Update: Behind the Scenes on Jan 28th 8PM ET OWN Channel / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

Will you watch the Oprah interview

  • Yes

    Votes: 87 70.7%
  • No I don't feel right about watching

    Votes: 36 29.3%

  • Total voters
    123
  • Poll closed .
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

Sorry but his family is acting very indecently towards him. Even when someone kills themselves, I rarely see the family members go on and on about the deceased shortcomings. I get the clear picture that they didn't know much about him for years. All of this I heard, I heard does not present a very intimate picture. Katherine's story has changed regarding the drugs and the surgery. Sorry but just because someone is a grieiving mother does not mean they are right about everything. I think what Michael would be hurt by is how his family has treated his name. But I don't know if he would be surprised by it.
I agree with you 100%, especially about the HEARD part and Katherine Jackson contradicting herself.

Michael loved his fans, but we are a bunch of strangers in reality. His mother on the other hand said his nose looked like a "tooth-pick," I'm sorry but in my opinion, Michael would be crushed if he knew his mother, just like the tabloids in the past, made fun of his nose.

Her feeling like that and talking about it around the kitchen table is one thing, but stating that on television is another thing. To be honest, I'm STILL shocked that she said that in public, knowing how private Michael was.
 
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

So why didn't she speak about the whole families decision to do plastic surgery? Only Michael felt he was ugly? Sorry, but I do not believe she was speaking honestly from her heart. If so, then what about all of her other interviews? What about what she said in the Dateline interview which contradicted this one? I do not believe Katherine is perfect just like you do not believe Michael is perfect and I choose to believe the autopsy and Michael.
The interview was about Michael why would she talk about her other kids. Michael said many times he felt ugly during puberty so this is no revelation. Janet has been talking recently about her new book and her insecurities as well, practiclly everyone who gets cosmetic surgey has insecurities that's why they want to change something to improve/change their appearance.
 
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

I've pretty much lost hope concerning the Jacksons. I will not be supporting anything the family puts out.
CO-SIGN!

Little by little the Jackson family lost my support and LORD knows I tried to be and wanted to be supportive.

The champions of Michael's legacy should START with his family and they have disappointed me over and over again.

I must admit that after reading about sweet Paris and her heartfelt responses regarding her father, my FAITH has been restored that she (along with her brother's) will pick up the gauntlet and continue to uphold her father's legacy.

In my opinion, Michael Jackson's three children will be his true legacy!
 
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

I felt really awkward for the Jackson children (apart from PPB) during the introductions. They were so out of place there. And Oprah making fun of Jermajesty's name made me want to switch off the sound. It's not the kid's fault he has such a name, it's his father's huge ego's fault. the boy didn't deserve it. Also later, when all the kids said they were or wanted to be singers Oprah was "okay :smilerolleyes:". And the way she asked that girl "whose child are you?" literally showed that she had zero interest in all those children (which is understable, there are few people who are interested in them). Very awkward.
You know I was surprised to see Rebbie's daughter there she is in her mid/late 30s yet was introduced as ''one of the kids''. I was extremely surprised to see a grown woman among the younger kids and/or young adults such as Genevieve, Donte and Randy, at least are still young. And I agree about the Jermajesty part, I felt sorry for him, its not his fault and he is a cute kid.

So why didn't she speak about the whole families decision to do plastic surgery? Only Michael felt he was ugly? Sorry, but I do not believe she was speaking honestly from her heart. If so, then what about all of her other interviews? What about what she said in the Dateline interview which contradicted this one? I do not believe Katherine is perfect just like you do not believe Michael is perfect and I choose to believe the autopsy and Michael.
Exactly, how come she didnt discuss why the whole family felt the need to compete with Michael, as all of them got nose jobs among other procedures done after Michael had his.
I agree. I've pretty much lost hope concerning the Jacksons. I will not be supporting anything the family puts out.
Im really surprised to see you state this, yaazgurl, as u have always been a fierce J Fam defender. :)
 
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

This interview never should have happened. I blame Oprah first, and then Katherine for agreeing to it, and then for failing to fully support her son. These are truly terrible times. We must pull together now, in UNITY, despite whatever we may think our divisions might be.

