Jury Selection / Jury Questionnaire (all threads merged)- April 7th - Jury Selection Day 3

Re: Jury Selection / Jury Questionnaire (all threads merged)

I'm glad that it finally looks like we might get some justice.
 
Re: Dr. Murray Targeting Jurors Who Take Responsibility

i'm sorry, but the patient does not get to dictate to their doctor. (after 9/11, i asked my doctor for "something" to calm my nerves because i didn't want to travel by nyc subway. He told me no, give it some time and i'd be fine. He was right, after a while, i was fine. That's how a real doctor acts, in my opinion.)

murray was supposed to be in charge, not michael. Michael jackson was a lot of things, but he was never a doctor, to my knowledge. I have no idea what michael asked for, but if he asked for propofol, murray should have said "no, we will address your sleep issues with a specialist who deals with sleep issues."

and unless you have spoken to every non-fan in america, your theory is moot, in my opinion.

exactly!
 
Re: Jury Selection / Jury Questionnaire (all threads merged)

spoken to every single person? stop generalising

Whatever elusive we dont agree. on anything so maybe you stop reaction on my post and i on yours.
If there is a poll not every person on the world is spoken to pff... wtf

ALOT of non michael fans say its his fault... non only in the media but ouside. I spoke also to alot of non michael fans, because in my area im the only fan, and they all said that, so why so bitchy about it.... im not stupid you know, dont act like i am!!! im a adult woman just like you so dont..... just dont...
 
Re: Dr. Murray Targeting Jurors Who Take Responsibility

I'm sorry, but the PATIENT does not get to dictate to their doctor. (After 9/11, I asked my doctor for "something" to calm my nerves because I didn't want to travel by NYC subway. He told me NO, give it some time and I'd be fine. He was right, after a while, I WAS fine. That's how a REAL doctor acts, in my opinion.)

Murray was supposed to be in charge, not Michael. Michael Jackson was a lot of things, but he was NEVER a doctor, to my knowledge. I have no idea what Michael asked for, but IF he asked for Propofol, Murray should have said "NO, we will address your sleep issues with a specialist who deals with sleep issues."

And unless you have spoken to EVERY NON-FAN in America, your theory is moot, in my opinion.

also to you, I DID NOT SAY I BELIEVE THAT !!!! I SAY NON FANS believe its his one fault. and no i dont have spoken to every person you??? What is it with this forum that people get so easyl personally upset if somebody said something.. HEre in holland alot of non fans say its his fault... so wtf..
 
Re: Jury Selection / Jury Questionnaire (all threads merged)

whatever people im going, its just rude and upsetting that you go against me like im believing its his fault.. i never said that.. i say non fans, im a fan, last i checked!!

SO for once and for al, NO I HAVE NOT SPOKEN TO EVERY PERSON DO YOU ?????
It goos both ways, i say non fans say its his fault most of them and somehow you read i say its his fault.. READ **F((F*

pfffffffff

There are alot of people loving people in jail...
there are alot of people hating gay people
both nothing to do with michael but same sentence its really worsh and true at the same time...
 
Re: Jury Selection / Jury Questionnaire (all threads merged)

Thank you very much for taking the time to keep us updated. Also the 2 potential jurors that said they never heard of this case....what do they do live under a rock ...I have a hard time believing that.

You just have to be an adult to be on the jury right? Honestly, most of my friends didn't even know that there was a case going on about Michael's death. They thought he died of natural causes... so maybe those two potentials thought something similar? Or maybe they don't watch the news?
 
Re: Jury Selection / Jury Questionnaire (all threads merged)

You just have to be an adult to be on the jury right? Honestly, most of my friends didn't even know that there was a case going on about Michael's death. They thought he died of natural causes... so maybe those two potentials thought something similar? Or maybe they don't watch the news?
really?? well then I guess then maybe it is a possibility...thank you for that information..:hug:
 
Last edited:
Re: Jury Selection / Jury Questionnaire (all threads merged)

You just have to be an adult to be on the jury right? Honestly, most of my friends didn't even know that there was a case going on about Michael's death. They thought he died of natural causes... so maybe those two potentials thought something similar? Or maybe they don't watch the news?

there is so many things said and thought, that this is one point! only the fans know so much about the case, but well when i said that... they believe im from mars..
 
