no your not and no its notNo really i am. Its my mission in life, really.
no your not and no its notNo really i am. Its my mission in life, really.
no your not and no its not
I think it quality arguing over the two biggies. I mean you can come up with a good argument...Unlike some people who probabaly go WHOS BIGGER JT OR USHER.
I love arguing bout the legends
I have and I'v replied many times.Well i may as well say that cause ur not gonna listen to anything else ive said...obviously.
5 times you got a reply too... Michael has done alot more than he has to be deserved to be claimed as being "more legendary" because all his feats and achievements are just that.Well it gets irritating saying the same things over and OVER again :lol: I think ive already posted at least 5 times in this thread why Elvis is more legendary than Michael. How many more times can i say it?
I have and I'v replied many times.
one cos u cant back it up with anything 2 that poll is just one of many out there Michael's achievement is waaaay beyond winning 3rd place in some poll that will be replaced with another poll in a week or 2...Yeah. So have i. But no matter what i say you dont think its a 'compelling arguement'.....im not here to make sure you believe that Elvis is more legendary. You can believe what u wanna believe. The numbers are there in bold print. What part of 'Elvis is number 1' in that article arent u seeing?
one cos u cant back it up with anything 2 that poll is just one of many out there Michael's achievement is waaaay beyond winning 3rd place in some poll that will be replaced with another poll in a week or 2...
and if you aint here to make us believe that Elvis is more legendary then that aint true because you dont get into a debate without the intention of making the other person believe what you do.
which numbers? a poll that will be forgotten?Make u believe Elvis is more legendary? lol!
The numbers speak for themselves! I feel like im talking to a wall.....
You do know that in 2002 he had a #1 hit single (Little Less Conversation) and album (Elvis: 30 #1 hits) 25 years after his death, don't you? That was 6 years ago, true, but it kind of defeats your statement that he's not topping charts these days.
which numbers? a poll that will be forgotten?
yes. LOL!
and the numbers comparison is weak because with all the tours and album sales and what not he's done just goes to make mike look much more legendary...
now ur changing the topic of the subject again, no one said that he would lose his legendary status in america :huh:Im gonna say this ONE more time then im done with this thread. I have to be cause this is getting more ridiculous every second....Elvis will NEVER lose his legendary status in America. He hasnt since 1955 and he never will. It dosent matter what u think about it. It is the way it is.
Peace.
Give the man some credit. He's pretty huge globally. He's had huge hits during his lifetime and well after his death in the UK, Australia, most of Europe, most of Asia. Every country MJ is HUGE in, Elvis is pretty big in too. Michael is huge in Germany but so is Elvis. Michael is huge in Japan but so is Elvis. I know this argument is based on a list involving Elvis and Michael, but while were talking who's more popular worldwide, MJ and Elvis can both sit down because the Beatles trump them both. If you put MJ's and Elvis's popularity and success together you'd get the worldwide popularity and success of the Beatles.
I don't know how many times this needs to be said.. ELVIS is not a worldwide entertainer.. He's not known all over the world like Michael Jackson is. It's as simple as that.. Michael Jackson was the FIRST entertainer known ALL OVER..
NOTHING can prove Elvis is a more 'legendary' entertainer.. When majority of his success comes from one country. With some help from others.
POLLS show what???
Ask people that have traveled the world.. I have been to SO many countries that don't know ELVIS or the BEETLES..
You know those same people cannot vote on the polls.. Many don't have enternet in homes or access to vote for anything.. lol!
Many places in Africa,many parts of the Middle East. The list goes on..
When Polls are only accessable to a specific type of people.. It's not TRUE.. It can't be accorate..
Take this example.. Lets say at a Republican Party they ask a question about a specific LAW that should be past.. Well they would most likely AGREE.. let say 80% would say YES.. THEN CNN shows the poll.. '80% of people believe that the law should be past.'
But what about all the democrats that did not vote.. That were not at the republican party... It's called 'bias control'!!
SOme people really need to STUDY history.. Music history. world history.. American History.. These things I'm mentioning you will learn in a simple Rock History class. And/or American Culture class.
I'm not pulling this stuff out of my butt. lol! As some are here.. Taking what the media protrays as the truth..
This country (U.S) has been built on a bedrock of lies.. YES I find this the greatest country, for many reasons.. But it's NOT what people try to believe it is.