This is one post I wholeheartedly agree with.
 
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

CO-SIGN!

Little by little the Jackson family lost my support and LORD knows I tried to be and wanted to be supportive.

The champions of Michael's legacy should START with his family and they have disappointed me over and over again.

I must admit that after reading about sweet Paris and her heartfelt responses regarding her father, my FAITH has been restored that she (along with her brother's) will pick up the gauntlet and continue to uphold her father's legacy.

In my opinion, Michael Jackson's three children will be his true legacy!
I agree but what happens if in the future the kids say something fans don't agree with, are they no longer his legacy will they get bashed or will they be labeled as brainwashed? Like let's say if in the future Paris is asked about her father's appearance and she doesn't say what fans expect? it just seems like some fans are so wishy washy when it comes to holding Michael on a pedastal, as a fan i would love to only hear great things about him but i inderstand i will hear some things i don't like at times but that doesn't make every person who says something slightly negative a bad /jealous or etc person.
 
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

I wanted to state something but Im not gonna do it, bc one thing will lead to another and etc.
God bless those who were dear to Michael Jacksons heart: his children, they are loyal and I dont think there will ever come a time when his sons and daughter are going to throw him under the bus just to promote books/business deals etc.
Money is something, which they will forever have, their father made sure of that. Made sure they have a secure financial future.
 
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

The kids are NOT his legacy (for the world).
 
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

I agree but what happens if in the future the kids say something fans don't agree with, are they no longer his legacy will they get bashed or will they be labeled as brainwashed? Like let's say if in the future Paris is asked about her father's appearance and she doesn't say what fans expect? it just seems like some fans are so wishy washy when it comes to holding Michael on a pedastal, as a fan i would love to only hear great things about him but i inderstand i will hear some things i don't like at times but that doesn't make every person who says something slightly negative a bad /jealous or etc person.

Stop being melodramatic. If anyone goes anywhere and starts talking against MJ for something we have scientific proof for, they will get the same. It is not about putting MJ on a pedastal to the detriment of everyone else. It is about not putting everyone else on a pedastal to the detriment of MJ. This is his board.

Did everyone read TheChosenOne's post? If not go back and read it please. When are people going to finally put their foot down. I feel like I'm in the twilight zone. Fans know full well if someone else like Brooke or whoever got on TV saying some of these same things they would be in uproar. Oh, but a family member can say it and suddenly it becomes ok???

Where I am from, you are even more protective of a family member, not less. And, you would certainly protect them more after they have died. Who freaking goes on Tv and talks about their dead loved ones by pointing out his flaws to a person and world who has crucified him his whole life. Well, I think we have our answer on that. Yet, this is repeatedly excused by some fans. Ther was NO mention of his humanitarism of his many works for the benefit of others. But there was tiome to mention that book more than once. Katherine has known Mj 50 years. She has the ability to humanize him just as much as his children. But the family never seems to do this. At the end of their interviews, he comes off as even more of a freak. We have learned more about Mj as a human in 5 minutes from his children than we have in hours of interviews from his siblings and parents. Why is that? How is this setting the record straight?

Whatever, people can think as they choose. No one is saying Kath didn't love MJ. No one. No one is saying she was not deeply hurt by his death. She obviously was. She is still hurting. She will hurt forever. And I would not wish this on her or any of her family members. It is a pain that does not go away. It is hard. I also think Kath will make mistakes. Of course she will. But to excuse every mistake she makes undere the guise that she is his mother is unacceptable to me.

I agree she needs to take care of herself and her children and of MJ's legacy. Plkease cut ties with those around her who don't care anything about her or MJ or his children (even if it is other family members). She did NOT have to do this interview. It was her choice. As fans we are asking her to choose differently next time.
 
