Latest on MJJC

Murray Trial - Day 19 - October 27 2011 - Discussion

Who knows what Karen Faye is up to. I don't care if she testifies-Walgren will destroy her like he has done every other defence witness.
 
"I'm on twitter! I'm not around but I'm on here!" Bitch.

Anyway. Going by all your comments that sounded a handful but worked out for the prosecution :D Dr White should be...interesting.
 
Issueswithjvm Jane Velez-Mitchell We hear you @jermjackson5 and would love to have you state your case on air! Please DM us and we'll give you the # to call in.

Apparently his tweet made the headlines with them.
 
Waldman said that 600mg of demoral was regarded as the max daily amount, so mj's 200-300mg twice a week doesn't sound dangerously excessive to me, but can't say i'm a drug expert.

Anyway, waldman's amazingly belligerent attitude towards walgren, who's already established himself to be v polite and reasonable, must have ticked off the jury. It wasn't as if he was a blood relation to the defendant or had any vested interest, he was just a hired expert - is that how experts are meant to behave? It was extraordinary. waldman made sure he had nothing whatsoever to do with defending or explaining murray's behaviour so he's not completely stupid.

As for continuing to defend that ridiculous chart with different scales along the y axis for the different drugs, any schoolchild knows you can't do that. Why just not blame his poor secretary, he just came over as even more of a jerk than before if that was possible.
 
|I want karen to testify because i think it will be interesting, especially when walgren is up!

She is not lost if she is on twittr?
 
last witness is white..walgren will wash the floor with him to ...I have confidence in him
 
Bonnie Blue said:
Waldman said that 600mg of demoral was regarded as the max daily amount, so mj's 200-300mg twice a week doesn't sound dangerously excessive to me, but can't say i'm a drug expert.

Anyway, waldman's amazingly belligerent attitude towards walgren, who's already established himself to be v polite and reasonable, must have ticked off the jury. It wasn't as if he was a blood relation to the defendant or had any vested interest, he was just a hired expert - is that how experts are meant to behave? It was extraordinary. waldman made sure he had nothing whatsoever to do with defending or explaining murray's behaviour so he's not completely stupid.

As for continuing to defend that ridiculous chart with different scales along the y axis for the different drugs, any schoolchild knows you can't do that. Why just not blame his poor secretary, he just came over as even more of a jerk than before if that was possible.
Click to expand...

I'm no expert either but to me it only shows that he had high tolerance levels to demerol and not surprising considering his pain issues (as mentioned by Metzger) and he's continuing cosmetic and dermatological treatments.

Let's look to this example

we see 300 mg of Demerol but from the graph it looks like MJ got 14 filler shots around his eyes (eyes/eyebrows) on that day. Do they really expect him not need any pain medication while he was being poked 14 times around the eye?

m8p8cn.jpg
 
elusive moonwalker said:
No. shes to busy hiding
Click to expand...

She still hasn't popped up to give her denial about that? She's one sweet tweet away from McCartney at the AP and could easily deny his recollection for all to see. Yet still nothing, eh?

I'm guessing she will conveniently start denying it AFTER both sides have rested and the jury starts deliberating....calling it a stupid rumor. Just took a peek at her twitter and she's talking about ppl believing things without knowing. Sigh. It ain't rocket science. If it's not true...McCartney is a sweet tweet away. Correct him.

Shall we take bets on when the groundhog will come out of her hole and finally deny it? Bets on her not addressing it all? I wonder if she will be unavailable when it's time for that AEG law$uit. :)
 
wendy2004 said:
She still hasn't popped up to give her denial about that? She's one sweet tweet away from McCartney at the AP and could easily deny his recollection for all to see. Yet still nothing, eh?

I'm guessing she will conveniently start denying it AFTER both sides have rested and the jury starts deliberating....calling it a stupid rumor. Just took a peek at her twitter and she's talking about ppl believing things without knowing. Sigh. It ain't rocket science. If it's not true...McCartney is a sweet tweet away. Correct him.

Shall we take bets on when the groundhog will come out of her hole and finally deny it? Bets on her not addressing it all? I wonder if she will be unavailable when it's time for that AEG law$uit. :)
Click to expand...

Excuse my ignorance, I haven't followed anything Faye has said in recent years. What are you referring to?
 
I loved the irony of chernoff bleating to the judge that it would be useful to have klein or klein's assistants testifying in this case. Er, not half as useful as having actual medical records of his client, dr muray, detailing his care of mj which led directly to his death.
 
23rx2dv.jpg


see if you can read what I am reading

Dr. Klein
Contact upon your return
Karen - MJ's make up Hair gal
phone number

xxx Botox be used for MJ's scalp perspication?

6/1/2009
Per Dr. Klein, Advised botox can be used for perspiration of scalp

28widqa.jpg
 
Yep, I'm reading what you're reading Ivy!

I wonder if the defense realised Faye wouldn't be any good as a witness after all? I find it hard to believe she's gone into hiding!
 
it's funny that they had a contact information for her on the records :)
 
dmehta said:
Excuse my ignorance, I haven't followed anything Faye has said in recent years. What are you referring to?
Click to expand...

The defense allegedly told Judge Pastor they were dropping Karen as a witness cuz they couldn't find her to subpoena her; witness was unavailable. Karen's bffs are claiming this isn't true or is a defense rumor, craziness, yada yada as Karen would readily testify to the truth as she has been spouting for 2 years on twitter and facebook and god only knows where else (whether called by pros or defense). Karen, however, has not yet denied the defense tried to reach her and could not. She has not denied that she was unavailable to be served that subpoena. Now, granted, the defense could be lying to the judge, but you would think Karen would come forth and say that. She has chosen to not comment at all...either way. Did she make herself unavailable to be served or is the defense lying about even trying? It's one or the other. We got silence....at least for now.
 
as Karen would readily testify to the truth
Click to expand...

i take it she knows the address of the court house? if shes that desperate why isnt she there.

so the last defence witness is actually the first defence witness that is actually relevent to their case.
 
chanel05 said:
i just got back guys..... what did jermaine tweet???
Click to expand...

jermjackson5 Jermaine Jackson
@HLNTV Jane Velez-Mitchell needs to stop projecting HER addiction onto Michael & listen to evidence: no addiction, no Demerol in body/house
1 hour ago

jermjackson5 Jermaine Jackson
@HLNTV Do JaneVM & Ryan Smith NOT listen to evidence?? Based on Klein med records, defense's own expert sd Michael "probably not" addicted
1 hour ago
 
volitional said:
seriously? I thought you were just kidding around. Well I'm glad, I think she'd muddy the waters if she did testify.
Click to expand...

But some of us were SO looking forward to hearing her testimony under oath...once and for all...and under cross-examination. Our loss. :(
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top