Re: Jury Selection / Jury Questionnaire (all threads merged)

really?? well then I guess then maybe it is a possibility...thank you for that information..:hug:

Yeah! I was surprised but they really didn't know. But it's not like we watch the news or anything (I'm in second year university, so that you can get an age bracket :lol:)

Would they want jurors who have no clue about the case though? I wonder how unbiased the selection could be
 
Re: Jury Selection / Jury Questionnaire (all threads merged)

thank you for the answer Ivy...I have some mixed feelings about the type of jurors they are looking for..retired folks...folks from corporations.

no that's not the specific type. The thing is this is not a normal case. They expect it to go on for 2 months so they need to find people who can attend it for 2 months and that their life wouldn't be affected by it - such as they won't get fired. Government employment and bigger corporations have "jury duty" in employment process - meaning that if you get called for a jury duty they have to let you attend and cannot fire you for it.

So in short they are looking for people that wouldn't be put into hardship because of 2 months of juror duty.

Ivy---is this just a misprint in the article--the May 4th date for both voir dire and opening statements? I think voir dire will take longer than just a few days too.

no they say voir dire is on may 4th and the opening statements will be on may 9th.

http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/member.php?u=9179Thanks for keeping us up to date Sharon B. Sidney

yes thank you Sharon. please keep to give us updates.

fans or haters. and blah at murray sucking upto them already

Also the 2 potential jurors that said they never heard of this case....what do they do live under a rock ...I have a hard time believing that.

they can be relatively older in age as well. For example I know that my grandmother knows nothing about the case as well. All she knows that Michael is dead and that's that. (she doesn't know Murray, she doesn't know homicide, she doesn't know the case - she hates news).

Would they want jurors who have no clue about the case though? I wonder how unbiased the selection could be

It's not about unbiased selection necessarily, it's about finding a group of people willing to put their bias, opinion, emotions and perceptions aside and make decision based on what is presented to them and what the rules call for.
 
Re: Jury Selection / Jury Questionnaire (all threads merged)

oh..ok Ivy thank you.
 
Michael Jackson's physician fires publicist for leaking jury selection information

On the first day of his trial, Michael Jackson’s personal physician fired his publicist for leaking jury selection information to a celebrity gossip website.

On Wednesday, TMZ.com had posted what purported to be proposed defense questions for potential jurors, a leak that Dr. Conrad Murray’s attorney acknowledged came from their own publicist. Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor said the questions were “bogus” but that he was concerned about how information on the Internet would affect the answers potential jurors give during jury selection.

Murray is accused of involuntary manslaughter for giving Jackson a fatal dose of the surgical anesthetic propofol.

Defense attorneys told Pastor in chambers that a media company hired by the defense had leaked six questions the company had suggested for the jury pool. None of the questions ended up in the final questionnaire, which Pastor earlier ordered sealed.

“It is an embarrassment,” Ed Chernoff, Murray’s attorney, told the judge. Chernoff apologized and said the company would be fired.

After the hearing, Chernoff confirmed that the employee was Miranda Sevcik, a Houston publicist who began working for Murray and his legal team two days after Jackson’s death.

Sevcik declined to comment, beyond wishing the defense well.

On Thursday, 159 potential jurors were sworn in and screened for financial hardship. Jury selection is expected to continue Friday. Testimony in the case is scheduled to begin in May.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lan...t-for-leaking-jury-selection-information.html
 
ivy;3311222 said:
Michael Jackson's physician fires publicist for leaking jury selection information

On the first day of his trial, Michael Jackson’s personal physician fired his publicist for leaking jury selection information to a celebrity gossip website.

On Wednesday, TMZ.com had posted what purported to be proposed defense questions for potential jurors, a leak that Dr. Conrad Murray’s attorney acknowledged came from their own publicist. Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor said the questions were “bogus” but that he was concerned about how information on the Internet would affect the answers potential jurors give during jury selection.

Murray is accused of involuntary manslaughter for giving Jackson a fatal dose of the surgical anesthetic propofol.

Defense attorneys told Pastor in chambers that a media company hired by the defense had leaked six questions the company had suggested for the jury pool. None of the questions ended up in the final questionnaire, which Pastor earlier ordered sealed.

“It is an embarrassment,” Ed Chernoff, Murray’s attorney, told the judge. Chernoff apologized and said the company would be fired.

After the hearing, Chernoff confirmed that the employee was Miranda Sevcik, a Houston publicist who began working for Murray and his legal team two days after Jackson’s death.

Sevcik declined to comment, beyond wishing the defense well.

On Thursday, 159 potential jurors were sworn in and screened for financial hardship. Jury selection is expected to continue Friday. Testimony in the case is scheduled to begin in May.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lan...t-for-leaking-jury-selection-information.html

:ph34r:
 
Re: Jury Selection / Jury Questionnaire (all threads merged)

Now we know who was TMZ's source - Murray's publicist.