Last edited:
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

The interview was about Michael why would she talk about her other kids. Michael said many times he felt ugly during puberty so this is no revelation. Janet has been talking recently about her new book and her insecurities as well, practiclly everyone who gets cosmetic surgey has insecurities that's why they want to change something to improve/change their appearance.

Actually she did mention her other sons how they were great fathers so why not give context to Michael's feelings? He didn't become insecure out of nowhere. Its clear that this is about saving face as a whole and at Michael's expense.
 
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

Wow, those Kids are brilliant. Paris just tears me up with her words. they show us the real michael.
 
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

melodramatic :lol: there nothing melodramatic about my post it was relaistic but have you seen 95% of the post in this thread? Do you have a link to TheChosenOne's post you are talking about ginvid? or a page number?

Let me find it. I will repost.
 
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

Back in 1993 when Oprah interviewed Michael and asked him about his brothers, he gave a very diplomatic answer. He did not get into how brothers may have been jealous of his success. Whatever issues he had with them, he could have aired them then and there. But that would not have been fair to them. And really, it was FAMILY business and NOBODY ELSE'S!

I honestly feel that both LMP and Mrs Jackson spoke about stuff that should have remained PRIVATE. Not everything needs to be in the public domain, for people to 'wash their mouths' on Michael. Keep a journal and write all those thoughts in them!

I am heartily sick of people not showing Michael the basic consideration that he showed them.
Amen!

Stop being melodramatic. If anyone goes anywhere and starts talking against MJ for something we have scientific proof for, they will get the same. It is not about putting MJ on a pedastal to the detriment of everyone else. It is about not putting everyone else on a pedastal to the detriment of MJ. This is his board.

Did everyone read TheChosenOne's post? If not go back and read it please. When are people going to finally put their foot down. I feel like I'm in the twilight zone. Fans know full well if someone else like Brooke or whoever got on TV saying some of these same things they would be in uproar. Oh, but a family member can say it and suddenly it becomes ok???

Where I am from, you are even more protective of a family member, not less. And, you would certainly protect them more after they have died. Who freaking goes on Tv and talks about their dead loved ones by pointing out his flaws to a person and world who has crucified him his whole life. Well, I think we have our answer on that. Yet, this is repeatedly excused by some fans. Ther was NO mention of his humanitarism of his many works for the benefit of others. But there was tiome to mention that book more than once. Katherine has known Mj 50 years. She has the ability to humanize him just as much as his children. But the family never seems to do this. At the end of their interviews, he comes off as even more of a freak. We have learned more about Mj as a human in 5 minutes from his children than we have in hours of interviews from his siblings and parents. Why is that? How is this setting the record straight?

Whatever, people can think as they choose. No one is saying Kath didn't love MJ. No one. No one is saying she was not deeply hurt by his death. She obviously was. She is still hurting. She will hurt forever. And I would not wish this on her or any of her family members. It is a pain that does not go away. It is hard. I also think Kath will make mistakes. Of course she will. But to excuse every mistake she makes undere the guise that she is his mother is unacceptable to me.

I agree she needs to take care of herself and her children and of MJ's legacy. Plkease cut ties with those around her who don't care anything about her or MJ or his children (even if it is other family members). She did NOT have to do this interview. It was her choice. As fans we are asking her to choose differently next time.
BIG PROPS GINVID!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping:
Thank you for telling it how it is:clapping::clapping::clapping:
I also wanted to add that I think some people pray/wish the kids to talk bad about Michael so that the relatives dont remain the only ones, so that it will be easier to defend the rest of the clan, time after time the children disappoint those secret hopes LOL!


Paris : What a wonderful and strong girl. The way she talked and defended her father reminded me of Debbie Rowe. She seemed like a little copy of Debbie defensive, determined, strong.
You know u said that now, but the second I saw Paris talk, I thought she had Debbie's fierceness, while she was defending HER father.
She's got Debbie's mannerisms imo, a strong girl indeed :)
 
Last edited:
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

I am truly shocked by Katherine's talk of interventions. Randy is behind all this.
 
