Latest on MJJC

Randy Jackson's Twitter...

Randy about cancellation of the tribute in Italy on the 25th!!!

Randy on Twitter, 23 minutes ago via web

"I want to thank Tony Harris and the CNN News Team for their kindness and having me on.
I also want to thank all of u for supporting me in an effort that has resulted in the cancellation of the tribute in Italy on the 25th."

Cause: scarce ticket sale - not more than 3,500 tickets sold to date

http://www.musiczone.it/pop/annullato-il-tributo-italiano-a-michael-jackson.html
 
Last edited:
Re: Randy about cancellation of the tribute in Italy on the 25th!!!

...and he thinks that lack of sales is due to people supporting him?
 
Re: Randy about cancellation of the tribute in Italy on the 25th!!!

Lmao.
 
How I've had enough of Randy and his stupid 'I did it for the fans' tweets. He did sod all and he's taking the credit for it. And the way he keeps mentioning how he paid for that girl's treatment, yes it was a nice thing to do, but Michael did that all the time and never told anyone as he always said true charity isn't waving a flag saying 'look at me.'
 
sloride said:
How I've had enough of Randy and his stupid 'I did it for the fans' tweets. He did sod all and he's taking the credit for it. And the way he keeps mentioning how he paid for that girl's treatment, yes it was a nice thing to do, but Michael did that all the time and never told anyone as he always said true charity isn't waving a flag saying 'look at me.'
Click to expand...
Charity is supposed to come from the heart, if it doesn't it doesn't mean ish. Steven has no genuine/giving bone inside of the 400lbs body of his. Behind every move of his, he's got selfish reasons. Someone tell that fella that rambling nonsense on twitter doesn't equal to actually doing something for fans. He should get a job and get over it we don't live in a jungle with the judiciary system we got it ain't possible for him or any of the other relatives to get anything from the estate forget even get a hold of the estate. Why? Because Michael wanted everything to go to his kids. Thanks God those kids will be grown adults by the time they get it, and by that time Randall will be in no position to pull crap. You can fool a 13/12/8 year old u can also fool a 18/21/25 year old but it's damn hard to fool a 30/35/ 40 year old. Michael's estate is for Michael's children and Michael's children's children as Michael wanted. Randy wants money he shouldn't have wasted the past 3 decades impregnating women and beating up on them
 
Last edited:
New tweets from @randyjackson8 June 23rd


Hello everyone, I'm back and healthy. Thank you for your loving comments and prayers

Thank you all, but there is so much to address in such little time. Where should I start?

Lets start with my family. There is a common concern about their lack of support and unity especially now that we're approaching June 25th

please understand im going to be direct and to the point because there is such little time but your support speeds up the process

This is a very difficult time for me and my family. I read your tweets and we share the same frustration.


I see what you see and I dont agree with many of their choices but they are my family and i do love them.

theres something specific that i do want to comment on....


Right now, my struggle is trying to get my family together on the 25th of June at Forest Lawn!!!!!

Surprising as it may seem, this is the case.... Im putting myself in the hot seat. I have nothing to lose....


I am not in support of the Gary event/trip or whatever it is... Im tired but I promise to continue this discussion first thing in the morn.
 
Last edited:
um ok.

so he wants to increase the hysteria at Forest Lawn on June 25 by bringing the family (I assume including Michael's kids) there? Way to go Randy.
 
I'm glad he's feeling better. He says he's not in support of the gary trip, i'm assuming he means katherine and the kids.
 
