

Even though sometimes jermaine annoys me lol i know he was quite close to mj in the j5 era. Just watch the "the jacksons -an american dream" movie and it shows

 

[twinklEE]

Yeah, Jermaine, for now, has been defending his brother a lot, never once mentioned this intervention topic, when they asked him, he said he knows nothing of that or wasn't a part of that to know and many times called him a wonderful person... I'll give him that, leaving aside his aspirations and things.

I co sign this.

 

[ScrEAm.Jack5on]

Plus I wanted to add that Whoopi kept silent during almost the whole interview. Her only comment (that I heard) to Rebbie was about people being surprised when they hear Rebbie being performing. To me it seemed like she (whoopi) didn't want to dissect Michael (because she's generally a very active participant during interview process).

Whoopi defended MJ on that show before..

Alexandrea Martin​

​

Whoopi Goldberg’s daughter
​

Whoopi: "To answer Mr King’s question, “Would you leave your children with Michael Jackson?” YES, I would. Yes, yes, I did in fact. I left my child with Michael, yes.
To him hurting a child – he’d rather hurt an adult if he was going to hurt somebody. He would never hurt a child, this is the last person in the world he would hurt, because to him they were the only people that understood him."


http://lacienegasmiled.wordpress.com/category/mjs-female-kid-friends/

 

[chanel05]

yeah agree especially with rebbie she showed her issues during 03-05 blaming him for what happened and supporting stacy brown. they are all in with randy. janet tweeted to him around the time of one the hearings something to the extent of im right behind you im in your corner.cant remember exactly what it was about. think it was when they were going on about the will or a similar issue. the ones who arent around randy ie jermaine jackie etc have totally diff stories to tell

Janet didn't tweet Randy anything around the time of a hearing. You are talking about the time Randy did an interview on CNN and Janet tweeted him for support. That was around the time of the anniversary of mjs death. Yes, in the interview Randy was talking about the estate and how he felt the will was invalid. He said that MJ's kids name were misspelled and he was too proud of a father to do something like that. He also talked about how the will say Los Angeles and he was in NYC. N she did say something I support you with getting the truth out there. Yea I do agree that they all have a different version of events and I wonder why???

 

[ginvid]

Well, all I can say is so much for that benefit of the doubt. I have officially finished with Rebbie.

 

[twinklEE]

Whoopi defended MJ on that show before..

Alexandrea Martin​

​

Whoopi Goldberg’s daughter
​

Whoopi: "To answer Mr King’s question, “Would you leave your children with Michael Jackson?” YES, I would. Yes, yes, I did in fact. I left my child with Michael, yes.
To him hurting a child – he’d rather hurt an adult if he was going to hurt somebody. He would never hurt a child, this is the last person in the world he would hurt, because to him they were the only people that understood him."


http://lacienegasmiled.wordpress.com/category/mjs-female-kid-friends/

Among all the women who were on that show (although being a host), I believe Whoopie's done the best in defending Michael.
As for Randy, I'm surprised his head hasn't exploded yet, two years and he still has to figure a way out to get his hands on the money that was never meant to be his, LMAO.
I'm also thinking since Janet and Randy are such close buddy's she should leave whatever she has for Randy and put Randy in charge immediately.

 

[chanel05]

Yeah, Jermaine, for now, has been defending his brother a lot, never once mentioned this intervention topic, when they asked him, he said he knows nothing of that or wasn't a part of that to know and many times called him a wonderful person... I'll give him that, leaving aside his aspirations and things.

Yep that's one about jermaine and Latoya. As much as they give interviews, I have never heard them talk about an intervention

 

[bluetopez]

Someone said what's the problem with the family saying they had interventions with MJ and that it doesn't mean that their saying he had a drug problem? HUH?

What do u think they meant by saying that exactly? Of course they meant he had a drug problem having u been listening to their interviews? They don't say he was in denial for nothing they meant drugs!

How come the same people defending the family don't question why the Jacksons wanted him to tour with them so badly!? According to the family he wasn't healthy for "This Is It" but, wanted MJ to tour with them as a family....REALLY?!


That's why I call the Family accusations B.S!

By the way Whoopi has defended MJ on the allegations with children! But, she do think he had a drug issue and said so on the view!

