I'm finding your way of thinking mind boggling :lol:
Okay, because Jay Leno felt that MJ was a pedophile and should've been locked away in a cell somewhere. Janet should distance herself as far away as possible from him? Non-sense.
The world isn't all roses, dear. People are going to have a difference of opinions but this shouldn't put a hold onto your thoughts on them or anyone else's for that matter. Janet knew who MJ really was and just because someone else feels differently shouldn't stop her from talking to them.
Sometimes it's okay to put down the armor.
another way of looking at this, is, why does someone feel they MUST appear on Jay Leno, to keep her career going? Are you saying that if she doesn't appear on Jay Leno, her career is over?
Michael proved, that if a career is strong, a person can show family loyalty, and not worry about their career failing. in fact, it's more likely, that a career will flourish more, due to honor, than, if a person feels they gotta do something, no matter what, at all costs.
you make it sound like Janet is in desperate need of Jay Leno.
so..why couldn't she appear on David Letterman?
i really have the feeling that if the tables were reversed, you would put the blast on Michael, if he appeared on Jay Leno. after all, you have no trouble dissing other members of the family.(the other brothers, et. al)
the same things you accuse us of, regarding Michael, you can be accused of, regarding Janet.
i find it alarming, just how easy it is to be desensitized to being publicly labeled a Pedophile. i mean..we're talking about, the term PEDOPHILE. and what followed, was clearly destructive to MJ, despite his innocence. remember the media? remember the trial? remember the hate? it all was nothing less than EVIL.
are we to believe that because MJ was found innocent, that we should say, all that he went through wasn't so bad? that, perhaps, it's ok to minimize it all?