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

Where I come from you usually do not clown and down dead people. But respect them guess its different at Hayvenhurst.
 
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

The whole interview is very depressing overall. No surprises here, it went as I thought it would. I did get emotional and feel like shedding tears, but all that aside, I think this is strictly just another routine for promotion. Except for the three kids, no one's a victim here. The contract was made, both parties got what they wanted. Sh*t, I already knew what this interview was all about, but after watching it, the whole thing leaves a bad taste in the mouth even more.
 
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

You know I was surprised to see Rebbie's
Im really surprised to see you state this, yaazgurl, as u have always been a fierce J Fam defender. :)
Believe me, I have loved Michael and his family for very personal reasons but I love Michael more. I just always tried to be fair to the family but they are not treating Michael with the same respect.
 
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

Where I come from you usually do not clown and down dead people. But respect them guess its different at Hayvenhurst.
Out of respect for the board, I won't say what I REALLY want to say about the respect coming from Hayvenhurst.

But I will say this: I wonder if Jermaine's "deadbeat dad" issues would be as FREELY discussed as Michael's "tooth-pick nose," if the shoe were on the other foot.

(P.S.: welcome back twinklEE!)
 
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

Out of respect for the board, I won't say what I REALLY want to say about the respect coming from Hayvenhurst.

But I will say this: I wonder if Jermaine's "deadbeat dad" issues would be as FREELY discussed as Michael's "tooth-pick nose," if the shoe were on the other foot.

(P.S.: welcome back twinklEE!)
Girl, when I get home I'm gonna pm you and discuss certain issues with u, oh and thanks :lol:
I agree with what u said though.. and the answer is no, there were already lies on that certain issue u pointed out.

Believe me, I have loved Michael and his family for very personal reasons but I love Michael more. I just always tried to be fair to the family but they are not treating Michael with the same respect.
I respect you for that yaazgurl, it shows ur honesty, I always used to state that everything has a limit, be it worship, hypocrisy, lies, whatever. I think some things are just inexcusable/indefendable, this interview is one of those, no ifs, and buts about it.
 
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

I wonder if the JacksonSecretVault website crashed with EVERYBODY running over there to purchase a copy of Howard Mann & Katherine Jackson's book. LOL!

Seriously though, I wonder if the sales of this book is going to make that interview worth it for the folks who have a monetary interest in same.

I would like to know how many books were sold after the fact.
 
Katherine is obviously a grieving woman. As for the comments made regarding plastic surgery and drugs, I won't even comment.

I watched the news today and all they had to say was "Michael Jackson was addicted to drugs and plastic surgery", and it was enough to desperately wish I were often numb.

So, imagine in Michael's case, with the sheer mental and physical abuse he had to endure, then the emotional abuse taken from the media, the damned industry, from most of his friends who betrayed him, and others.... many many others, from companies to sheer clueless people... then, proceeding with his low esteem who was fueled by somebody, as well as the jealous people hurting when saying they don't recognize him anymore, from his skin conditions fueling the very low self-esteem already, from the varied emotional and physical pains he endured, i.e. from the damned Pepsi incident (was it incident really..?, to the 1999 bridge collapse, which almost destroyed his back spine, from betrayal upon betrayal, from the often depression he felt when suffering for the children of this world which he admitted, the sleepless, restless nights he had occupied his mind with by means of writing songs, reading, watching TV, anything to divert him from his thoughts... from the varied threats he received in his life, either from companies, or humans (?...) like the Chandlers and Arvizos, emotional pain from personal relationships that hurt him, being sued left and right, often just for money and fame and greed and revenge etc., from the invisible enemy trying hard to destroy him, from the 1993 accusations which visibly ruined his life, from the restlessness he felt trying to discern between good and bad, between a foe and a friend, the fiends and the angels, the 2005 trial, the ultimate latest betrayals, the AEG threats, the fame pressures, the ever-working mind and heart of his and more........ anyone would have perished decades ago and became an ongoing addict. Which Jackson never was, and I don't even need that autopsy to tell me that. He wanted to be trusted on this.... and he never was. He needed some medication at points in his life, otherwise, he wouldn't have made it. But he had much more faith and love than medication (which everyone loves to call drugs), and very very often abstained and made superhuman efforts to do so for his children and fans.... his children didn't even know their father was being tried and acused of the things he was when alive... What else? And he wasn't an addict in the latest years of his life, and when he was in 1993 and admitted to that, and probably some other time, when Sony was destroying him and still does, and had every right to appease his pain. he wasn't trying to get a damn fix. He suffered hard, damn it! He felt he was ugly, because OTHERS made him think that and made fun of him.