I guess he's talking about this


Jackson home prepped for memorials





GARY | Keith Jackson laid down a patch of grass Tuesday afternoon along the curb outside of what's become Gary's most famous home.
The first cousin to Michael Jackson was among a handful of people making final tweaks to the modest house at 2300 Jackson St. for Friday memorials the city of Gary confirmed will include Katherine Jackson.
The musical family's matriarch is expected to attend an official unveiling Friday of a Michael Jackson monument that sits at the house, with her granddaughter, Genevieve Jackson -- Randy Jackson's daughter -- in tow.
The King of Pop died June 25 last year at age 50, after suffering cardiac arrest. In the months since, the intersection of 23rd Avenue and Jackson Street has hosted countless mourning fans and has welcomed home Jackson family members.
Keith Jackson said he and his brother, Ron Jackson, have been planting and primping along the home's perimeter for the last three weeks.
"I think Michael would be very happy to hear his first cousins are here doing this for his mom, my aunt," Keith Jackson said.
Ron Jackson swept dirt from near piles of sod and wood and talked about missing his cousin.
"We used to run and play together. We had a close bond," 50-year-old Ron Jackson said. "Sometimes, we get the opportunity to go back to the play dates," he said of memorials like Friday's.
He said more than a month ago, he got approval from his California relatives, including Katherine Jackson, after sending them sketches of how he wanted to landscape the property.
"We want to make it look nice," he said. "It's still their home."
And for the first time in several years, the home's front lawn is fully cloaked in lush green grass that Ron Jackson vowed to hose with sprinklers all week.
Ron Jackson said he and relatives and friends have made several improvements to the house and yard, including air conditioning and furnace repairs, electrical wiring and concrete surfacing most of the back yard.
In addition to the tall monument dedicated to the King of Pop, the singer's relatives are prepping a handful of bases that will hold small versions with more images of the singer and his musical legacy.
The embellishments are expected to be set in time for a series of events sponsored by the city Friday.
A candlelight vigil that night is scheduled to precede a performance of "We Are the World," according to a news release from the city of Gary.
Returning to the city after honoring the fallen singer at last summer's tribute at The Steel Yard, Gary native Kellee Patterson is expected to sing "Gone Too Soon," the city said.
Comedian Eddie Griffin and popular televised Judge Greg Mathis also are scheduled to attend.
Keith Jackson said he and his band, Triple Dose, are scheduled to perform, too, on a stage that will be erected near the house.
As Keith Jackson described what would become a concert venue, his cousin's tunes blared from a nearby car.
Sitting in her SUV outside of her 23rd Avenue home, Janine Bray swayed to "Who Is It."
A childhood neighbor, Bray said she used to bribe Michael and his brother Marlon with candy to sing for her.
When her CD skipped to "Man in the Mirror," a large smile drew across Bray's face.
She turned up her volume dial, extended her arm out of her window and danced.


http://www.nwitimes.com/entertainment/music/article_0acf5307-5896-50ef-9813-b0348cc6d2e2.html
 
nena said:
I'm glad he's feeling better. He says he's not in support of the gary trip, i'm assuming he means katherine and the kids.
Click to expand...

well, he doesn't support anything his family does, not a single one of them. and he never forgets to inform the public about that.

apparently the only thing he'd support would be if the will was proclaimed invalid.
 
qbee said:
New tweets from @randyjackson8 June 23rd

Right now, my struggle is trying to get my family together on the 25th of June at Forest Lawn!!!!!
Click to expand...

No, Randy.. no.

It's probably going to be mayhem at FL on Friday. Why would he want his family, especially Prince, Paris, Blanket, and his mother, to be there with all of the craziness? Being in a quiet/private setting somewhere in Gary is much better.
 
he loves cameras, etc... it's why

he don't care about the kids ; until now, he never says a single word about them.

We know he don't consider them like jackson members.

he even don't care about his own kids
 
This is getting kind of weird _ im not really getting why he is even doing this. Is he trying to cause more division
to suite his agenda. Why even bring up this personal family business to the fans ??? and put us in the middle :(

Then he leaves us hanging ...


I dont care where Michaels mother, children and family want to spend that day thats their business
The family should be able to honor MJ where ever they want _ They may not feel comfortable being at
forest lawn that day with all the hoopla .. Its going to be crazy their ... we know that

I want to trust Randy but he makes it very difficult _ That Family is in such turmoil right now it isnt funny
They are even fighting amongst themselves for control _ I feel sorry for Katherine being in the middle

Im so GREATFUL MJs WILL and trust is set up where they cant take control ( He knows his family)
not that he didnt love them _ but he was wise to exclude them and for a good reason ...

