Re: MSNBC to air Murray Documentary "Michael Jackson and the Doctor" / Interview part 1 transcript @
n
I tried asking this earlier but no one is answering my question granted no one may know...but I'll try one more time:
I'm just confused as hell right would the 25mg of propofol he claims he gave him have worked enough to "tip" him over as he says and finally put him to sleep along with the other meds he gave beforehand? Cause the anesthesiologist in trial said 25mg alone would do nothing she usually would have given 60mg but would all the other meds plus propofol finally put Michael to sleep?Murray claims it would have left his system quickly because the amount was so little so then enters his theory that it was the other meds that essentially caused his death in the end. Is that even possible? I'm curious and I'm awful with medical info so I pose the questions to those who have more knowledge then I do.
I think Murray meant that 25mg propofol would help make the other benzos work. I have no idea if it's possible, but it's just not true . Dr Shafer explained in 2 different ways that there was a drip : first because of the blood concentration, the only way to have such a concentration would be that Michael was still receiving propofol after he stopped breathing , second with the urine theory originally brought up by the defense. The amount of propofol in the urine showed that Michael received around 2000mg propofol, more or less, it was an average, but nothing anywhere near Murray's 50mg .
For those who watched, did you notice how Flanagan wanted to push the cardiac arrest theory and Chernoff did not ? That's what they were talking about when Flanny dropped the F bomb to Chernoff. I'll have to re watch that part, to check what Chernoff was reading on his computer in his hotel room, I'm wondering if in his horrible difficult to follow cross examination of Dr Shafer he was trying to get something from Shafer that would allow him to push that theory.
And yes, for those who asked, there are 2 versions of the doc , the one I watched is the UK one, they edited out parts where Murray and Flanagan keep insulting Michael (wetted his bed for example, the doll on the bed, etc..).
I was not surprised by Murray, he lies and lies and lies, he has a bad temper. Remember the day he got crazy in court about the IV set up demonstration ? I don't know if he would have phisically attacked Walgren on cross (that would have been funny with all the cops around ... Murray would have been handcuffed and on the floor before he could have reached Walgren ! ), but I'm certain he would have lost it ! Do you think he would have walked out of the courtroom , saying "Part 2" ?
Ad by the way, the interview with the Channel 4 journalist was good. I wish there had been a part 2.
And the way he talks about Flanagan's cross of Dr Steinberg..."he needs to wake up, he needs some Red Bull" ... OMG... He should be grateful to have lawyers willing to defend him, it was a lost case from the start. And he tells his own mother to shut up !
The only thing that surprised me, and actually made me laugh is the part when he explained he had been visited by some kind of spirit at 3 am one night .... I mean :bugeyed Someone should tell him not to self medicate.
About the Randy Philips part, I don't believe anything that comes from Murray. He lies for no reason, just to be mean. Remember what he said in his police interview about security having to go to a gas station when they needed to use the bathroom ? He really lies for no reason.
But Kenny's e mail do show there was some kind of pressure on Michael. The question would be how hard Michael took it, and Randy more or less said that it was a kind of misunderstanding on how to work , between Michael and Kenny. And that it was sorted out during one meeting, when according to Randy, Michael told Kenny "you build the house, I'll bring the doors and paint" or something like that.
I was surprised by Chernoff defending Michael, I didn't expect that from him.
I still don't understand why a TV channel would want to show such a doc. But the timing couldn't be worse for Murray. I hope Judge Pastor has seen it, and that the family adresses that if they speak at sentencing.
About the gag order, anyone knows if Murray has not respected it ? The interview with Channel 4 was done during the trial, when the gag order was in place, but shown after it was lifted. Same thing with Flanagan and Chernoff. So, can the judge do anything about that ?
About the recording, illegally recording Michael, was it erased on Murray's I Phone ? I don't remember that. And is it illegal if he didn't try to use that recording ?