I do know about the Beatles.. I know about Elvis.. Infact my mother met Elvis on several occasions, he was friends with my great aunt.. Even she (my mother) would admit that Michael Jackson is much bigger.. Much more famous, and much more legendary.. She just happens to be the same person that has traveled the world with me.. She has seen others reaction to Michael Jackson vs. ANY other celeb...
ive got to give up on this subject because of the sheer level of ignorance when it comes to note that others have been as influential.
i from ireland & that is where i received my education.but thats beside any point here.basically michael jackson 'fans only',for i am a fan of many including elvis,james brown, muddy waters,the beatles,the stones,& i could go on for ever.
so basically-elvis,sinatra(whom i never liked as a person),& numerous others done jack **** & have left no legacy,no fans,no influence! THATS WHAT PRO-ONLY JACKSON FANS WANT TO HEAR!
so there,ive said it.the only person who matters in the world in musical & legendary terms is michael jackson.he done it all,the rest,before,during & after him have done nothing! including all the classical masters.
thats kind of what alot of you people want to hear & believe aint it?? well ive said it,so now feel free to have a jackson orgasim of happiness in ignorance & self delusion enjoy.
man you talk poo, how are u getting "fans not wanting to hear others having legacy" from fans actually saying that MJ has a much greater legacy status etc, people here have excepted that elvis and the beatles have accomplished but they aint accepting that they are bigger then mike, stop making sh1t up.ive got to give up on this subject because of the sheer level of ignorance when it comes to note that others have been as influential.
i from ireland & that is where i received my education.but thats beside any point here.basically michael jackson 'fans only',for i am a fan of many including elvis,james brown, muddy waters,the beatles,the stones,& i could go on for ever.
so basically-elvis,sinatra(whom i never liked as a person),& numerous others done jack **** & have left no legacy,no fans,no influence! THATS WHAT PRO-ONLY JACKSON FANS WANT TO HEAR!
so there,ive said it.the only person who matters in the world in musical & legendary terms is michael jackson.he done it all,the rest,before,during & after him have done nothing! including all the classical masters.
thats kind of what alot of you people want to hear & believe aint it?? well ive said it,so now feel free to have a jackson orgasim of happiness in ignorance & self delusion enjoy.
ive got to give up on this subject because of the sheer level of ignorance when it comes to note that others have been as influential.
i from ireland & that is where i received my education.but thats beside any point here.basically michael jackson 'fans only',for i am a fan of many including elvis,james brown, muddy waters,the beatles,the stones,& i could go on for ever.
so basically-elvis,sinatra(whom i never liked as a person),& numerous others done jack **** & have left no legacy,no fans,no influence! THATS WHAT PRO-ONLY JACKSON FANS WANT TO HEAR!
so there,ive said it.the only person who matters in the world in musical & legendary terms is michael jackson.he done it all,the rest,before,during & after him have done nothing! including all the classical masters.
thats kind of what alot of you people want to hear & believe aint it?? well ive said it,so now feel free to have a jackson orgasim of happiness in ignorance & self delusion enjoy.
man you talk poo, how are u getting "fans not wanting to hear others having legacy" from fans actually saying that MJ has a much greater legacy status etc, people here have excepted that elvis and the beatles have accomplished but they aint accepting that they are bigger then mike, stop making sh1t up.
Give the man some credit. He's pretty huge globally. He's had huge hits during his lifetime and well after his death in the UK, Australia, most of Europe, most of Asia. Every country MJ is HUGE in, Elvis is pretty big in too. Michael is huge in Germany but so is Elvis. Michael is huge in Japan but so is Elvis. I know this argument is based on a list involving Elvis and Michael, but while were talking who's more popular worldwide, MJ and Elvis can both sit down because the Beatles trump them both. If you put MJ's and Elvis's popularity and success together you'd get the worldwide popularity and success of the Beatles.
True. I know this is a bit O/T and all, but how in the world people keep saying the at the beatles and Elvis sold a billion record from I will never know. Apart from the fact that they woould have had to have had the biggest album in history, which they haven't since MJ has, they would have also have made a ton of money for MJ, since he is the one that gets paid. MJ would be rolling in it, would he?
True. I know this is a bit O/T and all, but how in the world people keep saying the at the beatles and Elvis sold a billion record from I will never know. Apart from the fact that they woould have had to have had the biggest album in history, which they haven't since MJ has, they would have also have made a ton of money for MJ, since he is the one that gets paid. MJ would be rolling in it, would he?