I'm glad that Judge Pastor is putting his foot down :)
 
ivy;3311222 said:
Michael Jackson's physician fires publicist for leaking jury selection information

On the first day of his trial, Michael Jackson’s personal physician fired his publicist for leaking jury selection information to a celebrity gossip website.

On Wednesday, TMZ.com had posted what purported to be proposed defense questions for potential jurors, a leak that Dr. Conrad Murray’s attorney acknowledged came from their own publicist. Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor said the questions were “bogus” but that he was concerned about how information on the Internet would affect the answers potential jurors give during jury selection.

Murray is accused of involuntary manslaughter for giving Jackson a fatal dose of the surgical anesthetic propofol.

Defense attorneys told Pastor in chambers that a media company hired by the defense had leaked six questions the company had suggested for the jury pool. None of the questions ended up in the final questionnaire, which Pastor earlier ordered sealed.

“It is an embarrassment,” Ed Chernoff, Murray’s attorney, told the judge. Chernoff apologized and said the company would be fired.

After the hearing, Chernoff confirmed that the employee was Miranda Sevcik, a Houston publicist who began working for Murray and his legal team two days after Jackson’s death.

Sevcik declined to comment, beyond wishing the defense well.

On Thursday, 159 potential jurors were sworn in and screened for financial hardship. Jury selection is expected to continue Friday. Testimony in the case is scheduled to begin in May.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lan...t-for-leaking-jury-selection-information.html
that girl was probably following the orders given to her by THE DEFENSE and we all know that shit rolls down hill so she probably got the wrap for it.I don't trust that defense at all..they are known liars.
 
ivy;3311222 said:
Michael Jackson's physician fires publicist for leaking jury selection information

On Wednesday, TMZ.com had posted what purported to be proposed defense questions for potential jurors, a leak that Dr. Conrad Murray’s attorney acknowledged came from their own publicist. Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor said the questions were “bogus” but that he was concerned about how information on the Internet would affect the answers potential jurors give during jury selection.

After the hearing, Chernoff confirmed that the employee was Miranda Sevcik, a Houston publicist who began working for Murray and his legal team two days after Jackson’s death.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lan...t-for-leaking-jury-selection-information.html

Fascinating. :ph34r:
 
Re: Jury Selection / Jury Questionnaire (all threads merged)

That Miranda chick has been doing this crap for the past 2 years.. she's the one that kept putting out the statement that Murray gave ' MJ nothing that should've killed him'.. She is the one that told Murray to go to Forest Lawn for those fake pics and also having him go to the church in Texas with his patients. She is in PR and has been doing this since day one when Murray ran off and got hooked up with Chernoff in Texas after he murdered Michael.
 
Re: Jury Selection / Jury Questionnaire (all threads merged)

That Miranda chick has been doing this crap for the past 2 years.. she's the one that kept putting out the statement that Murray gave ' MJ nothing that should've killed him'.. She is the one that told Murray to go to Forest Lawn for those fake pics and also having him go to the church in Texas with his patients. She is in PR and has been doing this since day one when Murray ran off and got hooked up with Chernoff in Texas after he murdered Michael.
Mirinda is not alone in this it's all of them, that killer and his mofo lawyers were probably giving the orders
 
Re: Jury Selection / Jury Questionnaire (all threads merged)

She has been leaking over time and I am more then sure they knew what she was doing and never bothered to stop her. However they got caught and she got thrown under the bus
 
Re: Jury Selection / Jury Questionnaire (all threads merged)

Does Chernoff and his team think they are fooling anybody? they are playing dirty and its no wonder TMZ always knows where Dr. Murray is.

Hopefully this judge continues his tight reign on this case!
 
Court Hearing March 24th, 2011. My notes from inside the court room.

Restricted hearing requiring only 6 public seats which even some of the media had to participate in.

This hearing was for the Jury Selection Procedure which Murray attended as well.

No family present.

Due to elevator problems and security reasons the Jury Selection Assembly Procedure was moved to the 5th floor, in dept.107. Counsel and staff and public (us 6 people) were to be re-directed and escorted there after the Judge made some procedures clear to us.

His disclosures:

1.) He would be swearing in 160 prospective jurors in the assembly room.

2.) He would then present Murray to the prospective jurors.

3.) He would explain the procedure to the prospective jurors.

4.) Prospective jurors would be advised that this case would take 40-45 days and that they would need to come back on May 4th and expect to be available all the way up until July 1st.

