The Resurrection of Michael Jackson - Music Monthly

I have mixed feelings about this article. On the one hand, I'm always glad to see the public still taking an interest in MJ, and some of the stuff was really positive. I hope it's true that MJ hasn't performed for a while because he didn't want to do old stuff, and it was good to read the "skinny but not frail" part and the part about his finances being stable. But some of it just made me sick. It's a shame that a positive, honest article can't be written about him. They always have to throw in something that ruins it. =(

yes..and i'm damn sick of it..it's soo frustrating. and i really don't get people that would have a problem with me being frustrated about it...DUH..i'm an MJ fan. oh..but..hey...the definition of MJ fan has to be a person who is 'objective' or somns not altogether upstairs. but say that to a fan of some other artist and all hell breaks loose.
 
It is rather tiresome to hear the old trash.

A few positive crumbs is better than none, as in this case, I guess.

Thanks for posting. :)
 
Michael sure is skinny, but he does look very healthy. He's just naturally thin, it's never been the case that he's frail, just very thin. It's how he's built.
 
Last edited:
oh good lordy, what a lazy piece of journalism, most of it is just a rehash of crap although you have to look hard to find some reaaly good bits. oh and btw he never stayed with Michael Flatley and Lugga Castle is not "nearby", its 4 hours drive from Cork!!
 
I have mixed feelings about this article. On the one hand, I'm always glad to see the public still taking an interest in MJ, and some of the stuff was really positive. I hope it's true that MJ hasn't performed for a while because he didn't want to do old stuff, and it was good to read the "skinny but not frail" part and the part about his finances being stable. But some of it just made me sick. It's a shame that a positive, honest article can't be written about him. They always have to throw in something that ruins it. =(
That kills it for me.I'm afraid. If they are going to print lies about him, no amount of positivity can compensate. I just don't wat to read it anymore. Shame on the g|uardian. They have been nasty about MJ for a while now.:mello:
 
I stand corrected, Guardian can be rubbish sometimes!
 
Last edited:
I have mixed feelings about this article. On the one hand, I'm always glad to see the public still taking an interest in MJ, and some of the stuff was really positive. I hope it's true that MJ hasn't performed for a while because he didn't want to do old stuff, and it was good to read the "skinny but not frail" part and the part about his finances being stable. But some of it just made me sick. It's a shame that a positive, honest article can't be written about him. They always have to throw in something that ruins it. =(
I concur but the second part of it wasn´t so bad.
 
I havent read the thread but Ive scanned the article (just incase noone else has yet)
Holly x

scan0023.jpg

scan0024.jpg

scan0025.jpg

scan0026.jpg

scan0027.jpg

scan0028.jpg

scan0029.jpg
 
.
knew it would be a waste of time. gotta love all the sources they talked to. lol matt fiddes is certainly making his money for a couple of days work for geller back in 02 lol.

not even instrested in what self proclaimed journos have to say. articles full of B.S just to fill a few pages on a quiet news day. i guess the vultures need something to feed off.
 
.
knew it would be a waste of time. gotta love all the sources they talked to. lol matt fiddes is certainly making his money for a couple of days work for geller back in 02 lol.

not even instrested in what self proclaimed journos have to say. articles full of B.S just to fill a few pages on a quiet news day. i guess the vultures need something to feed off.
My thought exactly. I refused to read even the good part. I will not give the article any respect at all.
 
can someone pls help explain what is doddery zonked-out?
thx:)
Doddery means frail or feeble and perhaps not fully mentally capable. It is used to describe someone who has lost some of their mental and physical facilities due to age.

Zonked out mean not mentally aware or able to think clearly. That term usually is used in reference to someone who has used drugs although sometime it can be used if you have gone so long without sleep that you can't think.
 
anyone who claims those pictures in st tropez were of MJ tells you all u need to know about the rest of the article:lol::ph34r:
 
.
knew it would be a waste of time. gotta love all the sources they talked to. lol matt fiddes is certainly making his money for a couple of days work for geller back in 02 lol.

not even instrested in what self proclaimed journos have to say. articles full of B.S just to fill a few pages on a quiet news day. i guess the vultures need something to feed off.

You make it seem as if Matt Fiddes is mooching of MJ, that is not the case. They are very good friends, Michael has visited Matt several times since the trial, in secret which is why people don't know much about their friendship. Also, Matt is not only friends with MJ but with the entire Jackson, only last week did Tito come down here to Devon to see Matt, i don't think Matt would jepodise his friendship with them just for a new lines in a newspaper article.

His quotes in the article are about the only highly positive things in it so be greatful that are people who are friends with MJ that are willing to talk to the media.
 
I wonder how short this article would be if they only could write what they realy know?
I feel that most times reading articles about Michael, its a exercise in trying to disciminate between fact, fiction, and fantasy. Its kind of a challenge, because so many of the things that are repeated is just part of the myth about him, stuff that seems just too far off- and you know its not true- but its so closely tied with the public stories about him, that it always pops up, unquestioned. Some times I don`t blame people who believe whats written, because as they say: repeat a lie often enough and in the end it will seem like the truth..........Sigh!
 