 

[strawberry45220]

Jermaine did say he knew about the intervention he said he couldn't attend he was out of town, but serisouly they have asked everybody in the family about interventions.

 

[marebear]

They really need to explain when they helped him. Time frame. Otherwise it is too vague and people will think it was all the time. We can all agree at least in 1993 Michael admitted his problems. But after that it's all just talk. I really hope Murray's lawyers don't try to get someone from the family on the stand. That would be terrible.

For me I can accept whatever as long is it's the truth. If the family is going to talk about Michael like this then they need to explain it better than what they are doing. If they can't then don't say anything and focus on getting Michael justice. They keep talking about others involved. Who and where are they? The only person I see charged is Murray.

 

[ginvid]

Jermaine did say he knew about the intervention he said he couldn't attend he was out of town, but serisouly they have asked everybody in the family about interventions.

Well, if I recall, Jermaine after Mj first died, denied interventions and drug problems. He said MJ took medication for pain but he was not an addict. If his story changed later on, it makes me wonder why.

Just like Katherine said she "heard" about interventions. Now they know they would try and use Katherine to get Mj to do anything else they wanted. If they really felt MJ needed an intervention, then why wasn't Katherine involved? Why were family members only aware of it after he died?

If it was that serious, where was the united family effort? It really makes you wonder, right?

 

[twinklEE]

Someone said what's the problem with the family saying they had interventions with MJ and that it doesn't mean that their saying he had a drug problem? HUH?

What do u think they meant by saying that exactly? Of course they meant he had a drug problem having u been listening to their interviews? They don't say he was in denial for nothing they meant drugs!

How come the same people defending the family don't question why the Jacksons wanted him to tour with them so badly!? According to the family he wasn't healthy for "This Is It" but, wanted MJ to tour with them as a family....REALLY?!


That's why I call the Family accusations B.S!

By the way Whoopi has defended MJ on the allegations with children! But, she do think he had a drug issue and said so on the view!

don't get worked up on this, I know the extent to which defenders go is mind blowing.

 

[StacyJ]

Jermaine did say he knew about the intervention he said he couldn't attend he was out of town, but serisouly they have asked everybody in the family about interventions.

yeah I remember that... he was out of town yet his brother was supposedly a ticking time bomb ready to die of drugs and he wasn't concerned enough to get back in town?

 

[twinklEE]

Well, if I recall, Jermaine after Mj first died, denied interventions and drug problems. He said MJ took medication for pain but he was not an addict. If his story changed later on, it makes me wonder why.

Just like Katherine said she "heard" about interventions. Now they know they would try and use Katherine to get Mj to do anything else they wanted. If they really felt MJ needed an intervention, then why wasn't Katherine involved? Why were family members only aware of it after he died?

If it was that serious, where was the united family effort? It really makes you wonder, right?

everyone was united when it came to make Michael do something he did not want to. everyone was united when it came to harassing him do tours with them. ppl were even braggin on television, claiming they were tiny bits away from the great family concert. since that never happened they tried their luck on ''interventipns' lol

 

[twinklEE]

anyone remember back in sep/oct 2008. the family got some kind of award, and janet gave it to them and Michael didn't show up (nor did Jermaine btw) anyways, there was some kind of red carpet and on the red carpet the jackson's were asked why Mike wasn't with them and where he was, and Marlon said something like ''he's sitting/riding a camel in bahrain''. and I remember all of us fans on the KOP board,(back when it was normal) were kinda surprised/shocked by this reply. Michael wasn't there yet the reports on this award show the next day, were all about Michael and why he was MIA LOL!

 

[StacyJ]

yeah that has confused me to. How in the world was there an intervention without Katherine? she's the only one MJ even talked to. He would do anything for her so she most definitely should've been involved. But she has denied being involved and only has said she 'heard' about it and that she has only approached MJ once about drugs/medications. So if that's the case Katherine did absolutely nothing for her supposed drugged up son??