I think maybe Randy is trying to divide the fans and get support for a challenge of the Estate Or something
maybe his mothers Capabilities. IM NOT SURE BUT Something is Brewing here _ What is it ?? I will apologise if Im wrong.
But I have avery bad feeling about thisand It breaks my heart to see him bring in all this DRAMA at this time surrounding
MJs Anniversay _ STOP IT ... Not Now Randy

We cant take sides They need to work this out amongst themselves and its NOT fair to put us in the middle
of thier squables. We have enough division in the fan base as it is ..

I want something beautiful for Michael _ I need him to be honored not Family DRAMA as usual _


June 25th is NOT about Him Its about MICHAEL JACKSON.
We Fans will make it a very special day in our own way without all the DRAMA
 
Last edited:
Randy has no standing the will. He's not a heir at law or a beneficiary under the trust.

And It's too late for Katherine ; she had 120 days to contest it.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------


http://www.lawlink.com/research/CaseLevel3/48267

that only person interested may contest a will, either before or after probate, it has been held that "An 'interested person' is one who has such a pecuniary interest in the devolution of the testator's estate as may be impaired or defeated by the probate of the will or be benefited by having it set aside." (Estate of O'Brien, 246 Cal.App.2d 788, 792 [55 Cal.Rptr. 343].) In the early case of Estate of Baker, 170 Cal. 578, 586-587 [150 P. 989], it was held that the right of an interested person to contest a will is fundamentally based upon the loss of property or property rights resulting from the recognition of an invalid instrument depriving him that the purpose of a will of those rights; that the purpose of a will contest is to establish a violation of the contestant's right of property; that in its essence the contest is an action for the recovery of property unlawfully taken or about to be taken from the ownership of the contestant.
Click to expand...
http://www.lawlink.com/research/CaseLevel3/68233

An "interested person" is "defined as one who has such a pecuniary interest in the devolution of the testator's estate as would be impaired or defeated by the probate of the will or be benefited by setting it aside." (Estate of Marler (1957) 148 Cal.App.2d 30, 33 [306 P.2d 105].) Thus, a will contestant must show his or her share of the distribution will be increased if the contest is successful.
Click to expand...
http://www.lawlink.com/browse_codes.aspx?caselevel3=66263

To contest a will before or after probate, the would-be contestant must be an "interested person." (?? 370, 380.) [4] "The courts do not favor will contests." (3 Koontz, op. cit. supra, ? 22.4, p. 22-8.) [5a] Accordingly, the courts have long and steadfastly limited the right to contest the probate of a will to those who have "'such a pecuniary interest in the devolution of the testator's estate, as would be impaired or defeated by the probate of a will or be benefited by the setting aside of the will.' [Citations.]" (Estate of Molera (1972) 23 Cal.App.3d 993, 998 [100 Cal.Rptr. 696].)

In the seminal case of Estate of Land (1913) 166 Cal. 538 [137 P. 246], the California Supreme Court noted "'the statute contemplates a legal interest and not merely a grievance to the feelings of propriety or sense of justice.'" (At p. 543.) [6] The purpose of restricting who may contest probate is to avoid "delaying the settlement of the estate." (Estate of Plaut (1945) 27 Cal.2d 424, 429 [164 P.2d 765, 162 A.L.R. 837].)

[7a] As "only an interested person may properly be a contestant" (Estate of Powers (1979) 91 Cal.App.3d 715, 719 [154 Cal.Rptr. 366], italics in original), appellant must allege his standing as an interested person. [5b] That is, he must allege he would take under another will or by intestacy in the event of a successful contest to the purported will. (Id., at p. 720.)
Click to expand...
http://www.lawlink.com/browse_codes.aspx?caselevel3=66263

