Murray Trial Day 21, October 31st - Discussion

I'm kind of disappointed that the DA didn't ask White if Michael was so unaware of the dangers that he would self-inject, why did he hire Murray to being with and tell Lee he would be find as long someone is watching. Not to mention why Michael would wheel his IV around instead of yelling for Murray to get his butt back into the room.

I also wanted the DA to ask how Michael ate all the Lopz and showed no effect that Murray didn't clearly see. How high does White assumes Michael's tolerates to be?
 
showing the MAC details. white wrote them!!. its on the projector. bascially it says that even if u give light sedation you have to monitor have staff etc etc. contridicts what white implied on friday that murray didnt need the equipment and what not cause it was light sedation
 
Sky News legal expert:


MMcParland
Michael McParland



Dr W is reading but trying to put 'additional glosses' on his own words. He will try and distinguish it from MJ situation.

20 seconds ago



McParland_20Michael_normal.jpg
MMcParland Michael McParland



Watch this section of x-exam very carefully. Nothing better than trapping an expert with his own published works.

1 minute ago



McParland_20Michael_normal.jpg
MMcParland Michael McParland



Oh dear- each of these requirements re MAC care are matters that Pros have asked Dr W about earlier.


 
I'm kind of disappointed that the DA didn't ask White if Michael was so unaware of the dangers that he would self-inject, why did he hire Murray to being with and tell Lee he would be find as long someone is watching. Not to mention why Michael would wheel his IV around instead of yelling for Murray to get his butt back into the room.

I also wanted the DA to ask how Michael ate all the Lopz and showed no effect that Murray didn't clearly see. How high does White assumes Michael's tolerates to be?

There's still a lot of hours to go. He could still get to it OR he could incorporate that information into his closing statement. He may also address this on rebuttal when the additional test and info comes in. Hang in there. There's a lot of territory still to be covered like the flumazenil issue.
 
I'm kind of disappointed that the DA didn't ask White if Michael was so unaware of the dangers that he would self-inject, why did he hire Murray to being with and tell Lee he would be find as long someone is watching. Not to mention why Michael would wheel his IV around instead of yelling for Murray to get his butt back into the room.

I also wanted the DA to ask how Michael ate all the Lopz and showed no effect that Murray didn't clearly see. How high does White assumes Michael's tolerates to be?

good point
 
There's still a lot of hours to go. He could still get to it OR he could incorporate that information into his closing statement. He may also address this on rebuttal when the additional test and info comes in. Hang in there. There's a lot of territory still to be covered like the flumazenil issue.

I know, but I still what to know why White assumes Michael doesn't act or react like a normal person. I wonder if like the addiction expert that he based his biases on Michael's on his public behavior and just assumed that anything can go because his abnormal anyway.
 
BOOM! White concedes that whether on label or "off label" the standard of care remains the same when dealing with MAC sedation. It was like dragging molasses down the road but Walgren got it out of him. oof!
 
Another thing, I so wanted the DA to drop on White when he brought out the 'weaning' Murray was doing. I wanted him to ask him why Murray needed to wean Michael off since propofol isn't physically addictive. He should had stopped all care if he felt any addiction was forming.

Sorry if this comes off as a rant and this maybe address later, but I wanted to get my thoughts out.
 
Ut oh. White is becoming extremely defensive; getting himself riled up about being quoted with words missing. Walgren points out that the 2 words left out did not change the meaning/context of the sentence. Petty petty petty! He's not happy that Walgren is forcing him to admit the care Murray gave (certain actions) were total crap.

Get him with his own words, Walgren. That's prolly pissing White off, too. haha
 
white just said after phonecall from cm and being to the bedroom 2 min he did it himself. the fatal selfinjection.

BUT that cant be, because the timeline of death would be wrong. The call is earlyer than 11???

There's no official time of death so everyone is assuming.

The problem is that White is trying to bring in statements Murray made to him during his talks. Apparently, he told White a number of different things that didn't make it way to the police report. So, White said Murray left the room, but he had to admit Murray didn't tell the complete truth about how long he was gone, although he tried to gloss over it by saying the 2 minutes was how long it took him to use the restroom.

The point being is that everyone believes Murray was gone for more than 2 minutes, except White is trying to save Murray by saying he only meant the restroom and not the total time.

Hopes that help. Kind of tire today.
 
so no one reacts on my post? :(

It's difficult to read all the posts while watching the livestream. :( Sometimes, when I switch back to the forum, 4 pages have filled up with posts. Sorry, I'll have to go back and look for the post. :)
 
standards for monitoring ie having equipment etc during m.a.c is the same as if you are doing genal anthes? yes says white.showing another inset white wrote about needing the right equipment.

reducation in anxity levels or blocking. uses minimal sedation? yes showing another quote from the same transcript as above. its about requirenets of MAC for the reducation of anixity just using midaz. same standard of care for just giving midaz? yes says white but assuming a procedue is being done. walgrens says so if dip is being given for a non procedure the monitoring is less? white says i didnt say that.

showing a book white was was involved in and the defence have used and a quote given by white about diprivan.whites reading it out. its about making sure paitents are monitored and MAC is the purest form of sedation. .white keeps going on about whether a procedure is taking place or not. trying to imply u dont need as much care if dip isnt been given for an actual operation..walgrens asks him if hes claiming u dont need as much care if its been given for sleep or off label. white says no and admits you need the same amount of care reagardless of the reason dip is being given..