 

[StacyJ]

anyone remember back in sep/oct 2008. the family got some kind of award, and janet gave it to them and Michael didn't show up (nor did Jermaine btw) anyways, there was some kind of red carpet and on the red carpet the jackson's were asked why Mike wasn't with them and where he was, and Marlon said something like ''he's sitting/riding a camel in bahrain''. and I remember all of us fans on the KOP board,(back when it was normal) were kinda surprised/shocked by this reply. Michael wasn't there yet the reports on this award show the next day, were all about Michael and why he was MIA LOL!

Yep!! Remember it well.. so Marlon found it cute to crack jokes yet his brother was needing help desperately according to them and he needed an intervention from drugs. This family makes me sicker and sicker.

 

[ScrEAm.Jack5on]

Jermaine did say he knew about the intervention he said he couldn't attend he was out of town, but serisouly they have asked everybody in the family about interventions.

yeah I remember that...

Not quite.

Jermaine was asked about these 'interventions' and he said he didn't know, he wasn't there, he was out of the country, but he'd heard about it - it wasn't clear if he meant he'd heard about it then, or since MJ's death.

 

[xthunderx2]

yeah that has confused me to. How in the world was there an intervention without Katherine? she's the only one MJ even talked to. He would do anything for her so she most definitely should've been involved. But she has denied being involved and only has said she 'heard' about it and that she has only approached MJ once about drugs/medications. So if that's the case Katherine did absolutely nothing for her supposed drugged up son??

it seems unfortunate but Katherine does exactly what others tell her to do. to bad people have that much influence over her. If she thought for 1 minute that Michael had a problem with drugs..she would of stepped in and taken them children I am sure. The problem with that theory is...obviously Michael never had a problem to worry about.

 

[StacyJ]

In my opinion the family actions demonstrate they don't care if Murray goes to jail or not. You just don't do what they've done and care about what's going to happen to the killer of your relative. I've never in my life seen a family act like this when their relative died at the hands of another.

 

[xthunderx2]

In my opinion the family actions demonstrate they don't care if Murray goes to jail or not. You just don't do what they've done and care about what's going to happen to the killer of your relative. I've never in my life seen a family act like this when their relative died at the hands of another.

I haven't either....they are definitely a piece of work that is for sure...Michael deserves so much better.

 

[8701girl]

anyone remember back in sep/oct 2008. the family got some kind of award, and janet gave it to them and Michael didn't show up (nor did Jermaine btw) anyways, there was some kind of red carpet and on the red carpet the jackson's were asked why Mike wasn't with them and where he was, and Marlon said something like ''he's sitting/riding a camel in bahrain''. and I remember all of us fans on the KOP board,(back when it was normal) were kinda surprised/shocked by this reply. Michael wasn't there yet the reports on this award show the next day, were all about Michael and why he was MIA LOL!

Wow didnt know bout that....im shocked

 

[chanel05]

From my understanding they never could get Katherine to join. I guess she felt like there was no need. She said he asked and MJ said no so I guess she left it alone.

 

[chanel05]

They really need to explain when they helped him. Time frame. Otherwise it is too vague and people will think it was all the time. We can all agree at least in 1993 Michael admitted his problems. But after that it's all just talk. I really hope Murray's lawyers don't try to get someone from the family on the stand. That would be terrible.

For me I can accept whatever as long is it's the truth. If the family is going to talk about Michael like this then they need to explain it better than what they are doing. If they can't then don't say anything and focus on getting Michael justice. They keep talking about others involved. Who and where are they? The only person I see charged is Murray.

It would help if they state a time frame but I don't think any happened recent. Maybe in 2007 or early 2008 but that's probably it.

 

[xthunderx2]

It would help if they state a time frame but I don't think any happened recent. Maybe in 2007 or early 2008 but that's probably it.

But see thats the problem..they DONT state when..they make people ASSUME that they are talking about recent...before Michael passed. They dont specify..they dont say what drugs Michael was addicted to if it WAS recent...That family needs to clarify themselves as to what it is they mean. It is NOT that difficult..

 

[Petrarose]

But see thats the problem..they DONT state when..they make people ASSUME that they are talking about recent...before Michael passed. They dont specify..they dont say what drugs Michael was addicted to if it WAS recent...That family needs to clarify themselves as to what it is they mean. It is NOT that difficult..

Exactly, and if this is true about interventions what caused it. Is it that Michael did not do what we want so something is wrong with him.