Re: Michael Jackson Bodyguard Fired
Yup he was interviewed only in September according to Radar -
http://www.radaronline.com/exclusive...kson-witnesses
Alvarez was short interviewed in the hospital in
June
[(I had copied the article - the conversation about is in another thread somewhere on here).
I thought you know that already, and so I had not posted it again.
Yeah, sorry, my fault
]
and
at the end of August (between the two articles from radaronline).
September: In September it was released only by the press, the interviews have taken place earlier - 6-8 weeks after Michael has died and the inverstigation had started.
(note: the search of M. office in L.V. was also much too late!)
I guess, the LAPD were scared fo the entire case at that time:
Cal. state is broke, not enough manpower, to many authorities (LAPD, DEA, etc.) are involved, the press, the pressure that the whole world is watching them, etc.
In my opinion: the investigation should have done an offical search (idk the right word for) for Murray .. they have been made many errors.
Not to interview the entire household as soon as possible and not declar 'Holby Hills' as a crime scene, are the biggest ones.
I believe, it's not Alvarez fault to have been interrogated only in September.
-------
1) domestic violence?
Aren't there not more persons in that family who were accused and sentenced for the same action? :cheeky: double moral, may I say in this case.
I believe, Katherine is manipulatable (btw I like her, but she does make faults like other ppl).
She hat a long time that silly lawyer, who was representing her, and it looks like as he would represent only Joes opinion and not Katherine and the childrens interests.
Only when she took Adam Streisand and not longer strived against the state, and thus now against Joe, changed the impression.
I guess, this happens in many situations .. MJ will, Grace, the bodyguards.
I also believe, she supports her own children or former daughter-in-law or still husband.
Therefore, if anybody needs some money (or have personal interests) ..
R. and J., as examples, are not the best buisness men, if I'm not so wrong
The rest of the story is in your own believes
What you can do today, should be done, nobody lives forever or something like that *whistle*
2) I haven't heard the live chat ..
R., Gr. or A. or somebody else, i don't know, I'm not there, but:
somebody must have the need to speak to tabloids.
Why?
My personal note: the first two persons have already suffered under them and now they tell the tabloids what's going on in that family/household?
As I said before, I call something like that: double moral.
**********
It's that difficult for me to explain such connections and thoughts in a strange language. The last 30 years I have not much to read or write in english, my knowledge date back to my schooldays *sigh* no slang, no technical words
Please be indulgent with my faults .. thanks!!