5.) He would then ask every prospective juror to fill out a very short 3-page questionnaire which would include the question whether they would be able to serve on this case or claim a hardship (reason to not be able to serve). He expected that out of the 160 prospective jurors, up to 80-100 of them would claim hardship. This questionnaire has nothing to do with the questionnaire regarding the case which is 27 pages long.

The Judge then told us this questionnaire evaluation shouldn’t take more than 10 minutes and that once the prospective jurors were handed the questionnaire that the session would be private and secure. Once filled out the questionnaires would be handed to counsel for review (Prosecution and Defense).

The Judge stated that all questionnaires would be sealed until all questionnaires were filled and would then be released immediately and become a public document.

The judge brought up that several internet sites had been posting supposed “leaked” questionnaires online. He said he was concerned and wanted to find out the potential source of these questionnaires. However, the Judge said he read one of the site’s questionnaires and claimed that not a single one of the questions mentioned were accurate or true and that it was utter “nonsense”.

Then all media was asked to leave the court room and only the 6 of us were left alone with counsel, staff and Murray.

We were then escorted by Sherriff deputies out of the court room and through secret corridors and elevators. We were then brought into a room with 159 prospective jurors all staring at us coming in. We were allocated reserved seats facing all of them from the side.

We had been specifically told to not interact with any prospective jurors or even with each other. No media was allowed to intend except a couple of court allocated reporters. One of which I know very well and has interviewed me before.

As I watched the prospective jury pool I have to say it seemed fairly well balanced according to age, ethnicity and gender. Some were asleep…

The Judge then came in the followed the procedure he told us about but one thing shocked me horrendously! He announced the case was against Conrad Murray who was supposedly accused of administering a fatal dose of Propofol to Michael Jackson on…JUNE 28th, 2008!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHAT?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Murray then entered the room and there were obvious reactions from the prospective jurors. I watched and saw some have very clear reactions. Most knew who and what the case was about before the judge even mentioned the name Michael Jackson.

The judge then made them all rise and take oath. Judge asked if anyone present had NOT heard of the case before. Only 2 prospective jurors said they hadn’t.

Counsel presented themselves individually and so did Murray. He rose, looking uncomfortable and said “Good morning ladies and gentlemen”.

When explaining the importance of not lying under oath by punishment or perjury and to not discuss the case with ANYONE, the Judge read through a list of ways to not discuss, share or resort to anything to seek advice in the case (law book rules)….one of them was: “Do not consult the Bible about this case”…..!!!!!!! And “Do not make experiments with this case in mind”……Are you fucking kidding me???!!!!!!!!!!!! To top it off, he made jokes about the catered food the prospective jurors would have to eat and that it wouldn’t a culinary experience.

We were then led out, given the option to go back to 9th floor. I went back for a while. Counsel went into chambers. Nothing would happen publicly so I left and went to Forest lawn and watched from a distance the Elisabeth Taylor memorial, sitting in Baby Land overlooking Holly Terrace.

Samantha de Gosson
http://xltweet.com/show/?id=54595E5D52



:unsure:
 
Last edited:
The Judge stated that all questionnaires would be sealed until all questionnaires were filled and would then be released immediately and become a public document.

good that means soon enough we'll know about the questionnaires


When explaining the importance of not lying under oath by punishment or perjury and to not discuss the case with ANYONE, the Judge read through a list of ways to not discuss, share or resort to anything to seek advice in the case (law book rules)….one of them was: “Do not consult the Bible about this case”…..!!!!!!! And “Do not make experiments with this case in mind”……Are you fucking kidding me???!!!!!!!!!!!!

as she says it's one of the rules - not something that the judge made up.

It basically means that when making their decision they need to base their decision on what they were presented and to the law and not religious beliefs.

Because every religion could see some death/ punishment acceptable for a crime (eye for an eye principal) or could call for total forgiveness of crimes. Law on the other hand requires people to give appropriate convictions and punishments to people according to the legal standards.
 
Re: Jury Selection / Jury Questionnaire (all threads merged)

:hysterical: Serves them right!

But, doubt they will retract, so some will still think they were right!:smilerolleyes:

I love it when they make a fool of themselves, which happens a lot. The defense is feeding them a lot of trash which we should expect since Murray was in NYC this weekend. Everybody arm yourselves because the defense will through some dirty stuff around. Notice that the AP report shows what Murray's side think but not the prosecution's. They also make Murray's theories seem as the truth. Thank goodness we are following the case ourselves.
 
ivy;3311222 said:
Michael Jackson's physician fires publicist for leaking jury selection information

On the first day of his trial, Michael Jackson’s personal physician fired his publicist for leaking jury selection information to a celebrity gossip website.