Also, for the record, his plastic surgery was him doing things that would divert his violence from other people, like he said in those tapes: instead of taking it out on others, he took it out on himself. He preferred to destroy himself (which he didn't...) rather than others, especially children. The surgeries were done out of HURT, not vanity! It was a deep ravaging giant worm eating him from inside, that he chose to exorcize by means of this and art. He was the least violent person ever, even though the others didn't deserve him turning the cheek. Can anyone imagine the ongoing hurt he felt that others choose to exploit to the maximum? Does anyone care he always put others before himself, and the grand demonstrations that he made, i.e. the History statue were his hurt speaking volumes, the hurt subsequent to the 1993 abuse. Imagine being scrutinized by the whole world. Imagine surviving all that, and as dignified as he did, imagine trying to put on the smile he always did, faking it for the others, so we know that he's alright when he often wasn't, imagine to not only suffer so much, but to also try to hide this for his children especially.

The interview was heavily edited, and even that couldn't hide Prince's frustration. His gestures marked that and his answers were on point and clear, especially the one about the masks. Little Blanket and his sweet self... My heart hurts. And then Paris... They are going to be in my prayers for as long as I live, because his father is also living in them. And God. They have this strength. I for one, being at least a decade older than them and I wouldn't have contained my anger toward people like Oprah. They are the only ones to completely trust and I rely on them a lot, with my grieving process and all, and they don't have to appear anywhere, and I hope they will all leave these wonderful children in peace to continue living their childhood, and not nurse that deep, insurmountable pain their father nursed since "childhood".

I'll just like to post this extract of the audio interview Teddy Riley did recently. Although he doesn't know what he's talking about at times, regarding the Breaking News song, saying that it's Michael in it and even though some of his ways are forced, and his latest Twitter replies are dubious, he often had valuable things to say:

"If someone knew about certain things that he would do that was against him, you know, that he shouldn’t be doing, he would exit them. Yeah, he would exit them. […] He doesn’t – he would not do it around his friends or he wouldn’t do it around family. […] He doesn’t mind company, he loooves company. So, he – as long as a friend is around, he would not do it. He would stay in and take the pain, because he was in a lot of pain. He was in a lot of pain – and that pain from his skin disorder, you know… It (sic) was so much going on with Michael that he was in a lot of, I mean, when he was in a lot of pain, he felt like he had to do the drugs, but if somebody was around, he would just stay and, you know, not do, you know, what he had to do. […] He would make the sacrifice - there you go. […]"

Michael yearned to be normal, Paris confirmed so, that he was a normal dad and strived to be that way for them, tried to conceal his status from them, they remembered the most common and simple of things, another testiment of his nature, so many confirmed that, as well as so many actions of his: staying humble and mingling with anonymous people and wanting to know how they live, what they do, etc...etc...

Yeah, what else is there to say? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. I hate making it seem like I'm putting somebody human on a pedestal when I am not, but I am simply stating things that are true about Jackson and what his eyes and actions, for instance, express, and it's enough for me to draw all the conclusions above. I despise having to defend Michael again and again... but he's not here anymore... And he was one attacked by the too many around the world and he still is and it's too much to bear not to say anything or few things.