WTF? Can't you people EVER be satisfied? Would you all rather they called him a freak than talk about him as a genius? Some of you REALLY need to grow up.
 
I havent read the thread but Ive scanned the article (just incase noone else has yet)
Holly x

scan0023.jpg

scan0024.jpg

scan0025.jpg

scan0026.jpg

scan0027.jpg

scan0028.jpg

scan0029.jpg

this is a good post, in that it should be a lesson for us all on how to possibly figure out what's really going on with MJ...it depends on how you wish to see the glass...half empty or half full. it's possible the pictures were doctored from many diff photos of him..it could be the real thing.

you could decide that MJ is in trouble because most of the articles are negative, and they show documents...or you can realize that people who shell out documents aren't necessarily on the up and up...aka ENRON..

you can decide that the tipping factor is that MJ is still active and not on the streets, and owns Neverland...and that seventy five percent of the commercials you hear on tv or songs you hear on the radio belong to MJ(the only time you can be sure MJ isn't getting paid is if the song is a motown song..and even then, you can't be sure..)

i just heard a song that i despise...only recently did i find out it's in the atv catalogue..and now..when i hear it, i turn off the radio, but i cheer. the song is heard every hour on the hour, sometimes twice an hour...so..if u wanna forget stuff like that..then i guess you will see the glass the way you wish to see it...half empty..but if you wanna see it as it is..half full or more...you can remember that stuff..the sneaky stuff...the stuff that lends to why people underestimate him.

you can consider the old adage...that if you're always flattered, you'll believe the hype. and you'll fall..

and the one who's always getting castigated, is most likely the one to succeed. a lot of times..the one voted most likely to succeed won't. and the one who is voted least likely to succeed, does.

perhaps the most telling thing of MJ's success, is that the current MJ would be voted least likely to succeed in the eyes of people who wish to stereotype. so...i guess, to conclude....you will always see mixed articles...and that's because MJ is at the top of his game. i believe that the day that you see nothing but totally flattering articles, is the day that you should worry.

the most glaring example is, right now, the most searched and complimented figure in american culture, today, is the prostitute who slept with the governor of new york. the articles can't get enough of her...she only got a couple hundred thousand downloads, for her song, and a couple of offers to pose nude for some real sleazy magazines, which HAVEN'T even been finalized yet, and the compliments are just flying in her favor.


so....one has to remember, i think, that all articles are written by people who have an emotional interest invested in...or..against, the subject of their article.

now...i don't care what reactions this post will get, or even if anyone thinks i'm off topic. i feel it has been worth it for me to get this off my chest.

the bottom line is, MJ is like a retail business. i don't see why we can't see it the same way in masse. if you hear a commercial about a business that's been around for 40 years, you'll have confidence in that business. so...why are there any people who don't have the same confidence in Retail Michael. (that's my new nickname for him) after all...he's been in the business for 40 years...and still going.

it's the best we can go by, cus, most of the articles and all the info, combined, dissemenated about MJ makes for what can be best described as...surreal.
 
Last edited:
I don't see anything wrong with Matt. He's always said great things about Michael. I don't think he's mooching, especially if what you say is true Xscape, about them being friends.
 
I warned people not to read the first part. lol Noone listened. There was actually quite a bit of positive stuff in the part of the article I posted. It is just that I think when people decide to read the whole thing they quit paying attention before they get to the good part. I don't think the crappy part is from RF articles. I think it is all of the articles from the British tabloids, maybe from the Observer itself.

Yeah, you did warn people but I am stubborn. LOL.

In all seriousness, even though I do think the article as a whole was a bit of a waste, I actually liked the part that you posted. Some of the things that Matt Fiddles said, I had to take with a grain of salt, but I was liking what Peter Lopez was saying. :) He was on point. I was excited when it was mentioned about the pop song - :) Still, I thought the article was wack. ;)
 
Fiddes talks to mucking fuch...

Thank you.

I find it weird that people would defend this Matt Fiddles guy just because he is friends with the family. He said that he was MJ friend, that I doubt. He might be Tito's friend but whatever.

The picture of MJ in St. Tropez - I never seen that before. Don't tell me that is one of his children next to him. He looks tall.
 
Why are people hating on Matt Fiddes, he has only ever had good things to say about MJ, fans should be happy to hear MJ's friends talking to the press.

fans just get tired of ppl acting like media whores and using their "relationships" with mj as a way of getting themselves free publicity at every oppotunity.same ole.with most real friends, fans dont even know they excist or arnt aware for along time because their friendship is purely that and they dont use it every chance they get in order to get publicity for themself or their business.mark lester for eg
 
The picture of MJ in St. Tropez - I never seen that before. Don't tell me that is one of his children next to him. He looks tall.

the picture isnt of mj or any of his kids. it was aset up in the U.S/ uk press. they plastered it all over the front pages claiming it was mj when itwas clearly not. bain released a statement about it
 
Back
Top