On Wednesday, TMZ.com had posted what purported to be proposed defense questions for potential jurors, a leak that Dr. Conrad Murray’s attorney acknowledged came from their own publicist. Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor said the questions were “bogus” but that he was concerned about how information on the Internet would affect the answers potential jurors give during jury selection.

Murray is accused of involuntary manslaughter for giving Jackson a fatal dose of the surgical anesthetic propofol.

Defense attorneys told Pastor in chambers that a media company hired by the defense had leaked six questions the company had suggested for the jury pool. None of the questions ended up in the final questionnaire, which Pastor earlier ordered sealed.

“It is an embarrassment,” Ed Chernoff, Murray’s attorney, told the judge. Chernoff apologized and said the company would be fired.

After the hearing, Chernoff confirmed that the employee was Miranda Sevcik, a Houston publicist who began working for Murray and his legal team two days after Jackson’s death.

Sevcik declined to comment, beyond wishing the defense well.

On Thursday, 159 potential jurors were sworn in and screened for financial hardship. Jury selection is expected to continue Friday. Testimony in the case is scheduled to begin in May.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lan...t-for-leaking-jury-selection-information.html

What? Why do I get the feeling that this was all planned? Sevick seems to be the person they chose as the fall guy. It is very hard for me to believe the intentions of Murray and company at the moment.
 
Re: Dr. Murray Targeting Jurors Who Take Responsibility

spoken to every single person? stop generalising

I'm sorry, but the PATIENT does not get to dictate to their doctor. (After 9/11, I asked my doctor for "something" to calm my nerves because I didn't want to travel by NYC subway. He told me NO, give it some time and I'd be fine. He was right, after a while, I WAS fine. That's how a REAL doctor acts, in my opinion.)

Murray was supposed to be in charge, not Michael. Michael Jackson was a lot of things, but he was NEVER a doctor, to my knowledge. I have no idea what Michael asked for, but IF he asked for Propofol, Murray should have said "NO, we will address your sleep issues with a specialist who deals with sleep issues."

And unless you have spoken to EVERY NON-FAN in America, your theory is moot, in my opinion.

you need to calm down.. Have you spoken to every non-fan? Most non-fans I know say the doctor is at fault. No credible, competent doctor gives anyone anesthesia at home period. And the trial is about whether or not Murray provided the proper standard of care, not if MJ asked for it. Murray could've easily said NO Mike, I will help you find a safer method with a sleep specialist.

She was not making a false generalization. She said "a lot" of non fans said this. You all misquoted and misunderstood and had her saying "every". No one can tell me that "a lot" of fans do not think MJ played some part in this. Many do not even care enough to educate themselves about the circumstances of the case; and, all they hear are tabloid stories about him being a drug addict out of control. Lies spurred on by his own family. What do we expect for a lot of people to think?

Ingelief was simply expressing a concern. And because it points to something not popular, without reading carefully, words were put into her mouth. I can't help but thinking if we read a little more carefully and try to understand a little more before snapping on one another, we can all get through this a little easier.

also to you, I DID NOT SAY I BELIEVE THAT !!!! I SAY NON FANS believe its his one fault. and no i dont have spoken to every person you??? What is it with this forum that people get so easyl personally upset if somebody said something.. HEre in holland alot of non fans say its his fault... so wtf..

She did not say you believed that at all. Please reread.

1. Please be a little more understanding of people not speaking English as a first language.

2. Please read carefully.

3. For most of us fans, we don't have any other place to go to speak about our fears of what is happening with MJ's justice. If we can't speak to one another about our fears, where can we go? We can tell the difference between a troll and someone sincerely trying to understand. It is sad if we as fans cannot speak to one another and communicate because what we say is unpopular. And, it is sad that any of us has to feel weak and lost because we are cast out by our fellow fans. Please think about how your comments may affect someone.

Let's not have a repeat episode of what happened earlier in this thread.

Thank you.
 
Re: Jury Selection / Jury Questionnaire (all threads merged)

Not surprised at all. And TMZ was a flying joke anyway.
 
Re: Jury Selection / Jury Questionnaire (all threads merged)

Well said ginvid.
 
Re: Jury Selection / Jury Questionnaire (all threads merged)

that girl was probably following the orders given to her by THE DEFENSE and we all know that shit rolls down hill so she probably got the wrap for it.I don't trust that defense at all..they are known liars.
of course she was. and this time the defence got caught out and she paid the price. the fact she was hired 2 days after the 25th sums everything up.
 
Re: Jury Selection / Jury Questionnaire (all threads merged)

I'm confused about the June 28th date.
 
Back
Top