I, personally, will pray for the Jackson family, because they're shrouded by an evil wave, and am attacking that wave, not them... I know what the enemy can do. But I, personally, won't care what anybody on this whole wide planet will continue to say about him, except for his children and what I know it's true, like all the above and more.
 
Last edited:
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

Mothers don't mock their children especially in public. Is there not anything someone in the family would do that some of you won't defend? I cannot believe she told a nose joke on her son. A nose joke. Tell me how that makes her different from any other late-night comedian talking about Michael Jackson. Michael would be crushed.

For Oprah to even ask that question, someone else would have chewed her up and spit her out for even asking. Talking about anybody's personal appearance or asking them about it is rude, the height of rudeness. I can't even put my thoughts together I'm so hurt. The portrait he drew of MLK never made it on the TV screen. So much for showing another side of him. Did any of you really think Oprah would allow that part of Michael to be seen? But she could go into the dead, old topic of plastic surgery and his kids wearing masks and pajama day and every other tabloid situation she could think of. I don't what else to say. Its just over to me. We fought the good fight for Michael's name and reputation and all the ground we built with getting the public to try to understand him is just being dismantled with the help of his resentful and greedy friends and family.
 
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

What a sad couple of days it has been! Feel real depressed after the interview and BN fiasco. I read somewhere that Howard Mann holds some of the Jackson's stuff and Katherine was forced to do business with him in order to get the stuff back? Also tjat Oprah was approached by the family to do this interview? I sorta believe that now, after seeing how incredibly cold, condescending and disgusting Oprah was. Contrast this with the LMP interview. She asked questions damaging to Michael but she was all sympathy and especially respectful whenever Elvis was brought up. She was so horribly cold and rude when Katherine was choking back tears. Maybe she didn't feel any sympathy because she doesn't like Michael and she felt contempt because the family appraoched her. But it was hard to watch. And the book plug seemed so forced that I was embarrassed.

I feel for Katherine if she's being forced to do this, but her answers :( This is why it's better to not do these interviews, especially with unsympathetic interviewers, who ask the tired old tabloid questions. btw, Katherine is very shy, she barely answered many questions - so it makes me think she really would not have done this unless there were circumstances making her. The part where she spoke about Paris crying and saying "I want to go with him"!!! I felt such rage against Murray.

I think the kids didn't want to be on at all! :( My goodness, Blanket is shy. I did feel like it was too soon to ask them about their dad, seeing how they were reacting. I've seen the clip about 10 times and I tear up every time Paris says "Everything". Her whole face changes and she was deadly earnest. Heart stopping for me. What a cruel world to take Michael away from one of the few things in this world tat gave him joy. I wish I could hear them speak some more about their dad. Very selfish, I know, but I wanted to know so many things.

I hate this week. Wish it were weekend already.
 
Last edited:
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

Mothers don't mock their children especially in public. Is there not anything someone in the family would do that some of you won't defend? I cannot believe she told a nose joke on her son. A nose joke. Tell me how that makes her different from any other late-night comedian talking about Michael Jackson. Michael would be crushed.

For Oprah to even ask that question, someone else would have chewed her up and spit her out for even asking. Talking about anybody's personal appearance or asking them about it is rude, the height of rudeness. I can't even put my thoughts together I'm so hurt. The portrait he drew of MLK never made it on the TV screen. So much for showing another side of him. Did any of you really think Oprah would allow that part of Michael to be seen? But she could go into the dead, old topic of plastic surgery and his kids wearing masks and pajama day and every other tabloid situation she could think of. I don't what else to say. Its just over to me. We fought the good fight for Michael's name and reputation and all the ground we built with getting the public to try to understand him is just being dismantled with the help of his resentful and greedy friends and family.


applause to you... In essence what Katherine did is told a 'nose joke' about her own son. I thought it was pretty low myself.. Don't mock a dead man like that. She never said anything like that publicly when he was here. Some things are better left unsaid. I am actually ashamed of saying I used to be a Jackson family fan. The only one I do like is Michael and his 3 kids. All the rest aren't worth the time and effort.
 