[12] This procedure would be in keeping with the words of Justice Traynor, who wrote in Estate of Plaut, supra: "Although the right to ask the court for an adjudication of his claim to the estate should be denied a person whose interest 'has not even the appearance of validity or substance' [citation], it should not be denied a person who, even though he may ultimately not receive any part of the estate, has at least established a prima facie interest in that estate. Since a proceeding to probate or contest a will is a proceeding in rem [citation], and at the end of the six-month period [now 120 days] during which it may be contested the probate of the will is conclusive [citations], all persons whose interests may be adversely affected should be given an opportunity to be heard." (27 Cal.2d at pp. 428-429.) In that same opinion, Justice Traynor recognized with approval that the probate court could hold a hearing on the standing question before proceeding with the trial of the contest (id., at p. 426) and the contest should be dismissed if the contestant cannot make a prima facie showing of standing (id., at p. 429).
Click to expand...
Only an interested party could challenge the will (Probate code section 48) :

http://www.zwwillcontest.com/

Under case law, the general rule is that the will or trust contestant must have an interest of a pecuniary nature which may be impaired or defeated by probate of the will or benefited by setting it aside (such as an heir or legatee under a prior will).

Case law has recognized standing in the following persons:

Heirs at law: Any person who would succeed to any portion of the estate if decedent had died intestate (without a will) has standing to contest a testamentary document which would defeat or impair that intestate interest.

Pretermitted heirs: Decedent's children, spouse, and registered domestic partner, although omitted from the will (or other 'testamentary instrument'), may have claims to a 'statutory share' of the estate as 'pretermitted heirs.'

Beneficiaries under earlier will: The beneficiaries under an earlier will, whose interests are impaired or defeated by a later will offered for probate, have standing to contest the later will.

Beneficiaries under later will: Conversely, if the interest of a beneficiary under a later will may be impaired or defeated by probate of an earlier will, the beneficiary has standing to contest probate of the earlier will.

Creditors of heirs: An heir's creditors may have an 'interest' in the estate if decedent's will disinherits the debtor-heir. However, such creditors have standing to file a will or trust contest only if they have perfected a judgment lien at the time the property would pass to the heir if the will were set aside. Conversely, an heir's general unsecured creditors (no judgment lien) apparently have no standing to file a will contest.

Executor under earlier will admitted to probate: The executor appointed under a will, duly admitted to probate, has an affirmative obligation to defend that document against subsequent contests.

Proposed executor under will offered for probate: A person designated by decedent to be executor has no 'duty' to defend a contest before admission of the will to probate and his or her appointment as executor.

Assignee or estate of proper contestant: The right to contest a will survives to the contestant's estate; similarly, it is assignable. Hence, a proper contestant's assignee or a deceased contestant's estate representative has standing to pursue the will contest in the original (assigning or deceased) contestant's place.
Click to expand...
You have 120 days to contest the will (Probate Code section 8270(a)) and 60 or 120 days to contest the trust (Probate Code section 16061.7)
Click to expand...
 
Concerned about what they are doing? Randy ur the dangerous one among them.
 
2 days to go and he keeps bringing up the family drama on Twitter :doh: When is he going to leave all that cr*p and start remembering and honoring MJ's memory?
 
Reeta said:
2 days to go and he keeps bringing up the family drama on Twitter :doh: When is he going to leave all that cr*p and start remembering and honoring MJ's memory?
Click to expand...
he doesn't care about that...he wants his 15 min of fame or better infamy...well there are some naive or simply blind or not informed fans who will follow his crap....apparently he's not the only one who had attention issues...thanks god they are numerically irrelevant but it hurts anyway....there are 3 orphans kids who don't deserve their name associate with this cheap shit...poor M if he only knew his brother was trying to expose his kids like this....creating mayhem at a cemetery...even if the kids wanted to be there it would be a circus.
 
iheartMJJ said:
No, Randy.. no.

It's probably going to be mayhem at FL on Friday. Why would he want his family, especially Prince, Paris, Blanket, and his mother, to be there with all of the craziness? Being in a quiet/private setting somewhere in Gary is much better.
Click to expand...


You don't understand my dear collegue fan...

There are no cameras, pictures you can put on TMZ or any others shits tabloïds at home...

We need to see them cry, sad....

I can't stand this looser!
 
I've unfollowed him too, I'm sick of reading the rubbish he posts.
 
Randy where your mother and her grandchildren speed June 25 is not up to you no one made you boss. Worry about what your children are doing
 
I've just looked through the tweets that mention randyjackson8 and I have to say that sadly he has A LOT of supporters. I didn't expect that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top