walgren shows another book hes written in. shaffer contributed to the book aswell. whites claiming walgren is only reading out certain quotes from his book. walgren reads out the quote white said he missed out. its one word that wasnt relevent and walgrens points that out. as whites trying to imply crap.

mac level of care applies even if no anesthetic is given says the quote by white in the book. basically MAC covers everything. so white cannot claim that murray monitoring was ok for what murray was giving. as the rules white actually created and wrote say the opposite.

theres also rules if you give diprivan in a office space setting.. white doesnt know much about that. even though walgren points out that white wrote about these rules in one of his books .walgrens showing him the book. office requirements for giving dip are exactly that same as if its given in a hospital. walgrens names all the organistions that use these rules. what are the requirments says walgren? white says i already said b4 but ill say again.

trained personal. proper equipment. documentation of care given.(medical reports) monitoring equipment. prevision for a recovery area with nurses. make sure emergency equipment is there. a written plan for emergency transfer to a site where more care be given. quality assurance policy. education classes for dr. saferty standards thatshouldnt be jepogised for money etc and the paitent should be sure that the office is as safe as giving it in a hopsital

same standards for giving it in a bedroom? white wont answer. your opinion dr? white says i wouldnt give it in a bedroom. walgren asks the question again.. still wont answer! take 4 asks again . white says most but not all should be needed. walgren goes through them all one by one (the list i posted above) are u disputing the need for proper trained staff when giving dip? white says that standard is for offices. walgren says do u think the same standard of care should be given in a bedroom? white wont answer the question yes or no. (its not hard yes or no) white is nit picking about the wording of the trained personal.

u admit giving dip in a home should have the minimal requirments as dip given in an office? yes white finally admits it

lunch break. back at 13.30
 
Walgren is nailing him on his quote in the book/article about the MAC level of care, though White tries to emphasize that whatever he stated was in refferal to having a procedure.
Walgren asks if he is implying that without a proceudure lesser level of care is acceptable? White goes on to say that's not was I said stop taking my quotes out of context, I'm just pointing out the context of my quotes
Walgren says so what are yyou saying then, that without an op it's ok to have lesser care, White says he isn't saying anything about that, that he's insn't commenting on that, but that he'd like to give the same level of care to patients regardleless of patients given propofol or not.
Walgren's quotng another article/book white says I wanna see my book to say if it's a correct quote or not as u left out some of my paraphraph in ur last quatation.
walgren says sure
this quotation is about MAC level care as well,
Walgren asks if patients receiving regional or general anasthesia should be given the same level of care as well? White says that's right.
Says the continumn goes from minimal,/conscious sedation to deep anasthesia.
Walgren asks if it's also reffering to an office based setting, White says he ain't familiar with an office based settings as he doesn't practice in an offise, Walgren say's well you listed them in this article though, correct? White says yeah that's right.
Now White's reading his article on page 2617, Walgren asks him if he wrote guidelines on office based settings, White says corrects. That's right it's same for hospital settings as well, Walgren asks him about JCAHO, Walgren says it's an organisation that deals with monitoring equipments, requirements etc.
Walgren is asking White to read them, White says yeah if u insist I will but they are no difference from I mentioned, Judge interferes and says he isn't insisting but asking u to read them. Now White is reading them.






The guidelines are about office based Anasthesia.
Walgren's asking now if he'd agree if the same safety and monitoring requirements should apply equally if Propofol is administrated in a bedroom, White says he wouldn't give it in a bedroom. White says it's different as it's in a procedure. Walgren asks if he thinks there should be lesser safety requirements in a bedroom. White says it's different with off label use, say's some of it, applies some doesn't says there is no use for an anasthesia machine, says there would be no requirements for anathesia trained personel such as nurses.
Walgren's asking again about the standard of care and if the same should apply if propofol is given in a bedroom. White says again that he didn't say lesser care would be alright, says just different care. Says even if nurses/personel aren't trained in anasthesia it would be ok,
Walgren asks him in which way the requirements would change if it was administered in a home setting, White says there's different factors that would change in a home setting, Walgren asks if he'd at least agree that a patient given such meds in a home setting should at least be provided the minimal level of care patients in an office setting are, white says yes.
lunch break now
 
Jesus Christ, it takes forever for White to answer anything because he want to nitpick everything. Can White as a doctor just admit that Murray screwed up and didn't do what he was suppose to do. Forget the the drug levels or the fact White may think Michael is so weird he doesn't act normal, how as a doctor can you gloss over Murray's actions. Is your common sense and your code as a doctor be sold that easily when you're not even getting your normal charging fee?

God, I need to take a nap. I'll see you guys when court restarts.
 
just to lighten this thread up a bit

zgg01.jpg


----

On a more serious note little tidbits about the juror's

abc7MurrayTrial ABC7 Murray Trial
Jurors seem to be very attentive but are not scrambling to take notes of the back and forth "match" between Dr. White and Walgren.

abc7MurrayTrial ABC7 Murray Trial
The most active jurors continue to be #2 and Alternates 1 and 3. There's no visible reaction to the intensity of the questioning.
 
When your using a doctors own writings to discredit him, you know there's a problem...
 
Don't know if I should bring this up or not as the source isn't reliable, but RadarOnline's saying the prosecution hasn't decided yet if they'd bring up a rebuttal case or not? I thought it was known that they'd do a rebuttal and bring back Anderson and possibly Shafer? Or did I miss something?
 
Back
Top