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

applause to you... In essence what Katherine did is told a 'nose joke' about her own son. I thought it was pretty low myself.. Don't mock a dead man like that. She never said anything like that publicly when he was here. Some things are better left unsaid. I am actually ashamed of saying I used to be a Jackson family fan. The only one I do like is Michael and his 3 kids. All the rest aren't worth the time and effort.
:agree:
Thanks for writing this, because you saved me the trouble of having to do it myself. I agree with your statements.
God Bless You and Keep You Safe. :angel:
 
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

I read somewhere that Howard Mann holds some of the Jackson's stuff and Katherine was forced to do business with him in order to get the stuff back?
To be honest with you mijaons, I don't believe Mann is holding anything over Katherine Jackson's head. I say that because the things Mann brought have changed hands a few times and have already been picked over by different folks. So I believe that if there was anything thing in the "SecretVault" that was damaging it would have been revealed a LONG, LONG time ago. (I "think" that's the same stuff Diane Dimond look through during the trial.)

I think it's simply that they needed some promotion for that book, because other then the Dateline interview done by Katherine Jackson and those of us who visit MJ related fansites, nobody really knows about that book. It's not backed by any publishing house and is basically an online product.

I don't believe there is any great revelation being held over anybody's head, the only thing relevant is that a book needs to be promoted, in my opinion.
 
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

To be honest with you mijaons, I don't believe Mann is holding anything over Katherine Jackson's head. I say that because the things Mann brought have changed hands a few times and have already been picked over by different folks. So I believe that if there was anything thing in the "SecretVault" that was damaging it would have been revealed a LONG, LONG time ago. (I "think" that's the same stuff Diane Dimond look through during the trial.)

I think it's simply that they needed some promotion for that book, because other then the Dateline interview done by Katherine Jackson and those of us who visit MJ related fansites, nobody really knows about that book. It's not backed by any publishing house and is basically an online product.

I don't believe there is any great revelation being held over anybody's head, the only thing relevant is that a book needs to be promoted, in my opinion.
:agree:
I agree with you. Everyone is making my work so easy today. :cheeky:
 
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

To be honest with you mijaons, I don't believe Mann is holding anything over Katherine Jackson's head. I say that because the things Mann brought have changed hands a few times and have already been picked over by different folks. So I believe that if there was anything thing in the "SecretVault" that was damaging it would have been revealed a LONG, LONG time ago. (I "think" that's the same stuff Diane Dimond look through during the trial.)

I think it's simply that they needed some promotion for that book, because other then the Dateline interview done by Katherine Jackson and those of us who visit MJ related fansites, nobody really knows about that book. It's not backed by any publishing house and is basically an online product.

I don't believe there is any great revelation being held over anybody's head, the only thing relevant is that a book needs to be promoted, in my opinion.

Guess I was just trying to feel better thinking KAtherine was forced to do this. I can't imagine why she would think plugging the book on Oprah would make any diiference. How much sales can it possibly generate? This is all just pathetic. I dont know when a crap trail will stop following Michael. All this is just forcefully bringing back how much shit he had to go through when he was here. I wish someone , for once, did a positive show on Michael where they only talk about his music, how much money he gave to charities and what an outstanding human being he was, despite his incredible fame! For once!!!
 
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

like i said after the show in here... Read my blog....

btw where exactly is this part where Mama K says a "Nose Joke"?
 
Re: Update: Air date Nov. 8 th / Katherine Jackson May Be 'Oprah' Bound

Mothers don't mock their children especially in public. Is there not anything someone in the family would do that some of you won't defend? I

Good question.
 
Back
Top