MJFan07
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 135
- Points
- 0
Notice how Rebbie moved her hand towards her face when she responded to the intervention question. We learned in Social Psychology class that is a sign that someone is lying. Obviously, I can't say for sure, but her body language when she responded to that question indicated she may not have been 100% honest.
In general, I do like the Jackson family. I'd like to give them the benefit of the doubt and hope that when they refer to interventions they are being honest. It is possible that they had concerns and raised them with MJ, even if they didn't know if the stories were true or not. I don't see my siblings often but I love them dearly and if I had been hearing stories about alleged drug use, I would ask them out of concern and try to ensure if needed that they got help. So, just b/c they intervened it doesn't necessarily mean they thought he was a drug addict, just that they were concerned that he may have been. With them not spending a lot of time with him, they wouldn't know w/o asking. And them not spending a lot of time with him has nothing to do with how much they loved him. Again, I love my siblings even though I don't see them much.
I do have to give Rebbie credit for saying that it's not relevant to the current case. And you have to remember also these are not easy questions to answer. I thought that at least half the questions that were asked were rude and inappropriate. It's a difficult position to be in. Again, her responses made me somewhat uneasy, particularly the body language, but I do want to give her the benefit of the doubt. I do think she loved her brother, although probably wasn't that close to him.
In general, I do like the Jackson family. I'd like to give them the benefit of the doubt and hope that when they refer to interventions they are being honest. It is possible that they had concerns and raised them with MJ, even if they didn't know if the stories were true or not. I don't see my siblings often but I love them dearly and if I had been hearing stories about alleged drug use, I would ask them out of concern and try to ensure if needed that they got help. So, just b/c they intervened it doesn't necessarily mean they thought he was a drug addict, just that they were concerned that he may have been. With them not spending a lot of time with him, they wouldn't know w/o asking. And them not spending a lot of time with him has nothing to do with how much they loved him. Again, I love my siblings even though I don't see them much.
I do have to give Rebbie credit for saying that it's not relevant to the current case. And you have to remember also these are not easy questions to answer. I thought that at least half the questions that were asked were rude and inappropriate. It's a difficult position to be in. Again, her responses made me somewhat uneasy, particularly the body language, but I do want to give her the benefit of the doubt. I do think she loved her brother, although probably wasn't that close to him.